79
Chinese General Hospital College of Nursing ROUSSEL FRANCES C. GAJETE RN, RGN

Seminar organization

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Seminar organization

Chinese General Hospital College of NursingROUSSEL FRANCES C. GAJETE RN, RGN

Page 2: Seminar organization

At the end of the related learning experience, the student will be able to develop management competencies in planning, organizing, directing and controlling by organizing a seminar that concerns themes or topic in general education subject in nursing care management

Page 3: Seminar organization

After the seminar organization, the level IV students will be able to:1. Apply the concepts of leadership &

management in seminar organization2. Develop formal and informal communication

skills & attitudes achieving the learning objectives as developed from group dynamics & synergy

3. Conducts seminar following its sequential steps

4. Identify the significance & types of seminar organization

Page 4: Seminar organization

5. Analyze the cognitive, motor and attitudinal needs of prospective participants

6. Develop seminar objectives that would enhance participant’s understanding regarding seminar topics

7. Provide a climate setting that is conducive to learning among seminar participants

8. Determine the outcome of seminar objective

Page 5: Seminar organization

Performance 60%Team building activity 20%Seminar output 10%Peer Evaluation 10%_______________________________

100%

Page 6: Seminar organization

1. Title page2. Table of Contents3. Acknowledgement4. Introduction5. Goals and Objectives of the Seminar6. Working Committee7. Roles and Responsibilities of the

Committee8. Schedule Plan (Gannt Chart)9. Daily Activities (Budget Proposal,

Identifying Needs of the Participant, Identifying the subject matter, Formulation of Pre-test, Formulation of Goals and Objectives, etc.)

Page 7: Seminar organization

10. Program Script11. Opening Remarks12.Introduction of Guest Speaker13.Lecture Proper14.Closing Remarks15.Statistical Evaluation/ Program

evaluation result16.Final budget17.Recommendation18.Appendices (Letter, invitation,

certificate, picture, etc)

Page 8: Seminar organization

a team of advanced students/ professional walking in association under the guidance of a teacher/ adviser. It is a place to discover new ideas, to relook an old idea or to develop insight (lecture, discussion, return demonstration) in connections among ideas.

Page 9: Seminar organization

A group of people who have identified tasks and work together to achieve a specific purpose

Page 10: Seminar organization

1. Saving money2. Saving employee3. Saving customers and making new

one4. Saving time5. Reducing staffing concerns6. Saving relationships

Page 11: Seminar organization

Entry-level of threshold seminar Orientation

▪ GOALS:▪ To enable the newly hired individual be rapidly

assimilated into the nursing care system▪ To ensure the newcomer is a safe practitioner before

allowing her to be self-directed in carrying out her task or assigned role

Nurse –internship▪ GOALS:

▪ To improve recruitment (OJT)To facilitate role transition for the young graduate

▪ To decrease demands upon the head nurse, to provide task skill training

Page 12: Seminar organization

Remedial SeminarUpgrading or advanced seminars

Career mobility program▪ GOAL:

▪ To improve workers morale and motivation by eliminating dead-end jobs & to decrease demands upon the head nurse , to provide skill training

In service education Management development Organizational development

Page 13: Seminar organization

Retraining SeminarCross-training SeminarRe-entry Seminar

Page 14: Seminar organization

a. It requires full commitment & supportb. The activities must focus on problems

that can be solvedc. It must meet both organizational &

employee needsd. The pattern & arrangement of

seminar opportunities must complement& implement the philosophy of the organization

Page 15: Seminar organization

e. It must be developed thru systematic & orderly process

f. It must employ delivery systems that are select based on effectiveness, available technology, and cost effectiveness prior to full-scale implementation

g. It must include sound principles of adult learning

h. It must provide many opportunities for participants to apply & practice acquired knowledge & skills

Page 16: Seminar organization

A committee is a staff team which meets the purpose of affecting an integration of ideas leading to a meeting of minds, concerning a solution for some problems

Page 17: Seminar organization

Advantages Disadvantages

Harmony may be developed among executives

The time required for deliberation & the difficulty of reaching agreement may often result in indecision

The viewpoint of young executives are broadened

The cost of committee action may be discouraging. The differences in opinions may result in indecision

Continuity of functions may be provided

Page 18: Seminar organization

Seminar needs will arise from the identification of deficiency in a routine inspection or survey or result from a special survey method to determine whether any needs exist

