Alcoa - Pennsylvania State UniversityAlcoa Business Services Center Geoffrey Measel - Structural...

AlcoaAlcoaBusiness Services CenterBusiness Services Center

Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaPittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Efficiency Considerations for Modern Design

Geoffrey E. Measel – Structural Option 2004 Senior Thesis

Alcoa Business Services Center Alcoa Business Services Center Geoffrey Geoffrey MeaselMeasel -- StructuralStructural

IntroductionIntroductionThesis researchThesis research

•Structural Depth•Alternate Floor Systems

•Alternate Foundation Systems

•Core Framing For UFADS

•Mechanical Breadth•Under Floor Air Distribution System

•Construction Breadth•Direct Cost Of Each System

•Overall Building Cost

•Schedule Impact

IntroductionIntroductionPresentation OutlinePresentation Outline

IntroductionStructural Depth– Alternate Floors– Alternate Foundation– Building Impacts

Mechanical Breadth– Under Floor Redesign

Construction ManagementConclusionsQuestions

IntroductionIntroductionProject PlayersProject Players

General Contractor: PJ Dick Inc.

Construction Manager: PJ Dick Inc.

Architects: Primary: Pfaffmann & AssociatesInterior: IKM Inc.

Engineers:Structural: Atlantic Engineering ServicesMechanical: Ray EngineeringElectrical: Hornfeck Engineering, Inc. Site Consultant: Civil & Environmental Consultants Inc.

Owner: Jackson Row Holdings C/O The Rubinoff Company

IntroductionIntroductionLocationLocation

IntroductionIntroductionBuilding StatisticsBuilding Statistics

Function Types:Function Types:MultiMulti--tenant officetenant officeGround Floor Retail Ground Floor Retail Underground Parking GarageUnderground Parking Garage

Size: Size: 228,500 NRSF228,500 NRSF6 Stories6 Stories

Cost Information:Cost Information:Overall Cost: $26 millionOverall Cost: $26 million$19.3 million (excluding tenant fit$19.3 million (excluding tenant fit--out work)out work)

Delivery Method: Delivery Method: DesignDesign--BidBid--Build with CM at RiskBuild with CM at Risk

StructuralStructuralEXISTING STEEL FRAMINGEXISTING STEEL FRAMING

StructuralStructuralexisting core framingexisting core framing

Presentation Presentation OutlineOutline

StructuralStructuralfloor refloor re--designdesign

Existing Composite Existing Composite My Existing (Control for Study)My Existing (Control for Study)Percentage CompositePercentage Composite–– ShoredShored–– UnshoredUnshored–– CamberedCambered

NonNon--CompositeCompositeJoistsJoistsPrePre--Cast ConcreteCast Concrete

System Comparison

6.788.07 7.68

6.44 6.137.18

3.47 3.9 3.81 3 3.31 3.354.69

6.065.87

Steel Weight/ sq. ft Steel Cost/sq. ft

Floor Framing Comparison

StructuralStructuralFoundation ReFoundation Re--designdesign

7.5” Diameter Mini7.5” Diameter Mini--PilePile–– Pall =(.4 to .5) Pall =(.4 to .5) FyFy As + (.35 to .45) As + (.35 to .45) F’cF’c Ac Ac

Fy Fy =Yield Stress of Steel Casing (80ksi)=Yield Stress of Steel Casing (80ksi)As =CrossAs =Cross--sectional area of steel casing (7.86 in2)sectional area of steel casing (7.86 in2)F’cF’c =28 day Compressive Strength of grout (4000 =28 day Compressive Strength of grout (4000 psipsi))Ac =CrossAc =Cross--Sectional area of grout (35.78 inSectional area of grout (35.78 in22))

Mini-Piles

150 Ton Capacity

300 Piles

Existing Auger Cast Piles

95 Ton Capacity

374 Piles

StructuralStructuralCore ReCore Re--DesignDesign

Existing Core Framing Existing Core Framing My Existing (Control for Study)My Existing (Control for Study)Raised Floor FramingRaised Floor FramingBeam Raised FloorBeam Raised FloorRaised Core FramingRaised Core Framing

