27
ن الرحيم الرحم بسم الA Study on Genetic Variability, Interrelationships among some Agronomic Traits and Path Coefficient Analysis in Pearl Millet ؤلؤيلر في الدخن اللمسامل ايل معاحقلية وتحلت اللصفاط بعض ارتبان الوراثي، التباي دراسة اBy Omar Abdalla Bakhit Hassan M.Sc. presentation Supervisor Dr. El hag Hassan Abuelgasim 23 February 2010

Omar presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Omar presentation

بسم ال الرحمن الرحيم

A Study on Genetic Variability, Interrelationships among some Agronomic Traits and Path Coefficient Analysis in Pearl Millet

دراسة التباين الوراثي، ارتباط بعض الصفات الحقلية وتحليل معامل المسار في الدخن اللؤلؤي

By

Omar Abdalla Bakhit Hassan

M.Sc. presentation

Supervisor

Dr. El hag Hassan Abuelgasim

23 February 2010

Page 2: Omar presentation

INTRODUCTION

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.)R.Br) or "Dukhun", is a cereal crop belonging to section Panacea of the family Poaceae.

Pearl millet is a robust, diploid species (2n=14), cross-pollinated grass with immense genetic diversity.

The center of origin for pearl millet stretching from Western Sudan to Senegal.

Page 3: Omar presentation

It's planted across a wide range of It's environments around the world.

grown as a subsistence grain and forage crop for livestock. Also its

stalk can be used as building material or as fuel.

Pearl millet comes as the sixth among cereal crops in the world in terms of production, coming after wheat, rice, maize, barley and sorghum.

Page 4: Omar presentation

PEARL MILLET WORLD’S PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY:

The world total grown area, in 2006 was 36.297 million hectares.

produced 32.074 million metrics tones.

The world average grain yield was ranged from and 883.6 kg/ha for

the year 2006.

Page 5: Omar presentation

PEARL MILLET IN SUDAN:

Is a preferred food crop for the majority of the inhabitants of Western Sudan.

In terms of both area and production it ranks second after sorghum.

The crop is almost exclusively raised under rain-fed conditions with 97% of the total area in the country being raised under traditional farming conditions.

About 95% of the crop area is found in Western Sudan (Kordofan and Darfur states) mainly in the extensive sandy soil zone.

The annual average rainfall in the millet growing areas varies from 200 mm to 750 mm, falling during a short rainy season of 2 to 4 months.

Page 6: Omar presentation

PEARL MILLET IN SUDAN (Cont):

The annual average rainfall in the millet growing areas varies from 200 mm to 750 mm, falling during a short rainy season of 2 to 4 months.

The crop was grown on 2.256 million hectares producing 0.792 million metric tones in 2006 (FAO, 2007).

The average yield of grain per hectare in Sudan was 351 Kg/ha, in 2006.

Page 7: Omar presentation

CONSTRAINTS OF PRODUCTION:

The low and unreliable rainfall comes first since 99% of the area cultivated depends on rainfall.

The poor genetic stocks cultivated by farmers

Pests and diseases cause serious damage to the crop.

The poor cultural practices followed by farmers.

Lack of agricultural services and inputs.

Lack of financing and extension services.

Page 8: Omar presentation

OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY:

To obtain information on genetic variability of agronomic traits in local and exotic pearl millet genotypes.

To study the genotypic and phenotypic interrelationships between the different pairs of various agronomic traits.

To study the path coefficient analysis of some important agronomic traits and their direct and indirect effects on grain yield.

Page 9: Omar presentation

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY:[1] Materials:

Sites: El shegaila, Beinu and El jekka in rain fed areas (North Kordofan state), and Shambat was planted under irrigation area in (Khartoum state).

Genotypes: The 18 local and exotic genotypes were tested. Design: Randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four

replications was used.

The experimental plot: consisted of 4 rows of 5 meter length, with a spacing of 75 cm between rows and 50 cm between plant holes. Six to eight seeds were sown in each hole.

Recommended agronomic practices were used.

Page 10: Omar presentation

Table 1: The pearl millet genotypes used in the study of genetic

variability and interrelationships among different traits No Genotype Origin Note source

1 Ashana ICRISAT Released ARC-Sudan

2 Ugandi Uganda Released ARC-Sudan

3 Dembe (Um shegaira) Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan

4 Aish burno West Africa Collection ARC-Sudan

5 Um gerfa Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan

6 GB 87-35 ICRISAT promising ARC-Sudan

7 Bauda Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan

8 Demde yellow Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan

9 Dahabaya ARC promising ARC-Sudan

10 Local Kordofani Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan

11 Sudan II ICRISAT promising ARC-Sudan

12 HSD 2254 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan

13 HSD 2260 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan

14 HSD 2261 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan

15 HSD 2279 Darfur Collection ARC-Sudan

16 HSD 2348 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan

17 HSD 2380 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan

18 HSD 2416 Kordofan Collection ARC-Sudan

Page 11: Omar presentation

[2] Data collection:

All measurements were taken from the two central rows in each plot. The 17 agronomic traits were measured which includes : plant population/ hectare. Days to 50% to flowering. days to 95% maturity. plant height (cm). stem diameter (cm). productive tillers/ plant. panicle length (cm). panicle width (cm).

