Upload
ilri
View
83
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presented by Braja Swain and Nils Teufel, ILRI at the Brainstorming Session on Improving Dairy Animals Productivity through efficient Feed and Fodder Interventions in Bihar, Patna, India, 25 July 2014
Citation preview
Braja Swain and Nils Teufel, ILRI
Dissemination of ILRI-CSISA concentrate feed:
A study of Samastipur and Muzaffarpur
Brainstorming Session on Improving Dairy Animals Productivity through efficient Feed and Fodder Interventions
in Bihar, Patna, India, 25 July 2014
Background Livestock sector is an integral part of the socio-economic development of
the Indian as well as Bihar economy as whole. Small-holder producers have found it difficult to transform their livestock
production from a subsistence-oriented side activity to a profitable commercial venture.
Feed alone accounts more than 60% of the total management cost of dairy animals.
From 2011 ILRI has been promoting the balanced concentrate feed to improve the milk yield
Two blocks (Samastipur and Muzafarpur) were selected.400 hundred farmers participated in ILRI-CSISA feeding trials or trainings Frequent trainings and demonstrations have been conducted in two
blocks.20 dairy farmers were trained at NDRI, Karnal to act as Local Resource
Persons (LRP).
Objectives
Identify the farmers adopting and not adopting ILRI-CSISA concentrate feed.
Identify the non-trial/training farmers who have heard about ILRI-CSISA feed and their sources of information.
Farmers responses towards ILRI-CSISA feed
Data and Methods•Two blocks•Samastipur•Muzafarpur
•Total 360 HHs•Participants (Trial/training): -160•Non-participants : - 200
•Stratified random sampling•Simple tabulation
Results: Adoption of ILRI-CSISA promoted feed and sources
Indicators Participants Non-participants
Number 160 200
Number of farmers Knows about ILRI-CSISA promoted feed
160 55
Number of farmers continuing 30 11
Sources of information of ILRI-CSISA promoted feed by informed non-participants
Heard from neighbours 53
Heard from relatives 3
Heard from local services 0
Heard from ILRI-CSISA field guy 10
Heard from SHG 2
Dissemination of ILRI-CSISA promoted feed technologies to other farmers [no. of farmers reached]
Technologies Within village Outside village Total
Nutritional requirements 213 109 322
Chopping straw 25 17 42
Feeding wheat bhusa 72 28 100
Feeding maize stover 10 5 15
About ILRI-CSISA feed 846 460 1306
How to preparing ILRI-CSISA feed 704 456 1160
Reasons for adopting and not adopting ILRI_CSISA promoted feed
Reasons for adopting ILRI-CSISA promoted Tech.
% farmers out of adopters
Reason for not adopting ILRI-CSISA promoted Tech.
% farmers out of informed non-
adopters
Low cost technology 27 High cost technology 60
Easy to follow 39 Difficult to prepare 51
Can prepared local available resource
83 Resources not available locally
27
Increase milk yield 93 No change in milk yield
21
Improved animal health 98 No change in animal health
17
Low labour requirement 29 High requirement of labour
44
Market availability (timely availability) across participant and non-participant farmers [% farmers]
Participants (n=160)
Non-participants(n=200)
Total(n=360)
Green fodder 67 (63) 80 (60.2) 75 (61)
Brans 96 (96) 91 (90) 93 (95)
Oils cakes 97 (97) 91 (96) 94 (97)
Compound feed 99 (97) 95 (97) 97 (97)
Mineral mixture 95 (94) 90 (94) 93 (94)
Veterinary Service 98 (98) 94 (97) 96 (98)
Credit 96 (81) 93 (79) 94 (80)
Formal Dairy Market 98 (98) 94 (98) 96 (98)
Informal Dairy Market
56 (81) 49 (88) 52 (85)
Farmer’s knowledge before and after intervention
Subjects Participants Non-participants Total
Before int-vention
After inter-vention
Before int-vention
After inter-vention
Before int-vention
After inter-vention
breedingAverage Improved Poor Improved Average Improved
feed management Average No change Average No change Average No change
nutrition needs for cattle Average No change Average Improved Poor Improved
maize Stover feeding Average No change Average No change Average No change
wheat straw feeding Average No change Average No change Average No change
detect quality of dry fodder Average No change Average No change Average No change
growing green fodder Average Improved Poor Improved Average Improved
feeding oil cakes Average Improved Average No change Average Improved
feeding balanced feed Average Improved Average Improved Average Improved
preparing balanced feed Poor Improved Poor Improved Poor Improved
feeding mineral mixturePoor Improved Poor Improved Poor Improved
how to increase milk yield Average Improved Poor Improved Average Improved
deworming/vaccination Average Improved Poor Improved Average Improved
treat common diseases Average No change Poor No change Average No change
Conclusion 20% of participants farmers are feeding the ILRI-CSISA
promoted feed while only 6% non-participants feeding this.Out of non-participants sample farmers 28% farmers have
heard about ILRI-CSISA promoted feed Neighbours are main source of dissemination of technology
followed by project field staffParticipant farmers have shared the information on how to
prepare the ILRI-CSISA promoted feed among more than 1200 farmers.
Knowledge on concentrate feed has improved after intervention
Nevertheless, awareness of and training on balanced feeds among farmers should be further improved to increase adoption