12
Michelle Nary and Novea Lindsay

Section 230

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Section 230

Michelle Nary and Novea Lindsay

Page 2: Section 230

"No provider or user of an interactive

computer service shall be treated as

the publisher or speaker of any

information provided by another

information content provider.”

Page 3: Section 230

Cases• Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe, Inc. Ruling: dismissed

• Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Servs. Co. Ruling: Stratton Oakmont

Internet Development• Legislators wanted to facilitate the development of digital

technologies Ex: moderator tools

• Company Liability Restriction of commentary

1. Protect corporate interests

2. Encourage dialogue

Page 4: Section 230

Absolve Distributor Liability

Encourage Free Speech• Facebook

• Twitter

• Reddit

Content and Child Safety Standards

Page 5: Section 230
Page 6: Section 230

Defamation• Blumenthal v. Drudge (1998) Upheld

Privacy Violation• Barnes v. Yahoo, Inc. (2009) Upheld

Negligence• Jane Doe v. America Online, Inc. (2001) Upheld

Other torts associated with publishing• Discrimination Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC (2008) Rejected

Page 7: Section 230

'Revenge Porn' Victims Are Right To Be

Angry, But Perhaps Not Here

Page 8: Section 230

Screening

Selection

Editing

Page 9: Section 230

Soliciting

Purchasing

Facilitating

Maintenance

Page 10: Section 230

Content Editing• Original Statement: Carl is not a criminal (non-defamatory)

• Altered Statement: Carl is a criminal (defamatory) then they are not protected by section 230.

Interaction• Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com,

LLC (2008) Rejected

Material Removal• Barnes v. Yahoo, Inc. (2009) Promissory Estoppel

Page 11: Section 230

The Resident: Gov't gag order for the

Internet

Page 12: Section 230