Page 19: Seminar organization

Knowledge analysis Observational analysis Unstructured interview Structured interview Co-counselling Questionnaires Diary method Critical incident techniques Brainstorming Mirroring Psychological test

Page 20: Seminar organization

• Speculate on likely future issues that will have a significant impact on the participants

Macro-environment-Major trends & events outside the specific environment in which the organization operates

Social environment-Public health status of market, health impacts of generalized social behaviors such as poor diet, STD, substance & alcohol abuse,demographics

Technological environment-Advances in pharmaceuticals, genetics, high-tech equipment as well as knowledge base, skills and talents of the workforce pools (eg health informatics, telehealth)

Page 21: Seminar organization

Competitive environment- Defining and assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the organization and individuals; assessing the strategic alliances seminar organizers

Regulatory environment-Recent or expected changes in the myriad of regulations that directly affect the organization

Economic environment-Economic indicators specific to the market in which the org operates (assessment of growth, strength, impact on managed care arrangements)

Page 22: Seminar organization

Statements that describe the changes in behaviour or performance that can be the DESIRED OUTCOMES of participants and instructor activities & interaction

Page 23: Seminar organization

Goals General statements of intent which give the

approach to the problem without the definition E.g. The seminar aims to impart additional knowledge

and trends in the care and management of clients with COPD

OBJECTIVES Specific and precise statements of intent with

clear cut measure of terminal behaviour E.g. At the end of the seminar, the participant will be able to:

▪ 1. Provide an overview of COPD, its etiology and clinical course

▪ 2. Discuss the pathophysiology of COPD▪ 3. Identify the epidemiology of COPD in the Philippines

Page 24: Seminar organization

Within the objective setting, there are general principles to follow. For an objective to have some degree of realism, it will include: Precise statements of terminal behaviour

required A statement of condition, under which the

performance is to be achieved A description of standards to attain

E.g. At the end of the seminar, the participant will be able to:▪ 1. Provide an overview of COPD, its etiology and clinical

course▪ 2. Discuss the pathophysiology of COPD▪ 3. Identify the epidemiology of COPD in the Philippines▪ 4. Discuss the updated spirometric classification of COPD

Page 25: Seminar organization

The main reason for providing the training program is to change the performance of the participants in order to solve a problem

The seminar organizer should avoid having the learning program add additional problems

The participant must know the objectives of the program & the criteria for being the learning group

Participants need the opportunity to make the psychological adjustment

Page 26: Seminar organization

A check should be made to assure what is actually available and that they are physically on-site (e.g. chairs, table, auditorium)

A liaison person must be clearly identified Develop a checklist of items Organizers must know how the equipment

works (e.g. laptop, projector, sound system)

Make sure a “back-up” equipment is available

Page 27: Seminar organization
Page 28: Seminar organization

Check all equipments to verify that it is returned to the proper storage or rental facility.

Check the program site to make sure that the participants have not left anything behind

Activity must be carefully organized so as not to interfere with the climate. It must be handled as a normal occurrence without undue activity

Page 29: Seminar organization

Consists of activities that communicate an attitude conducive to effective learning

Formal openings to be used should be planned beforehand. It must be appropriate for the audience.

Informal openings are usually done before the learning program starts (E.g. “Good afternoon, the program is about to start. Kindly

turn off all your mobile phones and gadgets or put them in a silent mode. No eating and drinking is allowed while the program is going on..”)

When the learning program starts, the organizer should provide essential information (E.g. “Welcome to our seminar entitled ‘A New Breath of Life:

Updates on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease’. I am your host, Eileen Cruz…”)

Page 30: Seminar organization

In some situations, it is appropriate to start immediately with just one lesson. In others, some activities precede the seminar (E.g. pre-test, ice breaker, performances, learning exercises) . Some organizations have a standard opening, while others provide a guideline.

