34
Advanced Materials Program and Sensors Program FY 2010 Bidders Conference October 22, 2009

Bidders' Conference Presentation

  • Upload
    mike97

  • View
    329

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Advanced Materials Programand

Sensors Program

FY 2010 Bidders ConferenceOctober 22, 2009

Page 2: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Agenda

• Welcome and Introductions

• Ohio Third Frontier

• Commercialization Framework

Ohio Third Frontier Advanced Materials Program (OTFAMP) Ohio Third Frontier Sensors Program (OTFSP)

• Q & A

Page 3: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Ohio Third Frontier

Background

• The Ohio Third Frontier was initiated in February 2002 and, with a commitment of $1.35 billion, is the state's largest-ever economic development initiative

• Ohio’s investment has leveraged $4.1 billion in additional investments from the private sector and federal government

• Program investments have helped to create 598 new companies, more than 8,500 new jobs, and more than 48,000 direct and indirect jobs

Page 4: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Ohio Third Frontier

Vision

To establish, in targeted areas of technology, regional and statewide clusters of excellence that sustain our global competitive advantage in company and product formation, job creation and economic growth.

Page 5: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Ohio Third FrontierObjectives

Guided by a focus on Ohio research and industrial strengths:

• Increase the quantity of high quality research that has commercial relevance to Ohio companies;

• Expand access and availability of investment capital to create, grow and attract technology-based enterprises;

• Grow and nurture entrepreneurial management talent supported by organized systems of services and networking;

• Address the technical needs of existing companies pursuing new products and production processes;

• Contribute to the expansion of a technologically proficient workforce.

Page 6: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Focus Areas

Based on a 2002 study by Battelle and revised by the Ohio Third Frontier Commission in 2008, the Ohio Third Frontier embraces five technology focus areas:

BiomedicalAdvanced/Alternative Energy

Instruments, Controls, ElectronicsAdvanced Materials

Advanced Propulsion

Ohio Third Frontier

Page 7: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Research Commercialization Programs- Wright Projects Program RFP open

- R & D Center Attraction (New) RFP open

Entrepreneurial Programs- ESP Success / Pre-Seed Follow-on Funds (Modified) RFP TBR

Cluster Development Programs - Advanced Materials Program (New) RFP open - Sensors Program (New) RFP open

- Advanced Energy Program RFP closed- Fuel Cell Program RFP closed- Photovoltaic Program (New) RFP closed- Medical Imaging Program (New) RFP TBR- Biomedical Program (New) RFP TBR- Targeted Industry Attraction Grants

Human Capital Programs- Third Frontier Internship Program

TBR = To Be Released

Ohio Third Frontier FY2010 Programs

Page 8: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Ohio Third FrontierInvestment Highlights

• Statewide Entrepreneurial Signature Program (ESP) established and organized around 6 regional networks

• 46 pre-seed and seed funds capitalized

• 13 Wright Centers of Innovation (including one Mega-Center) established

• Endowments for 26 Ohio Research Scholars

• More than 80 advanced energy projects supporting the growth of the fuel cell and photovoltaic clusters

• 3,000 STEM interns placed in over 700 companies

Page 9: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Commercialization Framework

Mobilizing Resources

for Incubating

MARKET ENTRYto Prove

Commercial Viability

DEMONSTRATINGProducts & Processes

in Commercial Context

IMAGININGthe Commercial

Opportunity

INCUBATINGto Define

Commercial-izability

Mobilizing Resources for Demonstrating

Mobilizing Resources for Market Entry

Mobilizing Resources for

Growth & Sustainability

GROWTH & SUSTAINABILITY

to Generate Financial Returns

PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT TO CREATE PROOF

TRANSITIONS TO MOBILIZE RESOURCES

THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION

Adapted from Jolly, Vijay K., Commercializing New Technologies, Getting from Mind to Market, Harvard Business Press, 1997

OTF Cluster Programs

Page 10: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Ohio Third Frontier

Advanced Materials Program &

Sensors Program

Fiscal Year 2010

Page 11: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Program GoalTo accelerate the development and growth of the advanced materials and sensors industries in Ohio and their supply chains by direct financial support to organizations seeking to:

