23
International initiatives by non-state actors: closing the gap? Karlien Wouters 05/10/2015 VVM – The road to Paris – Part I

International initiatives by non-state actors

  • Upload
    ecofys

  • View
    745

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: International initiatives by non-state actors

International initiatives by non-state actors: closing the gap?

Karlien Wouters

05/10/2015

VVM – The road to Paris – Part I

Page 2: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Introduction

> Pledges made by central governments are not sufficient to limit global

warming to 2°C

> The emissions gap between national pledges and a 2°C compatible pathway

is 8-10 GtCO2e in 2020 (UNEP Gap report)

> International cooperative initiatives (ICIs) have been growing in the last few

years as an attempt of non-state actors to address climate change

> These initiatives are driven by other actors than Parties to the UNFCCC:

cities, regions, companies, NGOs, etc.

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters2

Page 3: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Example initiative 1: WWF Climate Savers

> Aim: encouraging businesses to become low-carbon leaders and agents of

change in their fields

> Members: 28 large, often global, companies from a variety of sectors

> The initiative helps companies to set, implement and achieve ambitious

targets

> Companies are required to include not only their own operational emissions,

but also other indirect emissions resulting from outsourced activities or

downstream products in their targets

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters3

Page 4: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Example initiative 2: en.lighten

> Public-private partnership (PPP) between the United Nations Environment

Programme (UNEP) and the companies OSRAM and Philips Lighting, with

support of the Global Environment Facility (GEF)

> Aim: Support participating countries in the transition to energy efficient

lighting

> Mission: Phase out inefficient lamps by 2016

> The initiative provides a strong network for policy support and advice,

knowledge and best practice sharing

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters4

Page 5: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Example initiative 3: Cement Sustainability Initiative

> Promotes sustainable development in the cement industry

> The initiative provides a strong network for sharing knowledge and best

practices

> Members cover 30% of the world’s cement production

> Members are required to set targets for CO2 emission intensity of cement

production within their own operations

– 11 out of 25 member companies have set targets

– Other members are in the process of setting targets

> The measurement, reporting and verification (MVR) process includes regular

and independent auditing of company targets and progress

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters5

Page 6: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

In total >180 international cooperative initiatives

identified

> Most initiatives in the areas: energy efficiency, renewable energy, transport

and agriculture

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters6

Page 7: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

What is the impact of these initiatives in 2020?

Criteria for inclusion in quantitative assessment:

> Initiative driven by others than central governments

– But these still may be involved

> Concrete mitigation action or targets

– Not necessarily the same for all participants

– In some cases the focus is on action, not targets

> Capacity to deliver

> Minimum size of expected impact (50MtCO2e)

> 15 initiatives selected based on those criteria,

focusing on cities, regions, companies and sectors

> Focus of the quantitative assessment is on 2020

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters7

Full report

Page 8: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Emission reduction impact of these initiatives in 2020

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters8

Combined impact = 2.9 GtCO2e (uncertainty range 2.5-3.3 GtCO2e)

Page 9: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Overlap with national pledges

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters9

Total emission

reduction potential

(17 GtCO2e)

Impact of

current

policies

(4 GtCO2e)

Impact of non-state action

(3 GtCO2e)

Overlap between pledges

and non-state action

(0.2-0.7 GtCO2e)

Page 10: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Significant impact, but not enough to bridge the gap?

Higher emission reductions in 2020 are possible

> This analysis is a snapshot of the 15 selected initiatives

> Impact of UN Climate Summit 2014 initiatives?

> Raising ambition and upscaling of initiatives is possible

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters10

Page 11: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Increasing the impact of initiatives

Ecofys and CISL evaluated 5 private sector

initiatives, using three scenarios

> Current target scenario

Current targets continued up to 2020

> Scale-up scenario

All members follow the example of leading

members or modest increase of membership

> Available potential

Similar actions by the entire sector

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters11

Full report

Page 12: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | | 05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters12

1,000

1,300

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

Currently, only 11 CSI members out

of 25 have adopted emissions

intensity targets of around 600

kgCO2e/t cement by 2020. This

results in avoided emissions up to

100 MtCO2e/yr by 2020.

CSI

Members currently deliver 100 MtCO2 e/yr by 2020.

This can be scaled to 160 MtCO2 e/yr.

Page 13: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Members currently deliver 100 MtCO2 e/yr by 2020.

This can be scaled to 160 MtCO2 e/yr.

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters13

1,000

1,300

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

This assumes that the remaining

CSI members adopt the same level

of ambition. This would deliver up

to 160 MtCO2e/yr of avoided

emissions by 2020.

