34
Reframing Web 2.0 as a public service for the right to communicate Sebastian Deterding Hans Bredow Institute for Media Research / Graduate School Media and Communication, Hamburg University Internet Research 11.0, Gothenborg, 15.10.2010 cbn

Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Reframing Web 2.0as a public service for the right to communicate

Sebastian DeterdingHans Bredow Institute for Media Research /Graduate School Media and Communication, Hamburg UniversityInternet Research 11.0, Gothenborg, 15.10.2010

cbn

Page 2: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

A part of fundamental human rights?

http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2009/06/10/hadopi-le-conseil-constitutionnel-censure-la-riposte-graduee_1205290_651865.html

Page 4: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

A new public sphere?

http://opennet.net/policing-content-quasi-public-sphere

Page 5: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

BBC News

»73% (of UK consumers) described broadband as essential

a utility as water or electricity.«

free broadband won‘t entice all (2009)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8091398.stm

Page 6: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

• Increasing convergence of content, communication, computers*

• Internet as the central infrastructural backbone: All-IP Networks/NGNs§

• Private and public actors increasingly rely on online services for communicative functions†

• Increasing centralisation of Internet services: SaaS/Cloud Computing‡

* Henten & Tadayoni 2008 § Dowden, Gitlin & Martin 1998, ITU 2001, Trick & Weber 2007 † Brown et al 2009, 2009a ‡ Carr 2008, ITU 2009

IP as the central communication service

Page 7: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

How might we

think about the Internet as a public service in a more systematic, technology-neutral manner?

Page 8: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

1

Introduction

3

Critique &Conceptual Model

2

Public Services& the Internet Today

4

Civil Society& Web 2.0

5

Outlook

Page 9: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

1

Introduction

3

Critique &Conceptual Model

4

5

Outlook

2

Public Services& the Internet Today

Civil Society& Web 2.0

Page 10: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

European Commission

»The term ‚services of general interest‘ … covers market and non-market services which the public authorities class as being of general interest and subject to specific public service obligations.«

services of general interest (2003)

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002L0022:EN:HTML

Page 11: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

European Commission

»The market usually ensures optimum allocation of resources for the benefit of society at large. However, some services of general interest are not fully satisfied by markets alone ... Therefore, it has always been the core responsibility of public authorities to ensure that such basic collective and qualitative needs are satisfied.«

services of general interest (2003)

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002L0022:EN:HTML

Page 12: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

public services

Media

Telecom.

Health

Security

Education

TransportEnergy

Water

Fire

Waste management

Social services

Scope of public services

Today‘s FocusAdministration

Page 13: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Legitimations of public services

Nationalconstitutions

Universal/transnational

Today‘s Focus

Page 14: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

• Natural law: UDHR, Art. 19*

• State theory: Provision of existence§

• Democracy theory: Public sphere/media crucial for deliberative democracy†

• Economics: Public/common goods (tragedies, externalities, monopolies)‡

* Kuhlen 2004 § Forsthoff 1938, Meinel 2007 † Gimmler 2001, Trappel 2010, Gripsrud & Moe 2010 ‡ Hardin 1968, Rose 1986, Heller 1998

Legitimations of public services

Page 15: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

• (Ultra-)Broadband connectivity*

• Public Service Broadcasting online§

• Freedom of Information, Open Data†

The current discourse

* OECD 2007, 2008 § Lowe & Hujanen 2003, Lowe & Bardoel 2008, Lowe 2010 † Hunt & Chapman 2006, O‘Reilly & Battelle 2009

Page 16: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

1

Introduction

2

Public ServiceInternet Today

4

5

Outlook

Civil Society& Web 2.0

3

Critique &Conceptual Model

Page 17: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

2 Layers of Public Service Internet?

Public Service MediaFreedom of Information, Open Data

Broadband Connectivity

phys

ical

con

ten

t

Page 18: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Yochai Benkler

»(The) freedom to create and communicate requires use of diverse things and relationships... These are the physical, logical, and content layers. ... The logical layer represents the algorithms, standards, ways of translating human meaning into something that machines can transmit, store, or compute, and something that machines process into communications meaningful to human beings.«

the wealth of networks (2006: 391-2)

Page 19: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

3 Layers of Public Service Internet?

Public Service MediaFreedom of Information, Open Data

Protocols, Software, Platforms

Broadband Connectivity

phys

ical

con

ten

tlo

gic

al

Page 20: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Lawrence Lessig

R/O culture -> R/W culture

remix (2008)

Page 21: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

»Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.«

article 19

Page 22: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Rainer Kuhlen

»r2r + r2w = r2c«

informationsethik (2004: 231)

Page 23: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

6 Modules of Public Service Internet?

Public Service MediaFreedom of Information, Open Data Remixable public content

Protocols, Software, Platformsfor Reception

Protocols, Software, Platformsfor Production

Broadband Connectivity Production Devices

phys

ical

con

ten

tlo

gic

al

right to read right to write

Page 24: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

WSIS Geneva Plan of Action

»Everyone should have the necessary skills to benefit fully from the Information Society. Therefore, capacity building and ICT literacy are essential.«

c4. capacity building, para 11

Page 25: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

8 Modules of Public Service Internet

Receptive New Media Literacies Productive New Media Literacies

Public Service MediaFreedom of Information, Open Data Remixable public content

Protocols, Software, Platformsfor Reception

Protocols, Software, Platformsfor Production

Broadband Connectivity Production Devices

phys

ical

con

ten

t

right to read right to write

log

ical

capa

city

Page 26: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

1

Introduction

3

Critique &Conceptual Model

2

Public ServiceInternet Today

5

Outlook

4

Civil Society& Web 2.0

Page 27: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Civil Society fills relevant gaps

Public Service MediaFreedom of Information, Open Data

Broadband Connectivity

phys

ical

con

ten

t

right to read right to write

log

ical

capa

city

Page 28: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Clay Shirky

»It is curiously the moment when technology becomes boring that the social effects become interesting.«

here comes everybody (2008)

Page 29: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Web 2.0 closes the capacity gap

Ease of use Ease of use

Consumable ContentUser Data

Shareable ContentUser Data

APIs, Protocols, Widgets, Editors, Cloud Hosting

Broadband Connectivity Production Devices

phys

ical

con

ten

t

right to read right to write

log

ical

capa

city

Page 30: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Web 2.0 covers the whole stack

Receptive New Media LIteracies Productive New Media Literacies

Public Service MediaFreedom of Information, Open Data Remixable public content

Protocols, Software, Platformsfor Reception

Protocols, Software, Platformsfor Production

Broadband Connectivity Production Devices

phys

ical

con

ten

t

right to read right to write

log

ical

capa

city

web 2.0/SaaS

Page 31: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

1

Introduction

3

Critique &Conceptual Model

2

Public ServiceInternet Today

4

Civil Society& Web 2.0

5Outlook

Page 32: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

• Natural law: Safeguarding freedom of speech

• State theory: Critical infrastructure security, safeguarding affordable universal access

• Democracy theory: Safeguarding independent, unbiased deliberation

• Economics: Natural monopolies to the detriment of innovation, competitors and citizens

Potential problems

Page 33: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

• Extend beyond media & communication

• Systemize potential problems and regulatory approaches

• Model too abstract to be useful?

• Where to place privacy/informational self-determination?

Next steps and open questions

Page 34: Reframing Web 2.0 as a Public Service for the Right to Communicate

Thanks.

[email protected]

@dingstweets

codingconduct.ccLicense: Creative Commons by-nc/3.0