View
9
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
ERASMUS+ BAROMETER 2016
2015-2016 Academic Year Survey Results
Presented by Gregoris A. Makrides,
EAEC President
With the cooperation of the European Commission
SURVEY DEMOGRAPHICS
2
1 1 1 1 12 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 34 4 4
5 5 56 6
7 7 7 7 78
9 9 910
1112
18
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
3
The survey took place online via the erasmusbarometer.net website between October 2016 and March 2017.
The survey results consist of 187 full responses to the questionnaire from 35 different countries.
57.53
21.51
11.299.68
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
ERASMUS Institutional Coordinator Officer in charge of the ERASMUS Mobility Head of ERASMUS Mobility office Other
PARTICIPANTS OF THE ONLINE SURVEY ARE:
4
NUMBER OF STUDENTS REGISTERED
5
Minimum Maximum MeanStd.
Deviation
Number of students registered in 2015-2016 Academic Year: [First Cycle]
0 57955 7515.03 10698.64
A9. Number of students registered in 2015-2016 Academic Year: [Second Cycle]
0 41754 2745.78 6044.65
A9. Number of students registered in 2015-2016 Academic Year: [Third Cycle]
0 10000 588.88 1467.32
NUMBER OF ERASMUS REALIZED MOBILITIESIN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015-2016,
INCLUDING THE SUMMER:
6
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Number of ERASMUS realized mobilities in the Academic Year 2015-2016,
including the summer of 2016: [SMS (studies):]
0 2074 191.34 341.08
Number of ERASMUS realized mobilities in the Academic Year 2015-2016,
including the summer of 2016: [SMP (traineeships):]
0 999 60.02 110.27
B1.MOBILITY BETWEEN PROGRAMME COUNTRIES
7
B1.1. EVALUATE THE INTEREST OF STUDENTS IN YOUR INSTITUTION TO UNDERTAKE A
TRAINEESHIP AS RECENT GRADUATES
8
32.26
30.65
8.06 8.06
3.76
17.20
38
26
9
11
5
11
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Below 5% Between 5% and 25% Between 50% and 75% Between 25% and 50% Above 75% Do not know - No answer
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B1.2. HAS YOUR INSTITUTION RECEIVED MORE DEMANDS FROM PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS (SMS AND SMP) UNDER THE 2014 CALL
COMPARED THE PREVIOUS CALLS?
Frequency Percentage
Do not know - No answer 14 8.5%
No 147 89.6%
Yes 3 1.8%
Total 164 100.0%
9
B2. PARTICIPATION AND FUNDING
10
B2.1. AMONG ALL THE STUDENTS WHO APPLIED FOR OUTGOING ERASMUS STUDIES,
WHAT PROPORTION HAS BEEN SELECTED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE PROGRAMME?
11
51.08
22.58
10.75
4.84 4.306.45
49.38
21.96
11.2
6.644.98 5.81
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Above 90% Between 70% and 90% Between 50% and 70% Between 25% and 50% Below 25% Do not know - No answer
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B2.2. AMONG ALL THE STUDENTS WHO APPLIED FOR OUTGOING ERASMUS
TRAINEESHIPS, WHAT PROPORTION HAS BEEN SELECTED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE
PROGRAMME?
12
56.99
17.20
5.91 5.384.30
10.22
52.7
17.4
7.9 7.1
4.1
10.8
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Above 90% Between 70% and 90% Between 50% and 70% Below 25% Between 25% and 50% Do not know - No answer
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B2.3. AMONG STUDENTS SELECTED FOR PARTICIPATION IN ERASMUS+, WHAT
PROPORTION WITHDREW THEIR APPLICATION AFTER SELECTION?
13
36.56
25.27
17.20
12.37
1.61
6.99
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Below 5% Between 5% and 10% Between 10% and 20% Between 20% and 40% Above 40% Do not know - No answer
B3. OLS (ONLINE LINGUISTIC SUPPORT)
14
B3.1. IN YOUR OPINION, HOW USEFUL IS THE OLS LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT?
15
18.58
43.17
22.95
9.84
5.46
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Very useful Useful Slightly useful Not useful at all Do not know - No opinion
B3.2. IN YOUR OPINION, HOW USEFUL ARE THE OLS LANGUAGE COURSES AND "LIVE
COACHING" ACTIVITIES?
