25
1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Memristor theory was formulated and named by Leon Chua in a 1971 paper. Chua strongly believed that a fourth device existed to provide conceptual symmetry with the resistor, inductor, and capacitor. This symmetry follows from the description of basic passive circuit elements as defined by a relation between two of the four fundamental circuit variables. A device linking charge and flux (themselves defined as time integrals of current and voltage), which would be the memristor, was still hypothetical at the time. However, it would not be until thirty- seven years later, on April 30, 2008, that a team at HP Labs led by the scientist R. Stanley Williams would announce the discovery of a switching memristor. Based on a thin film of titanium dioxide, it has been presented as an approximately ideal device. The reason that the memristor is radically different from the other fundamental circuit elements is that, unlike them, it carries a memory of its past. When you turn off the voltage to the circuit, the memristor still remembers how much was applied before and for how long. That's an effect that can't be duplicated by any circuit combination of resistors, capacitors, and inductors, which is why the memristor qualifies as a fundamental circuit element. 1.1. Need For Memristor A memristor is one of four basic electrical circuit components, joining the resistor, capacitor, and inductor. The memristor, short for "memory resistor" was first theorized by student Leon Chua in the early 1970s. He developed mathematical equations to represent the memristor, which Chua believed would balance the functions of the other three types of circuit elements. The known three fundamental circuit elements as resistor, capacitor and inductor relates four fundamental circuit variables as electric current, voltage, charge and magnetic flux. In that we were missing one to relate charge to magnetic flux. That is where the need for the fourth fundamental element comes in. This element has been named as memristor.

M memristor doc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: M memristor doc

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Memristor theory was formulated and named by Leon Chua in a 1971 paper. Chua

strongly believed that a fourth device existed to provide conceptual symmetry with the resistor,

inductor, and capacitor. This symmetry follows from the description of basic passive circuit

elements as defined by a relation between two of the four fundamental circuit variables. A device

linking charge and flux (themselves defined as time integrals of current and voltage), which

would be the memristor, was still hypothetical at the time. However, it would not be until thirty-

seven years later, on April 30, 2008, that a team at HP Labs led by the scientist R. Stanley

Williams would announce the discovery of a switching memristor. Based on a thin film of

titanium dioxide, it has been presented as an approximately ideal device.

The reason that the memristor is radically different from the other fundamental circuit

elements is that, unlike them, it carries a memory of its past. When you turn off the voltage to the

circuit, the memristor still remembers how much was applied before and for how long. That's an

effect that can't be duplicated by any circuit combination of resistors, capacitors, and inductors,

which is why the memristor qualifies as a fundamental circuit element.

1.1. Need For Memristor

A memristor is one of four basic electrical circuit components, joining the resistor,

capacitor, and inductor. The memristor, short for "memory resistor" was first theorized by

student Leon Chua in the early 1970s. He developed mathematical equations to represent the

memristor, which Chua believed would balance the functions of the other three types of circuit

elements.

The known three fundamental circuit elements as resistor, capacitor and inductor relates

four fundamental circuit variables as electric current, voltage, charge and magnetic flux. In that

we were missing one to relate charge to magnetic flux. That is where the need for the fourth

fundamental element comes in. This element has been named as memristor.

Page 2: M memristor doc

2

Memristance (Memory + Resistance) is a property of an Electrical Component that

describes the variation in Resistance of a component with the flow of charge. Any two terminal

electrical component that exhibits Memristance is known as a Memristor. Memristance is

becoming more relevant and necessary as we approach smaller circuits, and at some point when

we scale into nano electronics, we would have to take memristance into account in our circuit

models to simulate and design electronic circuits properly.

An ideal memristor is a passive two-terminal electronic device that is built to express

only the property of memristance (just as a resistor expresses resistance and an inductor

expresses inductance). However, in practice it may be difficult to build a 'pure memristor,' since

a real device may also have a small amount of some other property, such as capacitance (just as

any real inductor also has resistance). A common analogy for a resistor is a pipe that carries

water. The water itself is analogous to electrical charge, the pressure at the input of the pipe is

similar to voltage, and the rate of flow of the water through the pipe is like electrical current. Just

as with an electrical resistor, the flow of water through the pipe is faster if the pipe is shorter

and/or it has a larger diameter.

