View
222
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Festival Bridge published a State of the Region report in 2012.
Citation preview
1 | P a g e
A State of the Region Report commissioned by
Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge).
June 2012
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5
1.1 Structure of this report ............................................................................................. 5
2. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 6
3. Arts Council England and the Bridge organisations ........................................................ 8
3.1 Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) Audit ............................................................... 9
3.2 Background to the Audit Process .......................................................................... 10
3.3 State of the Region Report ................................................................................... 11
4. Background information to the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area ...................... 12
4.1 East of England .................................................................................................... 13
4.2 Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area .............................................................. 14
4.3 Greater Cambridge ............................................................................................... 14
4.4 Norwich ................................................................................................................ 14
4.5 Peterborough ........................................................................................................ 15
4.6 Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft ............................................................................. 15
4.7 Haven Gateway .................................................................................................... 15
4.8 North/West Norfolk and West Suffolk .................................................................... 15
4.9 Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEP) ..................................................................... 16
4.10 Greater Cambridge and Greater Peterborough ..................................................... 17
4.11 New Anglia ........................................................................................................... 18
5. Statistical data on the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area .................................... 20
5.1 Population ............................................................................................................ 20
5.2 What are the key messages from Table 2? ........................................................... 21
5.3 Poverty and unemployment .................................................................................. 21
5.4 What are the key messages from Table 3? ........................................................... 22
6. County Analysis by local authority areas ....................................................................... 24
7. Cambridgeshire ............................................................................................................. 25
7.1 Statistics ............................................................................................................... 26
7.2 Service Provision .................................................................................................. 26
7.3 Background concerns from audit interviews .......................................................... 28
7.4 Schools ................................................................................................................. 31
7.5 Local authorities and their areas of responsibility .................................................. 32
2 | P a g e
7.6 Cambridgeshire County Council ........................................................................... 33
7.7 Cambridge City Council ........................................................................................ 34
7.8 East Cambridgeshire District Council .................................................................... 35
7.9 Fenland District Council ........................................................................................ 35
7.9 Huntingdonshire District Council ........................................................................... 35
7.10 South Cambridgeshire District Council .................................................................. 36
8. Peterborough ................................................................................................................ 37
8.1 Statistics ............................................................................................................... 38
8.2 Service Provision .................................................................................................. 38
8.3 Background concerns from audit interviews .......................................................... 39
8.4 Schools ................................................................................................................. 40
8.5 Local Authority and its area of responsibility ......................................................... 40
9. Norfolk .......................................................................................................................... 42
9.1 Statistics ............................................................................................................... 42
9.2 Service Provision .................................................................................................. 43
9.3 Background concerns from audit interviews .......................................................... 44
9.4 Schools ................................................................................................................. 49
9.5 Local authorities and their areas of responsibility .................................................. 49
9.6 Norfolk County Council ......................................................................................... 51
9.7 Broadland District Council ..................................................................................... 52
9.8 Breckland District Council ..................................................................................... 52
9.9 Great Yarmouth Borough Council ......................................................................... 53
9.10 King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council .................................................... 53
9.11 North Norfolk District Council ................................................................................ 53
9.12 Norwich City Council ............................................................................................. 54
9.13 South Norfolk Council ........................................................................................... 54
10. Suffolk .......................................................................................................................... 55
10.1 Statistics ............................................................................................................... 56
10.2 Service provision .................................................................................................. 57
10.3 Background concerns from audit interviews .......................................................... 58
10.4 Schools ................................................................................................................. 62
10.5 Local authorities and their areas of responsibility .................................................. 63
10.6 Suffolk County Council ......................................................................................... 64
10.7 Babergh Borough Council ..................................................................................... 65
10.8 Forest Heath District Council ................................................................................ 65
10.9 Ipswich Borough Council ...................................................................................... 65
3 | P a g e
10.10 Mid Suffolk District Council .................................................................................. 66
10.11 St Edmundsbury Borough Council ....................................................................... 66
10.12 Suffolk Coastal District Council ............................................................................ 66
10.13 Waveney District Council ..................................................................................... 67
11. Education, Schools and Children and Young People .................................................. 68
11.1 Education ............................................................................................................ 68
11.2 Early Years .......................................................................................................... 68
11.3 Primary and secondary education ........................................................................ 69
11.4 Primary schools and education 5-11 .................................................................... 70
11.5 Secondary schools and education 11-16 ............................................................. 70
11.6 Post – 16 education ............................................................................................. 70
11.7 Information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit .................................. 72
11.8 Arts and cultural education .................................................................................. 74
11.9 Henley – Music Education in England .................................................................. 74
11.10 Henley – Review of Cultural Education ................................................................ 76
11.11 Artsmark .............................................................................................................. 76
11.12 Artsmark information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit ................... 77
11.13 Arts Award ........................................................................................................... 78
11.14 Arts Award information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit ................ 79
11.15 Children and Young People ................................................................................. 80
11.16 Rural issues: information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit ............. 81
11.17 Opportunities for Children and Young People ...................................................... 83
11.18 Youth Services .................................................................................................... 83
12. Cultural sector – arts, museums and libraries .............................................................. 85
12.1 Arts Council England ........................................................................................... 85
12.2 National Portfolio Organisations and the bridge ................................................... 86
12.3 ACE Funding in the bridge area ........................................................................... 88
12.4 Arts organisations and provision evidence from audit .......................................... 91
12.5 Local authority funding ......................................................................................... 92
12.6 Local authority culture/arts development information from the audit ..................... 93
12.7 Museums and Libraries........................................................................................ 95
12.8 Museums ............................................................................................................. 96
12.9 Museums information from the audit .................................................................... 96
12.10 Libraries ............................................................................................................... 97
12.11 Libraries information from the audit ...................................................................... 98
4 | P a g e
12.12 Concerns of the cultural sector as a whole in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival
(Bridge) area ................................................................................................................... 99
12.13 Communications ................................................................................................ 100
12.14 Sustainability of activity ...................................................................................... 101
12.15 Partnerships and networks ................................................................................ 102
12.16 Training ............................................................................................................. 103
12.17 Volunteers ......................................................................................................... 105
12.18 Disability ............................................................................................................ 105
12.19 Diversity ............................................................................................................. 106
12.20 Future activity, projects and delivery .................................................................. 107
12.21 Funding and commissioning .............................................................................. 108
5 | P a g e
1. Introduction
This State of the Region Report has been commissioned by the Norfolk & Norwich Festival
(Bridge).
Its purpose is to make information, related to its responsibilities, publicly available. The
subjects covered include:
• The cultural sector
• Local authorities
• Children, young people and their families
• Education
• Opportunities
• Needs and threats
• Facilities
The report will support the future planning and work of the bridge and will act as a
benchmark for similar reports in the future. The Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) is one of
ten (and four associate) bridges across England established by Arts Council England (ACE)
as part of its National portfolio. The bridge organisations have been set up for an initial three
years.
The report was compiled during June 2012 for the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) by
Catherine M Davis.
Data in this report is historic (typically from 2009-2011). While the data will have changed in
2012 the report proceeds on the basis that the recent data has value, not least in setting out
relative values and relationships.
1.1 Structure of this report
This report is in 12 parts. Following this Introduction and the executive summary in part 2
below, the main body of the report falls into ten parts:
• Section 3 discusses the background to establishment of the Norfolk & Norwich
Festival (Bridge) and the process by which this report was prepared;
• Sections 4, 5, 6,7,8 ,9 & 10 cover background information to the Norfolk & Norwich
Festival (Bridge) area, Statistical data and County Area Analysis, Cambridgeshire,
Peterborough, Norfolk and Suffolk respectively
• Section 11 deals with Education, schools and children and young people; and
• Section 12 discusses the Cultural sector – arts, museums and libraries.
Appendix 1 contains detailed individual responses which contain practical information,
further contacts, opportunities and potential concerns.
Appendix 2 contains an area analysis of background concerns in relation to children and
young people and cultural opportunities or provision.
6 | P a g e
Appendix 3 lists the names of those who contributed to the research and the organisations
they represent. It also lists the organisations who were approached during the research but
who were unable to contribute.
Appendix 4 contains tables of schools, museums, libraries, venues and festivals across the
Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area. It also includes information about museums
outside the immediate bridge area which may be of interest to schools, and others working
with children and young people, because of their proximity to some parts of the bridge area
or because of their unique offer.
2. Executive Summary
This State of the Region Report has been commissioned by the Norfolk & Norwich Festival
(Bridge). The report covers the area in which the bridge operates (Cambridgeshire, Norfolk,
Suffolk and Peterborough).
The report provides information on
• The cultural sector
• Local authorities
• Children, young people and their families
• Education
• Opportunities
• Needs and threats
• Facilities
The purpose of the report is to support the future planning and work of the bridge. It will also
act as a benchmark for similar reports in the future. There are ten (and four associate)
bridges across England established by Arts Council England (ACE) for an initial three years.
The report was compiled during June 2012 by Catherine M Davis.
Data in this report is historic (typically from 2009-2011).
The main body of the report discusses the background to establishment of the Norfolk &
Norwich Festival (Bridge) and the process by which this report was prepared; provides
background information to the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area, including statistical
data, deals with education, schools and children and young people; and discusses the
cultural sector – arts, museums and libraries
Separate Appendices contains detailed individual responses which contain practical
information, further contacts, opportunities and potential concerns, an area analysis of
background concerns in relation to children and young people and cultural opportunities or
provision, lists the names of those who contributed to the research and the organisations
they represent and tables of schools and cultural venues in the bridge area and beyond.
[The report is intended to provide a body of evidence: it deliberately does not seek to make
recommendations.]
7 | P a g e
The overarching themes of the evidence presented in the report are
• Diversity - in several senses. The area contains centres of population which are
prosperous and highly educated, which have rich and varied cultural provision (and
significant support), while other urban areas can present significant challenges
associated with multiple deprivation. The bridge wide area also contains many rural
locations. These are by no means uniform either, in terms of the social and
educational challenges they face. However rural areas do typically present particular
challenges in terms of isolation, poor infrastructure, widespread perceptions that
provision is concentrated in urban centres, limited access to the arts, and poor public
transport provision, therefore making it very difficult for children and young people to
travel to where cultural opportunities are
• Educational aspiration and attainment can be low in significant parts the area
covered by the report. While (with the exception of Peterborough) the area has a
lower than English national average BME population there are still significant minority
populations, and multiple education challenges. The latter was widely commented
upon.
• The long-term sustainability of provision was also widely commented upon; and there
was evidence of some scepticism about the viability of relatively short timeframe
projects.
• Partnership working should be a major objective for the bridge. There are already
significant networks whose work could be supported, and duplication should be
avoided. The bridge needs to support this activity though good communications and
information provision alongside the high visibility and involvement of the bridge staff.
The evidence received suggested there was mixed achievement on partnership
working to date – but with considerable strength and success in some areas. The risk
is that poor networking activity leaves arts bodies, in particular, isolated and robs
them of real opportunities to work with schools or other groups.
• Underpinning all of the above is the financial resources to enable work to be initiated
or continued. For many interviewees their emphasis was how the bridge can help
them by supporting or advising on funding applications. While for ACE, in particular,
commissioning is seen as a key opportunity for the cultural sector in the long term.
The reality of people’s and organisations’ experience does not match this ambition
and much work may need to be done by the bridge working on partnership with local
authorities and others to help the sector develop the necessary expertise to access
and secure such funding.
The area contains examples of world-class quality in cultural provision and
performance, but much of the region is functionally remote from that.
The bridge faces major challenges in building on and spreading existing quality
provision in what is likely to be a very challenging public funding environment in the
foreseeable future.
This report does not provide an answer to those challenges, but it does seek to
provide a body of evidence about the area to help the bridge in its work going
forward.
8 | P a g e
3. Arts Council England and the Bridge organisations
“Arts Council England has long supported art and arts organisations that work
with children and young people in order to improve access and increase
participation. In November 2010 Arts Council published its 10-year strategic
framework, *Achieving Great Art for Everyone, which included the goal that
‘Every child and young person should experience the richness of the arts’. This
goal has two priorities: to improve the delivery of art opportunities in a more
coherent way; and to raise the standard of art being produced for, with and by
children and young people”. (Arts Council England [ACE] website).
ACE has funded the bridges from the 1st April 2012 to help achieve the above goal. The
bridge organisations will use their ‘experience and expertise to connect children and young
people, schools and communities with art and culture’. Their activity will be supported by
bringing together a range of organisations including National portfolio organisations (NPOs),
arts organisations, museums, libraries and other cultural partners.
The Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) will work in the geographic area that includes the
county or unitary local authorities of Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, Peterborough and Suffolk.
(The other half of the East of England will be covered by the Royal Opera House (Bridge))
which will work in the geographic area that includes county or unitary local authorities of
Borough of Bedford, Central Bedfordshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Borough of Luton, Borough
of Southend on Sea, Borough of Thurrock and parts of North Kent).
The Arts Council1 has laid down the following objectives for the Bridge organisations:
• To build on the good practice already happening but also to establish a sound
evidence base. They will build and facilitate networks across the arts, culture and
education to make sure that there's an ongoing dialogue.
• To be the first point of contact for schools that are developing their arts and
cultural offer. They will help schools identify and access the right arts and cultural
opportunities, and help them bring their views into local cultural planning.
• To help National portfolio organisations and other arts and cultural
organisations, including museums and libraries, bring the cultural experiences that
they offer to more children and young people. Bridge organisations will help them to
connect with schools and to identify opportunities for new commissions.
• To help National portfolio organisations and other arts and cultural organisations to
identify investment opportunities from local authorities, local businesses, trusts
and foundations, so that they can enhance the offer they make to children,
young people and families.
1 www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/pdf/briefing_bridge_organisations_180711.pdf
9 | P a g e
• To develop the reach of arts and cultural experiences and the numbers of
people engaging with them through Artsmark and Arts Award. They will help to
balance the need for universal access to Artsmark and Arts Award with the targeted
development of both schemes.
• To support the Arts Council's ambition to raise the quality of work for by and
with children and young people. Arts Council England will play a facilitation role,
consulting and working through National portfolio organisations and the wider sector
to develop a shared understanding of how the quality of experience for children and
young people and families can be judged.
• To support the work of the new music education hubs and National Plan for Music
Education.
The Arts Council has also said that it is not “expecting bridge organisations to directly deliver
arts and cultural opportunities for children and young people as part of their role. Bridge
funding relates just to bridge activities. Bridge organisations also receive National portfolio
funding to produce and present art. Some bridge organisations will continue to deliver arts
opportunities to children and young people as part of their core business, distinct from their
bridge role. Bridge organisations may help to deliver opportunities for children and young
people with other agencies and organisations (for example by modelling or piloting ways of
working that directly benefit other arts and cultural organisations) in order to increase the
capacity and long-term sustainability of the sector”.2
3.1 Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) Audit
To support the initial establishment of the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge), and gain
understanding of the area’s activity and needs, an audit was commissioned between March
and April 2012. This research into arts and cultural provision, in relation to Children and
Young People (CYP) and their families, was also to enable the Norfolk & Norwich Festival
(Bridge) to take forward its planning and work programme. The work was principally
intended to be an intelligence gathering exercise and involved potential partners from arts
organisations, local authorities, museums, library services, third sector and youth
organisations from across the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area.
That research followed part of the model developed for the Royal Opera House (Bridge) so
that the two bridge organisations, that together cover the East of England, could directly
compare their findings and pattern of activity if they chose to. The audit was a confidential
document that provided Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) with details of partners’ activity,
resources, opportunities, concerns and ambitions to help provide the bridge staff with a
starting point for their own orientation, research and planning. Opportunities and suggestions
for where the early work of the bridge might focus were also contained in the report.
Consultees were told that the bridge staff would use the findings as a basis for further
conversations, research and joint working.
2 www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/our-priorities-2011-15/children-and-young-people/bridge-
organisations
10 | P a g e
3.2 Background to the Audit Process
To provide the platform for the information gathering, a questionnaire was drawn up based
on the information that Nicola Peacock, Director of Participation and Engagement at Norfolk
& Norwich Festival (Bridge) required. The document covered the following subjects:
• People and contacts
• Networks
• Strategic direction
• Research and consultation
• Resources and commissioning
• Children and young people
• Outside agencies
• Key messages to the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)
Two versions of the form were produced, one for local authorities and one for all other
organisations. These were sent out to a range of contacts in the county areas of
Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Suffolk and the unitary authority of Peterborough. These
contacts included:
• Local authority arts, libraries and museum services
• National Portfolio Organisations (NPOs)
• Ex-Regularly Funded Organisations (ex-RFOs)
• Independent Museums
• Other professional arts organisations
• Youth organisations
• Cultural and Arts Trusts
• Third sector organisations
• University funded cultural providers
Schools were not directly approached as this was beyond the scope of the research, given
the time available. However, local authority colleagues provided a considerable amount of
schools and education information, which was supplemented by additional information from
websites and elsewhere. Information about schools and the educational picture was also
provided by other respondees who work closely with them, including museums, libraries and
arts organisations.
In all 117 people were approached. 31 were interviewed directly and 23 submitted
completed forms. In one or two cases the same person completed interviews for two
different organisations. Of the remaining 63, some were people who passed the form onto
more appropriate colleagues while others were too busy to respond.
Appendix 1 contains publicly available versions of those interviews. People were asked for
their permission to use them, once any confidential material had been removed. In some
cases those interviewed did not want their information made public, nor did they wish to be
quoted at any point in the State of the Region report.
Since the audit brief was set, the purpose and partners of the bridges have changed
significantly e.g. film and heritage have been added. Moreover at the time the audit was
11 | P a g e
undertaken, the Music Education Hubs had not been announced and the applications to
Creative People and Places were being drafted.
3.3 State of the Region Report
Following the completion of the audit, ACE requested that each bridge produce a State of
the Region Report which would be publicly available. This State of the Region Report draws
on information from the audit, but also includes additional statistical information from Arts
Council England’s Cultural Education Profile Tool and LEP profile information produced by
the Office for National Statistics.
The State of the Region Report will attempt to cover the current state of play, but as the
picture in the cultural and educational sectors is a constantly evolving and dynamic process
at the moment, it will inevitably be something of a snapshot as well.
12 | P a g e
4. Background information to the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area
Unlike the other nine bridge areas which match the regional pattern, the East of England has
been split into two and is covered by two organisations. The Royal Opera House (Bridge)
covers the south of the region (but also includes parts of Kent) while Norfolk & Norwich
Festival (Bridge) covers the northern part of the East of England region.
Source: http://www.eastex.org.uk/east/
The Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area includes the counties of Cambridgeshire,
Norfolk and Suffolk. The unitary authority of Peterborough is also included, but it sits within
the historical county boundary of Cambridgeshire. So effectively the area covers much of
East Anglia.
However it must also be recognised that organisations and individuals do not operate within
strictly laid out administrative boundaries; instead they work with partners locally, across the
bridge area and much further afield. Schools and other organisations, who sit on the
boundary of any particular area inevitably, make use of the opportunities close to them,
wherever they are. This is particularly so in the case of museums and arts organisations who
have a unique or limited offer. Their interaction will take place with partners, audiences and
organisations from much further afield.
13 | P a g e
4.1 East of England
The East of England was described in the Regional Economic Strategy in 2004 in the
following terms:
“The East of England is one of the largest and most diverse regions in the United Kingdom
and comprises the six counties of Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Essex, Hertfordshire,
Norfolk and Suffolk. It is the second largest region in England with an area of 19,110 sq km.
Compared with other English regions there are fewer large cities and no obvious regional
capital. The region has a significant rural landscape, and is home to around a fifth of
England’s market towns. On the doorstep is London, a world city. Mainland Europe is only a
short journey away, and the region contains a number of important international gateways
and transport corridors of national significance.
As with elsewhere in the country, the demographic make-up of the region is changing with
an increasingly ageing population, especially in the coastal areas. Although the region
benefits from net in-migration, there is a significant out-migration in the 15-24 age groups.
There is also a steady growth in the region’s black and minority ethnic population, although
this population is distributed unevenly across the region and its size is below the UK
average.
The region has a significant concentration of internationally important businesses engaged in
research and development and houses over 30 of the world’s leading research centres. In
line with the trend in many western countries, there has been a clear structural change in the
UK, away from employment in manufacturing and towards employment in the service sector.
The growth of the knowledge economy is also associated with the emergence of a dual
labour market, with knowledge jobs and lower level jobs created simultaneously.
Globalisation is another major influencing factor on the future economic and social
environment within which the East of England is operating.
Globalisation of the labour market has a direct influence on employment in the region. The
region boasts a number of important transport gateways that link the region to continental
Europe and beyond. The economy of the East of England is also inextricably linked to the
economies of the neighbouring regions, nationally and internationally. The region plays an
important role in complementing and enhancing the position of London.
There is a need to ensure that the gap between wealthy and poor neighbourhoods does not
widen in the region as income inequalities between the rich and poor have tended to
increase in the developed world in the last 20 years”.
www.insighteast.org.uk/WebDocuments/Public/approved/user_9/full%20RES.pdf
While this description covered the whole of the East of England and was written before the
economic downturn, it still largely holds true and is a useful introduction Norfolk & Norwich
Festival (Bridge) area.
14 | P a g e
4.2 Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area
More useful background information about the area is available in The East of England
Implementation Plan, which was published in February 2010. This provides additional detail
about some of the local sub-regions within the Bridge area. While this information may seem
far removed from the body of the rest of this report, it serves as a useful background briefing
before examining individual subject areas, such as population, employment, ethnicity, and
data about children and young people (CYP), in more detail later on. Much of what is said in
the East of England Implementation Plan reflects information provided by many of those
interviewed.
www.insighteast.org.uk/WebDocuments/Public/approved/user_9/East_of_England_Impleme
ntation_Plan_WEB.pdf
A full break down of the areas of need, identified in the course of the audit research, is given
in Appendix 2.
4.3 Greater Cambridge
The economic footprint covers parts of nine districts; Cambridge City, South
Cambridgeshire, East Cambridgeshire, Huntingdonshire, Fenland, St Edmundsbury, Forest
Heath (Uttlesford and North Hertfordshire which fall outside the Norfolk & Norwich Festival
(Bridge) area). It is a centre of excellence and a world leader in higher education and
research. This has led to the attraction of world-class research institutes and science bases,
globally significant information and communications technologies and biotechnology
clusters, corporate and/or research and development functions of multi-national
corporations, and a strong presence of professional service, legal and consultancy
companies and networks. Taken with the historic character and setting of Cambridge and
the surrounding market towns, this provides an important basis for future development.
There is likely to be focus for growth in and around the built-up area of Cambridge, the new
settlement of Northstowe, market towns and other key centres.
4.4 Norwich
This vibrant city has an extensive cultural, leisure, sports and heritage offer. It has the
largest collection of heritage assets of any UK city outside of London and access to the
Broads and the Norfolk coast. The number of people working in the Norwich area makes it
the largest labour market in the East of England. Norwich is also the fifth most popular retail
centre in England. The area’s economic strengths include a diverse economic base with
existing and emerging sectoral strengths in finance and business services, a significant
cluster of creative industries in the region, food processing, environment and bioscience and
automotive engineering. Norwich supports more than 50 regional or national headquarters
and has an international reputation for research and development and higher education. The
Cities Outlook 2009 report ranked Norwich as having the UK’s fourth highest percentage of
employment in knowledge intensive businesses in the country, after Oxford, Cambridge and
Reading.
15 | P a g e
4.5 Peterborough
This major regional centre and gateway has an influence that extends into the East Midlands
region. It has a strategic location on the national road and rail network, allowing easy access
to national and international destinations. More than 6,000 companies are located within
Peterborough, including some with their regional and international headquarters based in the
city. Peterborough and the city has experienced high levels of in-migration in recent years.
There are plans for improvements in the urban fabric and renewal of the city centre, new
housing and investment in new educational and training opportunities, including the
development of a university.
4.6 Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft
The area has significant strengths, including an attractive biodiversity, landscape and
coastline, which provide major tourism opportunities and a unique built heritage and history.
There are emerging economic catalysts in Great Yarmouth. Challenges include inadequate
road and rail connectivity to other areas and a perceived poor image, which reduces the
attractiveness of both towns for new business investment. There are high levels of
deprivation, with average earnings below both county and regional averages, and below
average percentages of the population with NVQ4 or above qualifications. Significant
numbers have no formal qualifications at all.
4.7 Haven Gateway
The sub-region is one of the key international gateways to the UK, containing the
internationally significant Haven Ports, principally Felixstowe, Harwich and Ipswich. Its
growth and infrastructure are therefore of national significance to the well-being of the
regional and national economy. Ipswich is also in the Haven Gateway. The area is also
defined by its market and coastal towns and its high-quality rural hinterland, which includes a
series of nationally and internationally important landscape and ecological designations. Skill
levels are poor. The transport infrastructure is similar to that of Great Yarmouth and
Lowestoft.
4.8 North/West Norfolk and West Suffolk
This area includes the three distinct centres of King's Lynn, Thetford and Bury St Edmunds
and their largely rural hinterlands, including the North Norfolk Coast. The area reflects the
location of a number of smaller market towns each with a rural hinterland that share some
similar challenges (although they are distinctive in their own right, for example the coastal
issues faced by places like King's Lynn or Cromer). Much of the area is rural in nature and
includes a number of high-quality protected landscapes and habitats. Agriculture and tourism
remain important sectors, even though there is a desire to move away from a low-wage
economy to higher-skilled employment.