Page 31: Seminar organization

1. Machine-mediated instructor• Specific, not flexible• E.g. use of powerpoint presentations

and video clips 2. Instructor-mediated

(+) flexibility, (+) interaction between speaker and participant

Page 32: Seminar organization

DOMAINS OF LEARNING Skills Knowledge Attitude

WRITING LEARNING OBJECTIVES 3 components1.Performance2.Condition3.Criterion

CLASSIFICATION OF OBJECTIVES1.Primary objectives2.Derived objectives

Page 33: Seminar organization

Instructor-centered objectives- can be stated in the form of activities that the instructor is to perform To demonstrate the operation of a modern

machine To discuss the need for identifying gaps in the

work history of a job applicant prior to employment interview

To develop in the trainee an appreciation of the need for teamwork

Demonstrate the proper method of inserting hypodermic syringe

Page 34: Seminar organization

Subject matter centered objectives- objectives can also be stated in the form of topics, concepts, principles or other elements of the content to be taught in a seminar program Nomenclature (classification, organization) Preventive maintenance Starting and warm-up procedures Refueling procedures Emergency procedures

Page 35: Seminar organization

Trainee-Activity Centered Objectives- stated in terms of what the participant will be doing during the training period To learn to operate an IV infusion pump To learn company cost-monitoring To learn to adapt procedures & routine related

to the needs of the employee To learn the principles of magnetism

Page 36: Seminar organization

Trainee- Performance-Centered Objectives- stated in terms of what the participant should be able to do upon completion of the seminar or at any point during the seminar including how well he or she is able to perform At the end of the seminar, the participant will be

able to discuss the current approach in COPD management based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines▪ A. Assessment and monitoring of disease▪ B. Reduction of risk factors▪ C. Management of stable COPD▪ D. Management of the exacerbations of COPD

Page 37: Seminar organization

Over-all Goals:The implementation of FOURmula ONE for Health is directed towards

achieving the following end goals, in consonance with the health system

goals identified by the World Health Organization, the Millennium Development Goals, and the Medium Term Philippine Development Plan:

etter health outcomes;   * More responsive health system; and   * More equitable healthcare financing.

General Objective: FOURmula ONE for Health is aimed at achieving critical reforms with speed, precision and effective coordination directed at improving the quality, efficiency, effectiveness and equity of the Philippine health system in a manner that is felt and appreciated by Filipinos, especially the poor.

Specific Objectives: Fourmula One for Health will strive, within the medium term, to:          *  Secure more, better and sustained financing for health;       *  Assure the quality and affordability of health goods and services;        *  Ensure access to and availability of essential and basic health packages; and        *  Improve performance of the health system

Page 38: Seminar organization

Participants should be notified as to who to contact if there are any problems, especially if the speaker cannot show up

It is important to select an individual with a high level of nursing knowledge and skill to discuss any clinical nursing subject. The speaker’s personal power determines his/her credibility as a change agent or a role model

Page 39: Seminar organization

Direct role modeling occurs when a clinical specialist or nurse clinician allows a participant to observe her performance of highly skilled nursing activity and to ask questions about purpose, method and result of intervention

Indirect role modeling occurs when the specialist or clinician analyze a patient problem for a participant and guides the participant in handling the problem herself

Page 40: Seminar organization

Lecture or expositoryDiscussionCase studiesLearning module or learning packageRole playing or simulationRole modelingManagement games

Page 41: Seminar organization

Content must be determined before visual aids can be selected/ developed

While visual aids may be helpful, other methods may be used such as demos, role play, handouts

Page 42: Seminar organization

1. Motivation of the participant is the most powerful of all the principles

2. Logical organization of course materialis crucial to understanding and retention of significant facts and principles

3. Repetition of content improves acquisition and retention of information

4. Prompt feedback is needed to confirm correct responses and remedy errors

Page 43: Seminar organization

Formative evaluation allows organizer to determine whether appropriate learning is taking place (e.g. recitation)

Summative evaluation takes place at the end (e.g. Post-test)

As part of the pre-course work, pre-test may be conducted prior to the discussion

A good post test should be as close to the expected learning or performance possible

Page 44: Seminar organization

Is historical data is important, the organizer is advised to present this either as an appendix (in the souvenir program or booklet) or as a separate document

Statistics should be presented in clear terms with accompanying definitions as required

End result of the learning should be stated clearly

Analysis must also contain recommendations for improvement

Page 45: Seminar organization

TraineesSpeakerCourse contentSequence and time allocations Instructional strategiesMaterials, equipments and facilities

Page 46: Seminar organization

System validation (Strengths & areas to be commended)

System modification (Weaknesses & areas for improvement)

System quality control (standards vs. practice)