1.2. HISTORY

The story of the memristor is truly one for the history books. When Leon Chua, now an

IEEE Fellow, wrote his seminal paper predicting the memristor, he was a newly minted and

rapidly rising professor at UC Berkeley. Chua had been fighting for years against what he

considered the arbitrary restriction of electronic circuit theory to linear systems. He was

convinced that nonlinear electronics had much more potential than the linear circuits that domi-

nate electronics technology to this day.

Memristance was first predicted by Professor Leon Chua in his paper “Memristor—The

missing circuit element” published in the IEEE Transactions on Circuits Theory (1971).

In that paper, Prof. Chua proved a number of theorems to show that there was a 'missing'

two-terminal circuit element from the family of "fundamental" passive devices: resistors (which

Page 3: M memristor doc

3

provide static resistance to the flow of electrical charge), capacitors (which store charges), and

inductors (which resist changes to the flow of charge)—, or elements that do not add energy to a

circuit. He showed that no combination of resistors, capacitors, and inductors could duplicate

the properties of a memristor. This inability to duplicate the properties of a memristor with the

other passive circuit elements is what makes the memristor fundamental. However, this original

paper requires a considerable effort for a non-expert to follow. In a later paper, Prof. Chua

introduced his 'periodic table' of circuit elements.

Fig.1.1 : Describing the relation between charge,

current, voltage and magnetic flux to one another

The pair wise mathematical equations that relate the four circuit quantities—charge,

current, voltage, and magnetic flux—to one another. These can be related in six ways. Two are

connected through the basic physical laws of electricity and magnetism, and three are related by

the known circuit elements: resistors connect voltage and current, inductors connect flux and

current, and capacitors connect voltage and charge. But one equation is missing from this group:

the relationship between charge moving through a circuit and the magnetic flux surrounded by

that circuit. That is what memristor, connecting charge and flux.

Even before Chua had his eureka moment, however, many researchers were reporting

what they called “anomalous” current-voltage behavior in the micrometer-scale devices they had

built out of unconventional materials, like polymers and metal oxides. But the idiosyncrasies

were usually ascribed to some mystery electrochemical reaction, electrical breakdown, or other

spurious phenomenon attributed to the high voltages that researchers were applying to their

devices.

Page 4: M memristor doc

4

Leon’s discovery is similar to that of the Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleev who created

and used a periodic table in 1869 to find many unknown properties and missing elements.

1.2.1. HP’s first step:

Even though Memristance was first predicted by Professor Leon Chua, Unfortunately,

neither he nor the rest of the engineering community could come up with a physical

manifestation that matched his mathematical expression.

Thirty-seven years later, a group of scientists from HP Labs has finally built real working

memristors, thus adding a fourth basic circuit element to electrical circuit theory, one that will

join the three better-known ones: the capacitor, resistor and the inductor.

Interest in the memristor revived in 2008 when an experimental solid state version was

reported by R. Stanley Williams of Hewlett Packard. HP researchers built their memristor when

they were trying to develop molecule-sized switches in Teramac (tera-operation-per-second

multiarchitecture computer). Teramac architecture was the crossbar, which has since become the

de facto standard for nanoscale circuits because of its simplicity, adaptability, and redundancy.

A solid-state device could not be constructed until the unusual behavior of nanoscale

materials was better understood. The device neither uses magnetic flux as the theoretical

memristor suggested, nor do stores charge as a capacitor does, but instead achieves a resistance

dependent on the history of current using a chemical mechanism.

The HP team’s memristor design consisted of two sets of 21 parallel 40-nm-wide wires

crossing over each other to form a crossbar array, fabricated using nanoimprint lithography. A

20-nm-thick layer of the semiconductor titanium dioxide (TiO2) was sandwiched between the

horizontal and vertical nanowires, forming a memristor at the intersection of each wire pair. An

array of field effect transistors surrounded the memristor crossbar array, and the memristors and

transistors were connected to each other through metal traces.