16
15.85
38.25
22.95
6.56
16.39
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Very useful Useful Slightly useful Not useful at all Do not know - No opinion
B4.LEARNING AGREEMENT
17
B4.1. DID YOUR INSTITUTION MANAGE TO UPDATE ITS COURSE CATALOGUE BEFORE THE
END OF THE PREVIOUS ACADEMIC YEAR?
18
69.06
22.65
8.29
68.05
20.75
11.2
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
Yes No Do not know - No answer
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B4.2. HAS YOUR INSTITUTION PUBLISHED THE SPECIFIC DEADLINES FOR STUDENTS TO
INTRODUCE CHANGES IN THE LEARNING AGREEMENT?
60.22
29.28
10.50
62.66
31.12
6.22
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Yes No Do not know - No answer
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
19
B4.3. HAS THE NEW LEARNING AGREEMENT HELPED IN AVOIDING PROBLEMS WITH
RECOGNITION OF ECTS GAINED ABROAD?
27.07
30.94
26.52
15.47
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
Yes No Somewhat Do not know - No opinion
20
B5. INSURANCE COVERAGE
21
B5.1. INDICATE WHO IS TAKING CARE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF INSURANCE
COVERAGE: IN MOBILITY OF STUDIES [A.HEALTH]
22
2016 (F-Sp-Su)(%) 2015
Student 79.78 78.8
Sending HEI 17.42 19.9
Receiving HEI 2.81 1.2
B5.1. INDICATE WHO IS TAKING CARE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF INSURANCE
COVERAGE: IN MOBILITY OF STUDIES [B. LIABILITY]
23
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
Student 60.67 62.2
Receiving Organization/enterprise 11.80 8.7
Sending HEI 27.53 29
B5.1. INDICATE WHO IS TAKING CARE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF INSURANCE
COVERAGE: IN MOBILITY OF STUDIES [C. ACCIDENT]
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
Student 65.17 68
Sending HEI 30.90 27.8
Receiving HEI 3.93 4.1
24
B5.2. INDICATE WHO IS TAKING CARE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF INSURANCE
COVERAGE: IN MOBILITY FOR TRAINEESHIPS[A. HEALTH]
25
2016 (F-Sp-Su)(%) 2015
Student 80.34 79.3
Receiving Organization/enterprise
3.93 0.8
Sending HEI 15.73 19.9
B5.2. INDICATE WHO IS TAKING CARE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF INSURANCE
COVERAGE: IN MOBILITY FOR TRAINEESHIPS[B. LIABILITY]
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
Student 60.67 62.2
Receiving Organization/enterprise 11.80 8.7
Sending HEI 27.53 29
26
B5.2. INDICATE WHO IS TAKING CARE OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF INSURANCE
COVERAGE: IN MOBILITY FOR TRAINEESHIPS[C. ACCIDENT]
27
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
Student 61.80 64.3
Receiving Organization/enterprise
9.55 7.1
Sending HEI 28.65 28.6
B6. EUROPASS MOBILITY
28
B6.1. DO YOU ENCOURAGE YOUR PARTICIPANTS TO USE THE EUROPASS
MOBILITY CERTIFICATE?
47.19
52.81
0.000.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Yes No Do not Know /No Answer
29
B7. RECOGNITION
30
B7.1. DOES YOUR INSTITUTION USE ECTS GRADE DISTRIBUTION TABLES?
31
66.67
33.33
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Yes No
B7.2. DOES YOUR INSTITUTION CONVERT THE GRADES OBTAINED ABROAD BY MOBILE
STUDENTS TO HOME GRADE DISTRIBUTION TABLE RESULTS?
66.10
33.90
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Yes No
32
B7.3. IS THERE ROOM FOR PERSONAL INTERPRETATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF
GRADES IN THE PROCESS OF GRADE CONVERSION?
54.80
45.20
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Yes No
33
B7.4. DOES YOUR INSTITUTION INTEND TO PRODUCE ECTS GRADE DISTRIBUTION TABLES IN THE NEAR FUTURE AS ADVOCATED BY THE
2015 ECTS USERS' GUIDE?
49.72
38.42
11.86
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Maybe Yes No
34
B8. MOBILITY TOOL+
35
B8.1. TO WHICH EXTENT IS THE MOBILITY TOOL+ ADAPTED TO YOUR NEEDS IN TERMS
OF MONITORING YOUR MOBILITIES?
