Upload
waukema
View
984
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2012 IBM Corporation
ID105 - Fortify Your IBM® Lotus® Notes® and IBM® Lotus® Domino® Infrastructure Against a Competitive Attack
Michael [email protected]
Wouter [email protected]
2 | © 2012 IBM Corporation
Agenda■ Define the Scenario
■ Discuss the Methodology
■ Review Customer Example
3 | © 2012 IBM Corporation
Scenario - A new version of Notes and Domino is released, and...
■ “The Business” views this as an opportunity to re-visit the Notes decision ─ A strong desire to move to the “Cloud”─ New executives have come on board and they are unfamiliar with the Notes interface─ Competitors are whispering to anyone that will listen that Notes/Domino is a dead product
– “You are going to be the last company running Lotus Notes”─ Third Party vendors ship products with Microsoft® integration OOB. Limited or no support for
Notes/Domino integration
■ You believe that “The Business” is being irrational ─ You instinctively know that an upgrade is more cost effective than a migration─ You think that there is a way to prove that Notes/Domino is the right choice for the company,
but you do not know where to start
4 | © 2012 IBM Corporation
Why Develop a Business Case?■ Understanding the costs helps you make better decisions
─ What are my current costs today to support my Notes/Domino environment?─ Which platform is best suited for my workload?─ Which deployment model SaaS, On-Premises, or Hybrid is best suited for my needs?─ Is competitive offering better suited than an upgrade?
■ Numbers are real, not imagined─ Technical challenges are just a speed bump to someone determined to move off of
Notes and Domino.─ Emotions are difficult to control. Numbers have a sobering effect
5 | © 2012 IBM Corporation
Agenda■ Define the Scenario
■ Discuss the Methodology
■ Review Customer Example
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Recommended Approach
Baseline Optimize Evaluate
● Measure end user demand characteristics as the basis of compare
● User Profiling● Document I/O● Session Concurrency● Network Traffic● Session Duration● Database Transactions● Storage Usage Profile● Compression Usage
● Determine if the current environment can be optimized to reduce overall cost – “Future State”
● Server Consolidation● Storage Reduction● Network Utilization● End User Patterns● Domino Platform● Licensing Optimization
● Compare “Future State” TCO with Alternatives
● Cloud vs. On-premises● Competitive Alternatives
including migration costs
7 | © 2012 IBM Corporation
Agenda■ Define the Scenario
■ Discuss the Methodology
■ Review Customer Example
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Domino Environment Overview – 7 days of activity
Baseline
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
End User Demand Characteristics
Baseline
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Database Usage Patterns
Baseline
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Session Concurrency by Server
Baseline
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Overall Session Concurrency
Baseline
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Database Storage Usage
Baseline
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Network Compression
Baseline
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Server Consolidation Potential
131 Distributed Non-Clustered
Servers over 100 Distinct Locations
* 8 Consolidated Servers Clustered in 3 Data Centers
* Based on Session Max Concurrency of 7,631
Optimize
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Storage Consolidation Potential w/o DAOS
Optimize
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Network Demand From End User - Dallas
Dallas
577 kbps w/o Network CompressionEnabled
Optimize
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Top 5 End User Demand Characteristics (Documents Read)
Optimize
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Domino Platform Optimization and Licensing Review
− Domino Platform Optimization● Does optimization on a different platform provided better TCO● Does LotusLive Notes make sense for some or all of your mail users
− Licensing Review● Are you on the right licensing model that matches your “Future State”● Are you leveraging the entitlements that come with your Notes Client licensing
Optimize
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Financial Concepts
■ Management accounting or managerial accounting is concerned with the provisions and use of accounting information to managers within organizations, to provide them with the basis to make informed forward-looking business decisions that will allow them to be better equipped in their management and control functions.
■ Total Cost of Acquisition (TCA) is a managerial accounting concept that includes all the costs associated with buying goods, services, or assets.
■ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is the life cycle cost view of an asset, which includes acquisition, setup, support, ongoing maintenance, service and all operating expenses. It focuses attention on the sum of all costs of owning an asset, as opposed to the initial or vendor cost, and is useful in outsourcing decisions.