The crossbar is an array of perpendicular wires. Anywhere two wires cross, they are

connected by a switch. To connect a horizontal wire to a vertical wire at any point on the grid,

Page 5: M memristor doc

5

you must close the switch between them. Note that a crossbar array is basically a storage system,

with an open switch representing a zero and a closed switch representing a one. You read the

data by probing the switch with a small voltage. Because of their simplicity, crossbar arrays have

a much higher density of switches than a comparable integrated circuit based on transistors

electrodes.

Stanley Williams found an ideal memristor in titanium dioxide—the stuff of white paint

and sunscreen. In TiO2, the dopants don't stay stationary in a high electric field; they tend to drift

in the direction of the current. Titanium dioxide oxygen atoms are negatively charged ions and

its electrical field is huge. This lets oxygen ions move and change the material’s conductivity, a

necessity for memristors.

The researchers then sandwiched two thin titanium dioxide layers between two 5 nm

thick Applying a small electrical current causes the atoms to move around and quickly switch the

material from conductive to resistive, which enables memristor functionality.

When an electric field is applied, the oxygen vacancies drift changing the boundary

between the high-resistance and low-resistance layers. Thus the resistance of the film as a whole

is dependent on how much charge has been passed through it in a particular direction, which is

reversible by changing the direction of current. Since the HP device displays fast ion conduction

at nanoscale, it is considered a nanoionic device.

In the process, the device uses little energy and generates only small amounts of heat.

Also, when the device shuts down, the oxygen atoms stay put, retaining their state and the data

they represent.

On April 30, 2008, the Hewlett-Packard research team proudly announced their

realization of a memristor prototype.

Page 6: M memristor doc

6

CHAPTER 2

MEMRISTOR

2.1. MEMRISTOR FEATURES:

Memristor is passive two-terminal element that maintains functional relation between

charge flowing through the device (i.e. time integral of current) and flux or A memristor is a

two-terminal semiconductor device whose resistance depends on the magnitude and polarity of

the voltage applied to it and the length of time that voltage has been applied. When you turn off

the voltage, the memristor remembers its most recent resistance until the next time you turn it on,

whether that happens a day later or a year later.

Fig.2.1: An atomic force microscope image shows 17 memristors

As its name implies, the memristor can "remember" how much current has passed

through it. And by alternating the amount of current that passes through it, a memristor can also

become a one-element circuit component with unique properties. Most notably, it can save its

electronic state even when the current is turned off, making it a great candidate to replace today's

flash memory.

Page 7: M memristor doc

7

A common analogy to describe a memristor is similar to that of a resistor. Think of a

resistor as a pipe through which water flows. The water is electric charge. The resistor’s

obstruction of the flow of charge is comparable to the diameter of the pipe: the narrower the

pipe, the greater the resistance. For the history of circuit design, resistors have had a fixed pipe

diameter. But a memristor is a pipe that changes diameter with the amount and direction of water

that flows through it. If water flows through this pipe in one direction, it expands (becoming less

resistive). But send the water in the opposite direction and the pipe shrinks (becoming more

resistive). Further, the memristor remembers its diameter when water last went through. Turn off

the flow and the diameter of the pipe “freezes” until the water is turned back on. , the pipe will

retain it most recent diameter until the water is turned back on. Thus, the pipe does not store

water like a bucket (or a capacitor) – it remembers how much water flowed through it.

Fig.2.2: Schematic diagram of pipe and current example

The reason that the memristor is radically different from the other fundamental circuit

elements is that, unlike them, it carries a memory of its past. When you turn off the voltage to the

circuit, the memristor still remembers how much was applied before and for how long. That's an

effect that can't be duplicated by any circuit combination of resistors, capacitors, and inductors,

which is why the memristor qualifies as a fundamental circuit element.

Page 8: M memristor doc

8

Technically such a mechanism can be replicated using transistors and capacitors, but, it

takes a lot of transistors and capacitors to do the job of a single memristor.

Memristance is measured by the electrical component memristor. The way a resistor

measures resistance, a conductor measures conduction, and an inductor measures inductance, a

memristor measures memristance. An ideal memristor is a passive two-terminal electronic

device that expresses only memristance. However it is difficult to build a pure memristor, since

every real device contains a small amount of another property.

