25
1 ASPRS/CaGIS Specialty Conference ASPRS/CaGIS Specialty Conference AutoCarto 2010 AutoCarto 2010

Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

1

ASPRS/CaGIS Specialty Conference ASPRS/CaGIS Specialty Conference

AutoCarto 2010AutoCarto 2010

Page 2: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Humanitarian GeomaticsThe application of GI Science to complex

humanitarian emergenciesMore specifically: The role of GIS in the site

selection process for the establishment of refugee camps.

Why ? Despite a remarkable expansion an expressed interest by humanitarian workersGIS technology has been advanced as a tool for

management of refugee camps it is not widely applied for camp siting.

2

Page 3: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Goals of this research Main Goal

Describe the reasons for non-use of GIS in the site selection process.

Secondary GoalsEvaluate the needs of humanitarian

workers in site selectionEvaluate the methods usedEvaluate the spatial character of the

needs of the humanitarian workers and the possibilities offered by GIS.

3

Page 4: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Overview of the refugee situationNumber of displaced people in the world increased

between 1997 and 2006; reaching 42 million in 2008.

25 million have been assisted by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) 4

Source: UNHCR Statistics 2006

Categories Number ( in millions)

Refugees 16

Internally displaced

26

Total 42

Page 5: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Temporary housing1. Spontaneous installations2. Installations with governmental infrastructure3. Humanitarian temporary installations

REFUGEE CAMPS 1947 - 1948: First refugee camps In 2006 : World’s 700 refugee camps

accomodated over 12 million displaced persons. Source: http://millionsoulsaware.org/

6

1948 2008

Page 6: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Source: UNHCR7

Page 7: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Source: UNRWA 8

Page 8: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Source: UNHCR

9

Page 9: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Source: UNHCR 10

Page 10: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Site selectionImportant to locate an optimal site

Ensure camp’s viability with respect to logistics of aid delivery (food and water) and camp management

Ensure camp safetyEnvironmental protection

Site selection process: Processing of spatial dataMaking a choice among alternatives based on

defined criteria11

Page 11: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Geographical Information System

12

As a system allowing spatial analysis and decision-making aid, the GIS can contribute to an effective selection of potentially suitable sites for an optimal hosting of displaced persons.

Source: UNHCR, GeOnG,2008

Page 12: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Current Applications

13

Page 13: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Inventory of criteria suggestedQualitative study

Semantic comparaison Ontology

Quantitative study Taxonomy

Identification of spatial criteria and spatial data needed

Inventory of methodologies usedComparative study

Research Methodology

14Kigali – Rwanda (1994)

Page 14: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Total criteria results

17

Page 15: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Results for topics

18

Page 16: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Criteria

19

Page 17: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Spatial vs Non spatial Criteria

20

Over 47:

15

32

Page 18: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Cartographic data

21

Page 19: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

MethodologiesThe methodology is mainly

organizational: setting up a team, working out a list of criteria, assigning tasks, collecting data (mainly on the field) and comparing the available grounds

For comparison of sites according to criteria, the method is mostly combinative, with addition and exclusion and weighted ranking

GIS are sometimes mentioned, but never clearly used

22Corsellis, 2001

Page 20: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Resulting conclusion

23

Usefulness of GIS OK

Efficiency ?

Technical feasibility OK

Organizational feasibility ?

While the criteria are mainly spatial, the methods used by humanitarian aid workers nevertheless remain traditional, based on field work and observation.

Therefore, the reason for non-use does not come from the type of analysis at the technical level, but from the setting in which it occurs.

Page 21: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Reasons for non-use

Decision makersTools are not designed for direct and user-friendly application in the humanitarian aid fieldLow perceived value of GIS toolsResistance to change

ExpertsNeed for an expert, often expensive and unaware of the needs of humanitarian aid workersLots of work for limited results

24Time constraint: Time constraint: 0 to 72 hours

Emergency situation

WASTE OF TIME

Page 22: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Conclusion Although GIS tools are available to the agencies, they

are typically used for tasks which are not subject to time constraints imposed by emergency. (ex: cartography, management of statistical data in camps, etc…)

In order to ensure direct use for site selection, the following changes might be necessary: Spread expert evaluation among the decision

makersImprove user-friendliness of the toolGrant immediate access to the useful data bases

for types of circumstances25

Page 23: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Limits and Perspective Limits of the study: its main focus was on the basic

criteria of adaptation of GIS tools to the basic needs, conducted using only the literature.

A study of work methods used directly on the field by agencies carrying out this type of work would offer a more realistic overview of true operational constraints.

 www.intempestive.net/spip.php?aricle44 26

Page 24: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

Source: UNHCR

27

Page 25: Geo Hum E Autocarto2010

THANK YOU

Source: UNHCR28