Upload
hoshi94
View
2.287
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
VSEPR - Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory
Each group of valence electrons around a central atom is located as faraway as possible from the others in order to minimize repulsions.
These repulsions maximize the space that each object attached to thecentral atom occupies.
The result is five electron-group arrangements of minimum energy seenin a large majority of molecules and polyatomic ions.
The electron-groups are defining the object arrangement,but themolecular shape is defined by the relative positions of the atomic nuclei.
Because valence electrons can be bonding or nonbonding, the sameelectron-group arrangement can give rise to different molecular shapes.
AXmEn
A - central atom X -surrounding atom E –lone pair
integers
Factors Affecting Actual Bond Angles
Bond angles are consistent with theoretical angles when the atoms attached to the central atom are the same and when all electrons are bonding electrons of the same order.
C O
H
Hideal
1200
1200
larger EN
greater electron density
C O
H
H
1220
1160
real
Lone pairs repel bonding pairs more strongly than bonding pairs repel each other.
Sn
Cl Cl
950
Effect of Double Bonds
Effect of Nonbonding(Lone) Pairs
Types of repulsion:
• Lone pair – lone pair
• Bond pair – lone pair
• Bond pair- bond pair
Increasing strength: bond pair:bond pair<bond pair:lone pair<lone pair:lone pair
Figure 10.2 the five basic molecular shapes
lineartrigonal planar
tetrahedral
trigonal bipyramidal
octahedral
Figure 10.3 The single molecular shape of the linear electron-group arrangement.
Examples:
CS2, HCN, BeF2
Figure 10.4 The two molecular shapes of the trigonal planar electron-group arrangement.
Class
Shape
Examples:
SO3, BF3, NO3-,
CO32-
Examples:
SO2, O3, PbCl2, SnBr2
Figure 10.5 The three molecular shapes of the tetrahedral electron-group arrangement.
Examples:
CH4, SiCl4, SO4
2-, ClO4-
NH3
PF3
ClO3
H3O+
H2O
OF2
SCl2
Figure 10.6 Lewis structures and molecular shapes.
Figure 10.7 The four molecular shapes of the trigonal bipyramidal electron-group arrangement.
SF4
XeO2F2
IF4+
IO2F2-
ClF3
BrF3
XeF2
I3-
IF2-
PF5
AsF5
SOF4
Figure 10.8 The three molecular shapes of the octahedral electron-group arrangement.
SF6
IOF5
BrF5
TeF5-
XeOF4
XeF4
ICl4-
Figure 10.9 A summary of common molecular shapes with two to six electron groups.
Figure 10.10 The steps in determining a molecular shape.
Molecular formula
Lewis structure
Electron domain
geometry Bond angles
Molecular shape
(AXmEn)
Electron domain geometry =No. of atoms attached + no. of lone pairs
2- linear 3- trigonalpyramidal 4- tetrahedral 5- trigonal bipyramidal 6- octahedral
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
SAMPLE PROBLEM 10.6 Predicting Molecular Shapes with Two, Three, or Four Electron Groups
PROBLEM:Draw the molecular shape and predict the bond angles (relative to the ideal bond angles) of (a) PF3 and (b) COCl2.
SOLUTION: (a) For PF3 - there are 26 valence electrons, 1 nonbonding pair
PF F
FElectron domain geometry : tetrahedral
bond angle: 109.50
Molecular geometry: trigonal pyramidal.
PF F
F
The type of shape is AX3E
SAMPLE PROBLEM 10.6 Predicting Molecular Shapes with Two, Three, or Four Electron Groupscontinued
(b) For COCl2, C has the lowest EN and will be the center atom.
There are 24 valence e-, 3 atoms attached to the center atom.
CCl O
Cl
Electron domain geometry: trigonal planar
Type : AX3
Molecular geometry: trigonal planar
CCl
O
Cl
bond angle= 1200
CCl
O
Cl
124.50
1110
SAMPLE PROBLEM 10.7 Predicting Molecular Shapes with Five or Six Electron Groups
PROBLEM: (a) SbF5 and (b) BrF5.
SOLUTION: • SbF5 - 40 valence e-; all electrons around central atom will be in bonding pairs;
F
SbF
F F
FF Sb
F
F
F
F
Electron domain geometry : trigonal bypyramidalMolecular geometry shape is AX5 - trigonal bipyramidalBond angles : 120 and 90
(b) BrF5 - 42 valence e-; 5 bonding pairs and 1 nonbonding pair on central atom.
BrF
F F
F
F
Electron domain geometry : octahedralMolecular geometry shape is AX5E, square pyramidal.Bond angles : 90
Figure 10.12 The orientation of polar molecules in an electric field.