Two properties of the memristor attracted much attention. Firstly, its memory

characteristic, and, secondly, its nanometer dimensions. The memory property and latching

capability enable us to think about new methods for nano-computing. With the nanometer scale

device provides a very high density and is less power hungry. In addition, the fabrication process

of nano-devices is simpler and cheaper than the conventional CMOS fabrication, at the cost of

extra device defects.

At the architectural level, a crossbar-based architecture appears to be the most promising

nanotechnology architecture. Inherent defect-tolerance capability, simplicity, flexibility,

scalability, and providing maximum density are the major advantages of this architecture by

using a memristor at each cross point.

Memristors are passive elements, meaning they cannot introduce energy into a circuit. In

order to function, memristors need to be integrated into circuits that contain active elements,

such as transistors, which can amplify or switch electronic signals. A circuit containing both

memristors and transistors could have the advantage of providing enhanced functionality with

fewer components, in turn minimizing chip area and power consumption.

This new circuit element shares many of the properties of resistors and shares the same

unit of measurement (ohms). However, in contrast to ordinary resistors, in which the resistance is

permanently fixed, memristance may be programmed or switched to different resistance states

based on the history of the voltage applied to the memristance material. This phenomena can be

understood graphically in terms of the relationship between the current flowing through a

Page 9: M memristor doc

9

memristor and the voltage applied across the memristor. In ordinary resistors there is a linear

relationship between current and voltage so that a graph comparing current and voltage results in

a straight line.However, for memristors a similar graph is a little more complicated.

Fig.2.3: Current voltage characteristic of resistor and memristor

2.2. Physics of the device:

Fig.2.4: Memristor Symbols

Page 10: M memristor doc

10

2.3. Definition of Memristor

“The memristor is formally defined as a two-terminal element in which the magnetic flux

Φm between the terminals is a function of the amount of electric charge q that has passed through

the device.”

Chua defined the element as a resistor whose resistance level was based on the amount

of charge that had passed through the memristor.

2.4. MEMRISTANCE

Memristance is a property of an electronic component to retain its resistance level even

after power had been shut down or lets it remember (or recall) the last resistance it had before

being shut off.

The memristor is formally defined as a two-terminal element in which the magnetic flux

Φm between the terminals is a function of the amount of electric charge q that has passed through

the device. Each memristor is characterized by its memristance function describing the charge-

dependent rate of change of flux with charge.

Noting from Faraday's law of induction that magnetic flux is simply the time integral of voltage,

and charge is the time integral of current, we may write the more convenient form

Page 11: M memristor doc

11

It can be inferred from this that memristance is simply charge-dependent resistance. If

M(q(t)) is a constant, then we obtain Ohm's Law R(t) = V(t)/ I(t). If M(q(t)) is significant,

however, the equation is not equivalent because q(t) and M(q(t)) will vary with time. Solving for

voltage as a function of time we obtain

This equation reveals that memristance defines a linear relationship between current and

voltage, as long as charge does not vary. The power consumption characteristic recalls that of a

resistor, I2R.

As long as M(q(t)) varies little, such as under alternating current, the memristor will

appear as a resistor. If M(q(t)) increases rapidly, however, current and power consumption will

quickly stop. Furthermore, the memristor is static if no current is applied. If I(t) = 0, we find V(t)

= 0 and M(t) is constant. This is the essence of the memory effect.

Page 12: M memristor doc

12

CHAPTER 3

MANUFACTURING AND WORKING

3.1. MANUFACTURING

Manufacturers could make memristors in the same chip fabrication plants used now, so

companies would not have to undertake expensive retooling or new construction. And

memristors are by no means hard to fabricate. The titanium dioxide structure can be made in any

semiconductor fab currently in existence. The primary limitation to manufacturing hybrid chips

with memristors is that today only a small number of people on Earth have any idea of how to

design circuits containing memristors.

Fig.3.1: Schematic of our fabrication approach.