Page 47: Seminar organization

TYPE OF TEST

ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS

Paper & Pencil Test

Easy & quick scoringObjectivity is ensuredCan be given to large groupMay be self administered

Cannot validly measure all types of behaviorDifficult & time consuming to constructRestrictive in terms of trainee response

Oral Objective Test

Easy to administerAllows testee to qualify & clarify answerOffers the examiner an opportunity to clarify questions

Difficult to constructAdministered to one trainee at a timeMay turn out to be less objective than desired

Page 48: Seminar organization

EssaTYPE OF TEST

ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS

Essay Test Easy to constructGives opportunity to evaluate effectiveness in writingGives trainee an opportunity to SELECT, ORGANIZE AND INTEGRATE facts

Low content validity due to limited subject-matter sampling allowed by the testLow reliability because of the small number of test items Scoring is subjectiveTime consuming to administer and score

Performance test3 TYPES1.Identification2.Simulation3.Work Sample

Has face validity in that they cover in a realistic way a job duty or taskJob-relevantUsually highly reliable

Covers only a part or sample of a jobRequires more time to administer per item than most other types of testAdministered individuallyOften requires tools, sets of equipments & materials which adds to the problems & expense of administrationDifficult to design

Page 49: Seminar organization

1. Examiner should study directions for administration to make certain he/she knows purpose of test, materials needed and problems that may be encountered

2. Train the assistant test administrators3. Assign testees of their seats/ work stations4. Explain the purpose of test5. Distribute test materials6. Read aloud the directions from the manual7. Start test. Check to ensure that directions are being

followed correctly 8. Observe time limits (whole test & parts of the test)9. Collect test materials as quickly as possible after time

is up10. Report any unusual conditions surrounding the test to

those who score and analyze

Page 50: Seminar organization

An identified activity should denote the culmination of the learning experience. The impression should be conveyed that the next step is the anticipated change

Page 51: Seminar organization

The form of recognition must be consistent with the organization and observable to those who need to know

Other written forms of document may be used such as a letter from a high level official or other written notice that the participant has successfully completed the program

Those who still look for performance change should be involved in the closing ceremony

Page 52: Seminar organization
Page 53: Seminar organization

Shows how the group functions, communicates, sets and achieves objectives.

Both task-oriented behavior and maintenance-oriented behavior are necessary for adequate group development

Page 54: Seminar organization

TASK ROLES MAINTENANCE ROLES

DYSFUNCTIONAL ROLES

1. Initiator- contributor

2. Information seeker3. Information giver4. Opinion seeker5. Elaborator6. Coordinator7. Orienteer8. Critic9. Energizer10.Procedural

technician11.Recorder

1. Gatekeeper2. Encourager3. Harmonizer4. Compromiser5. Follower6. Group observer7. Standard observer8. Standard setter

1. Aggressor2. Dominator3. Recognition seeker4. Special-interest

pleader5. Blocker6. Self-confessor7. Help-seeker8. Playboy

Page 55: Seminar organization

Think out and sell your decisions to the group Personally involve group mates Maximize member freedom while keeping control Identify sincerity of group mates      Give deserved credit Hold members accountable for assigned work Build respect and loyalty from group members Cultivate optimal working relationship by implementing

the Golden Rule Recognize each member as an individual Work to strengthen weak members Emphasize team spirit Managers must relate to the group in a way that fosters:

Goal attainment Both individual and group needs Encourages interaction while minimizing conflict

Page 56: Seminar organization

Negative Attitudes are most commonly caused by:

1.   Misinformation2.   Lack of information/ training3.   Unclear performance expectations4.   Stereotyping without adequate data

Page 57: Seminar organization
Page 58: Seminar organization

1. Failure to test new strategy before full implementation

2. Righteous arrogance3. Failure to develop and propose

radical strategies4. Assuming that there is just one right

strategy for each goal

Page 59: Seminar organization

The Personnel Evaluation Standards was published in 1988,

The Program Evaluation Standards (2nd edition) was published in 1994, and

The Student Evaluations Standards was published in 2003.

Page 60: Seminar organization

The standards provide guidelines for assessing,designing,developing implementing, and improving the identified form of evaluation.

Each of the standards has been placed in one of four fundamental categories to promote evaluations that are proper, useful, feasible, and accurate. (propriety, utility, feasibility and accuracy standards)

Page 61: Seminar organization

1. The propriety standards require that evaluations be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of evaluatees and clients involved in.