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
TCO: A Range of IT Cost Factors - Often not Considered
25
Integration– Integrated Functionality vs. Functionality to
be implemented (possibly with 3rd party tools)
– Balanced System– Integration of / into Standards
Further Availability Aspects– Planned outages– Unplanned outages– Automated Take Over– Uninterrupted Take Over (especially for DB) – Workload Management across physical
borders– Business continuity– Availability effects for other applications /
projects– End User Service– End User Productivity– Virtualization
Skills and Resources– Personnel Education– Availability of Resources
Availability– High availability– Hours of operation
Backup / Restore / Site Recovery
– Backup– Disaster Scenario– Restore– Effort for Complete Site Recovery– SAN effort
Infrastructure Cost– Space– Power– Network Infrastructure– Storage Infrastructure– Initial Hardware Costs– Software Costs– Maintenance Costs
Additional development and implementation
– Investment for one platform – reproduction for others
Controlling and Accounting– Analyzing the systems– Cost
Operations Effort– Monitoring, Operating– Problem Determination– Server Management Tools– Integrated Server Management –
Enterprise Wide
Security– Authentication / Authorization– User Administration– Data Security– Server and OS Security– RACF vs. other solutions
Deployment and Support – System Programming
– Keeping consistent OS and SW Level– Database Effort
– Middleware– SW Maintenance– SW Distribution (across firewall)
– Application– Technology Upgrade– System Release change without interrupts
Operating Concept– Development of an operating procedure– Feasibility of the developed procedure– Automation
Resource Utilization and Performance
– Mixed Workload / Batch– Resource Sharing
– shared nothing vs. shared everything– Parallel Sysplex vs. Other Concepts– Response Time– Performance Management– Peak handling / scalability
Routinely Assessed Cost Factors
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
How to Approach a Business Case Comparison
■ Bottom Up is an approach to creating a TCO model from the ground up. This requires working across IT disciplines to accurately estimate.
■ Top Down is an approach to creating a TCO model from a high level from typically a average user or server cost. This can be conducted with little or no input from IT stakeholders, but is highly subjective and difficult to defend. The value of conducting a top down TCO analysis is that it could open a dialog when the business is unwilling to consider other options.
Realistically, most if not all business case comparisons are a combination of the two approaches. The key is to document your assumptions and be able to defend your numbers to the business.
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Sizing the Competition
■ HP® Sizing Tools─ http://h71019.www7.hp.com/ActiveAnswers/Secure/71110-0-0-0-121.html
■ Dell® Sizing Tools─ http://content.dell.com/us/en/enterprise/email-solution-strategy-design.aspx
■ IBM Sizing Tools─ http://www-304.ibm.com/partnerworld/wps/sizing/sizingguides.jsp
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
TCO ON-PREMISES with ECALs
IBM Annual Cost
MSFT Annual Cost
Annual Costs Savings Factor
2.1 Server Hardware $92,895 $367,261 $274,366 3.95 2.2 Network Hardware $18,579 $99,160 $80,581 5.34
2.3 Hardware Maintenance $8,309 $139,926 $131,617 16.84 2.4 Operating System $649 $89,503 $88,854 137.81