One of the key fabrication advantages of the crossbar architecture is that the structure is a well

ordered, periodic and simple structure. However, to achieve Nanoscale resolutions the standard

lithography approaches are insufficient. The manufacturing techniques for the Nanoscale

crossbar devices developed by Hewlett-Packard include nanoimprint lithography, which uses a

stamp-like structure with nanometer resolution to transfer a pattern of Nanoscale resolution to a

substrate.

Additional nanoscale fabrication approaches can include self-assembly techniques in

which a mixture of polymers or other materials can form periodic structures on a surface based

Page 13: M memristor doc

13

on processes of energy minimalization. These self-assembly techniques can be used to form a

periodic mask structure over a metal film which can act as a resist to control removal of metal

layers in regions not covered by the mask resulting in the desired metal nanowires required for

the crossbar structure.

Fig.3.2: Images of a 1 × 21 array of memristors.

(a) Optical microscope image.

(b) SEM image of the junction area.

(c) AFM image of part of the array.

3.2. HOW MEMRISTOR WORKS???

3.2.1. Appearance – HP Labs' memristor has Crossbar type memristive circuits contain a lattice

of 40-50nm wide by 2-3nm thick platinum wires that are laid on top of one another perpendicular

top to bottom and parallel of one another side to side. The top and bottom layer are separated by

a switching element approximately 3-30nm in thickness. The switching element consists of two

equal parts of titanium dioxide (TiO2). The layer connected to the bottom platinum wire is

initially perfect TiO2 and the other half is an oxygen deficient layer of TiO2 represented by TiO2-

x where x represents the amount of oxygen deficiencies or vacancies. The entire circuit and

mechanism cannot be seen by the naked eye and must be viewed under a scanning tunneling

microscope, as seen in Figure 6, in order to visualize the physical set up of the crossbar design of

the memristive circuit described in this section.

Page 14: M memristor doc

14

Fig.3.3 : Showing crossbar architecture and magnified memristive switch.

3.2.2. Operation – The memristor’s operation as a switch can be explained in three steps. These

first of these steps is the application of power or more importantly current to the memristor. The

second step consists of the amount of time that the current flows across the crossbar gap and how

the titanium cube converts from a semi-conductor to a conductor. The final step is the actual

memory of the cube that can be read as data.

Step 1 – As explained above, each gap that connects two platinum wires contains a mixture of

two titanium oxide layers. The initial state of the mixture is halfway between conductance and

semi-conductance. Two wires are selected to apply power to in either a positive or negative

direction. A positive direction will attempt to close the switch and a negative direction will

attempt to open the switch. The application of this power will be able to completely open the

circuit between the wires but it will not be able to completely close the circuit since the material

is still a semi-conductor by nature. Power can be selectively placed on certain wires to open and

close the switches in the memristor.

Step 2 – the second step involves a process that takes place at the atom level and is not visible by

any means. It involves the atomic process that the gap material, made from titanium dioxide,

goes through that opens and closes the switch. The initial state of the gap is neutral meaning that

Page 15: M memristor doc

15

it consists of one half of pure titanium dioxide TiO2 and one half of oxygen starved titanium

dioxide TiO2-x where x in the initial state is 0.05. As positive current is applied, the positively

charged oxygen vacancies push their way into the pure TiO2 causing the resistance in the gap

material to drop, becoming more conductive, and the current to rise. Inversely, as a negative

current is applied the oxygen vacancies withdraw from the pure TiO2 and condense in the TiO2-x

half of the gap material causing the pure and more resistive TiO2 to have a greater ratio slowing

the current in the circuit. When the current is raised the switch is considered open (HI) and for

data purposes a binary 1. As current is reversed and the current is dropped the switch is

considered closed (LOW) or a binary 0 for data purposes.

Fig.3.4 : Diffusing of Oxygen molecules.

(a) TiO2-x layer having oxygen deficiencies over insulating TiO2 layer.

(b) Positive voltage applied to top layer repels oxygen deficiencies in to the insulating TiO2

layer below.

(c) Negative voltage on the switch attracts the positively charged oxygen bubbles pulling them

out of the TiO2.

