Management Performance Assessment

Tool (MPAT) results 2016

PURPOSE

To presents an analysis of the MPAT 2016

results

To highlight progress and challenges

experienced.

2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3

3.0

2.5

2.3

2.8

2.6

2.9 2.8

2.5

3.0

2.8

3.0 3.0

2.6

3.2

2.9

-

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

1 Strat Mgt 2 Gov and Acc 3 HR Mgt 4 Fin Mgt Grand Total

Trends: MPAT Average final score: Key performance Area

MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6

BEST & WORST PERFORMING STANDARDS

Best performing Disposal mgt (3,2) Logistics mgt (3,2) Demand Mgt (3,2) Mgt struct (3,3) Pay sheet cert (3,3) Internal audit (3,3) Acquisition Mgt (3,5) Strat Plans (3,5) Cash flow (3,6) Account Audit Comm (3,6) Deleg PFMA (3,8)

4

Worst performing Discipl cases (2,1) Mgt diversity (2,3) Level 1-12 PMDS (2,3) Paymt of suppl (2,3) Evaluation (2,3) Org Design (2,3) PAJA (2,4) SMS PMDS (ex HODs)

(2,4) PMDS HOD (2,4) Serv del impr mech (2,6) Recruit and reten (2,8)

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

5

Introduction

of new

planning

cycle 2015

Introduct

ion of

new

planning

cycle

2015

3.3

2.8

2.9

- - -

3.0

3.0

3.2

3.0

2.0

3.4

2.8

2.9

3.5

3.1

2.9

2.3

- -

3.0

-

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Trends: MPAT Average final score: 1 Strat Mgt

MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6

GOVERNANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY

6

2.4

3.1

3.6

2.5

2.4

3.3

2.9

1.4

2.4

1.3

2.5

2.5

3.1

3.6

3.0

2.9

3.3

2.5

2.9

2.5

2.1

2.8

2.6

3.3

3.6

3.0

2.9

3.4

3.2

3.0

3.1

2.4

3.0

-

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Trends: MPAT Average final score: 2 Gov and Acc

MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

7

2.3

2.4

2.7

2.9

1.7

2.1

2.5

2.6

2.5

2.0

2.0

2.3

2.7

2.5

2.7

3.0

2.1

2.7

2.5

2.6

2.5

2.1

2.4

2.5

2.8

2.3

3.1

2.8

2.3

3.1

2.8

2.3

2.4

2.4

2.1

2.6

-

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Trends: MPAT Average final score: 3 HR Mgt

MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

8

2.7

9

2.8

9

2.6

7 2.9

5 3.2

0

2.4

8

2.6

4

2.7

7

3.2

1

2.8

5 3.1

2

3.2

5

2.9

5

3.0

3

3.2

5

2.5

9

2.7

5 3.0

5

3.2

8

3.0

3

3.2

3 3.5

0

3.1

8

3.1

7

3.6

2

2.3

0

3.0

6 3.3

2

3.7

6

3.2

4

-

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Three Year Trend Analysis: Average Final Scores per Standardfor KPA 4 Financial Management

MPAT 1.4 MPAT 1.5 MPAT 1.6

Centrality of managerial leadership

9

Note improvement

of NW

CONCLUSION

Institutionalisation of MPAT assessment within the

Public service

Challenges persist, particularly HRM Indicators and

Payment of Suppliers.

Once more the results highlight the centrality of

leadership in driving improvements

Need to close the gap between management practises and performance/delivery

10