36
17.24
38.51
27.59
9.207.47
43.15
13.69
27.8
10.79
4.56
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Adapted very well Adapted well Slightly adapted Not adapted at all Do not know - No opinion
2016(F-Sp-Su) 2015
B8.2. DO YOU FIND THE MOBILITY TOOL+ USEFUL?
37
21.84
42.53
24.71
4.60
6.32
20.75
41.69
26.97
7.88
2.9
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Very useful Useful Slightly useful Not useful at all Do not know - No opinion
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B8.3. DO YOU FIND THE MOBILITY TOOL+ EASY TO USE?
38
12.64
45.98
31.03
4.02
6.32
9.96
39.42
34.44
13.28
2.9
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
Very easy to use Easy to use Moderate Difficult to use Do not know - No opinion
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B8.4. IS THE MOBILITY TOOL+ USED AT YOUR INSTITUTION ON A REGULAR BASIS?
59.20
26.44
8.05
2.87 3.45
58.51
31.12
4.562.91 2.9
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Used very often Occasionally used Rarely used Not used at all Do not know - No opinion
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
39
B8.5. AMONG THE FOLLOWING FEATURES OF THE MOBILITY TOOL+, RATE THEIR LEVEL
OF DIFFICULTY.[A. IMPORT]
40
14.45
25.43
31.21
17.92
10.9810.8
22.4
34.9
15.8 16.2
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
1 - very easy 2 - easy 3 - moderate difficulty 4 - difficult 5 - very difficult
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B8.5. AMONG THE FOLLOWING FEATURES OF THE MOBILITY TOOL+, RATE THEIR LEVEL
OF DIFFICULTY.[B. EXPORT]
28.90
36.42
28.90
3.472.31
10.8
22.4
34.9
15.8 16.2
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
1 - very easy 2 - easy 3 - moderate difficulty 4 - difficult 5 - very difficult
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
41
B8.5. AMONG THE FOLLOWING FEATURES OF THE MOBILITY TOOL+, RATE THEIR LEVEL
OF DIFFICULTY.[C. MOBILITIESREGISTRATION]
42
25.43
42.77
24.86
6.36
0.58
22.82
39.83
28.63
5.39
3.32
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
1 - very easy 2 - easy 3 - moderate difficulty 4 - difficult 5 - very difficult
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B8.5. AMONG THE FOLLOWING FEATURES OF THE MOBILITY TOOL+, RATE THEIR LEVEL OF
DIFFICULTY.[D. PARTNERS REGISTRATION]
43
16.76
42.20
34.68
4.62
1.73
15.35
35.68 35.27
10.79
2.9
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
1 - very easy 2 - easy 3 - moderate difficulty 4 - difficult 5 - very difficult
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B9. OTHER
44
B9.1. IS THE NEW POSSIBILITY TO COMBINE STAFF TEACHING AND TRAINING MOBILITY
APPRECIATED AMONG YOUR STAFF?
45
11.18
21.7621.18
10.00
35.88
10.37
23.24
18.26
13.28
34.85
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Very appreciated Appreciated Slightly appreciated Not appreciated at all Do not know - No opinion
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B9.2. HOW MANY APPLICATIONS DID YOU RECEIVE FOR COMBINING STAFF TEACHING
AND TRAINING MOBILITY
46
Mean 5.18
Range 123
Minimum 0
Maximum 123
Percentiles
25 0
50 0
75 3
B9.3. DO YOU GET CLEAR RESPONSES FROM YOUR NATIONAL AGENCY?
47
39.64 39.64
15.38
2.37 2.96
41.0840.25
16.18
0.41
2.08
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Very clear Clear Slightly clear Not clear at all Do not know - No opinion
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
B9.4. DO YOU GET FAST RESPONSES FROM YOUR NATIONAL AGENCY?
48
27.78
51.85
15.43
3.70
1.230.00
28.63
44.81
20.33
3.73
0.412.09
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Very fast (less than 24 hours) Fast (less than 3 days) Neither fast nor slow (less than
one week)
Slow (one or two weeks) Very slow (more than two
weeks)
Do not know - No opinion
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
C1. MOBILITY BETWEEN PROGRAMME AND PARTNER COUNTRIES (KA107) -
INTEREST DEMAND
49
C1.1. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE INTERNATIONAL OPENING (TO PARTNER
COUNTRIES OUTSIDE EUROPE) OF ERASMUS UNDER ERASMUS+?