Electric field OFF
Electric field ON
Nonpolar molecules
Molecules with the following molecular geometry:
(applicable if all the bonded atoms are the same)
Linear
Trigonal planar
Tetrahedral
Square planar
Trigonal bipyramidal
Octahedral
SAMPLE PROBLEM 10.9 Predicting the Polarity of Molecules
(a) Ammonia, NH3 (b) Boron trifluoride, BF3
(c) Carbonyl sulfide, COS (atom sequence SCO)
PROBLEM: predict whether each of the following molecules is polar and show the direction of bond dipoles and the overall molecular dipole when applicable:
PLAN: Draw the shape, and combine the concepts to determine the polarity.
SOLUTION: (a) NH3
NH
HH
NH
HH
NH
HH
bond dipoles
molecular dipole
The dipoles reinforce each other, so the overall molecule is definitely polar.
SAMPLE PROBLEM 10.10 Predicting the Polarity of Molecules
continued
(b) BF3 has 24 valence e- and all electrons around the B will be involved in bonds. The shape is AX3, trigonal planar.
F
B
F
F
F (EN 4.0) is more electronegative than B (EN 2.0) and all of the dipoles will be directed from B to F. Because all are at the same angle and of the same magnitude, the molecule is nonpolar.
1200
(c) COS is linear.
S C O
C and S have the same EN (2.0) but Oxygen is more electronegative and the molecule is quite polar(DEN) so the molecule is polar overall.
SAMPLE PROBLEM Combined Concepts
PROBLEM: (a) SnCl2
SOLUTION: 18 valence e-;
Electron domain geometry : trigonal planarMolecular geometry : AX2E - bentBond angles : 120
Sn
Cl Cl
Lewis Structure Formal charge of the central atom: -1
Hybridization of the central atom: sp2
Polarity : polar
SAMPLE PROBLEM Combined Concepts
PROBLEM: (b) C2H2
SOLUTION: 10 valence e-; all electrons around central atom will be in bonding pairs;
Electron domain geometry : linearMolecular geometry : AX2 - linearBond angles : 180
Lewis Structure Formal charge of the C: 0
Hybridization of the C: sp
Polarity : nonpolar
The Central Themes of MO Theory
A molecule is viewed on a quantum mechanical level as a collection of nuclei surrounded by delocalized molecular orbitals.
Atomic wave functions are summed to obtain molecular wave functions.
If wave functions reinforce each other, a bonding MO is formed (region of high electron density exists between the nuclei).
If wave functions cancel each other, an antibonding MO is formed (a node of zero electron density occurs between the nuclei).
Properties of Molecular orbitals
*holds maximum of 2 electrons of opposite spins*have definite/discrete energy states*electron density distribution can be represented by contour
diagrams (similar to AO’s – s, p, d, f)*MO is associated with the entire molecule*MO’s are formed by the linear combination of atomic
orbitals (AO’s) and the overlap results in the formation of sigma () and pi () bonds
Figure 11.14 Contours and energies of the bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals (MOs) in H2.
The bonding MO is lower in energy and the antibonding MO is higher in energy than the AOs that combined to form them.
Bond Order = ½ (bonding electrons – nonbonding electrons)
Figure 11.15 The MO diagram for H2.
En
erg
y
MO of H2
*1s
1s
AO of H
1s
AO of H
1s
H2 bond order = 1/2(2-0) = 1
Filling molecular orbitals with electrons follows the same concept as filling atomic orbitals.
Figure 11.16 MO diagram for He2+ and He2.
En
erg
y
MO of He+
*1s
1s
AO of He+
1s
MO of He2
AO of He
1s
AO of He
1s
*1s
1s
En
erg
y
He2+ bond order = 1/2 He2 bond order = 0
AO of He
1s
SAMPLE PROBLEM 11.3 Predicting Stability of Species Using MO Diagrams
SOLUTION:
PROBLEM: Use MO diagrams to predict whether H2+ and H2
- exist. Determine their bond orders and electron configurations.
PLAN: Use H2 as a model and accommodate the number of electrons in bonding and antibonding orbitals. Find the bond order.
1s1s
AO of HAO of H
1s1s
AO of HAO of H++
MO of HMO of H22++
bond order = 1/2(1-0) = 1/2
HH22++ does exist does exist
MO of HMO of H22--
bond order = 1/2(2-1) = 1/2
H2- does exist
1s1s 1s1s
AO of HAO of H AO of HAO of H--
configuration is (1s)1configuration is (1s)2(2s)1
*2s
2s
2s2s
Figure 11.18
2s 2s
*2s
2s
Li2 bond order = 1 Be2 bond order = 0
Bonding in s-block homonuclear diatomic molecules.E
ner
gy
Li2Be2
Figure 11.19Contours and energies of s and p MOs through
combinations of 2p atomic orbitals.