Advanced Materials - Commercialize new products, manufacturing processes or technologies; adapt or modify existing materials orcomponents in order to address one or more issues, including cost, size, weight, strength, resistance to the environment, and durability of advanced materials; address technical and commercialization barriers; or demonstrate market readiness

Sensors – Investigate near-term specific commercial objectives with respect to products, processes, or services; commercialize new products, manufacturing processes or technologies; adapt or modify existing components or systems that can reduce the cost and improve the functionality of sensors; address technical and commercializationbarriers; or demonstrate market readiness

Page 12: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Program Objectives• To help Ohio companies achieve cost and performance standards that

ultimate end-users of advanced materials or sensors technologies define as necessary for successful commercial applications;

• To support development of advanced materials or sensors technologies that will result in the opportunity for significant employment in Ohio within 3 to 5 years of completing the project;

• To help Ohio companies secure additional financial resources needed to commercialize their advanced materials or sensors related products, processes, components, and systems; and

• To move advanced materials or sensors related products, manufacturing processes, components, and systems to a point in the commercialization process where the applicant is ready to demonstrate a commercial prototype or actually enter the market with a product

Page 13: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Eligible PurposesThe OTF will fund grant applications that focus on the following types of projects:

• Developing and commercializing new advanced materials or sensors products, manufacturing processes, or technologies that can address one or more issues (including cost, size, weight, strength, resistance to the environment, or durability of advanced materials), reduce the cost and improve the functionality of sensors technologies or systems, or address technical commercialization barriers

• Adapting or modifying an existing product or components or systems that are produced in Ohio

• Commercially oriented demonstration projects in Ohio of advanced materials or sensors or sensor-related technologies that maximize incorporation of Ohio components and are operating under final use conditions. Please note that proof of principle and bench scale demonstrations are not considered to be commercial demonstrations

• The OTF will not fund the construction or operation of production scale facilities

Page 14: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Technology Preferences• Advanced Materials - Preference for polymer and carbon nano-materials,

liquid crystals, and bio-based materials

• Advanced Materials and Sensors – Preference for projects that apply advanced materials or sensors technologies within one or more of Ohio’s key industries, including Advanced Energy and Environmental Technologies; Aerospace and Aviation; Agriculture and Food Processing; Biomedical; Instruments, Controls, and Electronics; Motor Vehicle and Parts Manufacturing; Distribution and Logistics; and Polymers and Advanced Materials, including Bioproducts

• Competitive advanced materials or sensors technologies are those that can be shown to meet or exceed technical and cost standards emanating from end users, any federal research, development, and policy work, or other recognized national and international associations dedicated to the advanced materials or sensors industries

• Preference is for work to be done within 2 years and not more than 3 years

Page 15: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Eligible Lead Applicants

• Lead Applicant (for-profit, not-for-profit, government research institute, public body, or educational institution) must be based in Ohio or have a principal place of business in Ohio, or be an out-of-state for-profit company that pledges to locate a principle place of business within Ohio as a pre-condition to award

• A substantial portion of the project activity and the benefit from the project must occur in Ohio

• Must be a collaborative effort where either the Lead Applicant or one collaborator must be a for-profit company, but must be comprised of, in any mix, two or more independent firms, higher education institutions, or eligible not-for-profit or government research institutions

Page 16: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Funding

Development anticipates awarding up to:

– Advanced Materials Program = $10 million

$8 million Third Frontier Research and Development Fund (TFR&DF); $2 million Wright Capital Fund (WCF)

– Sensors Program = $10 million

$8 million Third Frontier Research and Development Fund (TFR&DF); $2 million Wright Capital Fund (WCF)

Page 17: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Funding• There are no restrictions of the use of Third Frontier Research and

Development funds (i.e., may be used for operating or capital purposes) or on the eligibility of organizations to receive these funds

• Wright Capital Funds must be used solely to acquire, renovate, or construct

facilities and purchase equipment that is part of property of facilities owned by an Ohio State-supported or state-assisted institution of higher education or by a non-profit corporation or a public body that provides access and use of facilities or equipment to a collaborating Ohio State-supported or state-assisted institution of higher education

