19

Click here to load reader

Scaffolding for systemic_change

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Scaffolding for Systemic Change

Chapter 23

Sharadna Mungur0919052

Page 2: Scaffolding for systemic_change

John Seely Brown:

“open source is an institutional innovation, not just a technological one”

He calls for an “ecology of experiments and systems for the learning landscape.”

Thinkers of ‘open source’

Page 3: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Such a model requires

building social networks,

developing ways to accelerate capabilities

assuring staying power.

Page 4: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Projects that characterizes these are:

The Urban Universities Portfolio Project (UUPP)

The Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (CASTL)

The Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research (Inter/National Coalition)

Page 5: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Steven Weber:

“criteria for entering (and leaving), leadership

roles, power relations, distributional issues,

education and socialization paths, and all the

other characteristics that describe a nascent

culture and community structure” (2004, p. 15)

Page 6: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Reflection Interaction Knowledge

Building Social Networks

Information

Page 7: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Knowledge building emerge from social

interaction where people build knowledge

within their social group first and then

extending this to others.

Page 8: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Features:

Intermediaries

Continued Invitation to Involvement and Cultivation of Emergent Leadership

Page 9: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Intermediaries

Intermediaries are knowledge-builders that are essential for a social network involving

education.

They support open education by providing

the environment necessary for

wide-scale knowledge-building

Page 10: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Purpose of Intermediaries:

1. Provide coordination

2. Collaborative research

Page 11: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Continued Invitation to Involvement and Cultivation of

Emergent Leadership

Change initiatives

often choose or invite a set of players

willing to work toward mutual educational

objectives but also structure future entry

points into the project.

Page 12: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Interaction of Individuals, Campuses, and Organizations, Both

Nationally and Internationally

“Sometimes the nature of the work itself

elicits interaction.”.

In fact, this interaction helps in the

knowledge building-community of practice.

Page 13: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Requirement of open source

Courage to change

Page 14: Scaffolding for systemic_change

The Value of a National Context

1. Provides a “demilitarized zone.”2. Disparate achievements can become

more than the sum of the parts.

Page 15: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Sharing and Assessing Process and Findings

“Build in assessment at every stage”

i.e. formative assessment to provide

useful feedback to correct errors and

thus building up successful projects.

Page 16: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Ensuring Staying Power

“Incorporate the means for ensuring

staying power,” advise Bacchetti and

Ehrlich (2007, p.27)

Page 17: Scaffolding for systemic_change

One means for ensuring staying power is

technological support for communication

and dissemination of ideas and findings

Page 18: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Building on the Shoulders of Giants

“Building on the shoulders of giants entails

benefiting from ancestors but also

contributing to the next generation”

Page 19: Scaffolding for systemic_change

Learning theory and practice confirm that

scaffolding supports learning

in an open-education environment in

important ways