2. The utility standards are intended to guide evaluations so that they will be informative, timely, and influential.

Page 62: Seminar organization

3. The feasibility standards call for evaluation systems that are as easy to implement as possible, efficient in their use of time and resources, adequately funded, and viable from a number of other standpoints.

4. The accuracy standards require that the obtained information be technically accurate and that conclusions be linked logically to the data.

Page 63: Seminar organization

1. The utility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will serve the information needs of intended users.

2. The feasibility standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be realistic, prudent, diplomatic, and frugal.

Page 64: Seminar organization

3. The propriety standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will be conducted legally, ethically, and with due regard for the welfare of those involved in the evaluation, as well as those affected by its results.

4. The accuracy standards are intended to ensure that an evaluation will reveal and convey technically adequate information about the features that determine worth or merit of the program being evaluated.

Page 65: Seminar organization

1. The Propriety standards help ensure that student evaluations are conducted lawfully, ethically, and with regard to the rights of students and other persons affected by student evaluation.

2. The Utility standards promote the design and implementation of informative, timely, and useful student evaluations.

Page 66: Seminar organization

3. The Feasibility standards help ensure that student evaluations are practical; viable; cost-effective; and culturally, socially, and politically appropriate.

4. The Accuracy standards help ensure that student evaluations will provide sound, accurate, and credible information about student learning and performance.

Page 67: Seminar organization
Page 68: Seminar organization

The ability of the students to assess their clinical performance and competencies and identify both strengths and areas for improvement.

It is the continuous process of determining personal growth and progress, which can be raised or lowered by the behavior of a close other (a person that is psychologically close).

Page 69: Seminar organization

Abraham Tesser created the self-evaluation maintenance theory in 1988. The self-evaluation maintenance model assumes two things: that a person will try to maintain or increase their own self-evaluation, and self-evaluation is influenced by relationships with others

Page 70: Seminar organization

Self-evaluation is a potentially powerful technique because of its impact on student performance through enhanced self-efficacy and increased intrinsic motivation.

Evidence about the positive effect of self-evaluation on student performance is particularly convincing for difficult tasks (Maehr & Stallings, 1972; Arter et al., 1994), especially in academically oriented schools (Hughes et al., 1985) and among high need pupils (Henry, 1994).

Perhaps just as important, students like to evaluate their work.

Page 71: Seminar organization
Page 72: Seminar organization

When students evaluate their performance positively,

self-evaluations encourage students to set higher goals (1) and commit more personal resources or effort (2) to them. The combination of goals (1) and effort (2) equals achievement (3).

A student's achievement results in self-judgment (4), ("Were my goals met?“)

The result of the self-judgment is self-reaction (5), or a student responding to the judgment with the question, "How do I feel about that?"

.

Page 73: Seminar organization

Goals, effort, achievement, self-judgment, and self-reaction all can combine to impact self-confidence (6) in a positive way.

Self-evaluation is really the combination of the self-judgment and self-reaction components of the model, and if we can teach students to do this better we can contribute to an upward cycle of better learning.

Page 74: Seminar organization

the practice of keeping a diary or journal that explores thoughts and feelings surrounding the events of one’s life.

1. How much time and effort did you put into this?2. What do you think your strengths and weaknesses were in this assignment?3. How could you improve your assignment?4. What are the most valuable things you learned from this assignment?

Page 75: Seminar organization

Statements that are based on personal experience or personal knowledge.

Page 76: Seminar organization

Over-all Committee Chairperson Asst. Over-all Committee Chairperson Comm on Program & Invitation Comm on Registration, Reception,

Refreshments/ Ways & Means Comm on Physical Arrangement &

Technical Matters Comm on Finance and Awards Comm on Documentation & Evaluation

Page 77: Seminar organization
Page 78: Seminar organization

1. ^  Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

2. ^  Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

3. ^  Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2003). The Student Evaluation Standards: How to Improve Evaluations of Students. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

4. ^  Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol 21, (pp. 181-227). New York: Academic Press.

5. ^ Bradshaw, M. (2007). Innovative teaching strategies in Nursing and related health professions. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

6. ^ Gaberson, K. (2007). Clinical Teaching Strategies in Nursing. New York, New York:Springer Publishing Company

Page 79: Seminar organization