90.80
5.523.68
90.04
5.84.15
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Yes No Do not know
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
50
C1.2. DO YOU SEE THE INTERNATIONAL OPENING OF ERASMUS+ AS AN
INTERESTING OPPORTUNITY FOR YOUR HEI?
51
56.44
14.72
22.70
1.84
4.29
60.17
7.88
26.14
2.5 3.32
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
1 2 3 4 5
2016 2015(F-Sp-Su)
C1.3. DID YOU APPLY UNDER THE 2016 CALL FOR INTERNATIONAL CREDIT MOBILITY?
58.90
41.10
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Yes No
52
C1.4. IN CASE YOU DIDN'T APPLY UNDER THE 2016 CALL, PLEASE SPECIFY WHY (YOU
MAY MARK MORE THAN ONE)
24
9
13 13
15
7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Complicated procedure Couldn't find suitable partner Insufficient information Limited funding opportunities Not aware Not interesting for my
institution
53
C1.5 . HOW INTERESTING ARE THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL CREDIT MOBIL ITY TO YOUR
INSTITUTION? [A . STUDENT MOBIL ITY – INCOMING STUDENTS]
SCALE : 1 -NOT INTERESTING AT ALL ……. 5 -VERY INTERESTING
6.13
9.82
14.11
25.15
44.79
4.15
7.05
13.26
23.65
51.87
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
54
C1.5. HOW INTERESTING ARE THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL CREDIT MOBILITY TO
YOUR INSTITUTION? [A. STUDENT MOBILITY –OUTGOING STUDENTS]
SCALE : 1 -NOT INTERESTING AT ALL …….
5-VERY INTERESTING
6.757.98
14.11
29.45
41.72
4.98 5.39
14.94
24.9
49.79
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
55
C1.5 . HOW INTERESTING ARE THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL CREDIT MOBIL ITY TO YOUR INSTITUTION?
[A . STAFF MOBIL ITY – INCOMING STAFF]
SCALE : 1 -NOT INTERESTING AT ALL ……. 5 -VERY INTERESTING
6.759.20
17.18
23.93
42.94
5.39 4.56
16.6
24.9
48.55
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
56
C1 .5 . HOW INTEREST ING ARE THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL CREDIT MOBIL ITY TO YOUR INST ITUTION? [A .
STAFF MOBIL ITY – OUTGOING STAFF]SC ALE : 1 -NOT INTEREST ING AT ALL ……. 5 -VERY INTEREST ING
57
6.75 7.36
16.56
24.54
44.79
6.22
4.15
10.79
24.9
53.94
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
C1.6. IS INTERNATIONAL CREDIT MOBILITY RELEVANT FOR YOUR INTERNATIONALIZATION
STRATEGY ( IF APPLICABLE)?
58
71.60
6.79
21.60
73.96
7.88
18.26
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
Yes No Do not know - No answer
2016 (F-SpSu)(%) 2015
C1.8. WHICH REGIONS ARE MOST RELEVANT FOR YOU TO
COOPERATE WITH?
18.14%
11.08%
5.54%
17.63%
11.84%
7.81%
15.11%
6.05%
6.05%
0.76%
0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00% 18.00% 20.00%
Asia
Latin-America
Africa, Caribbean, Pacific
European neighbouring region - East
European neighbouring region - South Mediterranean
Western Balkans
North America
Australia-New Zealand
All of them
None
59
C2. MOBILITY BETWEEN PROGRAMME AND PARTNER COUNTRIES (KA107) -
FUNDING
60
C2.1. AMONG ALL YOUR PLANNED INTERNATIONAL MOBILITIES(STUDENT/STAFF) FOR THE
CURRENT 2015-2016 ACADEMIC YEAR, HOW MANY ARE EXPECTED TO BE FUNDED WITH ERASMUS+
EU FUNDS?
9.03%
7.10%
18.71%
45.16%
10.32%9.68%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
50.00%
Between 25% and
50%
Between 50% and
70%
Do not know - No
opinion
Below 25% Above 90% Between 70% and
90%
61
THANK YOU!
62
Recommended