17
ũ . ƞƬƄƫř - Ʃƺů ƾƫƹŵ ƼƤŤƬƯ : ŠŨƿŶŰƫř šŚƿŵŚƈŤƣLJř ƾƟ ŠǀŝźƘƫř ƩŚưƗǃř šŚưƔƴƯ ƾƟ ƽźƨƠƫř ƩŚưƫř ŽŏŹ - ƾƯƺƿ : 13 ƹ 14 źŞưƀƿŵ 2011 ť . ƇƒťƃŒŧƍƈ ťƒœſ ťƆšŊ ŧƒƒŪřƃŒ ƅƍƄŵƍ ŗƒŧœŞřƃŒƍ ŗƒťœŮřſƙŒ ƅƍƄŶƃŒ ŗƒƄƂ ƒŤ ťƆšƆ ŗŶƆœŞ Ű ŖŧƂŪŕ ŧ ¾œƆŵƕŒ ŘœƂŧŬ Ƒż ƐŧƂŽƃŒ ¾œƆƃŒ ũŊŧ ƅƒƒƀřƍ ŗŪŒŧť ŭŤƄƆƃŒ : ¿Ƅ»Ů Ə»ƍƏ řžũŸƈƅŔ ŧŕŰśƁŏ ¿Ŵ Ɠž řŝƔŧţƅŔ ŚŕƄũŮƆƅ řƔŬŕŬƗŔ ŧũŔƏƈƅŔ Ɖƈ ƒũƄſƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũ ũŗśŸƔ ŮŌ Ɖƈ ũŦŊ ŧƔŧŠƅŔ ŧŕŰśƁƙŔ Ɠž ƌŗ ŽũśŸƈƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũ ¿ŕƄ . Ɖ»ƈ řƄũŮ»Ɔƅ ƒũ»ƄſƅŔ ¿ŕ»ƈƅŔ ūŌũ ƉƏƄśƔƏ řƔƅŕśƅŔ řƔŬŕŬƗŔ ŚŕƊƏƄƈƅŔ : ƓƆƄƔƎƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũ ƒũŮŗƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũ ƓƊƏŗŪƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũ . ś Ũƍ ¿ŝƈ Ƌ řƆŦŔŧƈƅŔ ƌ»ŬŕƔƁ ƀũų ƌśŕƈƔŬƂś ƌśŕƊƏƄƈ ƒũƄſƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũƅ řƔƆƔƆţś řƔŧƂƊ řŬŔũŧ ū»ŬƗŔƏ ŧ»Ɣŧţś űũ»żƅ ŕƎŗƏƔŷƏ ŕƍŕƔŔŪƈ ŧƔŧţśƏ ƀũųƅŔ ƃƆś ŧƂƊƅ Řŧ੠řƅƏŕţƈ ŕŲƔŌ ƏƍƏ ūŕƔƂƅŔ řƔƆƈŷ Ɠž ŘŧƈśŸƈƅŔ ř»ƅŕţ řŠƅŕŸƈƏ ¿ŕƈŷƗŔ ŚŕƄũŮ Ɠž ƒũƄſƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũ ūŕƔƂƅ řƔƆƈŷƏ řƔŷƏŲƏƈ ũŝƄƗŔ řƂƔũųƅŔ ƏŌ ŖƏƆŬƗŔ ƉƈŪƅŔ ũƏũƈŗ ƌƔž ũƔżśƅŔ . şœŕśƊƅŔ ƇƍŌ ƉƈƏ řŬŔũŧƅŔ ƍŧŕſƈ ŕ Ɠ»śƅŔ ŚƛŕƄŮƙŔ ¿ţƅ řƂƈŸƈ ŚŕŬŔũŧ Ƒƅŏ ŞŕśţƔ ƒũƄſƅŔ ¿ŕƈƅŔ ūŌũ ƉŌ Śŕ»ŠƅŕŸƈƅŔ ŵƏŲƏƈ ūŕƔƂƅ ŘŧƈśŸƈƅŔ ŚŔũŮŎƈƅŔ űŸŗ Ɠž ŖŨŗŨśƅŔ řƅŕţ Ɠž řŰŕŦƏ ūŕƔƂƅŔ ƀũų ŕƎƊƈ ƓƊŕŸś ƌƅ řƔŧƔƂƅŔ řƔŗŬŕţƈƅŔ . SUMMARY The intellectual capital is an essential resource for companies in the light of modern knowledge economy, which is another form of capital recognized in the new economy. It consists of intellectual capital of the company from the following basic components: • structural capital; • human capital; • Capital Zubona. This research represents a critical study analysis of the intellectual capital, its components, subdivisions, measurement methods and principles adopted in the measurement process is also a serious attempt to critique these methods and identify their advantages and disadvantages for the purpose of determining the method or way in the most objective and a process for measuring intellectual capital in the business and address the situation of change in it the passage of time. We have emerged from the study's conclusion that the intellectual capital needed to in-depth studies to resolve problems faced by measurement methods, especially in the case of volatility in some of the indicators adopted to measure the subject of accounting treatments Agaydah him.

دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

.- :-:13142011

.

:

.

:

•.

.

.SUMMARY

The intellectual capital is an essential resource for companies in the light of modernknowledge economy, which is another form of capital recognized in the new economy. It consistsof intellectual capital of the company from the following basic components:

• structural capital;• human capital;• Capital Zubona.This research represents a critical study analysis of the intellectual capital, its components,

subdivisions, measurement methods and principles adopted in the measurement process is also aserious attempt to critique these methods and identify their advantages and disadvantages for thepurpose of determining the method or way in the most objective and a process for measuringintellectual capital in the business and address the situation of change in it the passage of time. We have emerged from the study's conclusion that the intellectual capital needed to in-depthstudies to resolve problems faced by measurement methods, especially in the case of volatility insome of the indicators adopted to measure the subject of accounting treatments Agaydah him.

Page 2: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

1

.

90

. ) (

. 115

10

.

) (

.

1-: : :

.

Page 3: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

2

• )OECD∗ :("

) ("1 .

• )Stewart :(" –

"2 .

•)Awad & Ghaziri (

.3

.

•)Despres & Chanvel :("

"4 .

.

.

.

.

... .

:

∗ O.E.C.D: The Organization For Economic Co-operation and Development.1 OECD, The Organization For Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Measuring and ReportingIntellectual Capital, Experience, Issues and Prospect Programme Notes and Background to Technical Meeting andpolicy and Strategy Forum, Paris, 1999.2 A.T.Stewart, Accounting Gets Radical Business, 2001, p15.3 E. Awad & H.Ghaziri, Knowledge Management, Person Education, Inc, 2004.4 Charles Despres and D. Chanvel, Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, 2000.

Page 4: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

3

:1

--

::

.

) (

.

:1

.)Despres & Chanvel :(

:2

• :

..

• : .• :

.• :

.. : .

= + : = +:

1 Charles Despres and D. Chanvel, Op.Cit, p 40.2 Ibid.

Page 5: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

4

= + :. : :

• :• :

o.o.o.o.

. :) ( :• .• .• .

:2

.

.

.

. : :

•.

. : :

1-

2- :

•.

Page 6: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

5

:

:1

1 . : ) (

.

.

2 . :

.

)Edvinson & Malone (

. )IBM (

.2

15

.

1 Charles Despres and D. Chanvel, Op.Cit, p 58.2 Lief Edvinson and M.Malone, Intellectual Capital, Harper Colins, New York, 1997, p147.

1 :

Page 7: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

6

.

:1

.

.

.

.

:2

- :

.

- .

.

- :

.

- :

.

3- :

.

:3

-

.

-

5

25.

::

1 Charles Despres and D. Chanvel, Op.Cit, p148.2 Ibid, p 150.3 Lief Edvinson and M.Malone, Op.Cit, p160.

Page 8: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

7

:1

.

Skandia .

. ) (

.

.

.

:

•.

•.

•.

• )(.

•.

•.

•.

::

.

.

:2

1 J.Skandia Liebowitz, Information Technology Management, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000, p29.2 CMA Huse, T. and Bell, A.H, Measuring and Managing Knowledge, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston, 2001, p24.

Page 9: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

8

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

:1

1- :

. :

2- : :

.

3- : ) ( .

:

•.

•.

•.

12004.

