Upload
piotr-makowski
View
127
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
The (In)flexible Agency "DESIRE" WORKSHOP
ROME 31.10-01.11.2014
Piotr Makowski Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan
http://pmakowski.com/ email: [email protected]
OVERVIEW1. INITIAL IDEA
2. FLEXIBILITY IN PSYCHOLOGY (DEFINITION, DISTINCTIONS)
3. WHERE TO SEARCH FOR THE PROBLEM OF PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY IN ACTION THEORY: RESISTANCE AND RIGIDITY OF ATTITUDES
4. TWO EXAMPLES: RESISTANCE OF DESIRE AND INERTIA/STABILITY OF INTENTION
5. SUPPLEMENTING THE PICTURE OF FLEXIBLE AGENCY IN ACTION THEORY: PLASTICITY OF PLANNING
6. CONCLUSIONS2
\ˈflek-sə-bəl\
• capable of bending or being bent, • able to change or to do different things, • willing to change or to try different things;
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
4
5http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lion_stretching_at_Ouwehands_2010.JPG
7
FLEXIBILITY - A FEW SAMPLES
• Kate is flexible about her working arrangement. • They can flexibly add more speakers. • Flexibility is not what describes her attitude
towards my lifestyle. • You shouldn’t have been so flexible in
accepting his plan!
8
PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY [PF]
'a slippery construct to define', reffering to different dynamic processes:
(1) adaptation to fluctuating situational demands, (2) reconfiguration of mental resources, (3) perspective shifting, (4) balancing competing desires, needs, and life domains.
(Kashdan & Rottenberg 2010: 886)
9
PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY [PF]
’a slippery construct to define’, reffering to different dynamic processes:
(1) adaptation to fluctuating situational demands, (2) reconfiguration of mental resources, (3) perspective shifting, (4) balancing competing desires, needs, and life domains.
(Kashdan & Rottenberg 2010: 886)
10
DEFINITION OF [PF]personality trait: capability of adaptation to fluctuating environment (by reconfiguration of our mental resources and change in perspective)
NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH: • COGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY [CF]: readiness with which the
person’s concept system changes selectively in response to appropriate environmental stimuli (Scott 1962: 405).
• PHYSICAL FLEXIBILITY [PhF]: the scope of movement in a joint and length in muscles that cross the joints to produce motion.
BUT: [PF] is supported by [CF] and [CF] is supported by [PhF] (Masley et al. 2009)
11
DEFINITION OF [PF]personality trait: capability of adaptation to fluctuating environment (by reconfiguration of our mental resources and change in perspective)
NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH: • COGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY [CF]: readiness with which the
person’s concept system changes selectively in response to appropriate environmental stimuli (Scott 1962: 405).
• PHYSICAL FLEXIBILITY [PhF]: the scope of movement in a joint and length in muscles that cross the joints to produce motion.
BUT: [PF] is supported by [CF] and [CF] is supported by [PhF] (Masley et al. 2009)
THE ROLE OF [PF]• FLEXIBILITY
- performance enhancement (improvement in response shifts, adaptability to find alternative routes), - psychological health (ego-resiliency, switching between life domains and time perspectives), - well-being (openness in aceptance emotional experiences, engagement in difficult activities connected with important values),
• INFLEXIBILITY
- psychopathology (anxiety disorders, experiential avoidance, depression, emotion context insensitivity, ADHD, schizophrenia);
12
WHERE TO SEARCH FOR THE PROBLEM?
- RESISTANCE AND RIGIDITY OF ATTITUDES
- FOLK-PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCEPTS
14
WHERE TO SEARCH FOR THE PROBLEM?
- RESISTANCE AND RIGIDITY OF ATTITUDES
- FOLK-PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCEPTS
15
WHERE TO SEARCH FOR THE PROBLEM?
- RESISTANCE AND RIGIDITY OF ATTITUDES
- FOLK-PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCEPTS
16
DESIRE (Airaksinen)
• 'subjective state of mind', entails wanting, • unsatisfiable (is 'about distant possible worlds') - unlike
mere choices or needs, • exists in the 'architecture' of an agent’s individual
character: presupposes fantasy (but realistic) narratives, • different from detached empty wishes (which
pressupose unrealistic narratives), • personally resisted
18
RESISTANCE OF DESIREINTENTIONAL OBJECTS OF DESIRE
• are desirable not per se, but because we stick to them with our narrative about it,
• cannot give genuine reasons for action because they are strange (they can give us apparent reasons),
• leave an affective sediment after the desired goal is putatively archieved (e.g. regret) = result of unsatisfiability
'INERTIA OF DESIRE'19
RESISTANCE OF DESIREINTENTIONAL OBJECTS OF DESIRE
• are desirable not per se, but because we stick to them with our narrative about it,
• cannot give genuine reasons for action because they are strange (they can give us apparent reasons),
• leave an affective sediment after the desired goal is putatively archieved (e.g. regret) = result of unsatisfiability
'INERTIA OF DESIRE'20
NORMATIVE CONSTRAINT
how to cope with the resistance of desire? • controlling the personal wants without additional wanting • ABANDONEMENT OF DESIRES ('wearing them out’)
restoration of normal attitude towards our goals
/[PF] via reconfiguration of our mental resources and change in perspective/
21
NORMATIVE CONSTRAINT
how to cope with the resistance of desire? • controlling the personal wants without additional wanting • ABANDONEMENT OF DESIRES ('wearing them out’)
restoration of normal attitude towards our goals
/[PF] via reconfiguration of our mental resources and change in perspective/
22
FUTURE-DIRECTED INTENTION (Bratman)
• mental state of planning: pro-attitude with commitment (cf. future-directed decision (Ferrero 2006)),
• structured hierarchically (when enters complex planning structures; goals embed means),
• prompter of practical reasoning (about other intentions), • conduct controller because of its specific inertia or
stability
24
'STABILITY OR INERTIA' OF INTENTION
• POSITIVE ASPECTS - STABILITY: - pragmatic dimension of our psychology: future directed intention settles the goal until the time of action,
- 'automatic' control of future action: retention of an intention and its nonreconsideration is the 'default option' (Bratman 1987: 16-17)
• NEGATIVE ASPECT - INERTIA: - inertial actions and errors: when intentions are not reconsidered or abandoned on time (when new relevant information arrives)
25
'STABILITY OR INERTIA' OF INTENTION
• POSITIVE ASPECTS - STABILITY: - pragmatic dimension of our psychology: future directed intention settles the goal until the time of action,
- 'automatic' control of future action: retention of an intention and its nonreconsideration is the 'default option' (Bratman 1987: 16-17)
• NEGATIVE ASPECT - INERTIA: - inertial actions and errors: when intentions are not reconsidered or abandoned on time (when new relevant information arrives)
26
NORMATIVE CONSTRAINTS?reasonable stabillity*
- aiming to provide non-inertial stability of intentions and plans
'TWO-TIER APPROACH' TO NONREFLECTIVE (NON)RECONSIDERATION
• PRIMARY TIER: pragmatic habits favoring non-reconsideration of prior intentions ('defaultness' of intentions)
• ADVANCED TIER: rationality of (not)following the above habit in a particular case ("right or wrong to retain/reconsider my intention given the change in the circumstances of my agency?”)
