View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Management Performance Assessment
Tool (MPAT) results 2016
PURPOSE
To presents an analysis of the MPAT 2016
results
To highlight progress and challenges
experienced.
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3
3.0
2.5
2.3
2.8
2.6
2.9 2.8
2.5
3.0
2.8
3.0 3.0
2.6
3.2
2.9
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
1 Strat Mgt 2 Gov and Acc 3 HR Mgt 4 Fin Mgt Grand Total
Trends: MPAT Average final score: Key performance Area
MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6
BEST & WORST PERFORMING STANDARDS
Best performing Disposal mgt (3,2) Logistics mgt (3,2) Demand Mgt (3,2) Mgt struct (3,3) Pay sheet cert (3,3) Internal audit (3,3) Acquisition Mgt (3,5) Strat Plans (3,5) Cash flow (3,6) Account Audit Comm (3,6) Deleg PFMA (3,8)
4
Worst performing Discipl cases (2,1) Mgt diversity (2,3) Level 1-12 PMDS (2,3) Paymt of suppl (2,3) Evaluation (2,3) Org Design (2,3) PAJA (2,4) SMS PMDS (ex HODs)
(2,4) PMDS HOD (2,4) Serv del impr mech (2,6) Recruit and reten (2,8)
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
5
Introduction
of new
planning
cycle 2015
Introduct
ion of
new
planning
cycle
2015
3.3
2.8
2.9
- - -
3.0
3.0
3.2
3.0
2.0
3.4
2.8
2.9
3.5
3.1
2.9
2.3
- -
3.0
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Trends: MPAT Average final score: 1 Strat Mgt
MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6
GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY
6
2.4
3.1
3.6
2.5
2.4
3.3
2.9
1.4
2.4
1.3
2.5
2.5
3.1
3.6
3.0
2.9
3.3
2.5
2.9
2.5
2.1
2.8
2.6
3.3
3.6
3.0
2.9
3.4
3.2
3.0
3.1
2.4
3.0
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Trends: MPAT Average final score: 2 Gov and Acc
MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
7
2.3
2.4
2.7
2.9
1.7
2.1
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.7
2.5
2.7
3.0
2.1
2.7
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.1
2.4
2.5
2.8
2.3
3.1
2.8
2.3
3.1
2.8
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.1
2.6
-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Trends: MPAT Average final score: 3 HR Mgt
MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
8
2.7
9
2.8
9
2.6
7 2.9
5 3.2
0
2.4
8
2.6
4
2.7
7
3.2
1
2.8
5 3.1
2
3.2
5
2.9
5
3.0
3
3.2
5
2.5
9
2.7
5 3.0
5
3.2
8
3.0
3
3.2
3 3.5
0
3.1
8
3.1
7
3.6
2
2.3
0
3.0
6 3.3
2
3.7
6
3.2
4
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
Three Year Trend Analysis: Average Final Scores per Standardfor KPA 4 Financial Management
MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6
Centrality of managerial leadership
9
Note improvement
of NW
CONCLUSION
Institutionalisation of MPAT assessment within the
Public service
Challenges persist, particularly HRM Indicators and
Payment of Suppliers.
Once more the results highlight the centrality of
leadership in driving improvements
Need to close the gap between management practises and performance/delivery
10
Recommended