20
This document is offered compliments of BSP Media Group. www.bspmediagroup.com All rights reserved.

Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

This document is offered compliments of BSP Media Group. www.bspmediagroup.com

All rights reserved.

Page 2: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

"Providing Cost Efficient Coverage To

Previously Unprofitable Areas”

12th November 2013

bad news, worse news, drivers, challenges, issues, opportunities, not so bad news…

Page 3: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

The challenge of rural coverage

• No money - $2 ARPU

• No power – dead devices

• No access – bad or no roads

• No interest – from MNOs

• High cost – Capex & Opex

• Low literacy – voice only

• Vast areas – remote communities

• Long distances - distributed communities

• Tech divide – urban priority & data

• High risk – licence obligation vs loss making sites

Page 4: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

GSM industry in a state of change

• Licence renewal (10-15 year anniversary) looms (unprecedented threat of losing a licence - imagine

losing it because of a lack of rural coverage)

• As voice revenue declines, data revenue

demands significant investment

• Operator generation shift – Technology centric to

marketing centric

• Leading to a focus on greater efficiency and

leveraging capex to maximise returns

• While regulators and users grow more

demanding

Page 5: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

OPERATOR CHALLENGES

• Licence renewal

• Flattening revenues

• Increased costs

• New technology capex (LTE – 5G)

• Legacy maintenance & upgrades

• Increasing opex

• Regulatory pressure

• Competition – other operators and government

Page 6: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Traditional Solution Challenges

• MNOs have difficulty in accepting technologies

outside their major vendors – so limited rural

solutions

• Towerco model presently limited to passive

infrastructure – so its not the answer

• USF models are slow and politically motivated -

so not necessarily sustainable on its own

• Major backbone upgrades to fibre for data

means low priority rural rollout for operators –

but NOT regulators

Page 7: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Demand for Rural GSM

• The next 1billion subscribers • 87% will come from emerging economies

• Large areas in developing countries without

coverage • 70% live in rural communities

• Telecoms - the key to economic development • Economic growth increases by 1.2% for every 10% rise in mobile

users - GSMA

• Political and regulatory pressure • Licence renewals and a drive towards rural empowerment are

resulting a scramble to address the lack of rural service delivery

Page 8: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

The challenge of rural coverage

• No money - $2 ARPU

• No power – dead devices

• No access – bad or no roads

• No interest – from MNOs

• High cost – Capex & Opex

• Low literacy – voice only

• Vast areas – remote communities

• Long distances - distributed communities

• Tech divide – urban priority & data

• High risk – licence obligation vs loss making sites

Page 9: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

No money? - There is money

Page 10: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

No power? - Solar innovation

Page 11: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

No access? - Lightweight solutions

Page 12: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

No Interest? Regulation & politics

Page 13: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

High cost? - New business models

• Outright purchase of equipment

• Supply, installation, commissioning, support.

• Vendor MNO

• Leasing

• Installation, commissioning, support

• Vendor Finance House MNO

• Managed services

• Provision of capacity against set of KPI’s

• Vendor Entrepreneur MNO

• Revenue share

• On sliding scale

• Vendor Entrepreneur MNO

Page 14: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Low literacy? - Smart people

Page 15: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Vast areas? – VSAT solutions

Page 16: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Long distances? - Added value solutions

Page 17: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Tech divide? – Rural tech solutions

Page 18: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

High risk? – Zero risk solutions

Page 19: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

The answer to rural coverage

• No money

• No power

• No access

• No interest

• High cost

• Low literacy

• Vast areas

• Long distances

• Tech divide

• High risk

• There is money

• Innovative solar

• Lightweight solutions

• Regulation & politics

• New business models

• Smart people

• VSAT solutions

• Added value solutions

• Rural tech solutions

• Zero risk solutions

Page 20: Providing Cost Efficient Coverage ToPreviously Unprofitable Areas

Thank you

CONTACT:

Dion Jerling

Special Projects Director

CONNECT AFRICA

Cell: +260 965 860 113 (Zambia)

Cell: +27 82 487 8354 (South Africa)

Email: [email protected]

www.connectafrica.net