The area also has strong functional links with the neighbouring settlements of Cambridge,
Norwich, Ipswich and Peterborough and this presents particular opportunities and
challenges.
16 | P a g e
The past designation of King’s Lynn, Thetford and Haverhill as London over-spill towns has
left a legacy of concentrations of deprivation and a reliance on larger employers that have
been vulnerable to global economic pressures. Provision of transport is a key priority while
power supply is also a significant constraint to growth in all areas. The area has significant
natural resources important for biodiversity, recreation and tourism. The Brecks, Thetford
Forest, the Fens, the Wash and the North Norfolk Coast are regionally and internationally
important areas for wildlife conservation. Whilst small firms are prevalent in North Norfolk,
King’s Lynn has suffered from the loss of employment in larger firms.
4.9 Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEP)
“Local enterprise partnerships are led by local authorities and businesses across natural
economic areas. They provide the vision, knowledge and strategic leadership needed to
drive sustainable private sector growth and job creation in their area”. Source:www.bis.gov.uk/policies/economic-development/leps
The Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area is covered by two LEP’s, Greater Cambridge
and Greater Peterborough and New Anglia. The bridge area borders the Hertfordshire and
South East LEPS in Royal Opera House (Bridge) area, and the Greater Lincolnshire,
Northamptonshire and South East Midlands LEP’s outside the East of England.
Table 1
Local authority LEP membership in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (bridge) area
The breakdown of LEP membership is shown below:
LEP LA (District/ Unitary) covered (spatially)
In multiple LEPs
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough Cambridge 0
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough Peterborough 0
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough Huntingdonshire 0
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough Fenland 0
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough East Cambridgeshire 0
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough Rutland 0
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough South Cambridgeshire 0
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough King's Lynn and West Norfolk
1
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough Forest Heath 1
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough North Hertfordshire 1
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough St Edmundsbury 1
Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough Uttlesford 1
New Anglia Babergh 0
New Anglia Broadland 0
New Anglia Great Yarmouth 0
New Anglia King's Lynn and West Norfolk 1
New Anglia North Norfolk 0
New Anglia St Edmundsbury 1
New Anglia Suffolk Coastal 0
New Anglia Waveney 0
17 | P a g e
LEP LA (District/ Unitary) covered (spatially)
In multiple LEPs
New Anglia Breckland 0
New Anglia Forest Heath 1
New Anglia Ipswich 0
New Anglia Mid Suffolk 0
New Anglia South Norfolk 0
New Anglia Norwich 0 1. For a LA (District/ Unitary) to be covered by a LEP either the LA (District/ Unitary) or the LA (County/ Unitary), in which the
LA (District/ Unitary) sits, must be full members of the LEP. If the LA (County/ Unitary) is a full member only the LA (District/
Unitary) stated in the LEP application are included (not the necessarily the entirety of the LA (County/ Unitary)). Therefore a list
of LA (District/ Unitary) covered by LEPs does not necessarily align with membership.
2. Those Local Authorities which are coloured in pink overlap with another LEP.
3. 37 local authorities (11 per cent) are covered by two LEPs and in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area these include:
Forest Heath, King's Lynn and West Norfolk and St Edmundsbury. Care should be taken when trying to calculate an all LEPs
total to ensure no double counting is involved. Local authorities in more than one LEP should only be included once.
www.bis.gov.uk/policies/economic-development/leps/statistics
4.10 Greater Cambridge and Greater Peterborough
This LEP is focused on helping to drive forward sustainable economic growth with local
business, education providers, the third sector and the public sector working together to
achieve this. The goal is to create an economy with 100,000 major businesses and create
160,000 new jobs by 2025, in an internationally significant low carbon, knowledge-based
economy balanced wherever possible with advanced manufacturing and services. The
strategic areas of focus are:
• Skills and employment
• Strategic economic vision, infrastructure, housing and planning
• Economic development and support for high growth business
• Funding, including EU funding, regional growth funding and private sector funding
The area currently has a population of 1.3 million people, which is estimated to grow to 1.5
million by 2031. The area boasts 700,000 jobs, 60,000 enterprises and generates £30 billion
per annum. However there is no mention of arts, culture, tourism, libraries, museums,
schools or education on the LEP website.
18 | P a g e
Source: www.yourlocalenterprisepartnership.co.uk
Greater Cambridge and Greater Peterborough includes a wide range of partners from the
following sectors:
• Local business including small business through to multi-national corporations
• Public sector which is represented by local authorities listed above and central
government departments
• Education providers from both the Further and Higher education sectors
• Third sector from volunteer groups through to social enterprises
Unfortunately the Greater Cambridge and Greater Peterborough LEP does not list its
members, so it is not possible to provide a list of those organisations in membership who
might be of interest to the bridge to compare with those on the New Anglia LEP list.
4.11 New Anglia
The New Anglia LEP is developing an approach to grow the Norfolk and Suffolk economy by
encouraging businesses to create jobs for the future. The two counties have similar
strengths and challenges. There are 60,000 enterprises in Suffolk and Norfolk and a
population of 1.5 million, Tourism and Energy are just two examples of major sectors which
employ significant numbers of people, bring wealth to the local economy and have the
potential to grow. However, Suffolk and Norfolk have below national average skills, poor
infrastructure and deprivation in urban, rural and coastal areas.
19 | P a g e
The LEP’s priorities are tourism, energy and business support. These offer real and
immediate potential for growth and job creation, especially for small and medium sized
enterprises.
Source: www.newanglia.co.uk
New Anglia Members, of particular interest to the bridge, include:
• Bressingham Steam Museum www.bressingham.co.uk
• City College Norwich www.ccn.ac.uk
• College of West Anglia www.cwa.ac.uk
• DanceEast www.danceeast.co.uk
• East Norfolk Sixth Form College www.enorf.ac.uk
• Easton College http://www.easton-college.ac.uk
• Lowestoft Sixth Form College www.l6fc.org
• Norfolk & Norwich Festival www.nnfestival.org.uk
• Norwich Theatre Royal www.theatreroyalnorwich.co.uk
• Norwich University College of the Arts www.nuca.ac.uk
• Otley College www.otleycollege.ac.uk
• Paston Sixth Form College http://www.paston.ac.uk
• University Campus Suffolk www.ucs.ac.uk/home.aspx
• University of East Anglia www.uea.ac.uk
• West Suffolk College www.westsuffolk-ac.co.uk
20 | P a g e
5. Statistical data on the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area
5.1 Population
Table 2
Total 0-19 male & female population and 20+ (m&f) population by area + population
density + ethnicity + SEN, 2010
AREA 0-19 M
(,000s)
0-19 F
(,000s)
20+
M&F
(,000s)
Total
%0-19
of
total
Pop
Dens
Ethnicity-
BME
@KS4%
SEN%
Cambridgeshire 74.8 70.2 455.2 600.2 24.16% n/a 8.1 23.9
Cambridge City 13.6 13.1 92.3 119 22.44% 3089
East Cambs 10.3 9.7 62.2 82.2 24.33% 130
Fenland 10.5 10.2 68.3 89 23.26% 168
Huntingdonshire 21.9 19.7 126.1 167.7 24.81% 185
South Cambs 18.5 17.5 106.3 142.3 25.30% 162
Peterborough 23 21.9 130 174.9 25.67% 505 22.5 25.9
Norfolk 94.2 89.5 663.3 847 21.69% n/a 5.6 21.0
Broadland 13.6 12.8 95.7 122.1 21.62% 224
Breckland 14.8 14 101.2 130 22.15% 100
Great Yarmouth 10.8 10.5 76.4 97.7 21.80% 559
King’s Lynn &
West Norfolk
16.2 15.2 107.5 138.9 22.61% 101
North Norfolk 10 9.3 81.1 100.4 19.22% 105
Norwich City 14.3 14.1 110.6 139 20.43% 3677
South Norfolk 14.5 13.6 90.8 118.9 23.63% 134
Suffolk 85.9 80.7 540.8 707.4 23.55% n/a 5.3 19.8
Babergh 10.4 9.8 66.3 86.5 23.35% 144
Forest Heath 8.5 8 46.2 62.7 26.32% 170
Ipswich 15.8 14.7 95.1 125.6 24.28% 3254
Mid Suffolk 11.2 10.3 66.5 88 24.43% 109
St Edmundsbury 12.6 11.6 79.6 103.8 23.31% 159
Suffolk Coastal 14.2 13.6 96 123.8 22.46% 139
21 | P a g e
AREA 0-19 M
(,000s)
0-19 F
(,000s)
20+
M&F
(,000s)
Total
%0-19
of
total
Pop
Dens
Ethnicity-
BME
@KS4%
SEN%
Waveney 13.2 12.7 91.1 117 22.14% 317
ENGLAND 401 17.3 21.3
Notes to Table 2
Population density = persons per square kilometre; source ONS LEP Profiles
5.2 What are the key messages from Table 2?
Table 2 provides detailed population data (for males and female groups aged 0-19, all
person aged 20+, and all population) for all areas. The three county areas number between
600,000 and 850,000 people (Peterborough 175,000). The highest proportion of young
people (nearly 26%) is in Peterborough. North Norfolk has the lowest share of young people
and anecdotally (interview evidence) this is at least partly attributed to high numbers of
retirees.
The population density varies very significantly. As would be expected the County ‘towns’
have high densities; all over 3,000 per sq kilometre, and Great Yarmouth and Peterborough
are in an intermediary position at about 500. The whole area is otherwise marked by a low
population density, substantially below the English average of 401. The lowest densities are
about 100, in Breckland, King’s Lynn, North Norfolk and Mid Suffolk.
Ethnicity (BME) data shows that areas across the region have substantially lower BME
population shares than the English average of 17.3% (NB this is data sampled at KS4).
Peterborough is a strong exception, at 22.5%.
Special education needs assessment data varies marginally across the areas covered but is
broadly consistent with the English average.
5.3 Poverty and unemployment
Table 3
Youth unemployment + Poverty + unemployment + Index of Multiple Deprivation data
+ educational attainment.
Area Youth
unemployed
% Children
in poverty
%
Unemployment
Index of
mult. dep.
NVQ4+
%
Cambridgeshire
Cambridge City 23.6 16.8 5.6 15.50 50.7
East Cambs 27.7 10.9 8.8 10.41 35.8
Fenland 30.9 19.8 6.3 22.27 14.9
Huntingdonshire 26.9 11.0 6.4 10.55 28.4
South Cambs 22.8 8.0 5.1 7.11 45.3
Peterborough 27.4 24.0 9.2 25.63 22.9
22 | P a g e
Area Youth
unemployed
% Children
in poverty
%
Unemployment
Index of
mult. dep.
NVQ4+
%
Norfolk
Broadland 29.5 9.8 3.0 10.41 26.0
Breckland 29.3 14.8 7.1 15.91 17.4
Great Yarmouth 28.1 24.3 7.8 27.66 14.1
King’s Lynn &
West Norfolk
27.8 17.9 9.4 21.05 23.9
North Norfolk 27.3 16.2 3.2 19.28 24.6
Norwich City 29.9 29.6 7.7 25.65 39.1
South Norfolk 28.4 11.1 8.8 13.31 30.6
Suffolk
Babergh 27.0 11.6 3.6 12.59 23.7
Forest Heath 28.6 14.5 3.7 13.28 24.7
Ipswich 28.0 21.7 9.0 24.82 28.9
Mid Suffolk 29.0 9.2 4.8 10.23 29.0
St Edmundsbury 28.6 11.4 8.4 13.49 27.6
Suffolk Coastal 29.3 10.5 5.2 11.41 35.2
Waveney 32.4 21.2 4.4 22.08 18.8
England 26.6 20.9 7.5 19.15 31.3
Notes to table 3
Data not shown at County level.
Youth unemployment = share of JSA claimants aged 24 and under as percentage of all JSA
claimants
Children in poverty = under 16’s in low income households as percentage of all households
NVQ4+ shows percentage of persons 16-64 with NVQ level 4 and above educational
attainment.
People are counted as being qualified to level 4 or above if they have achieved a first or higher degree, National Vocational Qualification (NVQ) level 4 or 5, a recognised degree-level professional qualification an Higher National Certificate(HNC)/Higher National Diploma (HND) or other higher-level vocational or management qualification, a teaching or nursing qualification; or a diploma in Higher Education (HE).
5.4 What are the key messages from Table 3?
Table 3 demonstrates the diverse challenges across the areas in terms of poverty,
unemployment, deprivation and educational achievement.
Outside Cambridge and South Cambs youth unemployment rates are above the English
average of 26.6%.
Norwich City has the highest recorded relative concentration of child poverty, but Great
Yarmouth is also significantly above the national English average.
Unemployment rates vary substantially across the areas covered and can be above the
English average at the time of the survey, of 7.5%. Similarly the index of multiple deprivation
data shows significant variations above and below the English average; Great Yarmouth is,
23 | P a g e
on this count, the most deprived area in the East of England, followed by Norwich,
Peterborough, Ipswich, Fenland and Waveney.
Great Yarmouth also shows the poorest educational achievement at NVQ level 4; at 14.1%
under half the English average of 31%, closely followed by Fenland, Breckland and
Waveney. The City of Cambridge, by contrast, along with South Cambs, do exceptionally
well at 51% and 45%.
24 | P a g e
6. County Analysis by local authority areas
The Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) will work across four top tier local authorities. These
are the counties of Cambridge, Norfolk and Suffolk and the unitary authority of
Peterborough. In addition the bridge will work with five borough or district authorities in
Cambridgeshire, seven in Norfolk and seven in Suffolk. The county areas are served by two
tier local authority delivery that between them provide the full range of local authority
services. In the unitary authority of Peterborough, all the local authority services are provided
by the city council.
Increasingly what were thought of as public services in the past are now being delivered by a
wide range of providers. Examples of these include trusts (delivering cultural services) and
third sector organisations (youth services). At the same time many schools are becoming
academies and so opting out of local education authority control. In some places free
schools are being established which have no formal relationship with the local education
authority. The latter was always the case for independent schools.
This change in delivery providers and structures will continue, which will make partnership
working, in the cultural sector and beyond, increasing complex. The pattern will accelerate
over the next few years if more local authorities seek to become commissioning rather than
delivery organisations. Such trends will be further encouraged by the next Comprehensive
Spending Review in two years time, which is expected to see further reductions in local
authority budgets.
Much of this commissioned work is likely to be with non-cultural services and providers, who
want to include arts or culture in their provision. They may wish to do so because of the body
of evidence which points to the benefits of this type of engagement which other approaches
cannot match. Working with children’s services or adult services groups is already part of the
experience of many of those working in the cultural sector and has been the case a number
of years. Many of the NPOs, arts organisations, libraries and museums interviewed in the
bridge area discussed examples of this type of work. Between them they had experience of
working with, amongst others, young offenders, young prisoners, young carers, Looked After
Children and children with special needs.
Localism too may offer opportunities as budgets, decision making and services are devolved
to much more local levels. This is already apparent in the approach some library services
are taking and in South Cambridgeshire, for example, where a Parish Council is employing a
youth worker.
While complicated, this picture may offer additional opportunities to cultural organisations
across the spectrum of arts, libraries, museums and (although not part of the ACE remit)
archive services as well. However it is likely that the greatest success will be for those who
are aware of such trends and who work in partnership with a range of cultural partners both
locally and possibly further afield.
The Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) in its strategic lead role should be well placed to
support the sector to take advantage of these changes.
25 | P a g e
7. Cambridgeshire
Cambridgeshire borders Lincolnshire to the north, Norfolk to the northeast, Suffolk to the
east, Essex and Hertfordshire to the south and Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire to the
west. Five District or Borough councils are included within the administrative county of
Cambridgeshire. These are Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council,
Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council, and South Cambridgeshire
District Council. The unitary authority of Peterborough sits within the historical county
boundary as well. Peterborough will be dealt with separately in a section 8.0.
Source: www.recap.co.uk/business-waste/recycling-services-directory
Cambridgeshire is a county of contrasts. It is very rich in cultural provision in Cambridge and
South Cambridgeshire, but other areas of the county are less well served, particularly the
further north one goes. The City of Cambridge is particularly rich in opportunities as six of
the county’s seven NPOs, as well as other high quality arts organisations, are based there
alongside the Universities of Cambridge and Anglia Ruskin. Cambridge University is not only
a world leader in higher education and research, but offers a wealth of cultural opportunities,
including eight museums, which are open to the public. These all have strong education and
learning programmes associated with them.
26 | P a g e
7.1 Statistics
The split described above, which is based on audit interviews, is supported by the statistical
data. For example in table 3 Cambridge, South Cambridgeshire and East Cambridgeshire
have the first, second and fourth highest levels of NVQ4+ in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival
(Bridge) at 50.7% , 45.3% and 35.8%. This is against an English average of 31.3 and
perhaps not terribly surprising when one considers that the University of Cambridge, its
science and research parks and associated staff and their families are in those local
authority areas. However Cambridgeshire also has the second lowest figure on this measure
in Fenland’s 14.9%. Huntingdonshire too is below the English average at 28.4%, although
this is more in line with the majority of the bridge local authority areas.
The same split can be seen in the index of multiple deprivation figures with South
Cambridgeshire’s figure of 7.11 and East Cambridgeshire’s 10.55 against Fenland’s of
22.27. The English average is 19.15. Interestingly Cambridge City is 15.50 on this measure,
and its ‘children in poverty’ figure of 16.8% is second only to Fenland’s, the highest in the
area, at 19.8% (although both of these are below the English average of 20.9%).
These figures pick up an important point and that is how people feel relatively to their local
area rather than to the much wider picture. Interviewees highlighted parts of Cambridge City
as areas of concern which had little on offer for CYP and their families. This was set against
the richness of what Cambridge has for those who are confident or affluent enough to
access it. However when compared to the lack of opportunity, infrastructure or provision
elsewhere in the bridge area it does not look so bad. For an organisation which has to take a
wider view trying to balance those demands will be a challenge for the bridge.
Fenland also has the highest youth unemployment figure at 30.9%, the second highest in the
bridge area. The figures for Cambridge City and South Cambs are 23.6% and 22.8% against
an English average of 26.6%. However in terms of adult unemployment East
Cambridgeshire has the highest figure of 8.8%, the fourth highest across the bridge area.
7.2 Service Provision
The County Council offices in Cambridge provide a base for the County Arts Development
Officer and the County Museums Development Officer. The County Music Service
successfully led on the Cambridgeshire Music Hub bid. The County Library Service had
been exploring the option of trust status, alongside other cultural providers. However this
process was halted by the Leader of the Council. The Library Service is now exploring the
option of community hubs. In the longer term, the future of some libraries may be under
threat and one possibility might be that the parishes will take them over and run them with
volunteers. Currently there are 45 static libraries while 244 villages, hamlets or other areas
are covered by mobile library service stops.
The City of Cambridge has an Arts and Events team which manages events (many of them
large scale) and venues, as well as supporting arts development. South Cambridgeshire has
an arts service partially based at the district council and partially in the village colleges
through stART’s network of five Arts Development Manger posts. This group delivers within
27 | P a g e
the village colleges and to the local community and their role includes arts development as
well.
East Cambridgeshire’s arts provision is delivered through ADEC, an independent company
limited by guarantee and a registered charity with funding from East Cambridgeshire District
Council. The quality of ADEC’s offer is very high, although the district suffers from some of
the cultural infrastructure and other problems identified in the remainder of the county
outside Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire.
The remainder of Cambridgeshire is much less well served in both arts services and arts
infrastructure. Fenland and Huntingdonshire districts have no arts team and apart from
museums and libraries, there is little other cultural infrastructure. These two districts were
identified as areas of great need by others in the county, as there are few opportunities for
CYP and what exists is often not of high quality. The anecdotal evidence from the interviews
is backed up for Fenland by the statistics in tables 2 and 3.
There are a range of museums across the county which include 8 University museums, 10
small museums and 10 voluntary (5 of which have education officers). They all work closely
with the County Museum Development Officer. The county has 27 accredited museums.
There are a range of cultural networks in Cambridgeshire which include Cambridge
Museums Advisory Partnership, Cultural Task Group, Cambridge Arts Network and
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Arts Development Officers Group. There is also the
Regional Learning Network for museums which is East of England wide. Unfortunately some
of those in the arts who could benefit from being part of wider networks do not seem to be
part of these. Which brings one back to the point at the beginning of the area analysis that
the county is only partially joined up and cultural provision remains partial.
In the well resourced areas the arts teams regard the bridge as someone to work with but
find it more difficult to see what the bridge can offer that is not already provided for in
Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire (although they do envisage a role for the bridge in
offering support and opportunities in Fenland and Huntingdonshire). There is some cross
border working amongst this group notably the stART Arts Development Managers (ADMs)
some of whom have links to Peterborough. ADEC works outside East Cambs (although not
in the City of Cambridge) if appropriate funding is secured, but the organisation is not in the
same position as the two local authority arts services to take on projects or partnership
working. The lack of district arts or cultural structure to link to in some areas makes is more
difficult for the County Arts Officer to work there, although of course the officer has good
links with schools and education. The latter is a key driver of the County Arts Development
Officer’s work.
Several of the arts organisations and museums are keen to widen their remit to work with
partners in Peterborough, Norfolk and Suffolk, but this is dependent on funding being
secured. However there are parts of Cambridgeshire that could benefit from their expertise
and high quality offer. In the long term helping these organisations embed opportunities and
provision in such areas could have a very beneficial effect on sustainability of provision.
Although Peterborough is a unitary authority, which sits outside Cambridgeshire, it too would
benefit from a similar approach in accessing others expertise. This would both be for the city
itself, which appears to need support in developing its cultural provision, and for the
28 | P a g e
residents in areas such as Fenland, as they are more likely to visit Peterborough than
Cambridge.
Key meetings in Cambridgeshire are: Cambridge Museums Advisory Partnership, Cultural
Task Group, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Arts Development Officers Group and
museums Regional Learning Network.
7.3 Background concerns from audit interviews
Table 4
Lack of provision by geographic area and factors affecting CYP and their families in
Cambridgeshire
The table below draws together comments from interviewees about the geographic areas in
Cambridgeshire where they feel there are deprivation issues or concerns about cultural
provision for CYP and their families. It also lists other factors that they felt negatively affect
CYP’s quality of life, including their engagement with cultural opportunities and problems
affecting their educational opportunities.
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
Cambridgeshire Places in need
• Fenland both the district and
the geographical area as these
are both very rural.
• North Huntingdonshire.
• East Cambridgeshire.
• Parts of Cambridge including
Chesterton and Arbury.
• Area to the east of north
Cambridge.
• Wisbech, in Fenland is one of
the most deprived bits of the
county.
• Fens.
• East Cambridge.
North Cambridge.
• Need to address lack of dance
provision in Fenland and South
Cambridgeshire.
City of Cambridge Places in need
• Wards to the north of
Cambridge are the most
deprived.
• Arbury, King’s Hedges,
Chesterton have some degree
of deprivation.
• Cherry Hinton falls into the
same category.
Concerns and challenges
• There is a lot of (housing and
population) growth in and
around Cambridge and there
is a mismatch in (service)
• Need to help CYP and their
families to feel connected to the
area that they have come to live
in.
• For young people, much provision
is available in the city centre and
not where they live, so they are
not able to access it.
• Much of the predominant art or
types of art forms in Cambridge
are not very accessible to young
people so they don’t engage with
them.
• In Cambridge a cluster of schools
29 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
provision between the new
neighbourhoods and the
historic centre.
• Some of the council estates
including some of the newer
estates on the outskirts of the
city and which may develop
problems in the longer term as
they do not have much in the
way of infrastructure.
• Cambridge is more than just
the university and for some
city residents the central area,
dominated by the University of
Cambridge and slightly further
out by Anglia Ruskin, can
make them feel ill at ease.
• Community centres in the
neighbourhoods are not well
geared up for the arts.
lack the resources to afford the
educational offer of the museums.
East
Cambridgeshire
Places in need
• North Huntingdonshire around
Yaxley and Ramsey.
Concerns and challenges
• Rural isolation is a problem.
• Local bus services have had
another cut recently.
• This area is very rural with little
cultural provision.
• There are multiple problems of
access, experience, and
aspiration for young people in the
area.
Fenland Places in need
• Rural Fenland.
• Waterlees in Wisbech is a
notable area of deprivation
that has had considerable
resource devoted to it;
however this seems to
produce few results.
Concerns and challenges
• Lacks much high quality arts
provision
• There are not many
professional artists and the
nearest open studios are
Lincolnshire and
Peterborough.
• Poor transport.
• Low aspiration.
• Poor infrastructure.
• A lot of the population don’t
• Poor education.
• Rurally isolated fenland schools.
• There are low achieving schools,
especially in Wisbech. Wisbech
Grammer is an academy. Many of
those who can afford to send their
children to private schools.
• Many young people are affected
by obesity especially those with
nothing much else to do with their
time.
• There is not enough on offer.
• There is a problem relating to
quality as well as quantity. The
quality of experience for CYP
needs improving. If all you see is
what is available on your doorstep
then you aren’t seeing much. It is
difficult to develop an awareness
of quality, and what that means, if
30 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
work and reliance on benefits
is high.
• The area lacks culture and not
many people appear to want it
anyway.
• Sparse population.
• There is a large eastern
European population in
Wisbech.
all you see is the local and often
mediocre.