.Step 3 – Step three explains the final step of memristance and is the actual step that makes the

circuit memristive in nature. As explained previously, the concept of memristance is a resistor

Page 16: M memristor doc

16

that can remember what current passed through it. When power is no longer applied to the circuit

switches, the oxygen vacancies remain in the position that they were last before the power was

shut down. This means that the value of the resistance of the material gap will remain until

indefinitely until power is applied again. This is the true meaning of memristance. With an

insignificant test voltage, one that won’t affect the movement of molecules in the material gap

will allow the state of the switches to be read as data. This means that the memristor circuits are

in fact storing data physically.

If we want a positive voltage to turn the memristor off, then we want the titanium oxide

layer with vacancies on the top layer. But if you want a positive voltage to turn the memristor on,

then you need the layers reversed. In its initial state, a crossbar memory has only open switches,

and no information is stored. But once you start closing switches, you can store vast amounts of

information compactly and efficiently.

3.3. Transistor versus Memristor

The first transistor was a couple of inches across which was developed about 60

years ago. Today, a typical laptop computer uses a processor chip that contains over a billion

transistors, each one with electrodes separated by less than 50 nm of silicon. This is more than a

1000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair. These billions of transistors are made by

“top down” methods that involve depositing thin layers of materials, patterning nano-scale

stencils and effectively carving away the unwanted bits. This approach has become overly

successful. The end result is billions of individual components on a single chip, essentially all

working perfectly and continuously for years on end. No other manufactured technology comes

close in reliability or cost.

Still, miniaturization cannot go on forever, because of the basic properties of matter. We

are already beginning to run into the problem that the silicon semiconductor, copper wiring and

oxide insulating layers in these devices are all made out of atoms. Each atom is about 0.3 nm

across.

The entire body of the transistor is being doped less consistently throughout as its sizes

are reduced below the nanometres which make the transistor more unpredictable in nature. It will

be more difficult and costly to press forward additional research and equipment involving these

Page 17: M memristor doc

17

unpredictable behaviours as they occur. Therefore the electronic designs will have to replace

their transistors to the memristors which are not steadily infinitesimal, but increasingly capable.

Table: Difference between Transistor and Memristor:

Transistor Memristor

3-terminal switching device with an

input electrode (e.g. source), an

output electrode (e.g. drain), and a

control electrode (e.g. gate).

Requires a power source to retain a

data state.

Stores data by electron charge.

Scalable by reducing the lateral

length and width dimensions

between the input and output

electrodes.

Capable of performing analog or

digital electronic functions

depending on applied bias voltages.

Fabrication requires optical

lithography.

2-terminal device with one of the electrodes

acting either as a control electrode or a

source electrode depending on the voltage

magnitude.

Does not require a power source to retain a

data state.

Stores data by resistance state.

Scalable by reducing the thickness of the

memristor materials.

Capable of performing analog or digital

electronic functions depending on particular

material used for memristor.

Fabrication by optical lithography but

alternative (potentially cheaper) mass

production techniques such as nanoimprint

lithography and self assembly have also

been implemented

Page 18: M memristor doc

18

The memristor is very likely to follow the similar steps of how the transistor was

implemented in our electronic systems. They may argue that the transistor took approximately

sixty years to reach the extent of today’s research and capabilities. Therefore, the memristors

may take approximately just as long to actually create some of its promising potentials such as

artificial intelligence. This new advancement means more jobs for research and development and

more potential for inventions and designs. Also, the dependency on getting the transistors to

work efficiently in atom sized is lessened.

Another reason for incorporating memristors is the materials used to make each element.

Transistors are usually made of silicon, a non-metal. While this has proven to be a very reliable

source, it returns to the problem of transistors needing to become smaller. Because they are

made of a non-metal it is much harder to make them much smaller. Memristors, on the other

hand, are made of titanium oxide. Titanium is a metal which is much easier to make into smaller

size. Since memristors have twelve times the power of transistors, however, products can be

made smaller and more powerful without reducing the size of the product that powers them.

Page 19: M memristor doc

19

CHAPTER 4

APPLICATIONS AND BENEFITS OF MEMRISTOR

4.1. APPLICATIONS:

The three main areas of application currently under development for memristor

electronics are

(i) Non-volatile memory

(ii) Logic/computation, and

(iii) Neuromorphics.