Existing Core Framing

Raised Floor Core

24” Raised Tate Access Floor

structuralstructuralCore ReCore Re--DesignDesign

Beam Raised Floor

W21X44 with Slab

Raised Core Framing

Option 2 Option 1

Core Comparisons

5.05 5.28 5.337.16

8.8010.56 10.83

0.002.004.006.008.00

10.0012.0014.0016.00

AES Existing My Exsiting Raised Floor Beam RaisedFloor

Raised Core

Steel Cost per Sq. ft Steel W eight per Sq. ft

Core Framing Comparison

MechanicalMechanicalUnderUnder--FloorFloor

ConCoreConCore 20002000System Weight: System Weight: 11.5 lbs/sq. ft11.5 lbs/sq. ftConcentrated Load:Concentrated Load: 2000 lbs2000 lbsUniform Load:Uniform Load: 500 lbs/sq. ft500 lbs/sq. ftUltimate Load:Ultimate Load: 5750 lbs5750 lbsImpact Load:Impact Load: 150 lbs150 lbs

Raised Floor Design

MechanicalMechanicalDuct work ReDuct work Re--DesignDesign

Existing Duct Plan Re-Designed Duct Plan

Const. MgmtConst. MgmtCost SummaryCost Summary

System Cost Comparison

1512000 1608750 1588500 15997502052000 2083500

15570001786500

0500000

1000000150000020000002500000

Overall Floor Framing Cost Comparison

Const. MgmtConst. Mgmtcost summarycost summary

Cost Comparison

271080 276048 287928230256

319032

050000

100000150000200000250000300000350000

AES Existing My Exsiting Raised Floor Raised Core Beam RaisedFloor

Overall Core Framing Cost Comparison

Existing Auger Cast PilesExisting Auger Cast Piles–– 374 Piles *( 50’) * $30.00/ft = $561,000374 Piles *( 50’) * $30.00/ft = $561,000–– Schedule: 50’ (374 piles) / 350 = 53 daysSchedule: 50’ (374 piles) / 350 = 53 days

MicroMicro--Piles (MiniPiles (Mini--Piles)Piles)–– 300 Mini300 Mini--piles*($55.00/ft) 50’ = $825,000piles*($55.00/ft) 50’ = $825,000

–– 300 mini300 mini--piles * 50’ / 275ft/day = 54.5 dayspiles * 50’ / 275ft/day = 54.5 days

Foundation Comparison

Reduction of Construction Cost:Reduction of Construction Cost:--HVAC Cost = $283,040HVAC Cost = $283,040

Enhancement of Property Value:Enhancement of Property Value:-Tenant Re-Occupancy = $312,131

Improvement in Tenant Attractiveness:Improvement in Tenant Attractiveness:-Life Cycle Savings (1st Year) = $304,168-Staff Productivity (1st Year) = $635,400

Projected Mechanical Savings

Summary & Summary & Conclusions Conclusions

Structural:Structural:–– Floor Framing: 70% Composite Floor Framing: 70% Composite UnshoredUnshored

–– Watch Steel PricesWatch Steel Prices-- 100% Comp. Shored100% Comp. Shored–– Foundation: Stay with Auger Cast PilesFoundation: Stay with Auger Cast Piles

–– If Schedule becomes an issue go with If Schedule becomes an issue go with MiniMini--PilesPiles

–– Core Framing: Raise the CoreCore Framing: Raise the Core

Mechanical: Under Floor Air DistributionMechanical: Under Floor Air Distribution

Special ThanksSpecial Thanks

Atlantic Engineering ServicesAtlantic Engineering Services–– John SchneiderJohn Schneider–– Andy Andy VerrangiaVerrangia

PJ DickPJ Dick–– Frank Frank BabicBabic–– Matt WetzelMatt Wetzel

PfaffmanPfaffman & Associates& Associates

G.E.M. Inc.G.E.M. Inc.