• The unchallenging nature of what
CYP are being involved in doesn’t
help them develop either their
critical faculties or any skills.
• Commissioning and competition
are affecting the county Youth
Service.
• CYP would benefit from more
dance opportunities.
Huntingdonshire Places in need
• Huntingdon, which has some
serious indices of deprivation.
• South Huntingdonshire has
urban issues, although there is
isolation there as well.
South
Cambridgeshire
Places in need
• Long Stanton is quite industrial
with a lot of young families
passing through on the way to
somewhere else.
• The area around Melbourn, in
common with much of rural
Cambridgeshire, suffers from
isolation where there are no
trains. The bus service is poor
and getting worse.
Concerns and challenges
• Bassingbourn, the Mordens
(several local villages have
Morden in the name) and into
Meldreth have high Traveller
populations.
• Venues can be problem as
they are either 244 seats in
one of the village colleges or a
room in a pub.
• Another issue is the loss of
mobile libraries locally.
• A lot of YP are rurally isolated and
have nothing to do other than
hang about in their local
communities due to the youth
club closures. In some areas the
parish councils are buying in a
youth worker or supporting a local
youth club.
• Relatively high number of split
families. Some of this appears to
be linked to the pressures of the
recent economic problems. This
affects Melbourn, Bassingbourn,
Comberton and Gamlingay.
• Hatton Park School in Long
Stanton is in special measures.
• There are a lot of Traveller
Families in the area and in South
Cambs generally.
• There are a lot of young carers in
Papworth.
• The loss of the Youth Service, or
its narrower targeting on
vulnerable young people. One
result of this narrow focus is the
loss of prevention work with
young people more generally.
• The lack of youth workers
combined with rural isolation and
poor transport infrastructure.
• Poor transport can lead to
exclusion for some groups of
31 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
young people. For example even
with the Guided Bus which is now
operating into Cambridge a young
person faces at least £5 in fares
and £5 to attend an event. This
excludes a lot of young people
especially in the current economic
climate.
• Those areas in South Cambs
which don’t have the Village
Colleges get missed out of the
cultural provision offered by
stART because they are not in
partnership.
• There is youth disengagement.
7.4 Schools
Cambridgeshire has:
• 7 Local authority nursery schools
• 203 Primary schools
• 30 Secondary schools
• 23 Further education/sixth form colleges
• 9 Special Schools
• 24 Independent schools
Table 5
Schools by sector in Cambridgeshire
Cambridgeshire Nursery Primary Secondary FE/Sixth
Form
Special Independent Total
Cambridge City 5 26 6 3 0 17 57
East Cambs 0 27 4 1 2 1 35
Fenland 0 33 4 6 2 2 47
Huntingdonshire 1 60 7 8 2 2 80
South Cambs 1 57 7 5 3 2 75
Total 7 203 30 23 9 24 294
Source: www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/CMSWebsite/Apps/Schools/SchoolSearch.aspx
By March 2012 six primary schools, twenty four secondary schools and one special school
had converted to academies. A further two primaries and four secondary’s had indicated
their intention to convert to academies.
32 | P a g e
7.5 Local authorities and their areas of responsibility
Table 6
Local authority division of responsibility for cultural service delivery
The table below shows the division of responsibility for delivering local authority services in a
two tier structure. It also lists the names and titles of those who contributed to the Norfolk &
Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit and whose information supports this report. An appendix of
the interviews that contributors agreed to make public are contained in Appendix 1.
Local Authority
area
Local authority responsibilities
and contacts from research
Other organisations in the
area and contacts from
research
Cambridgeshire
County Council
Education, libraries, museums
development, heritage, youth
service and music service
Joanne Gray , County Arts
Development Officer
Kate Brown, County Museum
Development Officer
Matthew Gunn, Partnership
Manager, Cambridgeshire Music
Partnership
Cambridge City
Council
Arts and events
Elaine Midgley, Arts & Events
Manager
Michael Garvey, Chief
Executive, Academy of Ancient
Music
Isobel Timms, Creative
Learning Director, Britten
Sinfonia
Sarah Campbell, Education
Officer, Kettle’s Yard
Tamsin Wimhurst, Learning
Officer, Cambridge & County
Folk Museum
Ruth Sapsed, Director,
Cambridge Curiosity and
Imagination
Cat Moore, Producer/ General
Manager, New International
Encounter (NIE)
East
Cambridgeshire
District Council
No arts service The arts service is delivered by
ADEC, a independent company
Jane Wilson, Director, ADEC
33 | P a g e
Local Authority
area
Local authority responsibilities
and contacts from research
Other organisations in the
area and contacts from
research
Sally Austin, Education Officer,
Ely Museum
Fenland District
Council
There is no arts service.
Karen Harvey, Artistic Director,
Atelier East
Huntingdonshire
District Council
No arts service.
Viv Peters, Director, Natural
High
South
Cambridgeshire
District Council
Arts Development which includes
the 5 stART Arts Development
Mangers based in the South
Cambs Village Colleges.
Museums.
Andy O’Hanlon, Lead Officer Arts &
Culture
Kirstin Bicknell, Education
Development Manager, Wysing
Arts
Kirstin Bicknell, ADM Melbourn
Village College
Karen Thomas, ADM Swavesey
Village College
7.6 Cambridgeshire County Council
This is the top tier authority in Cambridgeshire and has responsibility for many of the key
services that the bridge is interested in, including education, libraries, music education,
museum development and arts development. www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk
Cambridge Culture is the council’s official means of working with CYP and is directed at
schools. The Cambridge Culture Steering Group is keen to work with the bridge and this
contact would identify, in more depth, the strategic concerns the County Council has in
relation to CYP and their families.
In common with other parts of the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area the Youth
Service, another county council service, has been cut. This was mentioned with concern by
a number of other Cambridge interviewees because these service reductions will impact on
arts and cultural delivery, particularly to the more deprived or targeted young people.
Cambridgeshire County Council directly operates one museum, the Cromwell Museum in
Huntingdon. This is part of Libraries, Archives & Information rather than sitting with the
Museums Development Officer. The County Museum Development Officer supports four
learning officers based at St Neots, Fenland, Ely and Cambridge Folk and County museums.
34 | P a g e
Concern about a possible loss of these posts due to funding changes, related to the demise
of MLA, was expressed by a number of interviewees.
Recently ACE offered libraries the chance to bid for Libraries Development Initiative funding.
Cambridgeshire has been successful in its bid which was led by the countywide Cultural
Task Group rather than the Library Service. Four libraries in Fenland working with local
groups will have the option to say if they would like the funding spent on CYP or older
people. This outcome has yet to be finally decided.
7.7 Cambridge City Council
The well established Arts and Events team in the City Council is part of Arts and Recreation,
the department responsible for sport, recreational and cultural services including the Corn
Exchange and events in open spaces. The Arts Officer manages the Cambridge Arts
Network which has a membership of 700. There are grant funding agreements with a range
of organisations. www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/portal
The council’s current policy is to devolve power from the centre of Cambridge to the
neighbourhoods. Area committees have been established to make decisions and the system
is currently being tested. Some of the work the arts team is doing reflects that strategic drive
although community centres in the neighbourhoods are not well geared up for the arts and
this is an aspect that might benefit from the bridge’s involvement.
Several areas of the city were mentioned by interviewees as areas of deprivation, to a
greater or lesser degree, and included wards to the north of Cambridge, Arbury, King’s
Hedges, Chesterton and Cherry Hinton. Although the consensus was that other areas of the
county were possibly in greater need, as they had little on offer and access problems.
However the view was also expressed that for some CYP living outside the central city area,
the dominance of the Cambridge University made them feel ill at ease and so they and their
families may not access the cultural opportunities on offer.
The City is home to six of the seven Cambridgeshire NPOs and these are:
• Academy of Ancient Music
• Britten Sinfonia
• Hoipolloi Theatre Company
• Junction CDC
• Kettle’s Yard (part of the University of Cambridge)
• New International Encounter
Cambridge has eight university museums including the Fitzwilliam. This University of
Cambridge Museums cluster is one of the two ACE Renaissance major partner museums in
the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area. The other is Norfolk Archaeology and Museum
Service. Both will receive three year funding.
The City is also host to two universities with rich cultural provisions of their own, which the
public can access. This report does not discuss university provision in detail.
35 | P a g e
7.8 East Cambridgeshire District Council
The council does not have arts service and arts development work is contracted out ADEC.
www.eastcambs.gov.uk
ADEC has a strong focus on working with CYP supported by a clear strategy for youth
development work. The organisation works closely with the county youth service particularly
the Huntingdon and East Cambridgeshire area managers. ADEC also work with independent
youth services. Other partners include museums, adult and family learning and the stART
team. As well as working in East Cambridgeshire, ADEC does a small amount of work in the
city of Cambridge, and works in partnership with Cambridge City Council where appropriate.
In addition to youth work the organisation work with a range of community groups on areas
of specific interest to those groups, bringing in expertise around working with young people,
Arts Award, and project management.
The ADEC Director is also part of CS3 the culture and sport consortium for Cambridgeshire
and Suffolk which is just about to be launched. This is a special purpose vehicle designed to
enable the diverse range of culture and sport organisations in the two counties work together
in relation to strategic commissioning, community budgeting and other shared services.
The district is home to Ely Museum, the Stained Glass Museum in Ely and the Prickwillow
Engine Museum.
7.9 Fenland District Council
Fenland has no arts service and very little cultural infrastructure. Wisbech, one of the most
deprived parts of the county, is in Fenland. This Fenland District Council area and the wider
area of Fenland is currently the subject of a Creative People and Places bid.
www.fenland.gov.uk/home
The district is home to Wisbech and Fenland Museum which has one of the Learning Officer
posts which may be under threat. The district borders with Peterborough and those residents
living on that side of the district look towards the city. Wisbech is only thirty miles from
Cambridge but poor transport and a host of other factors mean there is little contact for many
residents so they are unable to access the range of opportunities the city might offer them.
There are two art organisations in the district, Fenland Arts and Atelier East who are trying to
develop work in the area for CYP but on tiny resources. There is a history in Fenland (a
cause of complaint across the whole Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area) of short term
projects which lack sustainability.
7.9 Huntingdonshire District Council
There is no arts service as the previous arts officer was made redundant (Viv Peters, who
held the post, now works for Natural High). www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk/Pages/Home.aspx
The area was identified by a number of contacts in Cambridgeshire as one that lacked
cultural provision and where activity was sparse.
36 | P a g e
There are a number of museums in the district, including St Neots Museum which has the
fourth of the Learning Officer posts that could be vulnerable to museum funding changes.
7.10 South Cambridgeshire District Council
Arts development is well supported in South Cambridgeshire through the Lead Officer Arts &
Culture and the stART team of Arts Development Managers.
www.scambs.gov.uk/default.htm
The ADM posts are partly supported by the council and partially by the five individual Village
Colleges in which they are based. Other village colleges in the district do not have such
posts as they do not contribute financial support. However like many arts development
posts, the ADMs are vulnerable to budget changes or reductions.
The ADMs fill a role both within the schools and as arts development officers. They have
small ADM development grants which help to start and support the development of arts
projects in the community. Much of their work focuses around CYP. They would be able to
inform and support some of the bridge’s aims, especially in Peterborough and on other
partnership projects within the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area.
The district council supports the Farmland Museum and Denny Abbey. The Imperial War
Museum Duxford is also in South Cambridgeshire.
The district is home to Wysing Arts, one of the seven Cambridgeshire NPOs.
37 | P a g e
8. Peterborough
Peterborough borders Lincolnshire to the North, Northamptonshire to the west and
Cambridgeshire to the east and south. The City of Peterborough is a unitary authority and is
divided up into neighbourhoods. Neighbourhood committees are made up of elected city
council members, representatives from parish councils, the police authority, fire authority
members of local community groups and ordinary members of the public. As well as a
means of consultation and discussion, the neighbourhood committees offer the chance for
committee members and residents to put forward their views on how funding could be used
to help shape what happens in the neighbourhood. www.peterborough.gov.uk
Source: www.cambs-pa.gov.uk/consultation_district-detail.cfm?sectorid=42
The 2008 Sustainable Communities Strategy highlights that many of the city’s challenges
are about inequalities. “There is a continuing gap between life expectancy rates at the local
level and nationally and lower than average attainment at schools and skills levels in the
workforce. There has been some progress in increasing the qualifications of children leaving
Peterborough’s schools but there is still a need for improvement. The skills levels of the
working age population, which lag considerably behind the national and regional level need
improving. The city also needs to recognise and accommodate the changes to
Peterborough’s demography brought about by inward migration and by the changing age
profile of the population. At least 100 separate languages are spoken and 93 different
nationalities live in Peterborough. The age profile of Peterborough will change significantly,
with a projected 21 per cent increase in children aged 0 to 14 and a 57 per cent increase in
those aged over 65”. Source: www.gpp-peterborough.org.uk/documents/SustainableCommunityStrategy_002.pdf
38 | P a g e
8.1 Statistics
This above view of Peterborough was supported in Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)
research. Peterborough was described by one interviewee as a ‘city of need’. One thing
which particularly stood out on the statistics in table 2 in section 5 of this report is the
percentage of BME young people which is nearly three times higher than the next highest
figure for Cambridgeshire at 8.1%. At 22.5% Peterborough is higher than the English
average of 17.3%. The proportion of 0-19s is the highest in the bridge area but this is not
hugely out of line with the other figures.
Table 3 shows Peterborough is third only to Norwich City and Great Yarmouth for
percentage of children in poverty and is second to Great Yarmouth on the index of multiple
deprivation. While youth unemployment is broadly similar across the bridge area, there are
much greater variations is adult unemployment, with Peterborough showing the highest
figure on this measure i.e. at 9.2%, that is around three times higher than some other areas
such as Broadland in Norfolk or Babergh in Suffolk.
Other information obtained about Peterborough seems to agree with that interviewee’s
analysis and, like Great Yarmouth; Peterborough has been a focus of ACE’s attentions for
some years. Interestingly their approach seems to be paying off in some respects as a
number of NPOs and other arts organisations mentioned working in the city, notably Britten
Sinfonia and New International Encounter. However there still seems a lot more to be done
and it is likely that the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) will be heavily involved in
supporting and brokering some of the cultural development in the city.
8.2 Service Provision
Cultural services in Peterborough are delivered by Vivacity an independent, not-for-profit
organisation with charitable status that manages many of Peterborough’s culture and leisure
facilities on behalf of Peterborough City Council. Arts, heritage, learning and sport form the
mainstay of the services and have the specific purpose of helping people. The Arts Services
Manager recently led on a Creative People and Places bid for Peterborough.
Peterborough City Council Music Education Hub was awarded funding in May 2012. This is
being delivered by the city council and is not part of Vivacity. The City Council is also
responsible for youth services.
The Museum service has three sites: Peterborough Museum, Flag Fen Archaeology Park
and Longthorpe Tower. Peterborough Museum has just re-opened after an eighteen month
closure. However, throughout the closure period, the Museum Learning Officer was involved
in a range of learning and community projects. The museum’s schools market covers
primary, secondary, special and independent. As well as Peterborough schools, the museum
attracts schools from south Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire and north Cambridgeshire. The
museum also contains a gallery which will be programmed by the Vivacity arts team. The
city has three accredited museums.
39 | P a g e
The Library Service has ten static libraries across the city and has a 103 mobile library
stops. It offers a wide range of services and activities to CYP and their families as well as
working with schools.
There are no NPOs in Peterborough.
Key meetings for Peterborough include Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Arts
Development Officers Group and the museums Regional Learning Network.
8.3 Background concerns from audit interviews
Table 7
Lack of provision by geographic area and factors affecting CYP and their families in
Peterborough
The table below draws together comments from interviewees about the geographic areas in
Peterborough where they feel there are deprivation issues or concerns about cultural
provision for CYP and their families. It also lists other factors that they felt negatively affect
CYP’s quality of life, including their engagement with cultural opportunities and problems
affecting their educational opportunities.
Area Geographical areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
Peterborough Places in need
• Hampton ward has lack of
facilities for CYP.
• A number of areas of
deprivation including Central
Ward, Dogsthorpe.
• Peterborough City has
significant areas of deprivation
and lack of cultural activity.
Concerns and challenges
• The ethnicity of the city is very
mixed including substantial
Asian, Eastern European and
Traveller communities.
• Community projects have
been successful but the work
needs sustaining.
• Although things are happening
in Peterborough there is not
really the quality of cultural
opportunity and experience
that one might expect in a city.
For example the theatre has a
lot of tribute band type events
but these are not balanced
with high quality music or
performance.
• The city is one of the lowest
achieving areas in England in
education.
• There are high second language
needs in many of the schools and
can be 40-90% in some schools.
• Low aspiration.
• Low numbers progress to higher
education.
• Poor language skills in both
English and other languages.
• The primary schools are fantastic.
40 | P a g e
8.4 Schools
Peterborough has:
• 7 Local authority nursery schools
• 56 Primary schools
• 11 Secondary schools
• 1 Further education/sixth form colleges
• 10 Special Schools and Pupil referral Units
• 2 Independent schools. (Most privately educated CYP go to schools in
Northamptonshire and Lincolnshire)
Table 8
Schools by sector in Peterborough
Peterborough Nursery Primary Secondary FE/Sixth
Form
Special Independent Total
7 56 11 1 10 2 87
Total 7 56 11 1 10 2 87
Cambridgeshire
Cambridge City 5 26 6 3 0 18 58
East Cambs 0 27 4 1 2 1 35
Fenland 0 33 4 6 2 1 46
Huntingdonshire 1 60 7 8 2 2 80
South Cambs 1 57 7 5 3 2 75
Total 7 203 30 23 9 24 294
Source: www.peterborough.gov.uk/children_and_families/schools.aspx
8.5 Local Authority and its area of responsibility
Table 9
Division of responsibility for cultural service delivery in Peterborough
The table below shows the division of responsibility for delivering cultural services in
Peterborough, a unitary authority which has contracted out much of the cultural delivery to a
trust. It lists the names and titles of those who contributed to the Norfolk & Norwich Festival
(Bridge) audit and whose information supports this report. An appendix of the interviews that
contributors agreed to make public are contained in Appendix 1.
41 | P a g e
Local Authority
area
Local authority responsibilities
and contacts from research
Other organisations in the
area and contacts from
research
Peterborough City
Council
Education, Youth Service, Music
Education Hub.
Cultural services are delivered
by a Trust, Vivacity.
John Green, Music Adviser,
Peterborough City Council Music
Education Hub
Greer Roberts, Arts Services
Manager, Vivacity
Pam Russell, Museum
Learning Officer, Vivacity
Heather Walton, Library and
Customer Services Manager,
Vivacity
42 | P a g e
9. Norfolk
Norfolk borders Lincolnshire to the west, Cambridgeshire to the west and southwest and
Suffolk to the east. Seven District or Borough councils are included within the administrative
county of Norfolk. These are Breckland District Council, Broadland District Council, Great
Yarmouth Borough Council, King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council, North Norfolk
District Council, Norwich City Council and South Norfolk Council.
Great Yarmouth Borough Council and Breckland District Council were due to share services.
This would have affected officers but not councillors. However, since the May 2012
elections, when there was a change of administration, this plan has been halted. Breckland
already shares services with South Holland District Council in Lincolnshire and will explore
additional other options.
Source: http://www.jbsv.co.uk/links.htm
The county gives the impression of having a very well joined up arts infrastructure which has
a clear view of what the problems are facing the county both generally and in relation to
CYP. Many of those working in the county have been there for a long time and are highly
experienced both professionally and in the way that Norfolk functions.
There are also a range of challenges that were universally identified by interviewees. These
included rural isolation, poor transport, poor education, low aspiration and isolated
communities. In addition deprivation was mentioned in relation to urban settlements
including Norwich and Great Yarmouth. This anecdotal evidence is backed up by the
statistical evidence in tables 2 and 3 in section 5 of this report. .
9.1 Statistics
In terms of population density, Table 2, in section 5, shows that some areas in Norfolk are
amongst the lowest in the bridge area. Breckland is the lowest at 100 persons per square
kilometre, followed by King’s Lynn and West Norfolk on 101. In contrast Great Yarmouth’s
43 | P a g e
figure on this measure is 559 and Norwich City’s is 3677, the highest in the bridge area. The
English average is 401.
On the ethnicity measure Norfolk and Suffolk are broadly comparable at 5.6% and 5.3%
respectively which contrast sharply with that of Peterborough at 22.5%. However this lack of
diversity was not something that was often referred to directly in the interviews, although lack
of wider influences and opportunities for many young people was.
Table 3 shows that the two highest areas on the index of multiple deprivation for the bridge
area are in Norfolk. These are Great Yarmouth on 27.66 and Norwich City on 25.65.
However King’s Lynn and West Norfolk is not far behind on 21.05. The English average is
19.15. All contrast markedly with South Cambridgeshire on 7.11 and Mid Suffolk on 10.23.
Interestingly while Breckland has the lowest population density its unemployment rate at
7.1% is close to the English average of 7.5%. However it is third lowest at 17.4% for the
percentage of NVQ4+, behind Great Yarmouth and Fenland in Cambridgeshire, whose
figures are 14.1% and 14.9%. This is in marked contrast to Norwich City on 39.1%, third only
to Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire on 50.7% and 45.3% respectively.
Broadland has the lowest rate of adult unemployment in the bridge area at 3.0%, but its
youth unemployment is the third highest at 29.5% after Fenland on 30.9% and Norwich City
on 29.9%. The English average for youth unemployment was 26.6% and adult
unemployment was 7.5%.
9.2 Service Provision
Norwich is the focus of much cultural provision and opportunity. The County Council is
based in the city and it is here that the county arts and events service, museum and
archaeology service, library service (including Schools Library Service), music service and
children’s services are all based. The music service led on the successful application for
Music Education Hub status.
The city is home to the University of East Anglia, including the Sainsbury Centre for Visual
Arts, and the Norwich University College of the Arts. The city is home to all five of Norfolk’s
NPOs:
• British Centre for Literary Translation
• Norfolk and Norwich Festival
• Norwich Arts Centre
• Tilted Productions
• Writer’s Centre Norwich
In addition there are a number of other high quality arts providers including the Norwich
Theatre Royal and The Garage. Norfolk Dance is also based in Norwich at The Garage.
The concentration of offer and opportunity in Norwich contrasts with the rest of the county.
This raises a point which a number of interviewees mentioned, that there are levels of
resentment towards Norwich by the rest of Norfolk. In particular it was reported by a number
44 | P a g e
of people that the West Norfolk area often feels that it receives little resource in comparison
to Norwich. However the city is not without its problems as the statistics relating to the City of
Norwich demonstrate.
Much of the Breckland’s arts officer’s work is with older people or communities, as the
district has a lot of rural isolation and older people affected by this are a focus for the
council’s attention. There is much less focus on CYP and their families. Broadland, like
Breckland and North Norfolk does not have a large amount of cultural infrastructure.
However the authority runs a Tots2Teens programme and works with local schools. North
Norfolk has a high concentration of professional artists and a thriving festival offer. The latter
is one way the arts officer is able to develop and support opportunities for CYP and their
families. There are varying degrees of engagement with the arts by schools but it was a
cause of concern to many Norfolk interviewees that the schools often failed to take up
opportunities or that the quality of some of what they offered in terms of arts was poor or
dated.
Great Yarmouth, Norwich City and South Norfolk do not have arts services. King’s Lynn Arts
Centre (KLAC) became a trust (replacing the local authority provision) on the 1st April 2012.
KLAC works closely with some local schools and its community and provides a high quality
offer in an area with considerable challenges. In Great Yarmouth, Seachange Arts works
closely with schools and local communities.
Norfolk Museum and Archaeology Service, manages museums across the county, is one of
the two ACE Renaissance major partner museums in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)
area. The other is the University of Cambridge Museums. In the city itself are a number of
museums including Norwich Castle. Most of the museums in the county have an education
or learning offer for CYP and schools. The county has 32 accredited museums.
The Library Service has 46 static libraries and 610 villages, hamlets and areas are served by
mobile libraries. There is also a Schools Library Service.
There was widespread concern about the loss of the county youth service which is being
replaced by Youth Action Boards at district level. It seemed to be unclear, at the moment,
how these were going to work.
Key meetings in Norfolk are: Regional Learning Network for museums and Norfolk Arts
Forum. There are a number of other specialist groups such as Norfolk Youth Arts
Consortium and Cultural Communities Consortium.
9.3 Background concerns from audit interviews
Table 10
Lack of provision by geographic area and factors affecting CYP and their families in
Norfolk
The table below draws together comments from interviewees about the geographic areas in
Norfolk where they feel there are deprivation issues or concerns about cultural provision for
CYP and their families. It also lists other factors that they felt negatively affect CYP’s quality
45 | P a g e
of life, including their engagement with cultural opportunities and problems affecting their
educational opportunities.
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
Norfolk Places in need
• All parts of the county need
focussing on, but for different
reasons.
• Greater Norwich, Great
Yarmouth and Kings Lynn all
have deprived wards.
• South and North Norfolk are
affected by rural isolation, poor
services that come with a high
cost, coastal areas affected by
isolation and seasonal
employment.
• North Norfolk is very rural.
• Many urban areas, especially
in King’s Lynn, Norwich and
Great Yarmouth, are seriously
deprived.
• West Norfolk especially, an
area in a ring around
Derehem.
• South Breckland.