4.1.1. Non-volatile Memory:

Non-volatile memory is the dominant area being pursued for memristor technology. Of

course most of the companies listed (with the exception of Hewlett Packard) do not refer to their

memory in terms of the memristor and rather use a variety of acronyms (i.e. RRAM, CBRAM,

PRAM, etc.) to distinguish their particular memory design. While these acronyms do represent

real distinctions in terms of the materials used or the mechanism of resistance switching

employed, the materials are still all memristors because they all share the same characteristic

voltage-induced resistance switching behavior covered by the mathematical memristor model of

Chua. Flash memory currently dominates the semiconductor memory market.

However, each memory cell of flash requires at least one transistor meaning that flash

design is highly susceptible to an end to Moore’s law. On the other hand, memristor memory

design is often based on a crossbar architecture which does not require transistors in the memory

cells. Although transistors are still necessary for the read/write circuitry, the total number of

transistors for a million memory cells can be on the order of thousands instead of millions and

the potential for addressing trillions of memory cells exists using only millions (instead of

trillions) of transistors. Another fundamental limitation to conventional memory architectures is

Von Neumann’s bottleneck which makes it more difficult to locate information as memory

Page 20: M memristor doc

20

density increases. Memristors offer a way to overcome this hurdle since they can integrate

memory and processing functions in a common circuit architecture providing a de-segregation

between processing circuitry and data storage circuitry.

4.1.2. Logic/Computation:

The uses of memristor technology for logic and computational electronics is less well

developed than for memory architectures but the seeds of innovation in this area are currently

being sown. Memristors appear particularly important to the areas of reconfigurable computing

architectures such as FPGAs in which the arrangement between arrays of basic logic gates can be

altered by reprogramming the wiring interconnections. Memristors may be ideal to improve the

integration density and reconfigurability of such systems. In addition, since some memristor

materials are capable of tunablity in their resistance state they can provide new types of analog

computational systems which may find uses in modeling probabilistic systems (e.g. weather,

stock market, bio systems) more efficiently than purely binary logic-based processors.

4.1.3. Neuromorphic Electronics :

Neuromorphics has been defined in terms of electronic analog circuits that mimic neuro-

biological architectures. Since the early papers of Leon Chua it was noted that the equations of

the memristor were closely related to behavior of neural cells. Since memristors integrate aspects

of both memory storage and signal processing in a similar manner to neural synapses they may

be ideal to create a synthetic electronic system similar to the human brain capable of handling

applications such as pattern recognition and adaptive control of robotics better than what is

achievable with modern computer architectures.

4.2. Other applications:

Signal processing with memristors, Arithmetic processing with memristors, Pattern

comparison with memristors, Memristors and artificial intelligence, Memristors and robotics.

Page 21: M memristor doc

21

4.2.1. Materials:

Although the different memristor materials have their respective merits and possess

differences in terms of their underlying physics each material share the same resistance

switching properties possessed by memristors.

Variety of binary oxides such as WO3, Ir2O3, MoO3, ZrO2, and RhO2 adjusted

to have memristive properties. A variety of other memristor variations based on TiO, CuO, NiO,

ZrO, and HfO materials have been under experimental investigation for the past several years.

4.2.2. Metallization Cell:

The memristive effect is due to the formation of metallic filaments which interconnect

two electrodes separated by an electrolytic material. The metallic filaments can be broken or

reformed depending on the polarity of an applied voltage.

4.2.3. Perovskite:

Perovskite materials are based on a variety of ternary oxides including PCMO, SrTiO3,

SrZrO3, and BaTiO3. These types of materials appear to have variable resistances which

are more easily tunable via pulse number modulation which may make these materials more

attractive for analog memristor electronics than the metallization cell or binary oxide materials.

4.2.4. Molecular/Polymer:

Molecular and polymer materials have been investigated by Hewlett-Packard and

Advanced Micro Devices as the basis for new types of non-volatile memory. HP has been

working with molecular systems called rotaxane which are thought to exhibit a resistance

switching effect based on a mechanical reconfiguration of the molecule. AMD has been focusing

on ionic molecular and polymer materials which also produce resistance switching behavior and

may have superior analog memristive properties than other materials.