AE FacultyAE Faculty–– Kevin Kevin ParfittParfitt–– Walt SchneiderWalt Schneider–– Jonathan DoughertyJonathan Dougherty

AE ClassmatesAE Classmates

My FamilyMy Family

QuestionsQuestions

Floor Framing Floor Framing SummarySummary

Composite Comparison

3.81 3.81 3.81 3.81 3.83 3.83 3.90 4.00

7.75 7.75 7.75 7.68 7.64 7.64 7.68 7.83

0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.008.009.00

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30

Percent Composite

Steel Cost per Sq. ft Steel Weight per Sq. ft

Percentage Composite Comparison Unshored

Composite Comparison (Shored)

3.00 3.00 3.11 3.11 3.14 3.22 3.27 3.27

6.44 6.44 6.49 6.50 6.44 6.37 6.43 6.43

0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.00

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30

Pe rce nt Composite

Steel Cost per Sq. ft Steel Weight per Sq. ft

Percentage Composite Comparison Shored

Existing System Comparison

3.473.90

AES My Existing

Steel Cost per Sq. ft Steel W eight per Sq. ft

Existing Floor Comparison

Existing Core Comparisons

5.05 5.28

AES Existing My Existing

Steel Cost per Sq. ft

Steel Weight per Sq. ft

Steel Systems Comparison

StructuralStructuralFoundation ReFoundation Re--designdesign

Pile Cap Re-Design

Alcoa - Pennsylvania State UniversityAlcoa Business Services Center Geoffrey Measel - Structural...

Documents

Alcoa Swot

Re: Alcoa Inc. - SEC · 2011. 1. 18. · Alcoa Ilc. Alcoa Corporate Center 201 Isabella St at 7th St Bndge Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858 Re: Alcoa Inc. Incoming letter dated December

· Alcan Alcoa Pechi Alcan Alcoa Alcoa Pechiney ... the two 809X series alloys show some ... additions up to 8000 ppm to Al—Si alloys

Alcoa Imr Final

Alcoa 951 Pretreatment Technology...Alcoa 951 Pretreatment Technology 1 September 26, 2014 Andy Mills, Alcoa Global Rolled Products Center of Excellence--Strengthening adhesive bonds

TRAMITACION GARANTIAS ALCOA

Alcoa Upstream Corporation*investors.alcoa.com/~/media/Files/A/Alcoa-IR/documents/ir-story/... · alcoa upstream corporation information required in registration statement cross-reference

Alcoa inc final

Alcoa Groundwater Test

Alcoa -- Community

Section 122.21(r)(2) – (8) Information Requirements · Section 122.21(r)(2) – (8) Information Requirements . Alcoa Power Generating Inc., a subsidiary of Alcoa Corporation . Alcoa

Alcoa, Inc., Amendment Request Letter dtd 09/09/2005. · 2019. 12. 15. · Alcoa Technology ALCOA Alcoa Technical Center 100 Technical Drive Alcoa Center, PA 15069oo01 USA Tel: 17243375300

Alcoa ® Wheels | Alcoa Wheels...Created Date: 8/6/2018 2:15:24 PM

Alcoa Wheel Service Manual - Alcoa ® Wheels | Alcoa Wheels€¦ · 6 Wheels in service ... subject to change without prior notice. To request a free copy of the current Alcoa Wheel

School-Wide Implementation of RETELL Bob Measel Assistant Director, OELAAA

Alcoa: Aluminium Production, Changing Climates and Flooded ...€¦ · Alcoa are currently involved in bauxite mining and alumina refining operations in Western Australia (Alcoa 2007a,

SUBMISSION OF ALCOA OF AUSTRALIA LIMITEDhazelwoodinquiry.vic.gov.au/.../Alcoa-of-Australia.pdf · Alcoa is owned 60 per cent by Alcoa Inc, and 40 per cent by Alumina Limited. 8. Alcoa

Alcoa Sustainability Project

Alcoa Foundation SBTi Memo Clean€¦ · Alcoa Foundation SBTi Memo Clean ... u

ALCOA - Wheres_ALCOA - Annual_Report_2000