• An arch from Great Yarmouth
to King’s Lynn and Thetford
with only small pockets of
activity in this area.
Concerns and challenges
• There are now 77 languages
spoken in Norfolk which is
partly due to the numbers of
overseas rural migrant
workers. Included are the new
communities from Latvia,
Lithuania and Russia amongst
others.
• The central area of the county
has very little cultural offer.
• The transport infrastructure is
poor and there are no
motorways in the county.
• There is a need for more artist
training to freshen those who
have worked in the county for
a long time.
• There is also a need for some
new young practitioners.
However there is difficulty in
• Public transport is a big issue for
young people in Norfolk and
especially in the rural areas.
• Transport and communications
are a real concern for many
young people. There is little public
transport and for those on lower
incomes it is difficult to afford.
One way round this is to make
sure opportunities are more easily
accessed by those in the rural
areas.
• In some isolated rural areas such
as north Norfolk, young people
have access to cultural outreach
opportunities delivered by
organisations such as
Sheringham Little Theatre.
• Gap in cultural provision for
young people outside school.
• Need to offer young people the
opportunity to access provision
outside their communities. As well
as the actual participation
opportunities, young people meet
a wider range of people which
helps build confidence. However
there are costs associated with
this approach which the Bridge
will need to consider when
thinking about benefits versus
costs.
• It can often take time to find the
right place and venue and get
participants to travel there.
• The library service has put in
some extra support put in around
teenagers. Three temporary posts
have been created which will run
until March 2013 and the post
holders will develop engagement
and the offer for teenagers in four
areas; Thetford, King’s Lynn,
Wymondham and Norwich
(Millennium Library).
• The worker at the Millennium
Library came about as a result of
46 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
recruiting people to come and
work in the county because it
is seen as rural and slightly cut
off.
• Rural counties have specific
problems of transport and
communication and these are
particularly pronounced in
Breckland and West Norfolk.
• There are no NPOs in great
swathes of Norfolk.
• Need for investment to get into
this hinterland to extend
opportunities to those places
currently lacking many.
• Local authority boundaries do
not matter to the public so new
work should not duplicate
current provision but add to a
greater offer overall.
• Working in rural areas is not
the same as working in larger
towns. There can be a
suspicion or dislike of
outsiders who appear to come
in, create a brief flare of
activity and then disappear.
consultation because the library is
very popular with CYP, especially
at weekends.
• South Norfolk has a lot of small
rural schools with low aspirations
and poor financial resources.
• The low level of aspiration and
sameness of what is on offer in
some of the rural areas.
• There is low engagement in CPD
because people are not being
pushed or challenged. In turn this
leads to a lack of energy.
• Over the years a range of really
good projects have been
implemented. However it has
become increasingly apparent
that sustainability of provision is a
real concern. Things happen for a
short time, because much activity
is based on up to three year
funding which can’t then be
repeated. This pattern can be
harmful as young people are
conscious that their needs attract
funding which can understandably
lead to youthful cynicism.
Breckland Places in need
• Thetford is an area of concern.
Concerns and challenges
• The district is geographically
large with five towns and 108
parishes.
• Much of the arts work is done
with older people or
communities.
• Breckland is quite a working
class district with a lot of rural
isolation which affects many
groups, including older people.
• Rural deprivation.
• High illiteracy levels.
• Transport is very difficult.
• Lowest council tax take in the
county.
• Very few venues.
• Sparse resources.
• Disparate district.
• The area lacks much in the
• Opportunities for young people
are a concern as they are not
used to having anything much
provided for them.
• The loss of the Youth Service has
also meant the loss of contact
with young people on a close or
one to one basis.
• Poor means of communication
with Young People.
• Holiday activities are not targeted
enough so consequently they
don’t always reach those who
need the activity most. Due to the
size of the district the money is
spread equally, but thinly, so
there isn’t a great deal of depth
for anyone.
47 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
way of arts organisation or
infrastructure.
Broadland Places in need
• No information.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
Great Yarmouth Places in need
• There are incredibly deprived
areas of Great Yarmouth
(South and Central wards)
which still do not have regular
access to high quality arts
provision.
Concerns and challenges
• ACE ‘Cold Spots’ mapping
shows Great Yarmouth in the
lowest 20% of Local
authorities in terms of
percentage of the population
not engaging with the arts (the
lowest in Norfolk).
• Residents perception studies
highlight desire for arts
activities generally and for and
young people specifically.
• The variety of different
nationalities (a significant
proportion of south and central
Yarmouth are migrant
communities, especially
Portuguese).
• There are high levels of non-
school attendance in parts of the
borough and it is important to
work with youth agencies in
addition to schools.
King’s Lynn and
West Norfolk
Places in need
• King’s Lynn
Concerns and challenges
• Large number of migrant
workers, many of whom are
Eastern European.
• High unemployment.
• Pockets of multiple deprivation
• 25% fewer professionals than
elsewhere in Norfolk.
• A number of retired
professionals who come to the
area.
• West Norfolk, apart from
King’s Lynn is very rural and
transport is poor, particularly
inland.
• West Norfolk has no NPO but
• Low educational aspirations and
attainments.
• There is a need for more outreach
work and working offsite which
needs more resources to do
effectively.
• There is little opportunity for YPs
who want to work in the cultural or
creative industries.
48 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
has a population of 200,000.
• West Norfolk can be very
marginalised in the Norfolk
cultural offer overall.
North Norfolk Places in need
• Towns of Stalham, Wells and
Fakenham.
• Fakenham has a lack of
venues for and the community
centre is old and very booked
up.
• There are 150 rural villages.
• Some of the most deprived
include Mundesley and Melton
Constable.
• Opportunities are patchy in
Sheringham and Cromer
despite having more provision
than in other areas because
there are more partners
available to work with.
Concerns and challenges
• Deprivation and access to
opportunities is limited and
patchy across the district.
• Access to arts is often quite
limited. North Norfolk has 7
market towns and 150 villages
so provision is patchy and
access to public transport very
limited.
• Rurality and the associated
lack of opportunities are a big
problem. There is also an
issue of hidden poverty related
to the rurality of the district.
• Transport is causes
considerable problems. The
bus service is poor or non-
existent away from the coast.
Trains are very limited and
only stop at three towns.
• Apart from issues around CYP
the area attracts a lot of early
retirees. On the positive side
this means there are a lot of
people who want to become
involved in voluntary work so
that drama and choral
societies particularly flourish.
• Fakenham School has proved
difficult to work with, even when
arts opportunities were offered.
However a new head teacher has
since been appointed.
• There are a lot of festivals in the
North Norfolk area which do offer
CYP some opportunities.
• Wells-next-the-Sea suffers from
limited opportunities for CYP, due
to the geography and small size
of the community. As does
Stalham and surrounding villages.
49 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
However on the other side this
population can become
increasingly resource heavy
over time and dementia is a
noticeable issue.
Norwich City Places in need
• Norwich.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
• Norwich has one of the lowest
GCSE achievement rates in the
country (bottom 10% for last 10
years, 3rd
from bottom nationally
in 2010/11).
• Most Norwich-based arts
organisations provide outreach
opportunities but not necessarily
year round.
South Norfolk Places in need
• No Information.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
9.4 Schools
Norfolk has:
• 3 Local authority nursery schools
• 359 Primary schools
• 35 Secondary schools
• 9 Further education/sixth form colleges
• 11 Special Schools
• 1 all-through school
• 1 short stay school
• 28 Independent schools
Source: www.norfolk.gov.uk/Childrens_services/Schools/index.htm
It was not possible to provide a further breakdown as no easy to access list appears to be
available. The list of schools on the county council website is only accessible by postcode
and there is no district breakdown available.
There are 17 academies (6 phase one and 11 converters) and 1 free school.
9.5 Local authorities and their areas of responsibility
Table 11
Local authority division of responsibility for cultural service delivery
The table below shows the division of responsibility for delivering local authority services in a
two tier structure. It also lists the names and titles of those who contributed to the Norfolk &
50 | P a g e
Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit and whose information supports this report. An appendix of
the interviews that contributors agreed to make public are contained in Appendix 1.
Local Authority
area
Local authority responsibilities
and contacts from research
Other organisations in the
area and contacts from
research
Norfolk County
Council
Education, libraries, museums
development, heritage and music
service. The staff in local authority
museums across Norfolk are part
of Norfolk Museums and
Archaeology Service (NMAS) run
by Norfolk CC.
Mary Muir, Arts Officer
Anna McCarthy, Creative Projects
Officer
Hazel Courtley, Museum
Development Projects Manager
Jo Warr, Programme Manager
(NMAS)
Katrina Siliprandi, Head of
Learning Development
Lorna Payne, Assistant Head of
Service – Development (Libraries)
Kirsten Francis, Manager for
Schools and Young People's
Services (Libraries)
Maureen Hanke, Head of Music
Service/Music Advisor
Breckland District
Council
Arts officer
Sam Dawson, Arts Development
Officer
Broadland District
Council
Arts officer
Nicola Pye, Leisure Services Co-
ordinator
Great Yarmouth
Borough Council
No arts service
Joe Mackintosh, Chief
Executive, Seachange Arts
Wendy Ellis, Youth Work
Manager, MAP
King's Lynn and
West Norfolk
Borough Council
No arts service
51 | P a g e
Liz Falconbridge, Director,
King’s Lynn Arts Centre Trust
North Norfolk
District Council
Arts service
Brenda Seymour, Arts Officer
Norwich City
Council
Culture and events but no arts
officer
Helen Selleck, Culture and Events
Manager
Mitchell Albert, Programme
Director, Norwich Writers
Centre
Derek Purnell, General
Manager, Tilted Productions
Derek Purnell, Director, Norfolk
Dance
Darren Grice, Executive
Director , The Garage
Veronica Sekules, Deputy
Director and Head of Education
and Research, Sainsbury
Centre for the Visual Arts
Peter Wilson MBE, Chief
Executive, Theatre Royal
Wendy Ellis, Youth Work
Manager , MAP
Kaja Holloway, Manager,
NEAD (Norfolk Education &
Action for Development)
Marcus Patteson, Director & In
Harmony Norwich Director,
NORCA (Norwich & Norfolk
Community Arts)
South Norfolk
Council
No arts officer.
9.6 Norfolk County Council
The County Council, and top tier authority, is well resourced with experienced cultural staff
and a good reputation for innovation. The authority has responsibility for many of the key
services that the bridge is interested in including education, libraries (including schools
library service), music education, museum development and arts development. However the
county council has divested itself of youth service delivery which is now the responsibility of
the newly established Youth Action Boards (YAB). These have not begun to fully function in
all areas and both the future working of the YABs and changes to youth services were of
considerable concern to many interviewees. www.norfolk.gov.uk
52 | P a g e
The Norfolk Arts Forum which is administered by Mary Muir, Arts Officer, is a model of good
practice. The Arts Officer and the Creative Projects Officer sit in different, geographically
separated departments. Mary Muir, Arts Officer is part of Community Services while Anna
McCarthy, Creative Projects Officer is part of Children’s Services. There seems to be good
cross working involving arts, libraries and museums both internally and externally. The Music
Service and Archives also work in partnership with a range of cultural colleagues across the
council. The Music Service led on the successful Music Hub bid for Norfolk.
Norfolk Museums and Archaeology Service is unique in bridge area in that it runs a
countywide museum service. It is one of the two ACE Renaissance major partner museums
in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area.
The county council financially supports nineteen arts organisations, including three of the
NPOs, and through them direct work with communities. Norfolk School Libraries Better
Libraries Project supports schools to make a difference to the reading environment in their
school. The scheme offers school libraries the chance to do more than upgrade the physical
aspect of a library or its stock, by providing an opportunity to combine such work with an arts
or cultural dimension as well.
9.7 Broadland District Council
Provision for CYP falls into three areas; Tots2Teens holiday activities for children aged five
years upwards, workshops in schools and training courses at Broadland Council Training
Services. The latter incorporates Arts Award at the Foundation stage. The council offers
small grants. www.broadland.gov.uk
Many of the arts organisations working in Broadland are based in Norwich. Like Breckland
the area seems to have a poor cultural infrastructure. However there are still a range of
ESCOs (Extended school coordinators) working in the area. There are also some festivals
which offer arts and cultural provision
9.8 Breckland District Council
The arts officer currently sits in the Communities department which is being restructured, but
the arts post is included in the new structure. The district is geographically large with five
towns and 108 parishes. Breckland currently shares services with South Holland District
Council in Lincolnshire. Much of the arts officer’s focus is older people.
www.breckland.gov.uk
The area lacks much in the way of arts organisation or cultural infrastructure. However the
library service is a good partner and supports the annual Breckland Book Festival. Due to
poor financial resources for the arts there is little opportunity to develop partnerships or bring
in freelancers to run activities. Opportunities for young people are a concern to the arts
officer because historically young people are not used to having much provision available to
them. Moreover what resource there is for CYP is spread thinly over the whole district which
is sparsely populated. The sense of a large, rather empty area is borne out in statistics.
53 | P a g e
9.9 Great Yarmouth Borough Council
Great Yarmouth has a Culture, Leisure and Sport Manager but unfortunately they were not
able to contribute to the report. Looking at the council’s website it seems to direct the
enquirer to non council sources for museums and arts and is otherwise unclear about how
the council supports culture. The arts contact link is Seachange Arts who have responded to
the research and have led on a Creative People and Places bid recently. www.great-
yarmouth.gov.uk/culture-leisure/arts-and-culture.htm
Great Yarmouth has considerable deprivation and has been a focus of ACE’s attention for
some years. The need for this focus is backed both by the statistics in tables 2 and 3 in
section 5 of this report and the residents’ surveys. Like many other parts of Norfolk, outside
Norwich, there are few arts organisations locally. Seachange Arts is a major presence and
the St Georges Theatre is due to re-open later in 2012. The library service recently
completed a lottery funded refurbishment of Great Yarmouth Library which involved
considerable community engagement and some of the lessons learnt here are being applied
elsewhere in the county.
The town is home to the Time and Tide Museum which is part of NMAS. It is supported by
NMAS Learning Team who offers learning opportunities in museums and schools.
9.10 King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
King’s Lynn and West Norfolk no longer has an arts service, having transferred it to a trust
structure from the 1st April 2012. www.west-norfolk.gov.uk
The King’s Lynn Arts Centre Trust includes the Arts Centre, a cinema and a theatre and has
three years of diminishing funding. Liz Falconbridge the Trust Director (and previously
managed arts development in the council) hopes to pull together the heritage and cultural
sectors to work as one. The KLAC works with local schools and a range of young people. It
can be difficult to persuade some local schools to engage, or appreciate the quality of the
centre’s offer. Most of the work is with primary heads who want to help improve their pupils’
confidence and self-esteem.
West Norfolk has no NPO and few other arts or cultural organisations, but has a population
of 200,000. It is one of the areas that many other Norfolk respondees highlighted as needing
additional resource, both to support the good work already happening, as well as additional
provision. Several of those who expressed a view said this needed to be a long term
commitment, as short term projects can do more harm than good.
9.11 North Norfolk District Council
A new administration was elected in May 2011 which saw the council change from Liberal
Democrat control to Conservative. There were 22 new councillors out of a total of 48.
Currently they are keen to retain existing services. The Arts and Heritage strategy is due to
be refreshed as it was last endorsed in 2010. www.northnorfolk.org
54 | P a g e
North Norfolk, although affected by many of the rural problems which are common in much
of the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area, is better served than many of the other
districts. There is a large community of professional artists and a strong voluntary sector.
The Arts Officer is part time and the department she sits in is currently being restructured.
Unlike some of the other district councils, North Norfolk is providing financial sources to
support arts organisations. There are SLA’s with Sheringham Little Theatre, Creative Arts
East, Community Music East), Norfolk Dance, North Norfolk Exhibition Project, Belfry Arts
Centre and Orchestras Live. The remainder of the budget of is used as project partnership
funding and promotion.
Despite this positive picture, access to the arts is often quite patchy and affects CYP and
their families. One way of providing opportunities to CYP is through the festival programme
of which there are 20 in the district.
9.12 Norwich City Council
There is no arts officer at Norwich City Council, the post having been deleted in 2011.
www.norwich.gov.uk/Pages/Home.aspx
One problem identified about the City by another interviewee was that Norwich City Council
has relatively low revenues because the richer parts of Norwich sit in other districts. It is an
area which is high in child poverty, and on multiple deprivation index.
It was unclear how much partnership working the council is involved in, but the bridge will
not be short of partners in Norwich as it is rich in arts organisations, libraries, museums and
higher education. The City is home to all five of Norfolk’s NPOs:
• British Centre for Literary Translation
• Norfolk and Norwich Festival
• Norwich Arts Centre
• Tilted Productions
• Writer’s Centre Norwich
9.13 South Norfolk Council
There is no arts service. The council website has a number of references to the arts and a
public art policy is available. However the officer mentioned in that document left the council
about two years ago and some of the other arts references look to date from that time.
www.south-norfolk.gov.uk/index.asp
55 | P a g e
10. Suffolk
Suffolk borders Norfolk to the north, Cambridgeshire to the west and Essex to the south.
Seven District or Borough councils are included within the administrative county of Suffolk.
These are Babergh District Council, Forest Heath District Council, Ipswich Borough Council,
Mid Suffolk District Council, St Edmundsbury Borough Council, Suffolk Coastal District
Council and Waveney District Council.
Forest Heath District Council and St Edmundsbury are due to share services in the near
future. This will affect officers rather than councillors, and it is currently unclear how this will
affect the two councils’ services that cover arts and heritage.
Source: www.csduk.com/CSD/Contact+details+for+other+district+and+borough+councils+in+Suffolk.htm
Suffolk, compared to Cambridgeshire and Norfolk, is historically under resourced. Ipswich is
the closest place to being a cultural centre which has an intensive amount of provision.
However much of this is a more recent development and has been something of a conscious
effort in order to provide the sort of focus that exists in other county towns and elsewhere
within the bridge area. This strategy includes the development of the Ipswich Waterfront
which houses DanceEast’s new home and the main centre of University Campus Suffolk.
Ipswich is also home to four of seven Suffolk’s NPOs which are:
• Dance East
• Eastern Angles
• Gecko Theatre
• New Wolsey Theatre
56 | P a g e
Colchester and Ipswich Museums had been a Renaissance Hub museum but failed to gain
ACE Renaissance major partner museum funding so their immediate future is unclear at the
moment.
Nevertheless there is excellent work in Suffolk and those that are there work well in
partnership. However a combination of some key organisations not being able to contribute
to the audit research and some strong individuals and organisations that have, gives the
impression of hotspots of innovation and provision set against a more hazy background.
10.1 Statistics
Ipswich, as well as being the county town of Suffolk, is the place with the third highest score
on index of multiple deprivation in the bridge area. The figure is 24.82 after Peterborough’s
25.63 and Norwich’s 25.65. Cambridge by contrast is 15.50. The next worst district in Suffolk
is Waveney with 22.08 while the rest of the districts are all under 13.50 against an English
average of 19.15.
Ipswich is also notable for its population density of 3254 per sq. Km. in a county where the
next highest figure is Waveney on 317 and the rest of the districts are 170 or lower against
an English average of 401. Waveney contains Lowestoft and anecdotally it is likely that it is
this town which will have a concentration of problems, rather than the district as a whole.
The lowest population density in Suffolk is 109 per square kilometre in Mid Suffolk, which is
the fourth lowest in the bridge area. So like much of the rest of the bridge area, Suffolk has
scattered populations which makes identifying places to concentrate the arts and cultural
offer difficult. As a result Ipswich is the one place where a critical mass of activity has been
built, which the bridge could build on. However for those outside the immediate area
transport and its associated cost provides a barrier to access as it does across much of the
bridge area, something which will particularly affect CYP and their families.
Ipswich and Waveney both score highly in the bridge area on the percentage of children in
poverty at 21.7 and 21.2 respectively. This follows Norwich on 29.6 and Peterborough on
24.0 against the average for England of 20.9. So the Suffolk figures while high for the bridge
area are only just above the English average.
There was a lot of comment in the interviews about the poor standard of CYP’s education
and results in Suffolk but this does not show up at NVQ4+ in quite the same dramatic way
that it does in some parts of Norfolk and Cambridgeshire. The worst area is Waveney on
18.8%, the fourth worst. The rest of the districts all fall into the 23.7 – 29.0 range (with the
exception of Suffolk Coastal on 35.2) against an English average of 31.3.
Youth unemployment in the bridge area ranges from 22.8 – 32.4 against an average for
England of 26.6. However Waveney is the highest, followed by Fenland in Cambridgeshire
on 30.9. However while Ipswich has the highest adult unemployment figure of 9%, the next
highest is St Edmundsbury on 8.4% against an English average of 7.5%. Waveney on this
measure has a score of 4.4%, but without further research it is unclear if this is concentrated
in Lowestoft or spread across the district more widely.
57 | P a g e
Information from the interviews supports the statistical picture above and the picture that
emerged was that Suffolk, like parts of Cambridgeshire and Norfolk, is affected by rural
issues, poor transport, low aspiration and poor progression to training and higher education
in many parts of the county. Like Norfolk it suffers from complacency because it is regarded
as a nice place to live and the average is acceptable.
For more information and an excellent insight into the challenges facing Suffolk it is worth
reading the Hidden Needs report commissioned from University of Cambridge.
www.suffolkfoundation.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=75:needs-
assessment&catid=6:latest-news
10.2 Service provision
Suffolk is akin to Cambridgeshire in terms of the quantity of cultural resource at county level.
Both the Arts Development Manager and the Museums Development Manager work closely
with related colleagues across Suffolk and these partnerships seem strong. Some of the arts
organisations such as Dance East, Aldeburgh and Eastern Angles have a remit to work
outside the county boundary and would like to do more cross border working. The Suffolk
CC Arts Development Manager works closely with the county’s arts organisations and
provides funding to a number of them including several of the seven NPOs.
The Museums Development Manager works closely with the museums, many of which are
volunteer run to a very high standard. The Library Service was unavailable to contribute to
the research as the service is currently in the final stages of becoming an independent
cooperative organisation. However there currently 47 static libraries and 200 villages and
hamlets served by mobile libraries. There is also a Schools Library Service. The Music
Service successfully led on the Suffolk Music Education Hub bid.
Suffolk County Council has closed about 17 youth clubs out of 40, but many of these had not
offered a good service as only very small numbers of young people were being served. The
service is now targeted to NEETS, or other deprived and underachieving young people.
Some youth workers will work in a community centred way, while others while be based on
the ground in areas where inclusion is a concern. While the service has been quite severely
cut, those who remain are beginning to find their feet again.
The number of arts officers is small, with only three of the possible contacts really focussing
on arts development work. There are a number of other officers who have arts in their titles
but their roles may be more limited in relation to the bridge.
One of the noticeable, and perhaps surprising, features of Suffolk is the high levels of poor
education. This had partly been tackled at a higher education level by the creation several
years ago of the University Campus Suffolk (UCS). There are six UCS centres; Ipswich,
Bury St Edmunds, Great Yarmouth, Lowestoft, Otley and Suffolk New College This
institution will see its first graduates in 2012; however it is currently difficult to tell what the
long term impact may be. www.ucs.ac.uk/About/Abouthomepage.aspx
Education is poor at KS2, so school improvement has been an overriding issue for Suffolk
County Council since the time of the Labour Government. Suffolk’s attainment at KS2 is
poor; it is third from the bottom in England. This has had a knock on effect on curriculum
58 | P a g e
areas and other subjects which are not related to literacy and numeracy. Literacy and
numeracy levels are not as high as they ought to be and the related GCSE results are
accordingly lower than they should be.
Currently the LEA is not interested in anything which doesn’t relate to driving those
standards up. The Advisory Team has been severely restructured, but those who are left
have been working very closely with the Arts Development Manager. Networks for teachers
are much weaker than they used to be.
Key meetings for Suffolk are: Suffolk Creative Learning Collaborative, Arts Development
Officers, Association of Suffolk Museums and the museums’ Regional Learning Forum.
10.3 Background concerns from audit interviews
Table 12
Lack of provision by geographic area and factors affecting CYP and their families in
Norfolk
The table below draws together comments from interviewees about the geographic areas in
Suffolk where they feel there are deprivation issues or concerns about cultural provision for
CYP and their families. It also lists other factors that they felt negatively affect CYP’s quality
of life, including their engagement with cultural opportunities and problems affecting their
educational opportunities.
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
Suffolk
Some of the
information came
from Suffolk
Hidden Needs
www.suffolkfoundat
ion.org.uk/index.ph
p?option=com_con
tent&view=article&i
d=75:needs-
assessment&catid
=6:latest-news
Places in need
• Lowestoft, Mildenhall,
Newmarket, Brandon and
parts of Ipswich are all areas
for concern in terms of
deprivation.
Concerns and challenges
• Nearly 78,000 people in the
county live in income
deprivation at the most
minimal living standard
provided by welfare benefits,
and well below the ‘poverty
line’. This number represents
11 per cent of the total
population, and includes
19,000 children aged under
16.
• Having a job does not always
raise household income much
above the poverty threshold.
There is evidence of in-work
poverty and under-counting of
deprivation by standard
measures in some parts of the
• Income deprivation affecting
children is particularly
concentrated in the larger towns
in Suffolk.
• Across the county, less than half
of five year-olds have reached a
‘good’ level of development. This
is one of the worst outcomes in
England, and is comparable to
highly deprived urban areas.