Page 12: Omar presentation

[2] Data collection (Cont):

number of panicles/ plot. dry panicles/ plot. number of seeds/ panicle. 1000 seed weight (g). grain yield/ plant (g). grain yield/ hectare (kg). biological yield/ hectare (kg). threshing percentage. harvest index.

Page 13: Omar presentation

[3] Statistical analysis :

Single site and combined analysis – MSTAT-C software. Mean separation (LSD 0.05). Phenotypic, genotypic and variation. Heritability (Hanson et al. 1956). Phenotypic coefficients of variation (Burton 1952). Genotypic coefficients of variation (Burton 1952). Genetic advance and percentage genetic advance (Johnson et al.

1955). Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients (Miller et al. ,

1958) . Path coefficients analysis (Dewey and Lu ,1959) .

Page 14: Omar presentation

RESULTS

Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences among locations for all traits.

Highly significant differences among genotypes were observed for most of the traits studied.

Significant differences for genotypes x locations interactions were detected for most of the traits.

Page 15: Omar presentation

Table 2: Overall means average for the different characters in 18 pearl millet genotypes at four sites in 2005/06 season.

Site Character El shegaila Beinu El jekka Shambat

Grand mean

Plant population/ha 27842 36408 16008 36209 29130 50% days to flowering 69.98 59.10 75.06 66.07 68.01 95% days to maturity 99.48 89.29 105.07 96.61 97.79 Plant height (cm) 164.75 151.208 142.63 180.83 159.84 Stem diameter (cm) 1.039 0.878 0.992 1.18 1.03 Productive tillers/plant 1.39 1.625 1.751 3.67 2.18 Panicle length (cm) 23.19 24.590 24.849 22.16 24.26 Panicle width (cm) 2.56 2.400 2.403 2.30 2.42 No of panicles/ plot 50.58 66.111 30.910 168.04 79.00 Dry panicles wt. (kg)/plot 1.04 1.208 0.971 3.86 1.801 No of seeds/panicle 1530 1234 1312 1450 1381 1000 seeds weight (g) 8.69 7.07 7.77 8.09 7.93 Grain yield (g)/plant 20.40 14.454 30.09 54.89 30.12 Grain yield (kg)/ha 541.198 529.644 450.554 1546.280 766.919 Biological yield (kg)/ha 3303.174 4223.833 1942.626 8478.773 4486.978 Threshing % 54.76 48.02 55.09 46.12 51.02 Harvest index % 16.21 12.790 23.60 18.32 17.77

Page 16: Omar presentation

Table 3: Means for different characters of 18 pearl millet genotypes evaluated at four sites in 2005/06 season.

Genotype PlantPopulation/ha

Days to50% flowering

Days to95%maturity

PlantHeight(cm)

StemDiameter(cm)

ProductiveTillers/plant

Ashana 26934 59.19 86.44 152.92 1.04 2.30

Ugandi 26827 58.25 85.25 156.77 1.17 2.57

Dembe (Um shegaira) 29663 77.31 107.25 163.25 1.12 2.01

Aish burno 28996 71.06 101.50 166.76 0.99 1.98

Um gerfa 27717 73.13 104.12 146.84 0.96 1.88

GB 87-35 28880 59.44 86.81 150.93 1.00 2.17

Bauda 28676 62.50 92.38 149.02 0.91 2.33

Demde yellow 30880 63.25 93.19 155.12 1.08 2.63

Dahabaya 29876 67.19 98.44 163.61 1.01 2.16

Local Kordofani 31049 72.75 103.63 160.37 0.99 2.35

Sudan II 27823 58.81 86.38 171.55 1.00 2.26

HSD 2254 30933 74.00 105.06 180.84 1.00 2.17

HSD 2260 27939 72.44 102.56 173.66 1.11 2.20

HSD 2261 29625 71.44 102.06 167.63 1.07 1.97

HSD 2279 28160 68.94 99.38 148.88 0.96 2.24

HSD 2348 31885 69.06 99.31 153.69 1.03 2.00

HSD 2380 28046 70.81 101.00 155.85 1.03 2.08

HSD 2416 30436 75.00 105.44 159.67 1.03 2.03

Mean 29130 68.01 97.79 159.84 1.03 2.18

SE ± 406** 0.636** 0.665** 1.84** 0.015** 0.055**

C.V% 15.68 9.81 7.84 10.63 11.28 19.71

LSD (0.05) 107.54 4.61 5.34 11.78 0.08 0.31

Page 17: Omar presentation

Table 3: Continued ….Genotype Panicle

Length(cm)