2.5 Administration $420,800 $1,294,455 $873,655 3.08 2.6 Additional Disk Storage $1,053,600 $1,182,200 $128,600 1.12
2.7 Power and Cooling $2,306 $96,120 $93,814 41.68 2.8 Application Software $614,200 $2,337,903 $1,723,703 3.81
2.9 Application Support Services $- $624,880 $624,880 - 2.10 Deployment and Migration $33,469 $3,563,300 $3,529,831 106.47
2.10 Co-exsitence $- $1,242,920 $1,242,920 - ON-PREMISES ANNUAL TCO FOR LS Demo $2,151,913 $10,670,367 $8,518,454 4.96
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.1 Server Hardware
IBM MSFT Back to TopInitial Capital Expense $278,685 $1,101,782 Number of servers multiplied by server unit cost
Annualized Expense $92,895 $367,261 Initial capital cost divided by server useful life
IBM Hardware
No. of Physical Servers* x Cost per Server = Initial Cost ÷
Server Useful Life
(Years)Annual Server
ExpenseHP ProLiant DL580 G7 (2.13 Ghz - 2p/8c, 105W per Core, 64GB RAM) 6
$13,679$82,074 $27,358
IBM Power 720 Express Model 8202-E4B3 (3 Ghz - 1p/8c, 40W per Core, 32GB RAM) 6 $32,768 $196,611 $65,537
$278,685 $92,895 * adjusted for clustering
MSFT Hardware
No. of Physical Servers* x Cost per Server = Initial Cost ÷
Server Useful Life
(Years)Annual Server
ExpenseAudiocodes Survivable Branch Appliance 6 $10,000 $60,000 $20,000 HP ProLiant DL580 G7 (1.86 Ghz - 2p/4c, 85W per Core, 64GB RAM) 26
$8,359$217,334 $72,445
HP ProLiant DL980 G7 (2 Ghz - 4p/6c, 105W per Core, 128GB RAM) 12 $36,499 $437,988 $145,996 HP ProLiant DL980 G7 (2.4 Ghz - 4p/10c, 130W per Core, 256GB RAM) 6
$64,410$386,460 $128,820
$1,101,782 $367,261
3 Years
3 Years
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.2 Network Hardware
IBM MSFT Back to TopInitial Capital Expense $55,737 $297,481 Initial capital cost of servers multiplied by network cost (%)
Annualized Expense $18,579 $99,160 Initial capital cost divided by hardware useful life
Initial Server Cost x
Network Cost (% of Initial Server
Cost) =Initial Network
Cost ÷
Network Useful Life
(Years) =
Annual Network Expense
IBM Network Hardware $278,685 20% $55,737 3 Years $18,579
Initial Server Cost x
Network Cost (% of Initial Server
Cost) =Initial Network
Cost ÷
Network Useful Life
(Years) =
Annual Network Expense
MSFT Network Hardware $1,101,782 27% $297,481 3 Years $99,160
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.3 Hardware Maintenance
IBM MSFT Back to TopAnnualized Expense $8,309 $139,926 Initial capital cost of hardware (servers & network) multiplied by annual maintenance cost (%)
Initial Server Cost +
Initial Network Cost =
Total Hardware Cost x
Annual Maintenance
Cost (%) =
Annual Maintenance
ExpenseIBM Annual Hardware Maintenance* 27,358 $55,737 $83,095 10% $8,309
* Hardware maintenance is included in the cost of the Power 7
Initial Server Cost +
Initial Network Cost =
Total Hardware Cost x
Annual Maintenance
Cost (%) =
Annual Maintenance
ExpenseMSFT Annual Hardware Maintenance 1,101,782 $297,481 $1,399,263 10% $139,926
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.4 Operating System
IBM MSFT Back to TopInitial Capital Expense $1,948 $268,510 Number of servers multiplied by server software unit cost
Annualized Expense $649 $89,503 Initial capital cost divided by server useful life
OS Cost per Server
3 yr Windows Enterprise $3,167 3yr Windows Standard $974
Total Server Demand x
Operating System Cost per Server = Initial Expense ÷
Server Useful Life =
Annual Expense