• Childhood poverty affects
educational attainment: only 43%
of low-income pupils claiming
free school meals achieved 5
GCSEs at grades A*-C,
compared to 69% of pupils
overall.
• More than 7 per cent of young
people aged 16 to 18 in Suffolk
are not in education, training or
employment. This is higher than
the national average, and one of
the highest rates for rural areas in
England.
• The recession has hit youth
59 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
county, particularly Forest
Heath.
• Much of the county remains
highly rural, and access to key
services has steadily
worsened in rural areas over
the past two decades. The
distances that residents of
many parts of the county must
travel to buy groceries, see a
GP or post a parcel are
amongst the highest in
England.
• Poverty of aspiration.
• The issues associated with the
rural nature of the county are
massive.
employment hard, and recovery
is slow. Many parts of Suffolk
have limited opportunities for
young people. Demand and
supply of employment
opportunities do not always
match geographically. In
Waveney, for example, there are
seven job-seekers for every
vacancy advertised in Job
Centres.
• There are 364 schools in Suffolk
and education is poor at KS2.
Literacy and numeracy levels are
not as high as they should be and
GCSE are lower than they should
be as well.
• The numbers going into higher
education are low against national
figures.
• The new University of Suffolk will
see its first graduates in 2012 but
it is too early to say what long
term effect this establishment will
have on higher education
aspiration in the county.
• Isolated children.
• NEETS.
• Lack of aspiration is a big
problem.
• Many Suffolk schools suffer from
a lack of engagement with the
wider world and are reluctant to
take their pupils out of the school
environment or engage with
external providers.
• There are concerns about under
achievement in Suffolk but some
schools and groups have the view
that they don’t want people
coming into rural Suffolk telling
them what to do.
Babergh Places in need
• No information.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
Forest Heath Places in need
• Newmarket is poor and is
surrounded by
Cambridgeshire. The town
• There are poor education
standards across the district.
• Young people do not, on the
60 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
lacks a middle class which has
an impact on the demand for
provision. This may change as
more middle earners are
moving in as Cambridgeshire
becomes too expensive.
• Mildenhall. The population
includes a lot of London
overspill. The Americans on
the Air Base don’t leave it very
much.
• Brandon.
Concerns and challenges
• Forest Heath is on the margins
of Suffolk .
• Newmarket has a number of
East European workers,
mostly Poles and a Muslim
Arabic population associated
with the horse racing industry.
Brandon also has a Polish
community.
• The district has the highest
percentage of unskilled
workforce members in the east
of England and is amongst
some of the lowest qualified
nationally.
• No professional arts
organisations.
• Very few visual artists.
• No cinema.
• No arts centre.
• No recognised venues.
• The village halls, of which
Mildenhall has a larger one,
are old fashioned and poorly
equipped.
• A Creative People and Places
application to cover Fenland
and Forest Heath has been
submitted.
• A successful bid would make a
huge difference to Forest
Heath on the arts side while
both heritage and arts would
benefit in Fenland.
• It would also support more
strategic planning as Forest
whole, reach their potential as
there are narrow life choices
available to them.
• The district has some of the
lowest educational achievement
nationally. Newmarket College
has a 38% A*- C rate.
• Suffolk is not high on the
deprivation indices but it does
have poor education in the state
schools. They also have low
aspirations for their pupils and are
affected by the rurality of the
area. One contributory problem is
that many staff are still recruited
locally and they are used to the
history of low standards.
• Educational standards suffer from
complacency linked to Suffolk
being regarded as a nice place to
live.
• There are high levels of free
school meals which point to
hidden deprivation.
• Even the best schools when
advising their pupils about
university applications do not
push them towards the top
universities or the Russell Group.
• The best schools are the catholic
ones.
• On the positive side both upper
schools in Forest Heath now have
new head teachers and positive
changes are beginning to become
apparent.
61 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
Heath requires more provision
and opportunities in the poorer
areas.
• Ultimately more money is
needed to make a difference
as the district is starting from a
low base of infrastructure and
provision.
Ipswich Places in need
• Parts of Ipswich.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
Mid Suffolk Places in need
• Stowmarket is often quoted as
an area for concern however
provision is improving there.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
St Edmundsbury Places in need
• Although there are pockets of
identified deprivation in West
Suffolk (Haverhill, Forest
Heath) the rural isolation can
be as difficult to overcome as
financial isolation.
• There are a couple of areas
within Bury.
• Two estates in Haverhill have
the highest need.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
• Transport is one of the biggest
problems for young people.
• The role of dance delivery is
currently being re-examined.
Suffolk Coastal Places in need
• No information.
Concerns and challenges
• No information.
Waveney Places in need
• Lowestoft has areas of
deprivation.
• Waveney.
Concerns and challenges
• The rural areas of the district
are better off and the
deprivation is not so high.
Those in rural areas will travel
to events and activities but not
vice versa so people from
Beccles will travel to Lowestoft
but not the other way.
• Halesworth and surrounding
• Active Waveney and its
programmes are the result of a lot
of consultation. Obesity, health
and well being were identified as
needs. The outcomes include a
lot of voluntary young people’s
programmes that work with
schools. Dance is part of this mix,
including dance days run by
Dance East.
• Distance and lack of engagement
make these challenging and
costly areas in which to deliver
work.
62 | P a g e
Area Geographical Areas and their
challenges
Factors affecting CYP and their
families
areas has very few
opportunities to work with
professional practitioners,
particularly in relation to new
writing and work.
10.4 Schools
Source: www.suffolk.gov.uk/education-and-careers/schools-and-support-in-education/applying-for-a-school-place#A6
Suffolk schools are divided into three areas: western, northern and southern. Education is
delivered on a primary, middle, upper model, in different parts of the county, so educationally
Suffolk is different from other parts of the bridge area. In 2006 Suffolk County Council began
a review of its school system. This review found that children in the three-tier system made
less progress than similar children in the two-tier system. The review recommended that the
Council began a review of school organisation in Suffolk with a preferred option of a two- tier
system of Primary and Secondary School education. This was approved by the County
Council in 2007 and the county schools are moving towards converting to a two tier
education system.
It is difficult to give a precise figure for the number of Suffolk schools because due to the
structural changes schools numbers are in a state of flux. In the course of the interviews a
figure of 364 was quoted. However looking at the admissions material for 2011-2012 the
figures seemed to be as follows:
• 1 Local authority nursery schools
• 254 Primary schools
63 | P a g e
• 28 Middle schools
• 43 Upper/high schools
• 8 Special Schools
• 13 Pupil Referral Units (PRU)
• 31 Independent schools
Table 13
Schools by sector in Suffolk
Suffolk Nursery Primary Middle Upper/High Special PRU Ind. Total
Northern 74 6 12 2 3 97
Southern 1 88 0 17 3 5 114
Western 92 22 14 3 5 136
Countywide 31 31
Total 1 254 28 43 8 13 31 378
10.5 Local authorities and their areas of responsibility
Table 14
Local authority division of responsibility for cultural service delivery
The table below shows the division of responsibility for delivering local authority services in a
two tier structure. It also lists the names and titles of those who contributed to the Norfolk &
Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit and whose information supports this report. An appendix of
the interviews that contributors agreed to make public are contained in Appendix 1.
Local Authority
area
Local authority responsibilities
and contacts from research
Other organisations in the
area and contacts from
research
Suffolk County
Council
Education, libraries, museums
development, heritage, youth
services and music service.
Jayne Knight, Arts Development
Manager
Lyn Gash, Museum Development
Manager
Babergh District
Council
Arts Service
Forest Heath
District Council
Arts and Heritage
Lizzi Cocker, Arts & Heritage
Officer
Ipswich Borough
Council
Cultural development but does not
include an arts officer. The
Museums service is run by
Colchester and Ipswich Museums.
64 | P a g e
Lucy Bayliss, Head of Learning
& Participation, Dance East
Michael Linge, Assistant
Producer, Red Rose Chain
Mid Suffolk District
Council
Arts officer
St Edmundsbury
Borough Council
No arts officer but runs a venue
(the apex) and a festival.
Museums.
Nick Wells, Festival, Arts &
Entertainment Manager
Lynn Whitehead, Head of
Creative Learning, Theatre
Royal Bury St Edmunds
Suffolk Coastal
District Council
No arts officer
Phillipa Reive, Head of
Education, Aldeburgh Music
Waveney District
Council
Service Manager - Sports & Arts.
Museums
Claire Henwood, Service Manager
- Sports & Arts
Philippa Wilkinson, Projects
Producer, High Tide Festival
Theatre
Alex Casey, Co-Director,
Suffolk Artlink
10.6 Suffolk County Council
There is little more to say specifically about Suffolk County Council, the top tier authority in
the county, which hasn’t already been highlighted in the section about the county as a
whole.
One other interesting aspect of the county council is that it was an early and leading
advocate of localism and the ‘Big Society’ approach. Until about a year ago was moving
towards becoming an enabling authority. This would have meant most services being
delivered through a commissioning arrangement and in time a very small staff of about 500
would have been left, mostly of commissioners. After a change of council leadership, the
CEO left, and these plans were halted. However there is a strong likelihood that much of this
approach will continue, but more slowly.
One service that will change fairly soon is the library service. The original plans for the
change in the management and delivery of libraries were so well advanced that these will
continue. In future the library service will be delivered through an independent cooperative
structure. www.suffolk.gov.uk
65 | P a g e
10.7 Babergh Borough Council
Babergh has two officers who job share the community/arts post, however neither had time
to contribute to the audit research. The council website states “The Arts and Community
development service is aimed at encouraging and nurturing the arts in the Babergh area and
recognises the value that cultural activity can have on communities, individuals and
businesses”. www.babergh.gov.uk/Babergh/Home/Leisure+-+Be+Active+-+Tourism+-
+Arts/Arts+and+Culture/Arts+Welcome+Page.htm
10.8 Forest Heath District Council
The Arts & Heritage Officer sits in a very strong community services team that works closely
together and has done so for a long time. Services in future will be shared with St
Edmundsbury Council although the councillors will not be affected by this change, only
officers. There is concern about how the two council’s cultural services teams will fit together
as the services sit in different departments and have different approaches and
responsibilities. www.forest-heath.gov.uk
The Arts & Heritage Officer is the sole officer covering both arts and heritage but with the
emphasis mostly on the heritage side. Her current work is heavily involved with the three
museums in the district, National Horse Racing Museum in Newmarket, the redevelopment
of Mildenhall Museum and Brandon Heritage Centre. Her heritage role includes supporting
the museums and heritage open days so that the value of the museums is clear to the
community and to visitors.
The Cultural Services team work closely together using a cross disciplinary approach.
Examples of this include the Equalities team working with Suffolk County Council on an
Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) funded Young Roots project and Health Improvement staff
cooking in schools.
10.9 Ipswich Borough Council
There is no Arts Development Officer in Ipswich although the town is culturally rich and has
four of the seven Suffolk NPOs, as well as many other arts organisations.
www.ipswich.gov.uk/site/scripts/documents.php?categoryID=200006 .
The museum service is part of Colchester and Ipswich Museum Service. This Essex/Suffolk
cross border museum service was a Museum Hub but failed to obtain funding in the latest
ACE managed round of funding. Unfortunately there was no response from the museum
service to a request for information. www.cimuseums.org.uk/home.html
Ipswich is home to four of Suffolk’s NPOs and these are:
• Dance East
• Eastern Angles
• Gecko Theatre
• New Wolsey Theatre
The University Campus Suffolk has a large campus development in Ipswich.
66 | P a g e
10.10 Mid Suffolk District Council
Mid Suffolk has an Arts Service which appears, from the Rural Arts Suffolk website, to work
in partnership with Babergh Arts and Suffolk Coastal. There is an Arts Officer but they were
not able to respond to the request for information during the audit.
www.ruralartssuffolk.org.uk
10.11 St Edmundsbury Borough Council
The Festival, Arts & Entertainment Manager, manages the Festival (which has run for 27
years) and programmes the apex, a new concert hall and music venue. The Festival is an
eleven day music event in May which has national and international links and includes a
wide range of music which encompasses classical, jazz, world and folk. Community
engagement work is done through projects and discussions have recently been taking place
with Aldeburgh about possible collaborations.
The council also supports Moyse’s Hall Museum and West Stow Anglo Saxon Village. Both
of these offer sessions for schools and events for CYP and their families. The council does
not have an arts development office, so no arts development work is undertaken across the
district. St Edmundsbury and Forest Heath District Council are due to share services, the
impact of which is not yet known. www.stedmundsbury.gov.uk
Bury St Edmunds is home to the Theatre Royal one of Suffolk’s seven NPOs. The theatre
has a strong learning offer and is keen to develop this further develop including skills
development and experience for those leaving school. A key organisational aim is to ensure
that both participation and professional work reaches the rural community. Smith’s Row, an
ex- RFO, is also in the town.
Elsewhere in the district is an arts centre at Haverhill which serves that town.
10.12 Suffolk Coastal District Council
There is no arts officer in Suffolk Coastal although the district is one of the partners on the
Rural Arts Suffolk website. www.suffolkcoastal.gov.uk and www.ruralartssuffolk.org.uk .
The district is home to Aldeburgh Music, one of the seven Suffolk NPOs. Aldeburgh is a lead
partner with Suffolk County Music Service on the Suffolk Music Education Hub. It is also
quoted as a delivery partner in the Cambridgeshire and Norfolk Music Education Hub
applications. The Suffolk County Council brief for Aldeburgh includes running large projects.
One of these is the schools festival which is aimed at all the county’s state schools. In over
25 years only two or three schools have not taken part, so this has a widespread effect in the
county. Amongst a range of very interesting work for CYP is their Arts Award work with
young prisoners at the nearby prison, HMYOI Warren Hill, and with young people with
complex needs.
67 | P a g e
10.13 Waveney District Council
The council has a strong involvement with sport and museums. Lowestoft, a notable area of
deprivation for the bridge, is in this district and a focus of much council supported sporting
activity, including dance.
There are quite a number of museums in the area which are financially supported by the
council, as they are seen to add to the economic/tourism offer. Lowestoft has six museums,
however only three of these are accredited. The arts are missing from this picture because
the council was given a very strong steer, by the local arts community, that they did not want
the council to lead in this area of cultural provision. There is a strong local play partnership
which is very active. www.waveney.gov.uk
The arts are managed locally by Waveney & Blyth Arts.
Waveney is home to one of seven Suffolk NPOs, the High Tide Festival Theatre. The
organisation runs an annual festival theatre and helps discover and develop new
playwrights. It already works with schools and this work will develop further.
Suffolk Artlink is a participatory arts charity delivering high quality creative activities to a
range of people including young people, people with learning disabilities, children in
hospitals and older people. Suffolk Artlink also plays a developmental role in the county by
creating partnerships with other organisations in order to deliver innovative projects. One
major aim, running though all the projects, is to add sustainability so they can deliver long
term high quality activities, rather than always having to buy expertise in.
68 | P a g e
11. Education, Schools and Children and Young People
The national and bridge area educational context continues to rapidly evolve but the arts and
cultural sector is well placed to respond, having built up considerable expertise over the
years, despite the sometimes frustrating experience of trying to engage with schools.
There is plenty of evidence of the benefits to schools of working with museums, libraries and
the arts. However the difficulty of communicating with schools, often with those who would
most benefit, due to the multiple challenges they face, cannot be underestimated.
Engagement with such schools, as well as the rest of the education sector, at a time of rapid
change, will be major challenge for the bridge and its partners.
11.1 Education
There is currently a considerable rate of change affecting all stages of education from early
years through to higher education. This will continue to be the case for the foreseeable
future. The following paragraphs highlight some of these developments but they are not
comprehensive and may look dated in a short time as new initiatives and developments
emerge in the coming months.
11.2 Early Years
The Early Years Foundation Stage is defined as 0-5 in the 2006 Childcare Act. This area of
provision has recently been the subject of a review led by Dame Clare Tickell and the
recommendations, published on the 30th March 2012 were:
• Significantly reducing the number of early learning goals children are assessed
against at age five from 69 to 17.
• Parents to get a summary of their child’s development, alongside the health visitor
check at age two, to help identify any early problems or special educational needs.
• A new focus on three prime areas which are the foundations for children’s ability to
learn and develop healthily: personal, social and emotional development;
communication and language; and physical development.
• Beneath these should be four areas of learning where these skills are applied:
literacy, mathematics, expressive arts and design and understanding the world.
• With the three new prime areas of learning, a greater emphasis on making sure
children have the basic social, emotional communication and language skills they
need to learn and thrive at school – things like being able to make friends and listen
effectively. There should also be a stronger link between the EYFS and what is
expected of children in KS1.
• Freeing the workforce from unnecessary bureaucracy so they can spend more time
interacting with children – including scrapping written risk assessments for nursery
trips and outings.
• All early years practitioners to have at least a level 3 qualification (which is equivalent
to A level) and the Government should consider applying the ‘teaching schools’
model to the early years.
• Ofsted should be clearer on what is required of settings when they are inspected to
help reduce high levels of paperwork.
69 | P a g e
• Independent schools should be allowed to apply to opt out of the learning and
development part of the EYFS, and the exemptions process should be made easier. Source www.education.gov.uk/childrenandyoungpeople/earlylearningandchildcare/a0076193/early-years-foundation-
stage-to-be-radically-slimmed-down
The government plans to respond to the recommendations in the summer of 2012. Any
changes to the Early Years Foundation Stage will begin in September 2012 at the earliest.
At the same time the Early Years training and qualifications of the associated work force has
been reviewed by Professor Cathy Nutbrown. Her interim recommendations published on
the 13th March 2012 were:
• An effective qualifications structure that motivates people working in the early years
and tells employers what skills and knowledge they have.
• Courses that prepare people for working in the early years, raise the standards of
those choosing to enter the profession, give them the right skills in literacy and
numeracy and include the latest cutting edge detail about child development.
• The case for expanding the role of teachers in the early years, creating new teaching
pathways with an early years specialism, linking more closely the education worlds of
the school and the early years. Source: www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/inthenews/a00205061/nutbrowninterim
For those working in the cultural sectors two of the areas of learning ‘expressive arts and
design’ and ‘understanding the world’ should hopefully provide some promising opportunities
to work with this education sector.
The final report of the Nutbrown Review is expected in the summer of 2012.
11.3 Primary and secondary education
These sectors both face a number of common challenges, quite apart from those that they
face separately. These include:
• The increasing likelihood of schools converting to academy status. Among other
things this will mean independence from the local education authority and control, by
a school, of all its budgets.
• The new OFSTED inspection regime which is due to be tougher than the current
model.
• The introduction of Teaching Schools, a network of schools funded to lead on
training, sharing good practise and research.
• The Pupil Premium which is allocated to schools for pupils who are on free school
meals. This money is intended to ‘narrow the gap’ between this group and their better
off peers. This is an ambition that those in the cultural sector could practically help to
deliver.
• The potential competition for resources with Free Schools.
• Concern over budgets and the effect reducing these will have on school provision.
The latter is of particular concern to those from the cultural sector working with
schools, as there is already evidence that this is the type of provision is being lost
due to reduced budgets.
70 | P a g e
• The schools White Paper, The Importance of Teaching, sets out a radical reform
programme for the schools system, with schools freed from the constraints of central
Government direction and teachers placed firmly at the heart of school improvement.
Amongst other things it includes powers for teachers to improve discipline; a vision
for a transformed school curriculum; changes to school performance tables, Ofsted
inspections; and governance and school-led school improvement replacing top-down
initiatives. Source: www.education.gov.uk/schools/toolsandinitiatives/schoolswhitepaper/b0068570/the-
importance-of-teaching/
• Henley reviews of music education and cultural education in England
11.4 Primary schools and education 5-11
In addition to the joint factors identified above, there are others which only affect this sector:
• Review of the National Curriculum. A full consultation on English, maths and science
will begin late 2012.
• The recent suggestion by the Secretary of State for Education concerning primary
age children learning another language, other than English, from age 7.
11.5 Secondary schools and education 11-16
In addition to the joint factors identified above, there are others which only affect this sector:
• The move to the English Baccalaureate which is made up of English, mathematics,
history or geography, the sciences and a language. There has been concern at how
this will impact on arts subjects and whether numbers taking them will reduce. There
were some early indications that this might indeed be the case amongst some of
those interviewed.
• Changes to the National Curriculum which will be introduced in 2013.
• Changes to GCSE’s from September 2012 which was already due to happen.
However this development may be overtaken by their possible abolition and
replacement by a new exam as announced to the House of Commons by the
Secretary of State for Education on the 21st June 2012.
• The review of ‘A’ levels which, although it will affect post 16 education, may have an
effect on the curriculum or teaching for this younger age group as well.
• Raising of the Participation in Education to 17 in 2013 and 18 by 2015.
11.6 Post – 16 education
Factors to be noted in this area of education and learning include
• Review of ‘A’ levels.
• Changes to the school leaving age which will go up to 18 by 2015.
• Increase in university tuition fees to £9,000 a year which may have an effect on the
choices of this younger age group.
• Wolf Review of Vocational Education.
• Apprenticeships.
The Wolf Review of Vocational Education was asked to consider how vocational education
for 14 to 19 year-olds can be improved in order to promote successful progression into the
71 | P a g e
labour market and into higher level education and training routes. Key recommendations in
the report include:
• Incentivising young people to take the most valuable vocational qualifications pre-16,
while removing incentives to take large numbers of vocational qualifications to the
detriment of core academic study.
• Introducing principles to guide study programmes for young people on vocational
routes post-16 to ensure they are gaining skills which will lead to progression into a
variety of jobs or further learning, in particular, to ensure that those who have not
secured a good pass in English and mathematics GCSE continue to study those
subjects.
• Evaluating the delivery structure and content of apprenticeships to ensure they
deliver the right skills for the workplace.
• Removing the requirement that all qualifications offered to 14 to 19 year-olds fit within
the Qualifications and Credit Framework.
• Enabling FE lecturers and professionals to teach in schools, ensuring young people
are being taught by those best suited.
In response, the government will take action on all the individual recommendations and will
deliver on three key themes:
• “Ensure that all young people study and achieve in English and mathematics, ideally
to GCSE A*-C, by the age of 19. For those young people who are not immediately
able to achieve these qualifications, we will identify high quality English and maths
qualifications that will enable them to progress to GCSE later. We will also reform
GCSE to ensure that they are a more reliable indicator of achievement in the basics,
in particular by ensuring that GCSEs are reformed alongside our current review of
the National Curriculum.
• Reform performance tables and funding rules to remove the perverse incentives
which have served only to devalue vocational education, while pushing young people
into qualification routes that do not allow them to move into work or further learning.
Those vocational qualifications that attract performance points will be the very best
for young people – in terms of their content, assessment and progression.
• Look at the experience of other countries to simplify Apprenticeships, remove
bureaucracy and make them easier for employers to offer.” Source: www.education.gov.uk/16to19/qualificationsandlearning/a0074953/review-of-vocational-education-the-wolf-report
Apprenticeships are also seen as of key importance to young people to acquire the training
and skills they need to enter and progress in work, move into higher-level skills development
and build fulfilling careers. Apprenticeships provide new opportunities and life chances for
young people and adults. Source www.education.gov.uk/a0064398/increasing-and-improving-apprenticeships-
opportunities
The sector skills council, Creative and Cultural Skills works through the National Skills
Academy to develop progression routes into creative careers. The National Skills Academy
is a membership network of 20 colleges and 220 theatre and live music employers
nationwide. The organisation recognises, develops and improves skills opportunities to
provide pathways into the creative and cultural industries. City College Norwich is a member
of the NSA and the only one in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area. Source: http://nsa-ccskills.co.uk/
72 | P a g e
11.7 Information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit
Although education and schools were beyond the direct scope of the audit research and
report due to time constraints, a considerable amount of information was obtained about
schools and their networks. All three disciplines, arts, libraries and museums work with
schools and in education. As CYP are at the core of Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)’s
mission, developing successful partnerships with schools and education will be one of three
key relationships alongside those with the cultural sector and local authorities.
This focus on working with schools is needed. Those interviewed will welcome it as there
was widespread concern about the education offer and extracurricular activities provision
across much of the area. Added to this were concerns about the current speed of change in
education and the ability of other sectors, which have a stake in working with CYP and
schools, to keep up with them. For example museums in the east of England did a lot of
work on engaging with schools through learning how to develop a relationship with the Local
Education Authority (LEA). However as the academy programme accelerates and the LEAs
become less important, in the much more fragmented picture that is emerging, museums will
need to find ways of establishing new relationships. Such work takes time and it can feel like
the long term investments of energy are lost very quickly.
While there is excellent provision in some parts of the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)
area, such as South Cambridgeshire, the overall impression is of a sector that is
underachieving. The same evidence came up often; complacency, low aspiration, poor exam
results and schools that won’t encourage their pupils to participate in experiences outside
the immediate area. In Norfolk and Suffolk there is difficulty in recruiting staff from outside
the county so the problems remain entrenched. In Suffolk the LEA has been experiencing
difficulties. Added to what is already a worrying picture, is the concern that schools are
becoming worse off financially and are increasingly unable to afford the trips or activities that
could help counteract some of these problems.
Many of those working in the arts (both local authority officers and arts organisations) have
considerable experience of working with education. Libraries and museums are usually good
at identifying the problems affecting young people in their area and developing work to try
and counteract these. What is also interesting about this is the local nature of the solutions,
which, in the case of museums, is often based on the local collection or heritage. However
these solutions can also be adapted by others for use in their own local circumstances.