Page 22: M memristor doc

22

4.3. BENEFITS OF MEMRISTOR:

Provides greater resiliency and reliability when power is interrupted in data centers.

Have great data density.

Combines the jobs of working memory and hard drives into one tiny device.

Faster and less expensive than MRAM.

Uses less energy and produces less heat.

Would allow for a quicker boot up since information is not lost when the device is turned

off.

Operating outside of 0s and 1s allows it to imitate brain functions.

Does not lose information when turned off.

Has the capacity to remember the charge that flows through it at a given point in time.

Conventional devices use only 0 and 1; Memristor can use anything between 0 and 1

(0.3, 0.8, 0.5, etc.)

Faster than Flash memory.

By changing the speed and strength of the current, it is possible to change the behavior of

the device.

A fast and hard current causes it to act as a digital device.

A soft and slow current causes it to act as an analog device.

100 GBs of memory made from memristors on same area of 16 GBs of flash memory.

High Defect Tolerance allows high defects to still produce high yields as opposed to one

bad transistor which can kill a CPU.

Compatible with current CMOS interfaces.

Page 23: M memristor doc

23

As non-volatile memory, memristors do not consume power when idle.

3 Memristors to make a NAND gate, 27 NAND gates to make a Memristor!!!

More magnetic than magnetic disks.

4.4. Major Challenges

The memristor’s major challenges are its relatively low speeds and the need for

designers to learn how to build circuits with the new element.

Though hundreds of thousands of memristor semiconductors have already been built,

there is still much more to be perfected.

Dissipates heat when being written to or read.

No design standards (rules).

Needs more defect engineering.

Page 24: M memristor doc

24

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE

CONCLUSION:

By redesigning certain types of circuits to include memristors, it is possible to obtain the

same function with fewer components, making the circuit itself less expensive and significantly

decreasing its power consumption. In fact, it can be hoped to combine memristors with

traditional circuit-design elements to produce a device that does computation. The Hewlett-

Packard (HP) group is looking at developing a memristor-based nonvolatile memory that could

be 1000 times faster than magnetic disks and use much less power.

As rightly said by Leon Chua and R.Stanley Williams (originators of memristor),

memrisrors are so significant that it would be mandatory to re-write the existing electronics

engineering textbooks.

FUTURE SCOPE:

Memristor bridges the capability gaps that electronics will face in the near future

according to Moore’s Law and will replace the transistor as the main component on integrated

circuit (IC) chips. The possibilities are endless since the memristor provides the gap to

miniaturizing functional computer memory past the physical limit currently being approached

upon by transistor technology.

When is it coming? Researchers say that no real barrier prevents implementing the

memristor in circuitry immediately. But it's up to the business side to push products through to

commercial reality. Memristors made to replace flash memory (at lower cost and lower power

consumption) will likely appear first; HP's goal is to offer them by 2012. Beyond that,

memristors will likely replace both DRAM and hard disks in the 2014-to-2016 time frame. As

for memristor-based analog computers, that step may take 20-plus years.

Page 25: M memristor doc

25

REFERENCES:

IEEE Spectrum: The Mysterious Memristor By Sally Adee

http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/may08/6207

Memristors Ready For Prime Time R. Colin Johnson URL:

http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208803176

Flexible memristor: Memory with a twist Vol. 453, May 1, 2008. PHYSorg.com

L. O. Chua, Memristor The missing circuit element, IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory, vol.

CT-18, pp. 507–519, 1971.

Memristor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.hpl.hp.com/

“How We Found the Missing Memristor” By R. Stanley Williams, December 2008 •

IEEE Spectrum, www.spectrum.ieee.org

http://avsonline.blogspot.com/

http://memristor.pbworks.com/

http://4engr.com/

http://knol.google.com/k

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/email/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7

377063.stm

http://hubpages.com/topics/technology/5338

http://totallyexplained.com/

A hybrid nanomemristor/transistor logic circuit capable of self-programming Julien

Borghetti, Zhiyong Li, Joseph Straznicky, Xuema Li, Douglas A. A. Ohlberg, Wei Wu,

Duncan R. Stewart,and R. Stanley.