Causation Reasoning about how and why things happen

Causation

Reasoning about how and why things happen

The Main Issue in Causal Reasoning:

Evaluation of a Causal Claim

The Main Issue in Causal Reasoning:

Evaluation of a Causal Claim

• May be intended as a causal hypothesis

If I persistently and obnoxiously get in someone's face, that will force them to take my demands seriously.

The Main Issue in Causal Reasoning:

Evaluation of a Causal Claim

• May be intended as a causal hypothesis

• May be intended as a conclusion based on observation or inductive inferencePower corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Reasoning patterns that work

Reasoning patterns that work

Relevant difference reasoning

If an effect is present in one situation but not present in other similar situations, consider relevant differences as causes of the effect. Screen for alternative causes.

Reasoning patterns that work

Relevant difference reasoning

If an effect is present in one situation but not present in other similar situations, consider relevant differences as causes of the effect. Screen for alternative causes.

Common thread reasoning

If an effect is present in multiple situations, consider as a cause any feature that is present whenever the effect is present. Consider alternative causes.

Reasoning errors and patterns that don’t work well enough

Reasoning errors and patterns that don’t work well enough Post hoc fallacy (post hoc ergo propter hoc)

Occurs when the fact that one event occurred before another is uncritically taken as sufficient evidence that the earlier event caused the later event

Reasoning errors and patterns that don’t work well enough Post hoc fallacy

Occurs when the fact that one event occurred before another is uncritically taken as sufficient evidence that the earlier event caused the later event

Overlooking a common thread or cause

Reasoning errors and patterns that don’t work well enough Post hoc fallacy

Occurs when the fact that one event occurred before another is uncritically taken as sufficient evidence that the earlier event caused the later event

Overlooking a common thread or cause Focusing on irrelevant threads or differences

Reasoning errors and patterns that don’t work well enough Post hoc fallacy

Occurs when the fact that one event occurred before another is uncritically taken as sufficient evidence that the earlier event caused the later event

Overlooking a common thread or cause Focusing on irrelevant threads or differences Overlooking possibility of reversed causation

Reasoning errors and patterns that don’t work well enough Post hoc fallacy

Occurs when the fact that one event occurred before another is uncritically taken as sufficient evidence that the earlier event caused the later event

Overlooking a common thread or cause Focusing on irrelevant threads or differences Overlooking possibility of reversed causation Asserting a wrong common cause

Reasoning errors and patterns that don’t work well enough Post hoc fallacy

Occurs when the fact that one event occurred before another is uncritically taken as sufficient evidence that the earlier event caused the later event

Overlooking a common thread or cause Focusing on irrelevant threads or differences Overlooking possibility of reversed causation Asserting a wrong common cause Appealing to anecdotal evidence

Problems in causal reasoning

Problems in causal reasoning Circularity

Occurs when the statement of cause essentially restates the effect, typically as a definition or description

Example: The explosion was caused by a rapid release of energy

Problems in causal reasoning Circularity

Occurs when the statement of cause essentially restates the effect, typically as a definition or description

Testability issuesOccur when the statement of cause is inappropriately difficult or impossible to falsify

Example (from the not-too-distant past): The illness is caused by tiny things that can't be seen.

Note that this statement of cause turned out to be right in some cases, but one would need to do some good inductive reasoning to justify this conclusion.

Problems in causal reasoning Circularity

Occurs when the statement of cause essentially restates the effect, typically as a definition or description

Testability issuesOccur when the statement of cause is inappropriately difficult or impossible to falsify

Specificity issuesOccur when the statement of cause is inappropriately vague, especially from use of undefined terms

Example: The illness is caused by a pathogenic agent.

Problems in causal reasoning Circularity

Occurs when the statement of cause essentially restates the effect, typically as a definition or description

Testability issuesOccur when the statement of cause is inappropriately difficult or impossible to falsify

Specificity issuesOccur when the statement of cause is inappropriately vague, especially from use of undefined terms

Inclusion of unnecessary assumptions

Problems in causal reasoning Circularity

Occurs when the statement of cause essentially restates the effect, typically as a definition or description

Testability issuesOccur when the statement of cause is inappropriately difficult or impossible to falsify

Specificity issuesOccur when the statement of cause is inappropriately vague, especially from use of undefined terms

Inclusion of unnecessary assumptions Conflict with well-established theory

Critical thinking theory places the burden of proof on new or unusual ideas

Causal reasoning alternatives Materialism

All events have at least one physical/material cause and no non-material cause

Single causationEvery effect has one and only one unique cause

Dependent co-arising (Buddhist)At least two entities must participate in the causation of any phenomenon, which is made possible by the natures of the entities involved

Theory of changes (Chinese)Situations have essential structures that tend to change in patterned ways