• Wright Capital Funds requested for any one proposal may not exceed the total WCF available

• Not more than 20 percent of the total direct State grant funds requested may be budgeted for Indirect Costs

• Un-recovered Indirect Costs are an allowable form of Cost Share

Page 18: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Cost Share• Must be at least one dollar for every one dollar of State Grant Funds

requested (i.e., a ratio of at least 1:1)

• Preference will be given to Proposals that pledge Cost Share as discretionary, unrestricted, and unallocated cash and such cash must appear on the financial records of the Lead Applicant

• Must be documented on the budget forms, in the budget narrative, and in a letter from each organization contributing Cost Share signed by a representative authorized to commit the organization to the proposed Project and the Cost Share described.

• Must represent a specific new commitment to the Project described in the Proposal

• Must be allowable costs that are verifiable and auditable and consistent with the Cost Share guidelines

Page 19: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Cost Share• Resources that have been designated as Cost Share for some other award

cannot be used as Cost Share for an Ohio Third Frontier award

• Cost Share must be applied to the Project during the Project Period

• If an organization has a published indirect cost rate, un-recovered Indirect Costs (the difference between 20% and the published rate) may be used as Cost Share

- If the Lead Applicant does not have a federally negotiated and approved Indirect Cost rate agreement, then the Lead Applicant is limited to using 20 percent of its Cost Shared direct costs as Cost Shared Indirect Costs and no other un-recovered Indirect Costs from the operating budget may be claimed

• OTF funding may not be used as Cost Share, and funds awarded under this RFP may not be used as Cost Share against other Third Frontier projects

• Lead Applicant will be held to the Cost Share ratio proposed

Page 20: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Proposal Evaluation CriteriaThe following criteria have been designated with the highest relevance to and weighting for the OTFAMP AND OTFSP:

- Level of Scientific Merit

- Alignment of the Proposal with the OTFAMP or OTFSP purpose, goals, objectives, eligibility, funding, and Cost

Share requirements as described in Section 2 of the RFPs

- Quality of responses to the requirements of the RFPs as outlined in sections 3.3.6 through 3.3.12 of the RFPs

- Compliance with the RFPs’ administrative requirements

- Past Performance (if applicable)

Page 21: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Proposal Evaluation Criteria

- 3.3.6 Technical Plan

- 3.3.7 Commercialization Strategy

- 3.3.8 Performance Goals

- 3.3.9 Performance on Prior OTF Awards

- 3.3.10 Experience and Qualifications

- 3.3.11 Budget

- 3.3.12 Collaborator Information/Letters of Commitment

Page 22: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Review ProcessAdministrative Review

– Third Frontier Commission staff– Receive and process proposals for administrative compliance– Forward to external evaluators for technical review

Technical Review– Independent, external evaluators– Technical and commercial review– Establish a competitive range– Second stage review– Rank proposals – Compile recommendations– Submit recommendations and summary evaluation statements

to Ohio Third Frontier Commission

Page 23: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Review ProcessIn addition to the external review, Development may review applications to assess:

- Past performance of Lead Applicant and its team;

- Proposal’s strategic fit with prior Third Frontier investments, other State investments, Development’s strategies, and the Ohio Board of Regent’s strategies; and

- Factual business intelligence relevant to describing the Ohio economic development opportunity

The results of such review will be presented to the Ohio Third Frontier Commission for its consideration

Page 24: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Timeline

October 7, 2009 RFP Released

November 4, 2009 LOIs due by 2:00 p.m.

December 7, 2009 Proposals due by 2:00 p.m.

December 2009 – March 2010 Review Process

Approximately March 2010 Award Announcements

Be sure to use the current version of the RFP and application / budget forms

Page 25: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Exceptional Opportunity FundingIf the Lead Applicant believes they have an exceptional opportunity, fitting the intent of the specific OTF program, but requiring significantly higher funding than the RFP allows, then the Lead Applicant may also submit a white paper that describes:

– the additional dimensions of the Project;

– the uses for the larger amount of funding requested; and,

– a clear justification for why the expanded scope represents an exceptional economic development opportunity for Ohio

Note: The core Proposal must stand alone and not depend on the exceptional opportunity white paper to achieve the benefits

required for a successful Project.