* other norms governing intentions not considered here 27
NORMATIVE CONSTRAINTS?'reasonable stabillity'
nonreconsideration reconsideration
('defaultness') [PF]
abandoning intentions? (without reconsideration)
28
NORMATIVE CONSTRAINTS?'reasonable stabillity'
nonreconsideration reconsideration
('defaultness') [PF]
abandoning intentions? (without reconsideration)
29
NORMATIVE CONSTRAINTS?'reasonable stabillity'
nonreconsideration reconsideration
('defaultness') [PF]
abandoning intentions? (without reconsideration)
30
NORMATIVE CONSTRAINTS?'reasonable stabillity'
nonreconsideration reconsideration
('defaultness') [PF]
abandoning intentions? (without reconsideration)
31
34
http://rpseawright.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/reality.png
PLASTICITY OF PLANS (Kotarbiński)
• ability to adjust ourselves to unpredicted circumstances (different versions of events)
• standard of not containing in our plans anything that prevents changes in the means (or even in the goal) of planning ('switching from one track to another').
• planning should be adjusted to the degree of uncertainty about planning environment. (Kotarbiński 1983: 26)
abandoning our means or goals without wasting our plans
35
INTENTION at t0 to Φ at t2
36
at t1: retain reconsider abandon
reflectively nonreflectively reflectively nonreflectively
reasonable stability (Bratman)
x x
plasticity (Kotarbiński) x x x
[PF] via reconfiguration of our mental resources and change in perspective
INTENTION at t0 to Φ at t2
37
at t1: retain reconsider abandon
reflectively nonreflectively reflectively nonreflectively
reasonable stability (Bratman)
x x
plasticity (Kotarbiński) x x x
[PF] via reconfiguration of our mental resources and change in perspective
(IN)FLEXIBILITY OF AGENCY• INFLEXIBILITY: crucial phenomena of action reveal immanent
inertia, which is responsible for:
- increased susceptibility to practical errors, - excessive rigidity of attitude, - unnecessary conservatism (inertial intentions) or utopianism/romanticism (resistance of desire);
• FLEXIBILITY: these phenomena are subject to normative control which
- has deeper rationale in the context of our cognitive abilities, - restores overall effectiveness of (and fluency in) our actions, - is conceivable only in the context of rigidity (=interconnectedness of flexibility and inflexibility)
39
META-CONCLUSION
POSSIBILITY OF DEEPER MUTUAL SUPPORT BETWEEN ACTION THEORY (PHENOMENOLOGY OF
ACTION) AND PSYCHOLOGY
40
BIBLIOGRAPHY• Airaksinen, T. (2012). Desire and happiness. Homo Oeconomicus 29(3): 393–412. • Bonanno, G. A. et al (2004). The importance of being flexible: The ability to enhance and
suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychological Science 157: 482−487.
• Bratman, M.E. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. • Ferrero, L. (2006). Three ways of spilling ink tomorrow. In E. Baccarini & S. Prijic-Samarzija
(Eds.). Rationality in Belief and Action (pp. 95—127). Rijeka: Filozofski Facultet. • Gardner, F.L. & Moore, Z.E. (2007). The Psychology of Enhancing Human Performance.
Springer Publishing Comp. • Kashdan, T.B. & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of
health. Clinical Psychology Review 30: 865–878. • Kotarbiński, T. (1965). Praxiology: An Introduction to the Sciences of Efficient Action. Transl.
by O. Wojtasiewicz, Oxford: Pergamon Press, • ______(1983). The general concept of plan. Dialectics and Humanism 10(4): 15–31. • Masley, S. et al. (2009). Aerobic exercise enhances cognitive flexibility. Journal of Clinical
Psychology in Medical Settings 16(2): 186-193. • Scott, W.A. (1962) Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility. Sociometry 25(4): 405-414. • Thurston, B.J. & Runco, M.A. (2011). Flexibility In M.A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.),
Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 729-732). Academic Press.41
42
The (In)flexible Agency "DESIRE" WORKSHOP
ROME 31.10-01.11.2014
Piotr Makowski Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan
http://pmakowski.com/ email: [email protected]