IBM Operating System Charges (Enterprise) 0 $974 $0 $0 IBM Operating System Charges (Standard) 2 $974 $1,948 $649 Total $1,948 $649
* The price of AIX and Linux is included in the cost of the Power 7 * From above section 3.1, above
OS Cost per Server Exchange Lync Total
3 yr Windows Enterprise $3,167 20 48 80 3yr Windows Standard $974 16 - 16
Total Server Demand x
Operating System Cost per Server = Initial Expense ÷
Server Useful Life =
Annual Expense
MSFT Operating System Charges (Enterprise) 80 $3,167 $253,366 $84,455 MSFT Operating System Charges (Standard) 16 $974 $15,144 $5,048 Total $268,510 $89,503
* From above section 3.1, above
3 Years
3 Years
SharePoint12 -
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.5 Administration
IBM MSFT Back to TopAnnualized Expense $420,800 $1,294,455 Administrators needed multiplied by user-defined average annual salary per FTE
Total Number of Servers ÷ Servers per FTE =
Number of FTE Needed x
Annual Salary per =
Total Annual Cost
IBM Administration Costs 34 50 1 $105,000 $105,000
Total Number of Users ÷ Calls per Day =
Number of FTE Needed x
Annual Salary per =
Total Annual Cost
IBM Help Desk Costs 12,000 2,580 5 $55,000 $275,000
Total Number of Servers x
Monitoring Cost per Server per
Year =Total Annual
CostIBM Monitoring Costs 34 $1,200 $40,800
Annual Administration Costs $420,800
Total Number of Servers ÷ Servers per FTE =
Number of FTE Needed x
Annual Salary per =
Total Annual Cost
MSFT Administration Costs 150 20 8 $105,000 $840,000
Total Number of Users ÷ Calls per Day =
Number of FTE Needed x
Annual Salary per =
Total Annual Cost
MSFT Help Desk Costs 12,000 2,580 5 $55,000 $275,000
Total Number of Servers x
Monitoring Cost per Server per
Year =Total Annual
CostMSFT Monitoring Costs 150 $1,200 $179,455
Annual Administration Costs $1,294,455
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.6 Additional Disk Storage
IBM MSFT Back to TopInitial Capital Expense $2,026,800 $2,412,600
Annualized Expense $1,053,600 $1,182,200
Total Number of Mailboxes x Mailbox Size (GB) =
Number of (GB) Needed x
Cost per (GB) =
Total Capital Expesnse
IBM Mailbox Storage Requirements 12,000 5 GB 60000 $3.78 $226,800
Total Number of Users x
Desired User Storage (GB) =
Number of (GB) Needed x
Cost per (GB) =
Total Capital Expesnse
IBM Collaboration Storage Requirements 12,000 25 GB 300000 $6.00 $1,800,000
Total Capital Expesnse ÷
Storage Useful Life =
Total Annual Cost
Annualized Requirements 2,026,800 3 Years $675,600
Total Number of (GB)
Backed up x
Backup Storage Cost per GB per
Year =Total Annual
CostIBM Backup Requirements 360,000 $1.05 $378,000
Annual Storage Costs $1,053,600
Total Number of Mailboxes x Mailbox Size (GB) =
Number of (GB) Needed x
Cost per (GB) per =
Total Annual Cost
MSFT Mailbox Storage Requirements 12,000 5 GB 60,000 $5.91 $354,600
Total Number of Users x
Desired User Storage (GB) =
Number of (GB) Needed x
Cost per (GB) per =
Total Annual Cost
MSFT Collaboration Storage Requirements 12,000 25 GB 300,000 $6.86 $2,058,000
Total Capital Expesnse ÷
Storage Useful Life =
Total Annual Cost
Annualized Requirements 2,412,600 3 Years $804,200 Total Number
of (GB) Backed up x
Backup Storage Cost per GB =
Total Annual Cost
IBM Backup Requirements 360,000 $1.05 $378,000
Annual Storage Costs $1,182,200
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.7 Power and Cooling
IBM MSFT Back to TopAnnualized Expense $2,306 $96,120 Annual power usage multiplied by user-defined electricity price per kW.