Page 26: Bidders' Conference Presentation

• The white paper should consist of a narrative not to exceed five (5) pages, supplemental budget forms and a schedule of activities. The white paper must include the title of the core Proposal and the Proposal number assigned by Development.

• The supplemental award request must be for no less than $1 million in additional support. The request for additional funds is subject to the at least 1:1 Cost Share requirement.

• If the Lead Applicant’s core Project is ranked high enough by the external evaluators to be recommended for funding, the white paper will be evaluated and presented to the OTFC. At its discretion, the OTFC may request additional due diligence be undertaken that will include submitting a more complete Proposal for the additional funding. Final decisions on supplemental awards will occur at the end of the FY 2010 program year.

Exceptional Opportunity Funding

Page 27: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Policy & Administrative Questions

• All questions must be submitted via e-mail

• E-mail: [email protected], with subject line “OTFAMP Q&A”

[email protected], with subject line

“OTFSP Q&A”

* LOIs are to be submitted to the respective e-mail address, with

the subject line of “2010 OTFAMP LOI” or “2010 OTFSP LOI”

• Frequently asked questions will be posted on the Third Frontier web site: www.thirdfrontier.com

Page 28: Bidders' Conference Presentation

RFP Modifications & Clarifications

• From time to time, it may be necessary to modify or clarify portions of the RFPs, as well as the forms. In that event, we will post a document titled “RFP Modifications and Clarifications” to the RFP page for the particular program on the Third Frontier website. The document will have an explanation of any changes.

• It is your responsibility to be aware of any RFP modifications and to ensure that your proposal conforms with any such modifications

Page 29: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Budget Forms

BF1 – The Total Budget Plan – Detail of total budget plan for the State funds requested and all Cost Share. This form includes the Lead Applicant and Collaborator(s). Subcontract/Subgrant line-item is not to be used.

BF2 – The Lead Applicant budget – Detail of Lead Applicant’s requested State funds and committed Cost Share. Subcontract/Subgrant line-item is to contain total

amount of requested State funds and committed Cost Share from all Collaborator BF3s.

BF3 – The Collaborator Budget – Must be submitted for each and every Collaborator receiving State funds and/or committing Cost Share.

BF4 – Cost Share – Single form that lists the source of the Cost Share by both entity and type for the Lead Applicant and all Collaborators committing Cost Share. Do

not submit multiple BF4s.

Note: *** The total on Budget Form 1 and the total on Budget Form 2 are to equal *** The total of all Budget Form 3s are to equal the “Subcontract/Subgrant”

line-item totals on Budget Form 2

Budget Forms have been reformatted – only use the reformatted Forms! Please carefully read the Instructions tab before filling out the Forms!

Page 30: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Things to Avoid

Collaborations

• Failure to consider/involve OTF grantees when it makes sense

• Involving OTF grantees when it doesn’t add value

• Window dressing and a cast of thousands

• Hollow letters of support

Page 31: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Things to AvoidCost Sharing

• Not viewing Cost Share as a true half of the whole

• Not addressing Cost Share specifics in the budget narrative

• Missing letters of commitment

• “Related” Cost Share

• Bait & switch

• The ratio you propose is the ratio we hold you to

• Assuming the highest bidder wins

Page 32: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Things to Avoid

Commercialization / Market

• Over/under estimating your position in the framework

• Proposing a program in its infancy

• Not acknowledging the competition

• Not considering/involving end users, suppliers, manufacturers

• Not being industry driven, omitting industrial leaders

• Unrealistic impacts

Page 33: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Things to Avoid

Administrative Issues

• Late proposals – deadline is 2:00 p.m.

• Ignoring page limitations

• More than 5 key personnel

• Claiming everything as proprietary information

• Appending material

• Requesting more funding than what’s allowed

Page 34: Bidders' Conference Presentation

Questions?