View
20
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Real-time or full-precision CRS imaging using a cloud computing portal: multi-
offset GPR and SH-wave examples
Z. Heilmann*, H.P. Müller**, G. Satta* and G.P. Deidda***
*CRS4, Energy and Environment Sector
**ABE-geo, Burgdorf, Germany
***University of Cagliari, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Architecture
1
Outline
Part 1: Cloud computing portal
o Concept & Realization
o GPR example (Real-time imaging)
Part 2: CRS stack imaging
o from CMP to CRS stack
o 3x1 vs. 1x3 parameter search
o SH-wave data (Full-precision imaging)
Conclusions 2
5
EIAGRID Portal
Basic idea
1. Web-browser-based interface accessible from the field
2. Real-time processing using distant HPC resources
3. Remote collaboration and acquisition controlling
Features
6
EIAGRID Portal
Basic idea
1. Project, data and user management
2. Simplistic toolbox for data visualization and manipulation
3. Data-driven imaging method suited for parallel computing
Components
Multi-offset GPR data: ● Aim: monitoring of water content and water conductivity
● Target depth: 0 - 5 m
● Profile length: 55 m
Instrumentation: RAMAC/GPR CU II with MC4 +
4 unshielded 200 MHz antennas
Geometry: Number of sources: 546
Source spacing: 0.1m
Number of receivers: 28
Receiver spacing: 0.2 m
Maximum offset: 6 m 9
CMP gather at 10 m
Time domain imaging
Published in: Perroud, H., and Tygel, M., 2005, Velocity estimation by
the common-reflection-surface (CRS) method: Using ground-
penetrating radar: Geophysics, 70, 1343–1352.
Results GPR data
GPR data
Comparison with published results:
Figure (a) CRS stack section and (b) time migrated section overlain with the migration velocity model
obtained from stacking parameters after smoothing and regularization.. 20
Figure taken from Perroud and Tygel 2005. (a) Final stack and (b) RMS velocity sections obtained by
the classical NMO method; the black lines in (a) represent the limits of the CRS midpoint aperture for
the first-order (inner curves) and second-order (outer curves) parameter searches.
From CMP to CRS stacking:
Figure taken from Perroud and Tygel 2005. NMO velocity analysis for the CMP at position x = 10 m.
22
Conventional CMP-by-CMP velocity analysis:
𝑡𝐶𝑀𝑃2 ℎ = 𝑡0
2 +4ℎ2
𝑣𝑁𝑀𝑂2
CRS stacking operator:
Hyperbolic traveltime in CRS gather:
𝑡𝐶𝑅𝑆2 ∆𝑥𝑚, ℎ = 𝑡0 +
2 sin 𝛼
𝑣0∆𝑥𝑚
2
+2𝑡0 cos2 𝛼
𝑣0
∆𝑥𝑚2
𝑅𝑁+
ℎ2
𝑅𝑁𝐼𝑃,
𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ ∆𝑥𝑚 = 𝑥𝑚 − 𝑥0.
… in CMP gather:
𝑡𝐶𝑀𝑃2 ℎ = 𝑡0
2 +4ℎ2
𝑣𝑁𝑀𝑂2
𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑣𝑁𝑀𝑂2 =
2𝑣0𝑅𝑁𝐼𝑃
𝑡0 cos2 𝛼
Fig.: Mann et al. 2007
24
Stacking parameter search:
Pragmatic search: 3 x 1 parameter line search in specific
gathers (Mann et al. 1999) + Cloud = Real-time imaging
One step search:
1 x 3 parameter surface search in
prestack data (Garabito et al. 2001)
+ Cloud = High-precision imaging
Figs: Mann et al. 2007
Algorithm: For every sample we maximize Coh(𝛼𝑖, 𝑅𝑁𝐼𝑃𝑘 ,𝑅𝑁
𝑙 )
● Sta
cked Z
O-S
ectio
n
𝑹𝑵𝑰𝑷
𝑹𝑵
Object function: Semblance (T&K 94)
𝒕𝟎, 𝒙𝟎
28
Urban SH-wave data:
● Aim: aquiclude survey for site remediation
● Target depth: 0 - 15 m
● 2D line: length 92 m
Source: mini-vibrator, dS=0.5 m
Receiver: landstreamer with 47
geophones, dR=0.5 m
29
Some CMP gathers:
CMP 1171 CMP 1267 CMP 1069
Offset [dm] Offset [dm] Offset [dm]
Tim
e [m
s]
Tim
e [m
s]
Tim
e [m
s]
30
Stacking results:
CMP stack after CVS analysis (a) versus 3x1 parameter CRS stack (b)
a)
b)
+ higher S/N
- unresolved events
32
Shear wave data
Stacking results:
CMP stack after CVS analysis (a), 1x3 parameter search CRS stack (b)
a)
b)
+ higher S/N
+ improved resolution
Computational cost:
0 50 100
3x1 Parameter
2-Parameter
3-Parameter
submission-time[min] on 30 CPU
runtime [min] on30 CPUs
34
1x3 versus 3x1 parameter search
High precision CRS (a) versus real-time CRS stack section (b)
a)
b)
35
Shear wave data
1x3 versus 3x1 parameter search
NMO velocities calculated using 𝑅𝑁𝐼𝑃 and 𝛼: High precision CRS (a) versus
real-time CRS stack section (b)
a)
b)
38
Outlook: Depth migration
(a) PreSDM (b) PostSDM using Dix inversion of CVS velocity
a)
b)
Top of Molasse
VSP
39
Conclusions:
• Real-time CRS imaging can be applied to optimize crutial acquisition parameters directly in the field:
easier use of reflection methods in near-surface.
• Full-precision CRS imaging uses a spatial operator not only for stacking but also for velocity analysis:
higher resolution and more stable velocities in case of low fold, strong noise & lateral inhomogeneity.
• A cloud computing portal provides optimum computing power in a location independent way:
reduced hardware requirement facilitate the use of data driven methods in near-surface imaging.