IBM HardwareTotal Number
of Servers xNameplate Power per Server (Watts) x
Power Conversion
Factor =
Average Server Power Usage
(Watts) xHours per
Year ÷ Watts/Kilowatt =
Server Annual Power Usage
(kW)HP ProLiant DL580 G7 (2.13 Ghz - 2p/8c, 105W per Core, 64GB RAM)6 1680 5,040 8,736 1000 44,029IBM Power 720 Express Model 8202-E4B3 (3 Ghz - 1p/8c, 40W per Core, 32GB RAM)6 320 960 8,736 1000 8,387
6 960 8,387
Server Annual
Power Usage x PUE =
Infrastructure Annual Power
Usage (kW)
Total Annual Power Usage
(kW) x Price/kW hour =Annual Power
ExpenseTotal Annual Power Usage 8,387 2.5 12,580 20,966 $0.11 $2,306
MSFT HardwareTotal Number
of Servers xNameplate Power per Server (Watts) x
Power Conversion
Factor =
Average Server Power Usage
(Watts) xHours per
Year ÷ Watts/Kilowatt =
Server Annual Power Usage
(kW)Audiocodes Survivable Branch Appliance 6 150 450 8,736 1000 3,931HP ProLiant DL580 G7 (1.86 Ghz - 2p/4c, 85W per Core, 64GB RAM)26 680 8,840 8,736 1000 77,226HP ProLiant DL980 G7 (2 Ghz - 4p/6c, 105W per Core, 128GB RAM)12 2520 15,120 8,736 1000 132,088HP ProLiant DL980 G7 (2.4 Ghz - 4p/10c, 130W per Core, 256GB RAM)6 5200 15,600 8,736 1000 136,282
50 40,010 349,527
Server Annual
Power Usage x PUE =
Infrastructure Annual Power
Usage (kW)
Total Annual Power Usage
(kW) x Price/kW hour =Annual Power
ExpenseTotal Annual Power Usage 349,527 2.5 524,291 873,818 $0.11 $96,120
50%
50%
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.9 Application Support Services
IBM MSFTAnnualized Expense $0 $624,880 Initial support contract costs
Support Packs x Hourly Rate = Annual Cost
IBM Support Costs
Unlimited 24x7
Telephone $0 $0
Hourly incidents
purchased in minimum
blocks of 40 x Hourly Rate = Annual CostMSFT Support Costs 2920 Hours $214 $624,880
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.10 Deployment and Migration
IBM MSFT Back to TopAnnualized Expense $33,469 $3,563,300 Number of server images to deploy multiplied by the number of man hours required to deploy the server image plus migration costs
Total Number of Servers x
Number of Man Hours =
Total Number of Man Hours
Required x Hourly Rate =
Total Deployment
CostIBM Deployment Planning Costs 34 18 612 $55 $33,469
Total Number of Mailboxes x
Upgrade Cost per Mailbox =
Total Annual Cost ÷
Length of Migration =
Annual Migration
CostIBM Mail Upgrade Costs to Version 8.5.2 0 40 $0 3 Years $11,156
Annual Deployment and Migration Costs $33,469
Total Number of Servers x
Number of Man Hours =
Total Number of Man Hours
Required x Hourly Rate =
Annual Deployment
CostMSFT Deployment Costs 150 26 3889 $55 $212,680
Total Number of Mailboxes x Cost per Mailbox =
Total Migration Cost ÷
Length of Migration =
Annual Migration
CostMSFT Mail Migration Costs 12,000 $39 $468,000 3 Years $156,000
Total Number of
Applications xNumber of Man
Hours =
Total Number of Man Hours
Required Hourly Rate =
Total Application Migration
MSFT Application Migration Costs 3,351 26 87126 $110 $9,583,860
Total Application Migration ÷
Length of Migration =
Annual Migration Cost
Annual MSFT Application Costs 9,583,860 3 Years $3,194,620
Annual Deployment and Migration Costs $3,563,300
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
2.11 Co-existence
IBM MSFTAnnualized Expense $0 $1,242,920 Annual Costs to support a Notes & Domiino infrastructure during a migration.