Museums, in particular, benefitted from MLA funded posts that supported cross regional
projects to test ideas and approaches. Libraries, too, develop such projects, but being large,
usually countywide authorities, their aim is to develop an approach that can be adapted
across the whole service area. In both cases however, such work may be delivered by staff
or volunteers who do not have a particular learning or CYP remit, or experience. This not a
criticism because the work is often of a very high standard, more a note of advice to those
not so well acquainted with those sectors.
Concern was expressed several times that schools do not realise what is on offer to them
locally nor do they realise the quality of the offer. Many schools still look to London or
opportunities outside their county or regional area. This is not because arts and museums, in
particular, are not communicating their offer. Two or three interviewees mentioned
73 | P a g e
contacting local schools to offer, free or at low cost, an opportunity involving performances or
workshops for which the take up was low or non-existent. However this touches on a whole
other area of concern about how schools can be communicated and worked with. This is a
long standing problem but with the current changes in education, and in poorer times, it
appears to be getting worse. This is something the bridge needs to be fully aware of both for
its own programme involving schools, as well as being the strategic lead for work in this field.
None of the people interviewed, with the exception of the Arts Development Managers in
South Cambridgeshire, work in schools. The views expressed below are from people who
work with schools or who are working with those who are having particular problems with
schools and the educational sector.
As direct consultation with schools was not part of the brief for the audit research, Norfolk &
Norwich Festival (Bridge) may want to consider how it can contact those working in schools
and education directly to establish their views and needs. The information and networks
already suggested in this report could act as a basis for planning further engagement with
the education and schools sector.
Comments included:
• Less available money for school trips.
• In Cambridge there is a cluster of schools that lack the resources to afford the
educational offer of the museums.
• Teachers also need to have the confidence to value what there is in their
communities and locally rather than feeling the need to go elsewhere to provide high
quality opportunities for their CYP.
• In the districts there is a strong network in secondary and primary schools (dance
related).
• There is no dance teachers’ network. Norfolk Dance and the Theatre Royal are trying
to revive a network following the loss of the Schools’ Coordinator post.
• There are high levels of non-school attendance in parts of Yarmouth and it is
important to work with youth agencies in addition to schools.
• One concern is that the Borough Council has not fully embraced the value of the arts
and this attitude can be picked up by others, including the local schools.
• It is hard to engage with the high schools due to curriculum restrictions and several of
these including King’s Lynn and West Norfolk are dealing with social challenges.
• Norwich has one of the lowest GCSE achievement rates in the country (bottom 10%
for last 10 years, third from bottom nationally in 2010/11).
• South Norfolk has a lot of small rural schools with low aspirations and poor financial
resources
• Often the low level of aspiration and sameness of what is on offer in some of the rural
areas. The ‘not very exciting’ isn’t challenged and many of those running sessions
have become stale. There is low engagement in CPD because people are not being
pushed or challenged. In turn this leads to a lack of energy.
• In education, Peterborough is one of the lowest achieving areas in England.
• Low aspiration with low numbers progress to higher education.
• Poor language skills in both English and other languages.
74 | P a g e
• At a recent celebration of music for schools at Snape Maltings a school from
Stowmarket would not attend because it regarded the 23 mile journey as too far
away.
• There are problems related to teacher CPD in that schools will not release teachers
due to the cost of cover and associated disruption. The Music Service offered free
Sing Up training in schools but teachers were not released to attend.
• In other cases attendance by teachers hasn’t happened because the costs of
engaging were regarded as too high.
• Schools are losing the access to activities as funding begins to disappear; for
example it is increasingly uneconomical to bring in a TIE organisation.
• In Suffolk school improvement has been a big issue since the time of the Labour
Government. KS2 (7-11) is third from the bottom in England.
• Poverty of aspiration.
• The numbers going into higher education are low against national figures.
• London is still important for school visits, which means Suffolk organisations are
competing with those in London.
• There is also a tendency amongst the local schools not to be very interested in the
cultural offer.
• There are poor education standards across the district.
• Young people do not, on the whole, reach their potential as there are narrow life
choices available to them.
• The district has some of the lowest educational achievement nationally. Newmarket
College has a 38% A*- C rate.
• Suffolk is not high on the deprivation indices but it does have poor education in the
state schools. They also have low aspirations for their pupils and are affected by the
rurality of the area. One contributory problem is that many staff are still recruited
locally and they are used to the history of low standards. Educational standards
suffer from complacency linked to Suffolk being regarded as a nice place to live.
11.8 Arts and cultural education
There are several arts and cultural initiatives that affect both education and the future of
Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge). These are the two Henley reviews, Artsmark and Arts
Award.
11.9 Henley – Music Education in England
The Music Education in England report by Darren Henley, published in 2011, has already
had an important outcome with the setting up of the Music Education Hubs. These will be
overseen by ACE and will be expected to work closely with the bridge. The summary of the
report concluded that:
• Many children in England benefit from excellent music teaching from excellent
teachers. In some parts of the country, the opportunities for children to take part in
musical activities are immense. However, some children in England do not currently
receive an adequate, let alone good, Music Education.
75 | P a g e
• The Review lays down recommendations for minimum expectations of what any child
going through the English school system should receive in terms of an education in
music.
• It also outlines a national plan, which describes the expectations of how Music
Education should develop over the coming years - this section of recommendations
is designed to ensure that patchiness is replaced by consistency, so that children are
able to enjoy the same level of Music Education, no matter where in England they
happen to live. • Source: www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/AllPublications/Page11/DFE-00011-2011
This review was followed by the ‘The Importance of Music’, the first national plan for music
education. It sets out the Government’s vision for music education; to enable children from
all backgrounds and every part of England to have the opportunity to learn a musical
instrument; to make music with others; to learn to sing; and to have the opportunity to
progress to the next level of excellence.
This is part of the Government’s aim to ensure that all pupils have rich cultural opportunities alongside their academic and vocational studies.
Amongst other things the plan will:
• Provide a new national funding formula to make sure all parts of the country get fair
funding for music on a per pupil basis, with a weighting for deprivation.
• A new music teaching module will be developed for trainee primary teachers, to give
them extra skills to teach music.
• Continued funding of £500,000 per year to the National Youth Music Organisations
fund, matched by the Arts Council England currently via Youth Music.
• Continued support for the internationally recognised Music and Dance Scheme –
which provides money for exceptionally gifted young people to attend the highly
specialist music and dance schools.
• Continued funding for In Harmony, Sistema England, augmented by matched funding
from Arts Council England so that the programme can expand.
From August 2012, music education hubs will be funded to bring together local authorities
and local music organisations, like orchestras, choirs and other music groups. They will work
in partnership to make sure every child has a high quality music education, including the
opportunity to learn to sing, to play an instrument and to make music with others. The hubs
will be fully operational from September 2012. The hubs, which will be held accountable for
their effectiveness, will also help improve the consistency around the country and make sure
all pupils receive a high quality music education. Source: www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/a00200352/national-plan-for-music-education
Four Music Education Hubs have been announced in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)
area. These are Cambridgeshire, Peterborough, Norfolk and Suffolk. In Peterborough the
service is new and based around the Hub bid. In the other three areas the bids were led by
the county music services but involved a range of partners including Aldeburgh Music and
Britten Sinfonia, two of the NPOs in the bridge area. All will be working closely with the
bridge.
76 | P a g e
11.10 Henley – Review of Cultural Education
In 2011, the Culture Minister Ed Vaizey, asked Darren Henley to carry out a review of
cultural education. The review was published in February 2012 and among the
recommendations are:
• There should be a minimum level of Cultural Education that a child should expect to
receive during his or her schooling as a whole.
• The government should develop a single National Cultural Education Plan. This
document should set out its ambitions for children and young people in this area,
while ensuring the development of a framework that enables these ambitions to be
delivered.
• Arts Council England, the Heritage Lottery Fund, the British Film Institute, the Big
Lottery Fund and English Heritage should work together to ensure that their
individual strategies/plans in the area of Cultural Education cohere in a way that adds
up to a single over-arching strategy in line with the government’s stated ambitions.
By coming together as a new Cultural Education Partnership Group (CEPG), this
could ultimately result in a single strategic commissioning fund for Cultural Education
money in England.
• The CEPG should consider establishing a new Cultural Education Passport scheme
for children between the ages of five and nineteen, which records all of their in-school
and out of school cultural activities, enabling parents, carers and teachers to
understand what each child has achieved and to plug any gaps in knowledge and
experience.
• Consideration should be given to rolling a structure out across the rest of the Cultural
Education spectrum, to enable meaningful partnerships on the ground across
different art forms and using all of the expertise and venues that are available in a
given area. This could be achieved through the further development of Arts Council
England’s Bridge Organisations, which currently focus on the arts, to include other
cultural areas.
• Greater priority should be given to the importance of Design as a curriculum subject
within schools.
• Consideration should be given to promoting Dance and Drama to subject areas in
their own right, rather than being seen as junior partners to P.E. and English.
• Most children and young people should be encouraged to take part in the Arts Award
and Junior Arts Award, which should be regarded as a valuable qualification.
• The scope of the Artsmark Award should be widened to include all areas of cultural
education covered by this Review. Source: http://www.dcms.gov.uk/publications/8875.aspx
The government responded positively to the report and the review endorses the role of the
bridge to help support or establish networks for arts, libraries, heritage, museums and film
with schools.
11.11 Artsmark
Artsmark is the national programme that enables schools, further education colleges and
youth justice settings to evaluate, celebrate and strengthen a quality arts offer. The new
77 | P a g e
focus of Artsmark is to support Arts Council England’s strategic framework for the arts,
‘Achieving Great Art for Everyone’. It delivers this by, amongst other things, providing:
• A kitemark for quality in provision of the arts
• Rigorous criteria against which applicants can benchmark their provision
• The creation of a network of organisations committed to high quality, broad and
sustainable arts provision. Source: http://www.artsmark.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/how%20to%20apply_0.pdf
Along with Arts Award which is discussed below, Artsmark will provide key KPIs for the
bridge.
11.12 Artsmark information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit
Due to the importance of this scheme to the bridge, those interviewed during the audit
process were asked for their views. As far as Artsmark was concerned the most common
response when asked about it was ‘no idea’. Arts officers and some museums, which work
with schools, were able to give a much clearer picture of their local schools’ involvement.
Some felt that the bridge could help Artsmark expansion by flagging up the cultural
organisations that can help support schools to achieve the award.
There was also considerable concern that lack of knowledge of the award meant teachers
and parents don’t really understand the importance of it, even though the award is
acknowledged by Ofsted. At a time of pressure on budgets and time, Artsmark needs to
have a much clearer identity or schools will withdraw from the scheme.
Comments included:
• There is a concern about schools being pushed towards academy status and the
benefit of Artsmark is not clear.
• As school budgets are tight the benefits of the scheme need to be made clear as
currently Artsmark is not top of anyone’s agenda but instead it becomes lost among
other competing demands.
• Ofsted is now recognising Artsmark which needs shouting about so its value is
realised by those who are sceptical.
• The current deadlines are much too tight and if there are future awkward changes,
more schools will withdraw from the scheme.
• The public understanding of the scheme is poor and it could do with some profile
raising. Again emphasising the Ofsted angle would help.
• Profile raising for Artsmark as there is a lot of work needed on this.
• Beginning to see the impact of the EBac, and its lack of arts inclusion, on the school.
For schools the EBac subjects are the priority so if Artsmark is to improve or have a
higher profile how can it compete against this priority? Is there a way that it can be
included in the EBac process?
• Schools are not approaching Kettles Yard, NPOs or other cultural providers over
Artsmark. Equally those organisations need more encouragement, and possibly
training, to support them to approach schools about involving them in the Artsmark
process.
78 | P a g e
• One positive sign recently was the high attendance by schools at Artsmark training
days which saw 33 schools represented, including three head teachers. (Suffolk)
This lack of knowledge or interest is borne out in the statistics below
Table 15
Number of Artsmark Awards by Level in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area
(2010)
Round Segment Norfolk
CC Cambridgeshire
CC Suffolk
CC Peterborou
gh
Current
Artsmark 34 7 6 4 Artsmark Silver 28 8 8 5
Artsmark Gold 21 13 9 5 Total Artsmark Awards
83 28 23 14
Historical
Artsmark 79 25 24 9 Artsmark Silver 39 33 32 10
Artsmark Gold 78 30 29 11 Total Artsmark Awards
196 88 85 30
Source: Arts Council England, Year: 2010 Measure: Number of Artsmark awards achieved by schools
As can be seen in the last round of the award in 2010, less than half the number of awards
were made compared to historical levels. Currently 148 institutions have Artsmark in the
bridge area as compared to 399 historically. Even if one just thinks of this in terms of schools
rather than FE or youth justice settings the number is small compared to the 1121 schools
across the bridge area, excluding independent schools. The current holders represent about
13% of the total number of schools. This would suggest that the bridge and it partners will
have quite a challenge to raise the numbers although, widening the scope to include all
areas of cultural education as recommended in Henley, may possibly help once the
partnerships across the cultural spectrum are in place.
11.13 Arts Award
Arts Award is a national qualification that supports young people who want to deepen their
engagement with the arts, helping them to develop as artists and arts leaders. It is open to
7–25 year olds and managed by Trinity College London in association with Arts Council
England.
Since its launch in 2005, the award has grown quickly and is now flourishing in arts centres,
colleges and schools, community projects, libraries, galleries, local authorities, theatres,
youth clubs and youth justice settings. Source: www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/arts-council-initiatives/arts-award/
The award can be achieved at five levels, four accredited qualifications and an introductory
award. These are Discovery, Explore, Bronze silver and Gold. Participants explore any of art
forms including performing arts, visual arts, literature, media and multimedia. The award
79 | P a g e
builds confidence, helps young people to enjoy cultural activities, and prepares them for
further education or employment. Source: www.artsaward.org.uk/site/?id=0
11.14 Arts Award information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit
Amongst those interviewed, Arts Award has a high profile and has been offered by a wide
range of arts organisations, schools, arts teams and museums. The latter sector ran a
scheme, supported by MLA funding, for five museums across the East of England to have
their staff trained as Arts Award Advisers to deliver the Bronze Award. The work is being
reviewed but the initial outcomes were very positive.
There was considerable interest in knowing more about the scheme from some
interviewees. Others were happy to revisit it, having been put off previously by the expense
or complexity. One other common comment was that people had been trained in Arts Award
but then had too few opportunities to put their training into practice.
There were also some objections to the scheme, partly because it was felt the Children’s
Universities in Suffolk and Norfolk offered better, more appropriate, possibilities to libraries
and museums. While other objections were on the grounds of the consistency of the offer or
pressure on CYP’s time to be take part in assessed activities. There was some enthusiasm
for the new Discover and Explore strand of Arts Award.
Comments included:
• Would like to discuss Arts Award welcome for families and the potential Artsmark
offer for schools as part of Wysing offer.
• There are some young people who are disaffected with Arts Award as there is a lack
of consistency of how it is delivered. Organisations need to know how they can be
confident in the quality of the delivery and assessment. They also need to be clear
about the rigour of the assessors’ training.
• There has been a lack of opportunity in some rural areas for people to be able to
apply their Arts Award training. They need support to able to apply this in their own
communities.
• Arts Award is an area we shall be keen to work with the bridge to develop.
• King’s Lynn Arts Centre ran one of the national Arts Award 7 – 11 pilots via a
Saturday Art Club model and will be championing this following final training when it
launches.
• The bridge could help by flagging up to schools, which are planning Arts Award, what
high quality resources exist locally. This would also help build local awareness and
sustainability.
.
80 | P a g e
Table 16
Number of Young Persons with Arts Award (New Awards) (2010-11)
The statistics relating to Arts Award for the bridge area show the following picture
Time Period
Segment Norfolk
CC Cambridgeshire
CC Suffolk
CC Peterboroug
h
October 2010 - March 2011
Bronze 123 86 57 0
Silver 3 15 10 0 Gold 0 0 0 0 Total Arts Awards
126 101 67 0
April 2011 - September 2011
Bronze 126 108 105 9
Silver 5 14 10 3 Gold 2 0 1 0 Total Arts Awards
133 122 116 12
Source: Arts Award data from Trinity College London, Year: 2011 Measure: Number of new Arts Awards achieved by young people
Unlike Artsmark, the figures for Arts Award show the numbers of young people achieving the
award increasing, particularly for Bronze awards. This rise is only marginal in Norfolk but is
more substantial in Cambridgeshire but Suffolk. However the total numbers involved are
very small overall. As the percentage of the total number of young people those achieving
Arts Award is 0.19% in Cambridgeshire, 0.04% in Peterborough, 0.17% in Norfolk and
0.15% in Suffolk. On the current picture it looks as though considerable work will have to be
done to raise these figures to even 1%.
11.15 Children and Young People
Children and Young People of all ages, and the need, or wish, to offer them high quality
cultural and learning opportunities are at the heart of why the bridge exists. One is conscious
that in this report they, and their views, are only represented by adult individuals and
organisations that work with them in so many different ways across the cultural sector. What
those interviewees said is a good starting point for providing some information but, just as
schools and educational representatives need to be consulted in due course, so will children
and young people.
The bridge is in a fortunate position to be able to do this, as there is a good range of ways to
consult with young people across the bridge area. These opportunities range include formal
youth councils, organisations’ youth representatives, mailing lists, virtual groups and groups
of CYP with an activity or organisation in common. There was also a lot of willingness by
interviewees to help with such work.
Despite this major omission it should be noted that there is some excellent work going on in
the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area. Through examples of CYP’s activities and work
and associated evaluations, the bridge has been provided with a good starting point.
81 | P a g e
Reading the attached interviews in Appendix 1 is the only way to gain a full flavour of the
provision and ambition to do more. Right across the bridge area there is outstanding
provision and many of those doing it were kind enough to contribute to the audit research.
Although, as was evident in section four of this report, the bridge area faces challenges
linked to geography, infrastructure, resources and low density of population it does have
allies and expertise to draw on, so that through partnerships and networks the offer to CYP
can be broadened and improved.
One thing that this report cannot demonstrate is how young people, and perhaps to a slightly
lesser extent children, feel about cultural activity and whether that is how they want to spend
their free time. In due course the bridge may want to investigate whether all CYP see such
provision as a good thing or not. If some disagree then this too will need further investigation
to see why it so and how it might impact on future planning?
Inextricably linked to education in the audit research were rural issues and opportunities for
children and young people. In many ways the problems created by the rural nature of the
bridge area is an overarching concern and it has already been discussed, perhaps more
obliquely, earlier in the report. However it seems to fit appropriately into this section so it can
be contemplated from the point of view of CYP.
11.16 Rural issues: information from Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) audit
Along with education and opportunities for CYP and their families, the rural nature of the
area with its scattered populations, isolation, poor public transport and communications is a
major issue which affects virtually the whole of the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area,
with the exception of the more urban areas such as Peterborough, Norwich, Cambridge,
Ipswich, Great Yarmouth and Lowestoft. However if transport difficulties or expense that
create barriers to participation are considered; then the CYP in the urban areas are often no
better off than their rural counterparts. This view is supported by the figures relating to
children in poverty referred to earlier in the report in section five. There is little point having
more opportunities on your doorstep if you or your family cannot afford to access them either
directly, or because the cost of transport bars you from doing so.
How the bridge can ameliorate these problems will no doubt form a major part if it’s future
planning and discussion with partners and others. The challenge of overcoming this is not to
be underestimated, as it goes to the heart of what the bridge will be able to achieve. Ways
need to be found of offering high quality sustainable opportunities to CYP and their families
in all circumstances.
Another side of this picture is that CYP, in particular, need opportunities to be able to engage
with cultural activity away from their local area to expand their horizons and help them
experience more of the world at large to support their learning and development.
One final point is that in many of the rural areas there are considerable opportunities for
seasonal agricultural work which attract a wide range of migrant workers, many of them from
Eastern Europe. While in one sense this might seem to offer the positive chance of more
82 | P a g e
diversity and a less local view in rural areas, this does not always seem to be the case. This
is another aspect of the modern nature of rural living that the bridge may need to note.
Another hint of the area’s increasing diversity is the 77 languages that are now spoken in
Norfolk schools and the diverse make up of Peterborough’s population. While this has long
been the case in London and the south east, not to mention cities and towns in northern
England it is a much more recent development in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)
area.
Comments included:
Negative
• Rural isolation is a problem and the local bus services have had another cut recently.
• The area around Melbourn, in common with much of rural Cambridgeshire, suffers
from isolation where there are no trains. The bus service is poor and getting worse.
• Transport and young people (although transport is very difficult for everyone in
relation to what is a regional facility). If the transport was better more young people
could access Wysing and its facilities.
• Most young people that Wysing work with are too young to drive so are otherwise
dependent on their parents to reach Wysing. This can lead to exclusion for some
groups of young people.
• The rural schools and part of the county often resent Norwich because there is a
perception that everything happens there. So there may need to be an emphasis on
the rural support the bridge offers.
• Access to arts is often quite limited. North Norfolk has 7 market towns and 150
villages so provision is patchy and access to public transport very limited.
• Rurality and the associated lack of opportunities are a big problem. There is also an
issue of hidden poverty related to the rurality of the district.
• Transport is causing considerable problems. The bus service is poor or non-existent
away from the coast. Trains are very limited and only stop at three towns.
• Transport and communications are a real concern for many young people. There is
little public transport and for those on lower incomes it is difficult to afford.
• Working in rural areas is not the same as working in larger towns. There can be a
suspicion or dislike of outsiders who appear to come in, create a brief flare of activity
and then disappear.
• Public transport is a big issue for young people in Norfolk and especially in the rural
areas.
• Rural counties have specific problems of transport and communication and these are
particularly pronounced in Breckland and West Norfolk.
Positive
• In such a rural and dispersed area the more that can be done by the community the
better, but they need skills and resources to achieve this.
• As in many other parts of the bridge area, the rural nature of the area means that
particular ways of working have been built up over time. The isolation, small
communities, poor infrastructure and narrow range of opportunities have meant
organisations have developed a way of working which is successful. This means a
gradual approach and a long term commitment to the communities and young people
within in them.
83 | P a g e
• Work in local communities to help they take ownership so that in ten years time
culture is embedded at a local level across the county.
11.17 Opportunities for Children and Young People
This section complements those on formal learning and rural issues. The challenges have
already been laid out in the local authority areas of need information. This section provides a
clear indication of the commitment by those who have worked in the bridge area over a long
time and are dedicated to trying to find solutions to improve the choices and lives of CYP.
Comments include:
• Young Promoters in which young people are trained to run their own events e.g.
Death Metal event in March (Cambs).
• CYP provision should be informed by listening to and working democratically with
children and families, rather than being designed and created by outside adults.
• I would like to see opportunities created for CYP to access and experience high
impact, high quality arts events (especially within the Visual Arts and Cross Art
Forms) which local voluntary sector isn’t able to provide.
• The bridge could play an important role by bringing in high quality top notch
opportunities and services for CYP. These need to have long term networking
inherent in them as well. The bridge needs to support the current infrastructure, but
also look at ways of making it stronger and to raise the profile of this work.
• Young People need opportunities to travel elsewhere to take part in the arts.
Geographic need is a real issue and the company would like to work further afield,
especially towards the west.
• Suffolk will have My Place Centre in Stowmarket called The Mix which is due to open
in January 2013. This is the only My Place in a rural market town. The original aim
had been for a slant towards sport and activity but the young people consulted
wanted to do creative things.
11.18 Youth Services
Finally in this section is a brief note about youth services across the bridge area. This is not
because the subject is unimportant, but more a reflection of the current state of the sector.
Youth Services are in disarray, due to cuts, all over the bridge area which meant it was very
difficult to find many contacts available to talk about such work. Disquiet about the effects of
these cuts was widely expressed across all three sectors of museums, libraries and arts.
Suffolk appears to be settling down after the changes there, Youth Advisory Boards are
being set up in Norfolk at district level and in Cambridgeshire the picture was unclear but
cuts were referred to by non county council contacts. One other aspect that emerged, and
may need monitoring, is the possible future involvement of parish councils or third sector
providers in youth service provision. Parish Council provision is happening in one place in
South Cambridgeshire and the Norfolk Youth Advisory Board providers were tendered for.
84 | P a g e
The bridge will need to monitor developments and the effect they may be having on cultural
access and provision for young people. This may be an area where the Bridge needs to
develop some strategic leadership so that it can make representation about the role that
youth services play in helping deprived young people and others to have access to ‘high
quality artistic and creative experiences’.
Comments included:
• In some areas the parish councils are buying in a youth worker or supporting a local
youth club.
• One project related to the scheme involved training officers, who work with young
people, in Arts Award as well as with artists to train them to work with young people.
This initiative was partly as response to the loss of the Youth Service or its narrower
targeting on vulnerable young people. One of the results of this narrow focus is the
loss of prevention work with young people more generally.
• The Youth Service has been heavily cut by Norfolk County Council. In North Norfolk
Holt Youth Project is now a major facility following the demise of the Youth Service.
• The Youth Advisory Board is being organised by West Norfolk although the delivery
organisation is unclear at the moment.
• As in other parts of Norfolk the Youth Service has been replaced by a Youth Advisory
Board. In Breckland this is due to be run by the Benjamin Foundation, although there
are few details as yet.
