7

Click here to load reader

Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

Unconventional Natural Gas Drilling and Water Demand in Texas

Texas Groundwater Summit8/29/12

Drew Nelson

Clean Energy Project Manager

Environmental Defense Fund

Page 2: Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

The Gas Boom Has Clear Advantages…

• Economic development

• Increased energy security

• Less air pollution

• Fewer greenhouse gases than coal• Fewer greenhouse gases than coal

…If done the “right way”.

Page 3: Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

…and Potential Risks

• Ground and surface-water contamination;

• Significant amount of water usage;

• Air emissions can threaten public health;

• Cumulative impacts from truck traffic, noise, lights, etc; lights, etc;

• Increased greenhouse gas emissions.

…If not done correctly.

Lack of public trust due to risks could erode economic and social benefits. It is in everybody’s interest to get it right.

Page 4: Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

• Texas has a water deficit that is projected to worsen.

• Hydraulic fracturing (HF) remains a small part of overall water use in TX, but still used ≈40,000 AF in 2011.

• Equivalent to 5 days worth of water use for every Texan.

Defining the TX Water Demand Problem

• For 7 of the 16 RWPGs in 2011, HF water equivalent to >70% of estimated unmet water needs (demand>supply after all management strategies included in water plan).

• Currently, most HF water removed from local H2O cycle.

According to data prepared for the TWDB report, Water for Texas: http://www.twdb.state.tx.us/publications/state_water_plan/2012/2012_SWP.pdf

EPA estimate of 100 gallons/day/person of average water usage: http://www.epa.gov/WaterSense/pubs/indoor.html.

Page 5: Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

Winter:Dec. 20, 2011

Spring:Mar. 20, 2011

51% of water used for hydraulic fracturing in 2011 is from 10 counties.

CulbersonWise

Collision Between Drought and Drilling

Almost Fall:August 21, 2012

Summer:Jun. 19, 2012

Dec. 20, 2011 Mar. 20, 2011

Sources: U.S. Drought Monitor Archives http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/archive.htmlE.P.A Indoor water use in the U.S. http://www.epa.gov/WaterSense/pubs/indoor.htmlNicot, J. P., Hebel, A. K., Ritter, S. M., Walden, S., Baier, R., Galusky, P., Beach, J., et al. (2011). Current and Projected Water Use in the Texas Mining and Oil and Gas Industry. Austin, Texas.

WiseDimmitReevesPecosLa SalleJackDentonHarrisonAtascosa

Page 6: Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

What it Often Means to the Public• Many people react emotionally to

water issues, particularly in drought. Why does drilling get water when my cows can’t?

• Public perception is that hydraulic fracturing causes water pollution fracturing causes water pollution and uses too much water, making water the largest hurdle to public license to drill.

• Until industry identifies ways to minimize water use, public perception likely won’t change.

Page 7: Public Perceptions and Hydraulic Fracturing, Drew Nelson

What Can be Done? • Increased use of brackish/non-

potable water for HF.

• Increased water recycling.

• More and better data on water consumption and sources/type of water used.of water used.

• Finding other uses for produced and flow-back water instead of injection.

• Increased data collection and aquifer modeling.

• Education/Transparency.