20
Cornelius J. König Saarland University with some slides from Neil Christiansen, Central Michigan University, USA Using Personality Test for Personnel Selection Cornelius König

Konig

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Cornelius Conig's Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Konig

Cornelius J. KönigSaarland University

with some slides from Neil Christiansen, Central Michigan University, USA

Using Personality Test for Personnel Selection

Cornelius König

Page 2: Konig

What is “personality“?

Page 3: Konig

Cornelius König

What are personality tests?

Self-report measures of preferences, general dispositions, and behavioral patterns

Sample items• I tend to shy away from crowds of people.• I try to be courteous to everyone I meet.• My work is likely to be slow but steady.• I often crave excitement.• I work hard to accomplish my goals.

Often: “Please answer on a scale from 1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree”

3

Page 4: Konig

Cornelius König

Which aspects of the personality of applicants can be measured?

One answer:• The “Big Five”

• Conscientiousness• Emotional stability• Extraversion• Openness for experience• Agreeableness

• An answer given by many scientists

Another answer:• Whatever you like to measure

• “We customize the test to your needs”• e.g., management of emotions, self-confidence, risk-averseness

etc.4

Page 5: Konig

Cornelius König

Which aspects of the personality of applicants can be measured? (II)

A third answer:• Another model proposed by a consultancy

• e.g., 4 dimensions resulting in 16 combinations in the Myers-Brigg Type Indicator (MBTI)

• e.g., 16 dimensions in the 16 Personality Factors Questionnaire (16PF)

• e.g., 32 dimensions in the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ32)

5

Page 6: Konig

Cornelius König

Which aspects of the personality of applicants can be measured? (III)

A fourth answer:• Some honesty or integrity related scales

• “Overt” version: direct questions about integrity-related attitudes and past dishonest behaviors

• “Personality-based” version: items measuring a mixture of constructs all thought to be precursors of dishonesty (e.g., impulse control)

• Integrity tests have received substantial research attention

6

Page 7: Konig

Cornelius König

Do personality tests work?

Can we predict performance? The “Big Five” (Salgado, 1997)

• Conscientiousness ρ = .25• Emotional stability ρ = .19• Extraversion ρ = .12 • Openness for experience ρ = .09 • Agreeableness ρ = .02

For comparison• Mental ability tests (Salgado et al., 2003) ρ = .62

7

Page 8: Konig

Cornelius König

Do personality tests work? (II)

What about customized tests?• The negative side

• You often don’t know whether they work unless you test it• You need a good job analysis to figure out how to customize it

• The positive side• You need a good job analysis anyway!• If you don’t customize, you will likely assess many aspects that are

irrelevant!Actually a common error (Christiansen et al., 2011)

8

Page 9: Konig

Cornelius König

Do personality tests work? (III)

Tests sold by consultancy• Again, assess only the aspects you need to assess!• Go and ask whether they have data that their test works!

• And be critical…

9

Page 10: Konig

Cornelius König

Do personality tests work? (IV)

Honesty tests• Very recent meta-analysis by van Iddekinge et al. (in

press, Journal of Applied Psychology)• Test publishers

• As computed by van Iddekinge et al. ρ = .21• As reported by the test publishers ρ = .27

• Non-publishers • Developed integrity test ρ = .20• Did not develop integrity test ρ = .10

• Compare this with the medical research literature: We are all humans with vested interests

10

Page 11: Konig

Cornelius König

For what decision may you use personality tests?

My advice: Use personality test as a tool to screen out applicant in

the early stages of your hiring process

Why this advice?• Why early? Because administering personality tests is

easy and fairly cheap• Why screen out? Because applicants who don’t get at

least mediocre scores in your personality tests …a) don’t have the right personality ANDb) don’t know that they should have it

11

Page 12: Konig

Cornelius König

Should you worry that applicants fake?

Some research findings1. People can easily fake if instructed to do so2. A considerable number of applicant will fake

• But not all• Maybe a bit less in Europe than in the US and in China

3. Empirically, faking doesn’t seem to be very problematic• “Faking” = actually appropriate self-presentation? Or maybe

even a skill?

12

Page 13: Konig

Cornelius König

Might you encounter problems if you use personality tests?

Applicant reactions• Nikolaou & Judge (2007): personality tests are perceived

as “okay”• Other selection tools are better, other tools are worse

Legal problems• Especially likely if the items are work-related

• Work-related items also work better • Plus: participants like them better

13

Page 14: Konig

Cornelius König

Common traps

Beware of forced-choice measures!

Example DISC question

MostPrefer

LeastPrefer

Receiving attention from other people

Working together with others to achieve an aim

Standing up for your rights

Showing affection in personal relationships

14

Page 15: Konig

Cornelius König

What’s the problem with forced-choice tests?

Because of dependency in response options, cannot be high on all traits

One exception: the forced-choice version of the OPQ32

15

Page 16: Konig

Cornelius König

Common traps (II)

Establish cut-off scores and don’t rely on narratives!

Nanos’ Basic Character“Nanos is extremely stable, sympathetic and reliable, inspiring trust inothers easily. He is approachable and friendly, although he is unlikelyto give his trust easily and will tend to remain suspicious until satisfiedhis security is not threatened.

Deliberate in thought and action, Nanos is careful and cautious in hisapproach to problem. He has a deep dislike of change and theunexpected.”

16

Page 17: Konig

Cornelius König

What’s the problem test with using narratives?

Often with no reference to scores or norms Often based on putting people in a “high on aspect

A” vs. “low on aspect A” tray• Sometimes, there are more 4 trays

Judgments are subjective: “Do I like this person”?

17

Page 18: Konig

Cornelius König

Common traps (III)

Never assume that there could be something like „too much of a good thing“!• Although this makes intuitively sense…• … researcher haven’t been able to find it for years

• Maybe the measurement of personality tests isn’t accurate enough…

• … but this will also apply to the test you will use!

18

Page 19: Konig

Cornelius König

Take home message

Should you use it personality tests or shouldn’t you?• My personal answer: Screening tool

If you use them:• Base the use on a careful job analysis• Customize• Beware of forced-choice measures• Use cut-off scores• Be critical before you buy• And: keep track of recent research!

19

Page 20: Konig

Cornelius Kö[email protected]

Thank you for your attention

20