Hardware
Number of Production
Domino xIBM Server Run Rate =
Annual Run Rate
End of Year 1 66 $9,960 $657,360 End of Year 2 33 $9,960 $328,680 End of Year 3 8 $9,960 $79,680
$1,065,720
Server Software
Number of Production
Domino Servers PVUs x
Domino Server Renewal Rate per
PVU =Annual
Software CostEnd of Year 1 26400 $42.00 $1,108,800 End of Year 2 13200 $42.00 $554,400 End of Year 3 3200 $42.00 $134,400
$1,797,600
Annualized Co-existance Server CostsCo-existence
Expense ÷Server Useful Life
(Years)* = Annual ExpenseHardware $1,065,720 $355,240 Software $1,797,600 $599,200
$2,863,320 $954,440
Annual Client Software RenewalDomino
Users xNotes Client
Renewal Rate =Annual
Software CostEnd of Year 1 12,000 $24.04 $288,480 End of Year 2 12,000 $24.04 $288,480 End of Year 3 12,000 $24.04 $288,480
$865,440
Annualized Co-existanceClient CostsClient
Software ÷Server Useful Life
(Years)* = Annual Expense$865,440 3 Years $288,480
Total Annualized Co-existance Costs Server Costs + Client Costs = Annual Expense$954,440 $288,480 $1,242,920
3 Years
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
TCO On-Demand
IBM Annual Cost
MSFT Annual Cost
Annual Costs Savings Factor
3.1 Collaboration Services $864,000 $3,888,000 $3,024,000 4.50 3.2 Additional Service Offerings $872,400 $1,980,000 $1,107,600 2.27
3.3 On-Premises Infrastucture $99,600 $19,920 $(79,680) 5.00 3.4 Application Software $100,800 $- $(100,800) -
3.5 Desktop Client Upgrade $- $- $- - 3.6 Migration Services $240,000 $468,000 $228,000 1.95
3.7 Power & Cooling $12,108 $38,198 $26,090 3.15 CLOUD ANNUAL TCO FOR LS Demo $2,176,800 $6,355,920 $4,179,120 2.92
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Evaluate
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Evaluate
Microsoft® TCO Comparison On-Demand vs On-Premises
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Evaluate
TCO Comparison On-Premises IBM vs. Microsoft®
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Evaluate
TCO Comparison On-Demand IBM vs. Microsoft®
| © 2012 IBM Corporation
Questions
41 | © 2012 IBM Corporation
Legal disclaimer© IBM Corporation 2012. All Rights Reserved.
The information contained in this publication is provided for informational purposes only. While efforts were made to verify the completeness and accuracy of the information contained in this publication, it is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind, express or implied. In addition, this information is based on IBM’s current product plans and strategy, which are subject to change by IBM without notice. IBM shall not be responsible for any damages arising out of the use of, or otherwise related to, this publication or any other materials. Nothing contained in this publication is intended to, nor shall have the effect of, creating any warranties or representations from IBM or its suppliers or licensors, or altering the terms and conditions of the applicable license agreement governing the use of IBM software.
References in this presentation to IBM products, programs, or services do not imply that they will be available in all countries in which IBM operates. Product release dates and/or capabilities referenced in this presentation may change at any time at IBM’s sole discretion based on market opportunities or other factors, and are not intended to be a commitment to future product or feature availability in any way. Nothing contained in these materials is intended to, nor shall have the effect of, stating or implying that any activities undertaken by you will result in any specific sales, revenue growth or other results.
Performance is based on measurements and projections using standard IBM benchmarks in a controlled environment. The actual throughput or performance that any user will experience will vary depending upon many factors, including considerations such as the amount of multiprogramming in the user's job stream, the I/O configuration, the storage configuration, and the workload processed. Therefore, no assurance can be given that an individual user will achieve results similar to those stated here. All customer examples described are presented as illustrations of how those customers have used IBM products and the results they may have achieved. Actual environmental costs and performance characteristics may vary by customer.
IBM, the IBM logo, Lotus, Lotus Notes, Notes, Domino, Quickr, Sametime, WebSphere, UC2, PartnerWorld and Lotusphere are trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both. Unyte is a trademark of WebDialogs, Inc., in the United States, other countries, or both.
HP, the HP logo, are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. in the United States, and/or other countries.
Dell, the Dell logo, are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Dell Inc. in the United States, and/or other countries.
Microsoft and Windows are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both. MSFT is the registered NASDAQ stock symbol of Microsoft Corporation in the United States.
Intel, Intel Centrino, Celeron, Intel Xeon, Intel SpeedStep, Itanium, and Pentium are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.
UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the United States and other countries.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both. Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.