• MAP is managing the Youth Advisory Boards (which are replacing the Norfolk CC
Youth Service) in Great Yarmouth and Norwich.
• The loss of the Youth Service is affecting project work because without their support
it is difficult to get some of young people, in most need, to the sessions.
• Suffolk CC has closed about 17 youth clubs out of 40, but many of these had served
small numbers of young people. The service is now targeted to NEETS, or other
deprived and underachieving young people.
85 | P a g e
12. Cultural sector – arts, museums and libraries
The Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) has a considerable range of cultural partners and
provision to call on, and work with, across its area. However this provision is patchy and one
challenge will be how to balance the very different needs of various areas for support or
partnership.
In areas where provision is excellent the bridge may be viewed as having little role to play.
However it still will need to develop relationships, so such areas do not feel ignored (and
therefore cut off from a major ACE supported initiative). Moreover those areas which have a
strong cultural infrastructure may be able to work with the bridge to improve the offer in
places which are poorly provided for. Such partnerships may also help lever in more funding.
The bridge will have to identify how such areas or organisations might have a role in the
places that lack cultural infrastructure or provision and what would be the most appropriate
way to develop these.
In some places, without high levels of provision or resource, the challenge is going to be
finding ways in to work with the locality, particularly as this dearth often coincides with
patches of poorer, or less forward looking education, or local authority support. However in
other comparable places good provision and hard working, innovative individuals exist, but
they may need additional support and resource to increase the impact of their work. This is
made more necessary if where they are working is in the face of local indifference or an
unhelpful local administration.
New sources of funding also need to be identified, as the traditional patterns of delivery and
funding support change. There will also be a challenge around helping arts organisations
and museums key into relevant local authority commissioning opportunities, including health.
This aspect of the bridge’s work will, as always, need to be considered in the light of
sustainability, something that was universally raised across the bridge area in all the audit
interviews.
12.1 Arts Council England
Arts Council England is the Non-Departmental Public Body (NDPB) which ‘champions,
develops and invests in artistic and cultural experiences that enrich people's lives’. Since
taking over responsibility for libraries and museums from the Museums Libraries and
Archives Council (MLA) in 2011, the organisation supports ‘a range of activities across the
arts, museums and libraries, from theatre to digital art, reading to dance, music to literature,
and crafts to collections’.
‘Achieving great art for everyone’, is Arts Council England’s strategic framework for the arts
over the next 10 years. This plan lays out five goals to be achieved by 2021. These are:
• Goal 1: Talent and artistic excellence are thriving and celebrated
• Goal 2: More people experience and are inspired by the arts
• Goal 3: The arts are sustainable, resilient and innovative
• Goal 4: The arts leadership and workforce are diverse and highly skilled
• Goal 5: Every child and young person has the opportunity to experience the richness
of the arts
86 | P a g e
While all these goals will impact on the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) it is Goal 5 which
is a particular driver for an organisation established to work with children and young people
and their families. The two aims of Goal 5 are:
• Improving the delivery of arts opportunities for children and young people. • Raising the standard of art being produced for, with and by children and young
people. Source: www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/our-priorities-2011-15/
Since ‘Achieving great art for everyone was published’, ACE has taken over the lead
responsibility for museums and libraries. To support this work ACE has published ‘Culture,
knowledge and understanding: great museums and libraries for everyone’ to integrate
museums and libraries into their framework. This will be touched on again in the section
below that deals with museums and libraries
12.2 National Portfolio Organisations and the bridge
From April 2012 ACE is funding nineteen National Portfolio Organisations in the bridge area
for the next three years.
Table 17
NPOs in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area arranged by local authority area
Area NPO Place Artform
Cambridgeshire 7 NPOs
Cambridge City
Academy Of Ancient Music Cambridge Music
Britten Sinfonia Cambridge Music
Hoipolloi Theatre Company Cambridge Theatre
Junction CDC Limited Cambridge Combined arts
Kettle's Yard Gallery Cambridge Visual arts
New International Encounter Cambridge Theatre
East Cambridgeshire
Fenland
Huntingdonshire
South Cambridgeshire
Wysing Arts Centre Wysing Visual arts
Peterborough 0 NPOs
Norfolk 5 NPOs
Breckland
Broadland
Great Yarmouth
King’s Lynn & West
Norfolk
North Norfolk
Norwich City
British Centre For Literary
Translation
Norwich Literature
87 | P a g e
Area NPO Place Artform
Norfolk & Norwich Festival Norwich Combined arts
Norwich Arts Centre Norwich Combined arts
Tilted Productions Norwich Dance
Writers' Centre Norwich Norwich Literature
South Norfolk
Suffolk 7 NPOs
Babergh
Forest Heath
Ipswich
DanceEast Ipswich Dance
Eastern Angles Theatre
Company
Ipswich Theatre
Gecko Theatre Ltd Ipswich Theatre
New Wolsey Theatre Ipswich Theatre
Mid Suffolk
St Edmundsbury
Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds Theatre
Suffolk Coastal
Aldeburgh Music Aldeburgh Music
Waveney
HighTide Festival Theatre Halesworth Theatre
As can be seen from the above table, the location of the NPOs tends to reflect the pattern in
provision already discussed previously in the report and there are large parts of the bridge
area without arts provision at this level. Of course this is not the whole picture of provision,
as the majority of arts organisations and providers sit outside the directly funded ACE sector.
The table also shows the clustering which occurs in the county towns of Cambridge, Norwich
and Ipswich that between them account for 15 out of 19 NPOs. There are advantages to an
area of such clusters of provision, or activity, because the whole is usually greater than the
sum of the parts. Clusters of any sort tend to attract other associated providers so they
become a focus for people to access a wide range of options in a relatively small geographic
area. However this may be of little consolation to those for whom access is difficult due to
transport barriers or other types of difficulties that have already been highlighted.
One way the bridge could help NPOs and others, is through providing brokering or support
for their work with places and organisations outside their immediate locality. Many cultural
organisations are already working across borders and plan an expansion of such work. Set
against the paucity of cultural provision in some parts of the bridge area, such support
seems a worthwhile approach.
This type of working is already happening in Peterborough, a unitary authority without an
NPO currently. Britten Sinfonia, New International Encounter and Wysing all discussed their
88 | P a g e
work in the city. Metal, a Southend on Sea based NPO, will soon be expanding its
organisation by moving into Chauffeurs Cottage, new artspace in Peterborough.
12.3 ACE Funding in the bridge area
In 2011-12 ACE provided £5,806,543 to the Regularly Funded Organisations (RFO) in the
bridge area. (This system of funding predated the NPO approach, although some RFOs
became NPOs in the new arrangement).
In the first year of NPO (2012/13) funding this figure will rise to £8,148,995. At the end of the
three year funding, which coincides with the term of the current Comprehensive Spending
Review, that annual figure will be £8,335,417. Under their agreements with ACE, NPOs will
not be able to apply for Grants for the arts.
In addition to the NPOs, ACE also funds a range of arts activity through Grants for the arts
and Lottery investment.
Table 18
Grant awards by Arts Council England East in 2010/11 in the Norfolk & Norwich
Festival (Bridge) area
The table below is for the year 2010/11 shows the direct RPO funding. Some of the Grants
for the arts funding and the lottery investment may also have been made to RFOs in addition
to this.
Total Grant Amount (£k) by each programme in 2010/11
Funding Type / Body Norfolk CC Cambridgeshire CC Suffolk CC Peterborough
RFO Funding £990.8 £1,542.9 £3,345.8 £0.0
Grants for the arts £4,000.0 £1,100.0 £0.0 £0.0 Lottery Investment £1,737.1 £1,077.3 £1,118.2 £75.7
Sources: RFO Funding - Arts Council; Grants for the arts - Arts Council; Lottery Investment - DCMS; LA Investment (incl. Assets) - DCLG; Youth Music - Youth Music
Year: 2010/11, Measure: Total Grant amount (£k) under each programme
Table 19
Distribution of Grants for the arts awards by local authority area
In the period January 2011 – 13th March 2012 there were 77 Grants for the arts awards in
the Norfolk & Norwich (Bridge) area. Six of these awards refer to working with children and
young people in some form. Others may have included this group in their planned activity,
but this was not specified in the project summary.
Area Grants for
the arts
/Nos
Artform
Cambridgeshire
Cambridge City 23
• 12 Theatre
• 3 Dance
• 6 Visual Arts
89 | P a g e
Area Grants for
the arts
/Nos
Artform
• 2 Music
East Cambridgeshire
Fenland
Huntingdonshire 1 • 1 Literature
South Cambridgeshire 3 • 2 Theatre
• 1 Visual Arts
Peterborough 2
• 1 Theatre
• 1 Combined Arts
Norfolk
Breckland
Broadland 1 • 1 Literature
Great Yarmouth 4
• 3 Theatre
• 1 Combined Arts
King’s Lynn & West
Norfolk
North Norfolk 2 • 2 Visual Arts
Norwich City
12
• 5 Combined Arts
• 1 Theatre
• 2 Literature
• 2 Music
• 1 Visual Arts
• 1 Not art form specific
South Norfolk 1 • 1 Theatre
Suffolk
Babergh
Forest Heath
Ipswich
7
• 1 Dance
• 5 Theatre
• 1 Combined Arts
Mid Suffolk 1 • 1 Music
90 | P a g e
Area Grants for
the arts
/Nos
Artform
St Edmundsbury 3
• 2 Visual Arts
• 1 Theatre
Suffolk Coastal
5
• 1 Dance
• 2 Combined Arts
• 2 Music
Waveney
10
• 1 Visual Arts
• 6 Theatre
• 1 Literature
• 1 Music
• 1 Combined Arts
Some of the above awards were to RFOs, while others were to range of other organisations
including:
• Oblique Arts (filmmaking opportunities to young adults which aimed to take a group
of participants through the Arts Awards scheme).
• Gomito Productions (research and development of a new piece of theatre for 2-4
year olds).
• Garlic Theatre (develop and tour a performance for younger audiences that will
initially tour 11 schools in the region, 6 theatres and a residential home).
• Suffolk Artlink (work with young adult family carers, looked after children and young
people in Suffolk, bringing them together with the highest quality artists).
This table again highlights areas where there is no ACE funded activity currently. Affected
districts include East Cambridgeshire, Fenland, Breckland, King’s Lynn and West Norfolk,
Babergh and Forest Heath. Many of these areas have already been highlighted as places
that could benefit from more cultural activity allied to poor indicators across a number of
measures. The bridge may want to focus some of its attention on helping such places to
develop projects and secure funding in pursuit of its principle aims connected to CYP and
their families. Although funding will be covered in a later section it is worth saying that all
those interviewed in such areas were very keen to work with the bridge to achieve more
resources and a richer offer for the CYP in their area.
Table 19 also shows that those areas that are rich in provision come out top in this table as
well. Once again this demonstrates how a cluster of provision can support the breadth and
depth of the cultural offer. Cambridge and Norwich are first and second, with Ipswich in third
place. The odd one out in this table is Waveney, which scored badly compared to some
areas, in other parts of the statistical analysis. However the district is home to High Tide
Festival Theatre (three awards) as well as the Poetry Trust, Suffolk Artlink, Beccles Music
Festival, Lombik, Utter and Waveney and Blyth Arts. Not all of these work with CYP and their
families, but it may be that a cluster of a different sort is developing here as well which might
offer the bridge some useful partnership development opportunities.
91 | P a g e
12.4 Arts organisations and provision evidence from audit
In addition to the NPOs and ex-RFOs consulted during the research, there are a vast range
of arts organisations doing very interesting work with CYP across the whole bridge area. A
flavour of this diversity is apparent throughout the response forms, all of whom mention
contacts that are worth exploring further. It was not possible within the timeframe of this
research to do more than provide these additional organisations’ website or contact details,
but many merit further investigation.
Another striking feature was the range of national and international arts organisations the
bridge might have access to through the NPOs and others such as Norwich Theatre Royal .
Orchestras Live, in particular, seem to work with majority of local authorities in the bridge
area.
Arts organisations were very clear about the possibilities that they thought the bridge offered
them and individual artists working in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area. They saw
the bridge as a strategic lead, the possible means to helping publicise and place their work,
a potential project partner, an advisor on funding bids and the route to training provision.
They were also interested in the opportunities offered by Arts Award and Artsmark and the
chance to work with CYP and schools, although the latter was acknowledged as being quite
problematic at times and something the bridge could help make easier.
Comments included:
• Support is needed for artists and community arts organisations including looking at
the way artists work, and how that might relate to the bridge’s aims and future
provision.
• There is little arts/cultural activity outside the amateur scene.
• There are not enough young artists and the county needs a fresh injection of new
talent. For example those involved in whole peer group learning involving the under
25s need artist of their age that they can relate to. The arts could benefit from more
youth and its associated vitality.
• It will be useful for all the appropriate arts organisations to know how to secure work
with schools and how that work might be bought in by schools, particularly in the
current state of change.
• There are 22 professional arts organisations in Norfolk, but in addition there are lots
of other organisations. The bridge needs to be aware of this delivery picture and that
it represents a very diverse and organic sector.
• There is also a need for some new young practitioners. However there is difficulty in
recruiting people to come and work in the county because it is seen as rural and
slightly cut off.
• Quite a number of the NPOs bring external organisations into Suffolk through their
relationships. For example Aldeburgh has a relationship with the Guildhall and the
New Wolsey has one with Punch Drunk.
• Arts organisations build relationships with a few schools, how can this be widened?
Schools are not always connected with the best of the arts but it can be very difficult
to get schools to engage.
92 | P a g e
• With very few NPOs delivering dance in the region there is a concern that provision
and access to good quality activity will become ever patchier.
• We have a strong network of professional practitioners, writers and creatives across
the country who are all keen to work with us in the region
12.5 Local authority funding
The other key player supporting art and cultural provision through direct grants, or Service
Level Agreements, has traditionally been local authorities. The amount of funding provided
has always more or less equalled that of the Arts Council nationally, although local levels of
investment vary enormously. In the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area both Norfolk
and Suffolk support a range of organisations. Some smaller authorities such as Cambridge
City and North Norfolk also provide good support.
In many cases local authorities use their money to support the major professional arts
organisations in their area, in partnership with the Arts Council. This is so that local people
benefit from such organisations being resident locally. However local authorities also support
other organisations that they feel produces high quality work, or benefits the residents and
locality. For example Suffolk County Council supports five NPOs and three other
organisations:
• Aldeburgh Music
• DanceEast
• Eastern Angles
• New Wolsey Theatre
• Theatre Royal Bury St Edmunds.
• Gainsborough's House
• Smiths Row
• Suffolk Artlink
Norfolk County Council supports 19 organisations of which three are NPOs:
• Norfolk & Norwich Festival.
• Norwich Arts Centre.
• Writers’ Centre Norwich.
• Cinema Plus, a film based education programme operating across the county.
• Community Music East, an organisation that develops music resources for the community.
• Creative Arts East, the arts development agency for the Norfolk area.
• The Garage focuses on providing creative opportunities for young people, particularly
those with fewest opportunities.
• Kings Lynn Arts Centre Trust.
• King's Lynn Festival.
• The Maddermarket Theatre which stages a year-long programme by British and
European playwrights, created and staged by and for community members from
across the region.
• Norfolk Dance, the development agency for dance in the county.
• Norwich Playhouse.
• Norwich Puppet Theatre.
93 | P a g e
• SeaChange Arts, a charitable organisation set up to contribute to the social,
economic and cultural regeneration of the Borough of Great Yarmouth through use of
the Arts and Creative Technology.
• Sheringham Little Theatre.
• Thalia, a 'user' led Theatre Company for disabled adults and young people with
physical and sensory impairments and learning difficulties in particular but not
exclusively.
• Norwich Theatre Royal.
• Westacre River Studios which is committed to widening access to high quality drama
and creative activities for the whole community of West Anglia and especially for
young people.
• Writers’ Centre Norwich.
• Wymondham Music Festival.
In contrast North Norfolk District Council supports, through SLAs:
• Sheringham Little Theatre
• Creative Arts East
• Community Music East
• Norfolk Dance
• North Norfolk Exhibition Project
• Belfry Arts Centre
Elsewhere in areas such South Cambridgeshire, the Arts Development Manager have
relatively modest sums to support smaller scale community arts development.
Local Government has also played a vital role instigating or supporting arts development in
their area and without this the picture of provision would be much bleaker. However this role
is likely to change in the future because of a number of factors including reduced budgets,
deleted arts services or alternative service delivery.
12.6 Local authority culture/arts development information from the audit
The major concern expressed by many arts development contacts was the loss of, or cuts
to, posts, budgets and services and the fact that this trend is likely to continue for at least
two more years. On a positive note though, in a couple of districts, which are currently
undergoing restructuring, the arts posts have been retained.
In two areas of Norfolk and Suffolk, councils are sharing of services across local authority
boundaries. What effect this will have on arts or cultural provision is currently unclear. In
three places, East Cambridgeshire, Peterborough and King’s Lynn and West Norfolk the arts
development provision is delivered by non local authority organisations.
During this research arts officers were often the route to other contacts within their own
authority, as well as to external arts organisations, schools or others with a relevant interest
in CYP work. Where arts officers were not in post, finding contacts to approach was much
more difficult. Looking at the contact list, it is clear that a number of districts do not have arts
94 | P a g e
development officers, while others have officers with arts in their title but that is one
responsibility among several.
Table 20
Distribution of arts services by local authority area
Area Arts
Service/officer
Cambridgeshire ����
Cambridge City �
East
Cambridgeshire
�
Fenland
Huntingdonshire
South
Cambridgeshire
�
Peterborough �
Norfolk ����
Breckland �
Broadland �
Great Yarmouth
King’s Lynn & West
Norfolk �
North Norfolk
Norwich City
South Norfolk
Suffolk
Babergh �
Forest Heath �
Ipswich
Mid Suffolk �
St Edmundsbury *
95 | P a g e
Area Arts
Service/officer
Suffolk Coastal
Waveney *
Note: *The St Edmundsbury and Waveney contacts (both of whom were very helpful and
contributed to the research) have their main work focus outside arts development.
Arts officers are very good at working creatively and in partnership. Such skills are often
honed by having a small amount of resource to support their work. Partnership working
offers a way of both increasing resources and, for solo officers, the chance to work as part of
a project team. This group should offer the bridge staff good partnership development
opportunities. They may also welcome the chance to work in cross area groups if the
opportunities arise. Such groups could also help raise the profile of the bridge’s work as it
would also help increase Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge)’s capacity and visibility.
Comments included:
• There will be a corporate restructure in the next two years and there are likely to be
cuts in future as a result of this.
• Big savings will need to be found in the next three years.
• There is no local authority Arts Service (I know because it had been me and I was
made redundant in July 2010!).
• Suffolk only has three officers who fall into the category of Arts Development Officers
out of seven local authorities.
• Ultimately more money is needed to make a difference as the district is starting from
a low base of infrastructure and provision.
• The ADO post was abolished and I originally covered some of that work, however
this is no longer the case and my current responsibilities means that I focus on Bury
rather than the district as a whole.
12.7 Museums and Libraries
Arts Council England took over national lead responsibility for museums and libraries from
the MLA in 2011. Since then they have produced ‘Culture, knowledge and understanding:
great museums and libraries for everyone: a companion document to Achieving great art for
everyone’. This document states:
“In the long-term, we expect that Arts Council England will not have separate
strategies for museums, libraries and the arts. We will use the same framework to
drive all of our programmes and inform all of our funding decisions. We will evaluate
our success using common goals for museums, libraries and the arts, and will
establish a robust evidence base that can inform our policy-making and demonstrate
public value in what we fund.
In the short-term, however, we believe that we must first reflect on the diversity of our
extended remit to understand fully the specific challenges and opportunities facing
museums and libraries.”
96 | P a g e
Source: www.artscouncil.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/browse-advice-and-guidance/developing-great-museums-and-
12.8 Museums
Arts Council England now represents museums, having assumed some of the functions of
the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA), on 1 October 2011.
The principle museums responsibilities assumed by the Arts Council are:
• The Renaissance in the Regions programme for regional museums, including
completing the re-design of its content and operation
• Regional museums improvement and development agenda, including the
Accreditation Standard and the Designation Scheme and projects relating to the
2012 Cultural Olympiad
The effect of this in the bridge area is the establishment of two ACE Renaissance major
partner museums in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area: Cambridge University
Museums and Norfolk Museums and Archaeology Service. There will be additional
outcomes once the Regional museums improvement and development decisions are
clearer.
12.9 Museums information from the audit
This sector gave the impression of feeling vulnerable due to the change from the MLA to
ACE leadership. Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) staff will need to develop an
understanding of the different types of museum across their area and which can include
national, local authority, university, independent and volunteer museums. They will also
need to develop an understanding of the museums accreditation scheme.
In addition to the museums themselves, some local authorities support Museum
Development Officers (MDO) whose role is not dissimilar to that of Arts Development
Officers. In Norfolk, uniquely, there is a countywide museums and archaeology service run
by Norfolk County Council.
Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) is fortunate that the two Hub Museum Services in
Cambridge and Norwich received funding from ACE. One of the services in the Royal Opera
House (Bridge) area, Colchester and Ipswich Museums Service, failed to win ACE
Renaissance major partner museum funding. This will impact to a degree on the Norfolk &
Norwich Festival (Bridge) area because that was the Hub that the Suffolk museums worked
most closely with.
A major fear of the museum sector is that that ACE does not really understand or know very
much about it and that somehow they will be expected to become more ‘arty’. Some early
contact with ACE has left the museums with the perception that there is little knowledge
about the work of museums, including their Arts Award work.
In fact the museums sector offers the bridge some really fruitful opportunities. Museums are
very well linked up across the east, as well as across the bridge area which, in part, is due to
previous MLA support which encouraged this type of working. They are used to working with
97 | P a g e
schools, including the museums in the voluntary sector, and many of the middle sized and
bigger museum services have learning staff. Museums often work closely with the arts,
libraries and archives as well as arts organisations.
A number of museums are either being redeveloped or have plans to be. These include
Newmarket National Horse Racing Museum and Mildenhall Museum.
Museums offer the potential to provide a range of venues based in local communities (often
in areas which have little such provision otherwise). This might be helpful to future bridge
plans. However due to the complex nature of museums it would be advisable to work with
the MDO’s or bigger museum services, in the first instance, to help broker relationships
across the museums sector. Like their arts colleagues, museum staff also noted the time it
takes to establish projects and the need to consider sustainability is paramount.
Comments included:
• Don’t overlook the SHARE network and all the important development and work that
supports.
• While keen to work with partners, including the bridge, it always has to be
remembered that the museum is a small independent and a charity, which only
receives a small grant from the City Council. The rest of the funding has to be
generated so any partnership working has to take this into account.
• The changes to the museum sector brought about by the loss of the MLA and the
shift of responsibility to ACE.
• The effects on the ex Hub Museum services in the region i.e. Luton and Colchester
and Ipswich of the loss of the hub status and funding.
• What will happen to museum development work in the longer term? The current
application to support museum development work is only for three years of funding.
• How will national initiatives be responded to? What will be the response to Henley 2?
Did a very good project with King’s Lynn Museum which was led by Kings Lynn Arts
Centre. This was an education project aimed at all ages and based on domestic
objects. Artists responded to these and worked in a flat in a very deprived part of
King’s Lynn as well as at the museum and the centre.
• There are increasing pressures possibly around charging fees. This hasn’t been
done in the past but there will always be the need for activities and to work in
schools.
• Archives are good partners.
12.10 Libraries
As with museums Arts Council England took over responsibility for libraries in October 2011.
“While we will not be responsible for providing or funding library services, we will play
a significant role in supporting and developing the libraries sector. Continuing
discussions with the libraries sector, new in-house expertise and a national overview
will enable us to draw an accurate picture of the challenges and opportunities for
libraries, and be in a unique position to help drive national cultural policy.
98 | P a g e
The Arts Council's vision for libraries is that they inspire and empower people to lead
active lives, enriched through cultural experience. The Arts Council would like to work
with libraries to explore a vision for arts and culture working together. The essential
first stage in this work will be the Libraries Development Initiative which intends to
build on the Museum, Libraries and Archives Council's (MLA) Future Libraries
Programme to look at new approaches to library service delivery”. Source: www.artscouncil.org.uk/what-we-do/supporting-libraries/
12.11 Libraries information from the audit
Two library services, Norfolk and Peterborough, responded to the request for information
and both were keen to work with the bridge. The other two county services in
Cambridgeshire and Suffolk are both undergoing reviews so were unavailable. Quite a
number of other interviewees across the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area mentioned
working with library services or the wish to do so.
Most library services in the bridge area are still local authority managed, however this will
change. Libraries in Peterborough are part of the Vivacity Trust. In Suffolk an independent
cooperative is due to manage the library service in the very near future. Cambridgeshire is
exploring other forms of management after a move to a cultural trust was halted. The option
of community hubs is now being explored. Changes to library services may be something
that the bridge needs to monitor as they may have implications for how the bridge works with
library services in the longer term.
The bridge needs to be aware that Norfolk and Suffolk county councils provide a Schools
Library Service (although nationally many of these services are under threat or have been
disbanded). Those services that exist have generally worked on a traded basis for some
time, but like many organisations related to education the future is uncertain because of the
change to academies and other educational developments. Some schools may have school
librarians, most usually in secondary schools, and this may be another group that the bridge
will want work with in future to develop opportunities for CYP.