CSI

CSI

Page 14: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Available Potential: Including entire cement sector with a

specific focus on Chinese companies could deliver up to

540 MtCO2 e/yr by 2020.

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters14

1,000

1,300

CSI

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

CSI

CSI

Applying similar targets across the

whole cement sector would result in

avoided emissions of up to 540

MtCO2e/yr by 2020. A large

portion of the avoided emissions in

this scenario could be achieved by

specifically focusing on setting CSI

intensity targets in the Chinese

cement sector.

Page 15: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

This PPP is delivering 60 MtCO2e/yr emissions savings

by 2020 and can be scaled to 80 MtCO2e/yr.

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters15

1,000

1,300

CSI

CSI

CSI

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

En.lighten has 73 member

countries under the current target

scenario. 39 of these countries

have committed themselves to ban

the sale of inefficient lighting before

2020. Taken together, this market

transition could result in an

estimated 60 MtCO2e/yr in

avoided emissions by 2020.

En

Page 16: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

This PPP is delivering 60 MtCO2e/yr emissions savings

by 2020 and can be scaled to 80 MtCO2e/yr.

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters16

1,000

1,300

CSI

CSI

CSI

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

En

The most ambitious members, 23

of them, will ban incandescent

lighting by 2016. Under the Scale

Up scenario it is assumed that all

73 members adopt 2016 as target

year for the ban, resulting in

avoided emissions of around 80

MtCO2e/yr in 2020.

En

Page 17: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | | 05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters17

1,000

1,300

CSI

CSI

CSI

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

En

If the whole world were to follow

the 2016 commitment (ca. 120

additional countries) to ban

inefficient lighting, the potential

avoided emissions would be as high

as 640 MtCO2e/yr by 2020, with

340 MtCO2e/yr coming from

developing countries.

Available Potential: if the world would phase out incandescents avoided emissions of 640 MtCO2/yr could be achieved.

En

En

Page 18: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Members are currently delivering 32 MtCO2e/yr in

emission reductions, this could be doubled to 60

MtCO2e/yr if scaled.

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters18

1,000

1,300

En

En

En

CSI

CSI

CSI

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

CS

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

The initiative’s 28 members have

committed to emission reduction

targets of between 15-40% of

emission reductions in their supply

chains and operations. This results

in overall avoided emissions up to

32 MtCO2e/yr by 2020.

Page 19: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Members are currently delivering 32 MtCO2e/yr in

emission reductions, this could be doubled to 60

MtCO2e/yr if scaled.

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters19

1,000

1,300

En

En

En

CSI

CSI

CSI

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

CS

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

The initiative’s 28 members have

committed to emission reduction

targets of between 15-40% of

emission reductions in their supply

chains and operations. This results

in overall avoided emissions up to

32 MtCO2e/yr by 2020.

CS

If 28 additional companies would

join the initiative, membership

would double. With similarly

ambitious emission reduction

targets for these members, the

initiative could increase its impact

in 2020 to around 60 MtCO2e/yr.

Page 20: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | | 05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters20

1,000

1,300

CSEn

En

En

CSI

CSI

CSI

Upper range of MtCO2-eq mitigated by 2020

100

200

300

400

500

600

650

CS

Current Targetscenario

Scale-upscenario

Available Potential

Finally, if the average emission

reduction targets were to be

applied to all industry sector peers

of Climate Saver companies the

avoided emissions could be raised

up to 1,300 MtCO2e/yr by 2020.

CS

The available potential lies at nearly 1,300

MtCO2e/yr if industry peers would follow suit.

Page 21: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Action plan to increase the impact of initiatives, based on

lessons learned from case studies

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters21

> Cooperative initiatives should:

– Set clear goals

– Monitor action

– Increase ambition

– Increase membership

– Collaborate across sectors

– Communicate

> Stakeholders should support initiatives by:

– Including cooperative initiatives in climate strategies

– Supporting them to increase impact

– Creating open support structures

Page 22: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Conclusions

> Impact of 15 selected initiatives from cities, regions, companies and sectors

is 2.9 GtCO2e in 2020

(uncertainty range 2.5–3.3 GtCO2e)

> Overlap with government pledges is less than 1 GtCO2e

(impact of pledges 5–7 GtCO2e, UNEP Gap report)

> Raising ambition and upscaling of initiatives is needed and possible

> Next step: including non-state initiatives in international negotiations?

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters22

Page 23: International initiatives by non-state actors

© ECOFYS | |

Thank you!

Karlien Wouters

Ecofys

[email protected]

05/10/2015 Karlien Wouters23