20
Engagement in public service IT projects (a pecha kucha) UK AIS 2012 Liz Hartnett [email protected] 1

Engagement in public service IT projects

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Engagement in public service IT projects

(a pecha kucha)

UK AIS 2012

Liz [email protected]

1

Public scrutiny & accountability

2

A cause of project failure

Lack of effective engagement with stakeholders NAO (2006)

3

Previous research on engagement

4

The puzzle

5

Something different

Communication:

a process of

“human sense reading and sense giving”

Walsham, (2002)

6

7

Initial conceptual model for engagement

CONDITIONS BEHAVIOURS

afford

influence

Sense-making

Sharing

Participants

Environment

Expertise

Research questions

• What behaviours are required for engagement?

• Which conditions are important for engagement?

• How do these conditions and behaviours interact?

8

Cases in government

9

Case A B C D ESector Island Island Local Central Non-

departmental public body

Requirements IT strategy Systems development

Appraisal of IT options

Systems development

Systems analysis

People involved

Users

~60 public servants in ISD

Contractors

Consultants

Users

Contractors

Consultants

Clients

Consultant

Consultant’s informants (users)

Clients

Suppliers

Contractors

Users

Clients

Consultant

Consultant’s informants (users)

External professionals

Consultants, contractors

Consultants, contractors

One consultant

Suppliers, contractors

One consultant

Environment & participants

1015/09/12

• Photo from a case study

Interactions

11

EMERGENT BEHAVIOURSCONDITIONS

Sharing

Participants

Environmentcommunicate

participate

Sense-making

Expertise

contribute

Sharing

1215/09/12

Sense making

1315/09/12

Self reinforcing behaviour

1415/09/12

15

Sense-making

Sharing

Adapting

EMERGENT BEHAVIOURS

Behaviour starts trust ,

which influences

sharing

understandcommit

Interactions

Sharing expertise and what’s in the environment facilitates sense making

Adapting

1615/09/12

Interactions

17

Sense-making

Sharing

Adapting

EMERGENT BEHAVIOURS

Behaviour starts trust ,

which influences

sharing

understandcommit

CONDITIONS

Adapting

Participants

Environment

Expertise

persuade

influence

co-produce

Adapting behaviour allows persuasion and influence

Developed model

18

Fitting together

19

Further?

• Is it worth it?• Proof?

– Context limited to public sector projects– Context limited to IT projects– Context limited to successful projects

20