Public library services can be quite self sufficient and this may be because in local authority
cultural service terms, they tend to be by far the biggest service and don’t always have the
same need to work in partnership that other sectors do. However the two library services
who contributed to the audit were keen to work in partnership with others in the cultural
sector.
Individual libraries tend to see themselves as a service with an individual community focus
so a public library service is both a local and universal service within any local authority area.
Libraries will not rely on ACE for funding in the way the arts or museums will because the
bulk of their funding normally comes from a local authority budget. For all these reasons
working with libraries may be very different from working with other cultural partners.
Like museums, static libraries are based in communities and offer apparently readymade
venues. The bridge may want to take advantage of these to connect with communities at a
local level to help build sustainable activity. However as a note of caution, although library
services seem well resourced with staff and buildings, compared to other services, their work
tends to be tied to ensuring that libraries are kept open, often from early in the morning until
99 | P a g e
mid evening. The smaller libraries may have very limited opening hours and staffing;
sometimes this will be one person on their own. In addition all the library services in the
bridge area run mobile library services which reach out to those who live too far from a static
library. However these stops are often very limited in time and frequency of visit.
Nationally the numbers of CYP Development and Reader Development Librarians have
fallen, along with staff numbers generally, however these are the sort of contacts that the
bridge will want to develop relations with as they are more project, CYP or community
focussed. These tend to be the library staff that organise outreach activities and run (or
manage the volunteers that run) arts events, reading groups, literary festivals or the annual
Summer Reading Challenge.
The librarians who responded were keen to talk to the bridge and they see the organisation
as way to develop more partnership working. However while local projects are developed for
individual libraries, library services are often looking for a scheme that can be applied across
a number of service points, if not the whole service. This too makes libraries different from
some other parts of the cultural sector.
Comments included:
• The Library Service’s core mission and purpose is supporting reading, learning and
information for all. The service to CYP is a reflection of that. There is still a universal
service but this is light touch and the targeted work (involving programmed staff time)
is to CYP who don’t read.
• One of the challenges is for the library service to identify niches where it can make a
difference.
• Libraries have a gateway role for the community and provide a safe public space
which sees them used by many sections of a community.
• It is worth acknowledging by those who work with libraries, that much of the resource
is used in keeping the libraries open and the service functioning.
• Works with the Library Service who is a good partner. (An arts officer).
• Interested in more opportunities to involve young people in developing the offer to
suit their ideas and needs.
• There is no joint work with the Library Service at the moment although they are keen
to explore this option and are supportive. (an arts officer)
12.12 Concerns of the cultural sector as a whole in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area
As well as the individual concerns of the libraries, arts and museums sectors there were, as
one would expect, a number of themes and areas of discussion (apart from the bridge itself)
which came through strongly from all three groups. The evidence presented below results
from the information and views expressed in audit interviews. These common areas of
discussion were:
• Communications
• Sustainability of activity
• Partnerships and networks
• Training
100 | P a g e
• Volunteers
• Disability
• Diversity
• Future activity and projects
• Funding and Commissioning
12.13 Communications
This seems to be a key role for the bridge and was something that was mentioned by a
number of respondents. People wanted to know more about what was going on in their
sector elsewhere in the bridge area. There was perhaps less curiosity, especially from the
arts, about what was happening in museums and libraries, but that may be because their
attention has not been drawn to work with or in those sectors before, unless they already
had direct involvement and experience of such partnership working.
There is a lot of very interesting work going on across the bridge which is perhaps only
apparent after doing this type of research exercise. In particular there are a lot of small
organisations working very locally, which in some cases are making the only provision for
CYP at a very local level. They would benefit from being joined up to the much bigger
picture. This would also help with the problem that was identified in some rural areas of
organisations coming into the area to work for a short time without connecting to those who
are already there.
Only a few people stated the need for information sharing and an information lead role
across the bridge area. This potential strand of activity for the bridge was not as clearly
defined as in the Royal Opera House (Bridge) area where it came out very strongly.
Although a number of people did express the wish for a readily accessible and up to date
source of information on recommended artists or other creative providers. Another area that
people would like support with is in advertising or raising the profile of their work. Despite the
lack of a clear call for Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) to lead on this provision the bridge
may still want consider the importance of this role? It could help improve communications
and the likelihood is that if it was well done, colleagues in the cultural sector across the
bridge area would find it very helpful over time. This provision should be given serious
consideration, especially in light of the near universal comment on poor transport and
communications across the Norfolk & Norwich (Bridge) area.
The museums sector is very good at sharing knowledge and experience across the east
through the SHARE network for example. A Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) website
would provide an easy way to provide links for everyone to sites like the SHARE network. It
could also create links to the Royal Opera House (Bridge) information. This would be helpful
to organisations based in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area but who are close to
the Royal Opera House (Bridge) border. It may be that for some of those a connection to the
Royal Opera House (Bridge) may be easier and more convenient and could help provide
cultural resource more easily than from within the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area.
101 | P a g e
Comments included:
• It is an odd region that Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) is going to cover, as the
communications are poor.
• There used to be a BENCHES database of artists that the Arts Education Officers
had worked with and recommended. This is no longer functioning because of the
resource that was needed to maintain it but if the bridge was able to institute
something similar it would be very helpful for the sector.
• Marketing and getting the word out about provision and events is hard work in Great
Yarmouth and sometimes results in low recruitment.
• There’s a great deal of waste currently from individual organisations communicating
directly with schools.
• One problem identified was the council’s lack of engagement with social media. So
for example the officer is not able to use Facebook, although Youth Engagement has
limited access to it. School assemblies are not an effective alternative.
• Helping us to offer quality arts provision, and/or sign posts to quality arts provision for
vulnerable young people.
• One area that the bridge could offer support and information is to compile a list of
artists regionally that could be made use of across the bridge area.
• We would love support marketing the HighTide Academy as it’s still very much in its
infancy. Particularly to Norfolk where we’d like to grow our participants.
• An advocacy conference for heads, policy makers, and curriculum leads to be run for
those across the bridge area.
12.14 Sustainability of activity
Alongside education and schools, rural issues and opportunities for CYP the thorny issue of
sustainability came up in every discussion, almost without exception. Again due to the nature
of the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area and the length of experience many people
have, this factor will need to be seriously considered by the bridge in its planning. If it is
seen, or perceived, not to be happening, it may damage the long term credibility of the
bridge organisation.
Comments included:
• However it has become increasingly apparent that sustainability of provision is a real
concern. Things happen for a short time, because much activity is based on up to
three year funding which can’t then be repeated. This pattern can be harmful as
young people are conscious that their needs attract funding which can
understandably lead to youthful cynicism.
• One of the problems of working in rural Norfolk is the need for a much longer 5 -10
year view rather than the 3 year cycle which leaves nothing behind.
• There is continuing need in Norfolk particularly in the arch from Great Yarmouth to
King’s Lynn and Thetford with only small pockets of activity in this area. Work takes
time there and it doesn’t happen quickly. Four or five years are needed on average
and those working there have to be in for the long haul. Grants for the arts is not
sufficient as the three year time available does not support long term commitment.
• Support and work needs to be long term as otherwise short term projects can do
more harm than good.
102 | P a g e
• Community projects have been successful, but the work needs sustaining.
• A lot of strategic things in the past have been put in place but there are no resources
to keep them going.
12.15 Partnerships and networks
Linked to communications, partnerships and networks were another key area of discussion.
There was a very clear view that the bridge should be involved with and support the existing
networks before trying to set up any new ones. This was both so that the bridge staff could
use them to meet and work with potential partners, but also so that resource was not wasted
on unnecessary duplication.
Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Suffolk seemed to have good networks. The picture in
Cambridge and Suffolk may reflect that there is much less resource, particularly at county
level than in Norfolk, and their networks help provide the support to ensure partnership work
has sufficient density and resource to achieve jointly what cannot be done alone. However
some of those who would benefit from attending meetings of their peers, and so link into
these partnership opportunities, were not able to due to time and/or transport issues.
Much of the resource in Norfolk is focussed in Norwich and there seemed to be very good
knowledge amongst those working there of what else was going on locally in their sector.
Norfolk as a whole has the benefit of the Norfolk Arts Forum but it cannot make up for where
there is little provision to join up with. It was unclear what the networks were like in
Peterborough.
It must also be said that some of the networks have begun to suffer as local authority posts
are lost or staff are unable to travel because of spending restrictions. For many smaller arts
and cultural organisations attending networking meetings has been problematic for a long
time due to cost or limited staff resources. It is unlikely that these factors will improve across
the cultural sector in the foreseeable future and this should be another aspect to consider in
the bridge’s communication role.
The network pattern within school and education wasn’t clear. Very few people mentioned
Extended School, Heads meeting or specialist subject meetings. The isolation of drama
teachers was mentioned in Suffolk and the loss of the county dance teachers meeting in
Norfolk.
Some cross border working is due to happen as councils come together to share services
but the picture relating to this is unclear as yet. On the whole the people keenest to work in
other parts of the area away from where they were based, were arts organisations, both
NPOs and others.
Museums are used to be being part of a much bigger partnership especially through the
Regional Learning Network and through the MLA work which supported pilot projects across
the east such as trial of Arts Award in a range of museums. Libraries have their own internal
networks. All three sectors of arts, museums and libraries are well linked into national
networks.
103 | P a g e
Young people too seemed to have access to a range of consultation and decision making
bodies including youth councils or as part of individual organisations.
A number of people expressed enthusiasm for cross border working and this might be a
good place for the bridge to try an initial project, particularly where networking or partnership
is weak. This approach offers focussed a reason for discussion with a number of
organisations and will help develop a sense of the wider locality. There was also an
acknowledgement in some of the discussions that there is likely to be an increase in the
number of shared local authority services and the bridge may have a role in being involved
or supporting such developments.
A lack of networking can also affect arts organisations by leaving them isolated, probably
more so than equivalent museums. If there is no network there is no chance to meet
partners from other parts of a locality, district or county. This lack of contact may mean
missing opportunities in helping to find partners and secure funding.
Comments included:
• Would generally like help in making connections to strengthen bids.
• Opportunities to share how we work with those from a different field would be useful.
• Time pressures, but would like to work more in partnership, however money is a key
consideration to all that is done.
• Norfolk arts activity is well connected. It links a little to Suffolk and has good
communications with Cambridgeshire.
• Joint working with Peterborough would benefit from a concentrated approach by the
bridge and others.
• There are fewer networks than there used to be for example the Children’s Trust
partnership arrangements have gone.
• There are a lot of cross sector partners and the Norfolk Arts Forum includes business
and health representatives amongst others.
• Professional networks in the county are weak and teachers are not brought together.
For example drama teachers across the county don’t know one another and the
subject is not a core subject.
• In the past the Suffolk arts officers had good links and worked well together however
with the loss and change in many posts this has become fractured although there is
still some good communication taking place.
12.16 Training
Training was seen as another key way in which the bridge could lead and support. Training
for teachers, artists, council staff, arts organisations, young people, volunteers and
museums were all raised by various interviewees. People were also looking for new models
of training to be developed that they could take advantage of. As with communications the
bridge is uniquely set up to help do this both by its remit and its area wide view.
Comments included:
General
104 | P a g e
• Henley 2. If schools are to offer training I would be keen to be involved in this and if
any funding is available it would be helpful to know about it.
• Cancellation of the CPD take up which is happening all over the county and is mostly
money related.
• It would be useful for the arts and education sectors to pool more resources, offer co-
ordinated CPD arts programmes etc.
• Arts provision is being offered to children and young people who are at
risk/vulnerable, by expert arts facilitators, but who lack specialist knowledge of the
holistic support these young people needs.
• Each event was a whole day’s training so culture/arts/bridge needs to be able to find
out or identify what is important enough to them for them to participate. (This was
about Artsmark, but applies more widely).
• Something for practitioners which involves quality collective training and information
exchange. A new training model is needed as coming out for a day is becoming
increasingly difficult for many. How can this be done at a local level and involve
practitioners working with teachers? Is this something the bridge can help to
develop?
Young People
• Would like to build up local knowledge and offer training to young people in the arts.
Would there be resources to support this?
• Can the bridge do anything to help more YP have the opportunity to work through the
cultural venues?
• The Youth Service changes are impacting in other ways as well. There is a real need
for properly qualified youth workers to support arts projects involving vulnerable
young people. We hadn’t anticipated that their loss would be the problem that it has
turned out to be. An artist’s responsibilities are different to that of a youth worker in
such a situation and the loss of youth workers is having a real effect.
• We’re interested in developing a kind of ‘foundation programme’ as a gap year
preparation/reality check for people interested in drama school. This foundation
course would be the beginnings of ‘Creative TRAIN’ where we hope to offer
performance experience across the range of our work.
Volunteers
• It would be good to develop opportunities and training for volunteers in libraries to
add value and increase provision which the resources don’t otherwise exist. This
could include reading groups led by young people for other groups of young people.
• A programme of volunteer training would be beneficial.
Artists
• Many artists have become complacent and need challenging effectively over the
effectiveness of the learning they offer. More questioning of quality is required.
• There is a need to support artists and internships to increase employability.
• There is a need for more artist training to freshen those who have worked in the
county for a long time.
105 | P a g e
12.17 Volunteers
All the cultural sectors, museums, libraries, arts and youth services have considerable
experience over a number of years of working with volunteers across a very wide span of
activity. These range from individuals giving time to arts organisations to museums being
managed and run on a volunteer basis. This contribution, alongside developments such as
the future direction of some services such as libraries, may raise the profile and involvement
of volunteers in delivery to CYP and their families still further.
Some of the interviewees mentioned a need for training, communications and networking in
relation to volunteers. It was also noted that volunteers come with responsibilities for the
host organisations and that volunteers need to gain something from their relationship as
well. However this in turn can increase the demands on the host organisation’s resources. In
a nutshell volunteers do not come for free and the implications for training and resources
need to be considered.
All three disciplines, museums, libraries and arts want to increase the opportunities and
training for young volunteers in particular.
Comments included:
• There is a post to coordinate volunteers at Cambridge Folk Museum which is funded
by the HLF which also works at the Cambridge Museum of Technology.
• Young people need further support to develop their Arts Award portfolio of activities.
This may mean using more volunteers, as there is a limit to the amount of activity
that the museum staff can run.
• Volunteering is a notable aspect of library service work. A scheme has been
developed to offer opportunities to young people including as Summer Reading
Challenge young champions. Could this development support engagement with Arts
Award?
• A lot of volunteers are involved in Vivacity and there is a lead person on volunteering.
So there are training needs that need examining. In addition the volunteers need to
get something out of their involvement.
• What progression paths are there for those who volunteer and is this something that
the bridge could explore so that people can get a cross cultural experience if they
want one. Is this applicable to other organisations or groups of organisations in the
bridge area?
12.18 Disability
A number of arts organisations and third sector groups listed in the responses work with
disabled CYP and their families, while others run integrated provision. There are some
excellent examples of this work in the Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) area and it is
probably something that could benefit from a higher profile.
Although not a concern of the bridge, a number of respondees mentioned working with older
people and the problems that they faced in terms of accessibility to provision. Some of this
mirrors similar concerns in relation to CYP. Intergenerational provision was an area raised
106 | P a g e
by a number of interviewees as something they would like to develop or improve and this
might help the needs that were identified at both end of the age spectrum.
Comments included:
• There are a lot of young carers in Papworth.
• SCOPE runs two schools for those with complex disabilities in the Melbourn area.
Both are very keen to work with the community and took part in the Canal Art
project.
• The school cluster project working on the family counselling reflects the high mental
health needs of the area linked to the relatively high number of split families. Some
of this appears to be linked to the pressures of the recent economic problems. This
affects Melbourn, Bassingbourn, Comberton and Gamlingay.
• Norfolk Arts and Events Service is currently working with Children’s Services and
Adult Services to develop a three year initiative to develop pilot activity which
demonstrates the role and value of using the arts in health and social care contexts
and also to build the capacity of the sector with regard to commissioning in health
and social care.
• It worth being aware of the Foundation Degree in Arts and Well Being offered by City
College Norwich. The degree brings together health, social care and arts
practitioners and is the only one of its type.
• There are issues around transport for those with disabilities being able to travel to
take part in things. The aim is to deliver in the rural locations if possible. (This
comment was about older people, but may apply equally to disabled CYP and their
families).
12.19 Diversity
Diversity, like disability was not specifically included in the research but was mentioned often
by those who responded. Some of this comment was around working with Traveller
Education colleagues. There were some good examples of projects, that involved diverse
groups, mentioned in the interviews and which could provide a good basis for further
development and discussion
Others mentioned the increased number of nationalities and languages represented in their
area. This was often linked to rural employment and eastern European populations were
mentioned in Peterborough, Fenland and Norfolk in particular. As was seen earlier in the
report the high levels of BME at KS4 in Peterborough is an indicator of the diversity of that
city.
The final point was around how isolated many rural young people were from external cultural
influences and conversely the positive effects these had on their aspirations and enjoyment
when they had such opportunities. When they had taken part in activity with an international
flavour the positive and longer term impact this tended to have on them was noticeable.
Comments included:
• Traveller population locally (South Cambs).
107 | P a g e
• There is currently no diversity focus to the work however a project involving CYP
working with a Caribbean company is still being spoken about several years after the
event. (Dance organisation).
• Residents perception studies highlight desires in terms of arts activities and young
people and also the variety of different nationalities (a significant proportion of south
and central Yarmouth are migrant communities, especially Portuguese).
• We should like to work with Platforma arts and the Refugees network next year.
• There are now 77 languages spoken in Norfolk which is partly due to the numbers of
overseas rural migrant workers. Included are the new communities from Latvia,
Lithuania and Russia amongst others.
• Engaging with children in new immigrant families / non English speaking parents is a
challenge.
12.20 Future activity, projects and delivery
As one would expect, when carrying out research that involves the cultural sector, the scale
of ambitions and plans was impressive and inspiring. Despite the difficult economic
circumstances everyone (despite some concerns) had a positive view about future work they
would like to do in order to have a positive impact on the lives, learning and creativity of
children and young people.
Much more specific detail can be gained from reading the individual responses in the
Appendix 1, but there is plenty that the bridge could consider supporting both now, to help
achieve some immediate results, or strategically in the longer term.
Some of the comments relate to help with identifying to securing funding, but many are more
complex than that and could provide good partnership opportunities over time. The range of
suggestions came equally from libraries, museums and arts and there is potential contained
in these for cross sectoral working as well as cross local authority boundary working.
There are also a range of comments which highlight the need for the bridge to take a lead in
either carrying out research to help increase the knowledge of the sector or to support
research by others to achieve the same result. If the bridge wanted to draw up a list of
possible research to support over the next three years the interview responses provide a
good starting point.
Comments included:
• Literature opportunities are underdeveloped in Cambridge.
• Expand the range of networks that Britten Sinfonia is involved in.
• We would like to build up long term involvement in Suffolk – a Cambridgeshire based
organisation.
• Wysing has a regional remit and it would be good to support the wide Norfolk
audience for education work as well.
• Subject to funding, we hope to work with the Princes Trust on a stained glass project
involving three schools near Ramsey. (A museum)
• Kettle’s Yard would like help reaching communities that do not otherwise engage with
the arts including young people’s / children services, community support.
108 | P a g e
• Would like to work with artists more although some imaginative work has been done.
(Museum comment)
• The museum does a lot of reminiscence work but would like to develop this towards
more inter-generational work.
• Coming from my arts admin background, I would love the opportunity to develop a
really exciting, challenging and long-term arts project for the young people of
Huntingdon. They could do with one!
• The Artlandish Programme at Houghton Hall (Norfolk) which includes craft, art and
training. The scheme could do with being much more heavily used and there is even
a free minibus which can be used by schools to bring CYP in form areas with poor
transport.
• Working together to build links between the Garage’s emerging music inclusion role
and the bridge could release value for money and match funding in both directions.
• There may be a useful piece of work to be done in identifying the youth theatres
across the bridge area.
• Would like to see the bridge help support regional artist’s development.
• We are sure there will be partnership projects through the Youth Worker programme
across the county for which Norfolk & Norwich Festival (Bridge) can help us identify
partners, arts practitioners and potential funding sources.
• Work with the third sector to improve services for those with autism.
• We would like to work with the bridge on using the Norfolk & Norwich Festival as a
platform for performance, possibly as part of our partnership with Britten Sinfonia.
• We are keen to use new technologies and live literature (performance) in our work
wherever possible.
• Writers Centre Norwich has a sustainable programme of schools and libraries work
that we are seeking to extend and develop over the next few years.
• The Breckland Book Festival takes place annually in October/November. It includes
local and national authors, children’s authors and creative writing in its programme.
There is a Grants for the arts application currently awaiting a decision which would
provide a further two year funding for the event.
• Help by the bridge to identify ways of getting secondary school teachers to use the
museum would be very welcome.
• We are interested in exploring ways of sharing models of work. A lot of how we work
is by testing ideas in a particular setting then developing and rolling out model to
other settings/locations. This could work across county borders.
• Costume Creators for young adults with mild-moderate learning disabilities. It’s well
loved but un-funded. The Costume Creators has great funding potential. It would be
brilliant to talk funding on a longer term.
• We plan to launch a new writing based schools programme in the autumn; support
here would also be useful as we need to develop stronger links and relationships with
local schools.
12.21 Funding and commissioning
Underpinning all the whole report and discussion above is the funding and resources that
are required to support the cultural sector in its continuing work with children and young
people and their families. At the beginning of this section, information about the current ACE
109 | P a g e
and local authority provision and patterns was highlighted. However in common with so
much else this well established pattern is likely to change as public spending reduces and
the delivery of public services changes.
The possibility of accessing financial resources for arts and other cultural organisations
through commissioning has been a concern and ambition of the Arts Council for several
years. The attractions are obvious in that the contracts are often for three years, at a
minimum. This approach also offers funding possibilities which stretch further into the future
than some of the traditional models that the sector has been used to. Moreover by delivering
in areas that have a higher profile with politicians, senior officers and the non-arts or cultural
sector; arts, museums and libraries can raise their profile, demonstrate their effectiveness
with measurable outcomes, and provide a long term positive impact for those they work with.
All of which would help provide a more secure sustainable future for the sector.
There are some very good examples in the bridge area of such funded work, particularly in
the arts and youth sectors including with Looked After Children and young offenders.
However much of the cultural work is still being funded through grants or with lottery support,
rather than through commissioning. In the case of Aldeburgh Music the money they are
awarded to deliver to work with young prisoners requires match funding that has to be raised
from elsewhere to make the work financially viable.
A number of individuals and organisations do have experience of commissioning. Once such
individuals or organisations learn how to secure funding support via commissioning they
tend to be good at winning further work of this type. However despite funding and
commissioning being one of the subjects’ interviewees, and others, were asked about in the
audit research, not a great deal of information was forthcoming.
Commissioning, in particular, was not really mentioned and there seemed to be little general
knowledge or experience of it. This was apparent both amongst those who work in, or for,
local authorities as well as cultural organisations. Another aspect of this gap, which has been
noted elsewhere, is that because few of those outside local authorities have much
knowledge of commissioning it means generally people will be unaware of the opportunities
that might be being advertised which they could take advantage of. This effect is
compounded by the local authority officers’ ignorance of commissioning opportunities which
in turn means they are not alerting cultural organisations or helping them take advantage of
such opportunities. Many arts officers have tried to engage with their commissioning
colleagues, so this lack of knowledge is not due to their lack of interest or attempts to
engage. However it seems to be very difficult to build such relationships and knowledge at
the moment and this may be another reflection of the pace of change in local government at
the moment.
Another problem is the length of time contracts are awarded for so that if people are missing
the tenders it may be several years before they might have chance to bid again. People are
aware that commissioning could be important in the future, particularly as a means to secure
funding long term, but very few really know how to take the next step. Commissioning is
another area that the bridge should take a lead on to help the whole sector help itself in the
longer term.
110 | P a g e
There may be more experience and a higher awareness of this in the education sector, but
would need to be investigated further.
There was a lot of expressed need for support with funding applications and the comments
virtually all relate to this rather than anything to do with commissioning. Despite
commissioning been seen as an important future support for culture, many people are still at
the stage that want help with scoping and refining funding applications. The bridge may have
to consider how it might help support this need, perhaps as part of a staged progression in
encouraging people to look at the wider and newer forms of funding support. They
comments also give a flavour of some of the work people want help with and this in turn
should give the bridge another insight into the range and scope of work that its partners are
developing.
Comments included:
• Storytelling project with Primary Schools in Peterborough during 2013/ 14.- would like
bridge help
• Mental Health project with primary schools in the Melbourn area
• Securing a subsidy for primary school visits as Wysing is currently a very expensive
option for them. It would also be helpful to find funding to support sixth form visits so
more can come.
• Would like to develop more work for children and young people facing challenging
circumstances but this would be dependent on securing funding.
• Would like to discuss if a Grants for the arts bid might help with increasing the work
with artists and possibly around an inter-generational theme.
111 | P a g e
Report compiled by Catherine M Davis.
CatherineMDavis44@gmail.com
01462 458831
22nd June 2012.
The author would like to thank Gemma Cox (Participation and Engagement Administrator
[Bridge], Norfolk & Norwich Festival), and Oliver Payne (Participation and Engagement
Administrator, Norfolk and Norwich Festival) for their help with compiling the lists and the
mapping of museums, schools, libraries, venues and festivals.
Recommended