Figure 11.20 Relative MO energy levels for Period 2 homonuclear diatomic molecules.
MO energy levels for O2, F2, and Ne2
MO energy levels for B2, C2, and N2
without 2s-2p mixing
with 2s-2p mixing
Figure 11.21
MO occupancy and molecular properties for B2 through Ne2
SAMPLE PROBLEM 11.4 Using MO Theory to Explain Bond Properties
SOLUTION:
PROBLEM: As the following data show, removing an electron from N2 forms an ion with a weaker, longer bond than in the parent molecules, whereas the ion formed from O2 has a stronger, shorter bond:
PLAN: Find the number of valence electrons for each species, draw the MO diagrams, calculate bond orders, and then compare the results.
Explain these facts with diagrams that show the sequence and occupancy of MOs.Explain these facts with diagrams that show the sequence and occupancy of MOs.
Bond energy (kJ/mol)Bond energy (kJ/mol)
Bond length (pm)Bond length (pm)
NN22 NN22++ OO22 OO22
++
945945
110110
498498841841 623623
112112121121112112
N2 has 10 valence electrons, so N2+ has 9.
O2 has 12 valence electrons, so O2+ has 11.
SAMPLE PROBLEM 11.4 Using MO Theory to Explain Bond Properties
continued
2s
2s
2p
2p
2p
2p
N2 N2+ O2 O2
+
bond orders
1/2(8-2)=3 1/2(7-2)=2.5 1/2(8-4)=2 1/2(8-3)=2.5
2s
2s
2p
2p
2p
2p
bonding e- lost
antibonding e- lost
En
erg
y
MO of HF
AO of H
1s
2px 2py
AO of F
2p
Figure 11.23 The MO diagram for HF
En
erg
yFigure 11.24 The MO diagram for NO
MO of NO
2s
AO of N
2p
*1s
1s
2sAO of O
2p
2p
2p
*2p
*2s
N O
0 0
N O
-1 +1
possible Lewis structures
Problem:(1)Construct the molecular orbital
diagram(2)give the electronic configuration
(using MOs) (3)give the bond order of the following
molecules: a. O2
2-
b. N2
a. O22-
1. Molecular orbital diagram:
2s2 * 2s
2 2p4 2p
2 * 2p4
2.Electronic configuration using MO:
3.Bond order
= ½(8-6) = 1
b. N2
1. Molecular orbital diagram:
2s2 * 2s
2 2p4 2p
2
2.Electronic configuration using MO:
3.Bond order
= ½(8-2) = 3
Summary
Figure 10.1
The steps in converting a molecular formula into a Lewis structure.
Molecular formula
Atom placement
Sum of valence e-
Remaining valence e-
Lewis structure
Place atom with lowest
EN in center
Add A-group numbers
Draw single bonds. Subtract 2e- for each bond.
Give each atom 8e-
(2e- for H)
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Figure 10.12The steps in determining a molecular shape.
Molecular formula
Lewis structure
Electron-group arrangement
Bond angles
Molecular shape
(AXmEn)
Count all e- groups around central atom (A)
Note lone pairs and double bonds
Count bonding and nonbonding e-
groups separately.
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
See Figure 10.1
Metallic Bonding
Metallic Bond – bonding in which bonding electrons are relatively free to move throughout the three-dimensional structure.
Physical Properties of Metals
*Metal surfaces has a characteristic luster*Metals have high electrical conductivity*Metals have high thermal/heat conductivity*Most metals are malleable and ductile
Electron Sea Model for Metallic Bonding*in this model, the metal is pictured as an array of metal cations in a “sea” of electrons.*electrons are confined to the metal by electrostatic attractions to the cations, and they are uniformly distributed throughout the structure.*above physical properties of metal can be explained by this model
Molecular-Orbital Model for Metals or Band Theory
*in a metal the number of atomic orbitals that interact or overlap is very large thus, the number of molecular orbitals is also very large.*it has an energy band – numerous and continuous tiny energy separation of between metal orbitals.*electrons available for metallic bonding do not completely fill the available molecular orbitals. It is partially filled.*electrons at the top require a little input to be promoted to still higher energy orbitals.
Metallic conductors have partially filled energy bands, as shown in (a). Insulators have filled and empty energy bands, as in (b).Notes: According to the MO theory metals are able to conduct electricity because there are more molecular orbitals in the band than are necessary to accommodate the bonding electrons. In metals an excited electron may easily move to a nearby higher orbital. The bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals of insulators such as diamond are separated by a large energy gap so there are no nearby orbitals for the electrons to move to, making diamond a poor conductor of electricity.