Page 10: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

9

4- : )ROA (

:

)ROA = (

.

:

.

:

1- : :

=–

5 10

=10–5 =5

.

:3

)( )( )(0.413.90.915.4

10.980.76.512.425.3327.441.47.933.7177.032.55.4

)(4.63.32.21.5184.630.520.61.514.43.03.60.83

Source: G.G. Dess et al. (2004): Strategic Management, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston, p109.

)Cetin (:1

.

.

1 F.Cetin, Measuring and Managing Intellectual Capital, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, 2000, pp 5-13.

Page 11: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

10

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

2-: )Kaplan & Norton (

.

:1

..

..

. )(.

..

.

.

1 R.S.Kaplan & Norton, D.P, The Balanced ScoreCard: Measures That Drive Performance, HBR, Vol.(70), No.(1),1999, pp71-79.

2 :

:

Page 12: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

11

3- :

) (

.

)KVA (

.

.

II-:

.

.

)Y.Malharta () .(1

)K.E.Sveiby (

:

- )– / .(

- .

- .

- .

1 Yogesh Malharta: Measuring Knowledge Assets of A Nation, p3, Available From (http://www.brint.org).

3 :

y x

:

1–)x =y ( .

2– .

3– .Source: Thomas Housel and A.H.Bell(2001): Measuring and Managing Knowledge, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, p94.

Page 13: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

12

.

:1

1- :

.

.

2- :

.

.

.

:

: :).. .(

: ) :(

.(

:CV = MV

CV =

MV =

:BV = TA + IA

:

TA = ) (

IA =

1 Karl-Erik Sveiby, Method For Measuring Intangibles Assets, Available on: www.sveiby.com/articls, 2001.

Page 14: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

13

) (

:IC = F ( IA1 + IA2 + …+ IAn ) + ( IR1 + IR2 + … + IRm )

:

IC =

)IA1 + IA2 + …. + IAn = (

)1, 2, 3, … , n. (

( IR1 + IR2 + …. + IRn ) =

)1, 2, 3,

… m ( :

.

)IAn ( )IRn (

:1

: :

.

: :

:

)( ) (

) ( .

.

:

. )D.Anderiessen (

:2

: :

.

: :

.

: :

.

1 Karl-Erik Sveiby, Op.Cit.2 D.Anderiessen, The Financial Value of Intangibles, Available on: www.weightlesswealth.com, 2002.

Page 15: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

14

: :

.

: :

.

: :

.

:

1 (:

:

•.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

2 (:

:

.

•.

•.

Page 16: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

15

.

.

Page 17: دراسة و-تقييم-رأس-المال-الفكري-في-شركات-الاعمال-أحمد-قايد-نور-الدين

16

:1.

2004.2. A.T.Stewart, Accounting Gets Radical Business, 2001.3. Charles Despres and D. Chauvel, Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, 2000.4. CMA Huse, T. and Bell, A.H, Measuring and Managing Knowledge, McGraw-Hill/Irwin,Boston, 2001.5. D.Anderiessen, The Financial Value of Intangibles, Available on: www.weightlesswealth.com,2002.6. E. Awad & H.Ghaziri, Knowledge Management, Person Education, Inc, 2004.7. F.Cetin, Measuring and Managing Intellectual Capital, Helsinki University of Technology,Finland, 2000.8. J.MchenZie & C.V.Winkelen, Understanding the Knowledgeable Organization, International,Padstow, Cornwall, 2004, pp236-237.9. J.Skandia Liebowitz, Information Technology Management, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000.10. Karl-Erik Sveiby, Method For Measuring Intangibles Assets, Available on:www.sveiby.com/articls, 2001.11. Lief Edvinson and M.Malone, Intellectual Capital, Harper Colins, New York, 1997.12. OECD, The Organization For Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Measuringand Reporting Intellectual Capital, Experience, Issues and Prospect Programme Notes andBackground to Technical Meeting and policy and Strategy Forum. Paris, 1999.13. R.S.Kaplan & Norton, D.P, The Balanced ScoreCard: Measures That Drive Performance, HBR,Vol.(70), No.(1), 1999.14. Yogesh Malharta: Measuring Knowledge Assets of A Nation, p3, Available From(http://www.brint.org).