Upload
polyurethanes4u
View
538
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7659/12 IH/sb 1
DG C LIMITE EN
COUNCIL OF
THE EUROPEAN UNION
Brussels, 29 March 2012
Interinstitutional File:
2011/0172 (COD)
7659/12
LIMITE
ENER 94
ENV 206
TRANS 81
ECOFIN 259
RECH 88
CODEC 662
NOTE
from: General Secretariat of the Council
to: Permanent Representatives Committee
No. Cion prop.: 12046/12 ENER 256 ENV 582 TRANS 201 ECOFIN 454 RECH 252
CODEC 1102
Subject: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy
efficiency and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC
- Preparation of the first informal trilogue
1. On 22 February and 14 March 2012, Coreper discussed a number of key issues on the
proposed Energy Efficiency Directive, notably on Articles 3, 4, 5, and 6. On 2 March, the
Presidency presented a three-column document (7127/12 +ADD 1) which was discussed by
the Working Party on Energy at its meetings on 6 and 13 March. On 15 and 21 March, the
Working Party carried out a first examination of the draft amendments as voted by the
European Parliament's ITRE Committee on 28 February. Finally, at its meeting on 27 March,
the Working Party considered possible approaches suggested by the Presidency in relation to
Articles 3 and 4.
7659/12 IH/sb 2
DG C LIMITE EN
2. Based on Coreper's guidance and delegations' views, and thus responding to calls for greater
flexibility and less prescriptive provisions, the Presidency has significantly revised its
proposals for a provisional Council position, which are found in the third column of 7659/12
ADD 1 and ADD 2.1 To only name two key Articles on which the Presidency has responded
to requests by delegations, changes have been introduced
in Article 6 such as in relation to an incremental pace of the 1.5% savings target, the
treatment of industries covered by ETS, earlier consideration of otherwise unrecorded
actions, greater possibility to count measures on generation, distribution and
transmission, and the possibility of statistical transfers. Annex V has been further
lightened;
in Article 10, the text clarifies the relationship between the comprehensive assessment
for CHP/DHC potentials and any further obligations and it removes elements that could
have been seen as an investment obligation. Annex VIIIbis is also significantly
simplified.
As regards the new suggestions, the Presidency has been fully committed to including
approaches on key Articles on which broadest possible support has emerged. On that basis,
the Presidency believes that, while it is understood that on a number of issues more work will
be necessary to refine Council's "preliminary" position in the full meaning of this word, the
views of Member States have converged to an extent representative of the desired general
direction for the proposal which would justify the start of the negotiating process with the
Parliament. In any case, the Council's position will need to be reviewed once first reactions
are available from the Parliament's side.
1 Note: the 4-column text in 7659/12 ADD 1 and 2 contains the Commission proposal, the
ITRE opinion, and the revised Presidency suggestions. ADD 1 comprises the preamble and
articles, ADD 2 the annexes of the proposal. The fourth column contains general indications
on first orientations in relation to the ITRE opinion as they emerged from the discussions.
Changes as compared to the Commission proposal are in bold; deletions are reflected by […].
Underlining in bold indicates new changes to the Commission proposal and […] deletion,
compared to the third column in 7127/12 + ADD 1.
7659/12 IH/sb 3
DG C LIMITE EN
3. It is appropriate to note in this regard what appears as key principles on which broad
agreement exists, such as:
In accordance with the expectation of the European Council, the Directive needs to
provide both the necessary level of ambition and flexibility for Member States to
engage in the most cost-efficient measures.
The Directive needs to make a significant contribution to reaching the EU's 2020 20%
energy efficiency target, which can be expressed in primary and final energy
consumption. Member States should be able to express indicative national targets in
primary or final energy consumption or savings, or energy intensity. National energy
efficiency targets are set at national level, but assessed at EU level on the basis of
common principles.
The measures retained under the Directive should be measurable and verifiable, hence
the need for suitable methodology(ies).
With a view to the exemplary role to be played by the public sector, a specific target for
public buildings, subject to the scope being focused on a suitably defined "central
government" concept, can be envisaged, together with the possibility for Member States
to take alternative measures that can be assessed as equivalent. Provisions on public
procurement should also support this role, without being over-prescriptive.
A binding end-use energy saving target under energy efficiency obligation schemes or
alternative policy measures requires a suitable methodology to assess the equivalence of
measures, while creating legal certainty and avoiding unnecessary administrative
burdens. There need to be provisions to account for otherwise "unrecorded" actions,
improvements of energy efficiency in generation, transmission and distribution, and to
take into account the risk of carbon leakage.
A voluntary option to engage in statistical transfers, and the possibilities for
contributing to a national energy efficiency fund under the provisions on end-use energy
savings and public buildings should be part of the policy tools made available to
Member States.
7659/12 IH/sb 4
DG C LIMITE EN
It being understood that this should not imply new financial instruments at EU level,
consideration can be given to financial mechanisms more generally, addressing the
better use of existing ones or the possibility to establish more accessible financial
instruments at national level.
There should be cost-efficient provisions on consumer information/participation,
provisions on energy audits commensurate with their expected benefits, and provisions
on certification and training. Metering and billing provisions should be consistent with
the third internal energy market legislation.
The same argument of cost-efficiency, not only from the point of view of the energy
system, but also of the achievement of climate change, security of supply, and
competitiveness objectives suggests that the promotion of CHP/DHC1 should be subject
to the outcome of a cost-benefit analysis and does not create counterproductive effects
on the development of energy from renewable sources.
While acknowledging that the Directive will impact on and reinforce action in other
policy areas (e.g. renewables or climate change), related EU instruments should not be
amended via this Directive.
Monitoring and reporting obligations should be kept to the necessary minimum to
achieve the objectives of the Directive, while building as much as possible on existing
frameworks (such as National Energy Efficiency Action Plans).
4. On the basis of the above mentioned principles and the Presidency suggestions for a
preliminary Council position found in the third column of 7659/12 ADD 1 and ADD 2, the
Presidency seeks the Committee's agreement to start the negotiations with the European
Parliament with the aim of reaching a first-reading agreement in accordance with the repeated
request of the European Council.
1 Combined Heat and Power/District Heating and Cooling.
7659/12 IH/sb 5
DG C LIMITE EN
5. The first informal trilogue is scheduled for 11 April in Brussels. At this meeting, and taking
the aforementioned into account, the Presidency intends to present and explain to the
Parliament side the Council's general preliminary position on the Energy Efficiency Directive,
and in particular the main principles described in point 3 above, around which a possible
compromise on the proposal could be built.
6. Coreper is invited to grant the Presidency a first mandate to start the negotiations with the
Parliament on that basis.
________________________