PanicleWidth(cm)

No ofPanicle/plot

Dry panicleWeight(kg)/plot

No of seeds/panicle

1000-seedWt.(g)

Ashana 24.20 2.62 75.50 1.567 1299 8.25

Ugandi 25.41 2.44 87.44 1.563 1213 8.59

Dembe (Um shegaira) 23.80 2.59 73.19 1.830 1498 7.16

Aish burno 24.07 2.02 70.69 1.325 996 7.84

Um gerfa 24.60 2.43 63.44 1.656 1430 7.93

GB 87-35 23.68 2.41 78.44 1.580 1265 8.44

Bauda 25.28 2.32 85.47 1.762 1195 7.71

Demde yellow 24.33 2.53 97.25 2.266 1519 8.51

Dahabaya 25.86 2.41 83.94 2.325 1493 8.07

Local Kordofani 23.40 2.49 90.81 1.842 1507 7.91

Sudan II 30.66 2.13 77.63 1.928 1603 7.80

HSD 2254 23.24 1.91 81.56 1.877 1183 8.17

HSD 2260 23.87 2.44 80.67 1.689 1560 7.55

HSD 2261 23.43 2.44 75.88 1.769 1201 8.32

HSD 2279 21.08 2.54 78.25 2.148 1499 7.25

HSD 2348 23.37 2.44 78.75 1.667 1343 7.74

HSD 2380 23.41 2.68 69.06 1.631 1478 7.97

HSD 2416 23.05 2.66 74.56 1.992 1579 7.57

Mean 24.26 2.42 79.00 1.801 1381 7.93

SE ± 0.265** 0.030** 1.519** 0.039** 26** 0.104**

C.V% 9.98 11.87 20.57 17.55 15.80 11.17

LSD (0.05) 1.68 0.19 11.76 0.22 151.30 0.61

Page 18: Omar presentation

Table 3: Continued ….

Genotype GrainYield (g)/plant

GrainYield(kg)/ha

BiologicalYield(kg)/ha

Threshing%

HarvestIndex %

Ashana 34.75 835.347 3528.008 57.86 22.05

Ugandi 33.48 782.027 35902.212 58.80 20.44

Dembe (Um shegaira) 29.92 746.480 4140.748 51.04 17.15

Aish burno 23.71 568.747 3847.928 52.34 15.84

Um gerfa 25.74 617.624 3385.82 47.10 16.96

GB 87-35 31.96 768.697 3807.938 58.30 19.58

Bauda 33.40 764.254 3528.008 54.67 19.05

Demde yellow 34.71 958.872 4179.401 53.58 18.44

Dahabaya 36.45 710.045 4345.58 49.50 18.45

Local Kordofani 26.24 694.938 4381.128 45.84 15.40

Sudan II 39.35 905.552 3910.135 55.78 24.30

HSD 2254 25.98 686.051 4336.695 41.98 15.05

HSD 2260 26.84 662.057 4185.620 44.46 15.69

HSD 2261 28.69 692.272 4007.888 48.33 15.53

HSD 2279 28.83 729.596 4221.168 45.83 17.78

HSD 2348 23.01 640.729 4025.660 51.40 15.10

HSD 2380 25.83 614.958 4104.64 48.52 14.89

HSD 2416 32.97 854.009 4274.488 53.37 18.15

Mean 30.12 735.816 4012.330 51.04 17.77

SE ± 1.07** 14.667** 75.333* 0.860** 0.477**

C.V% 23.65 21.47 20.05 12.12 21.81

LSD (0.05) 4.93 3.27 18.79 4.24 2.53

Page 19: Omar presentation

Table 4: Means for grain yield (kg)/ha of 18 pearl millet genotypes evaluated in 2005/06 season.

site

Genotype El shegaila Beinu El jekka Shambat Grand mean

Ashana 529.645 833.125 461.180 1762.226 835.347 Ugandi 457.663 840.679 412.340 1557.833 782.027 Dembe (Um shegaira) 507.429 434.558 520.759 1625.370 746.480 Aish burno 494.099 399.900 380.014 1051.293 568.747 Um gerfa 531.423 419.451 359.910 1239.69 617.624 GB 87-35 532.310 780.248 506.667 1162.376 768.697 Bauda 510.982 432.781 391.012 1816.435 764.254 Demde yellow 481.656 444.332 484.322 2090.144 958.872 Dahabaya 774.916 439.890 321.696 2240.329 710.045 Local Kordofani 668.276 491.433 321.692 1412.98 694.938 Sudan II 572.300 684.272 526.978 1885.751 905.552 HSD 2254 455.886 545.640 446.998 1356.106 686.051 HSD 2260 622.067 566.081 402.566 1151.712 662.057 HSD 2261 505.650 437.225 427.449 1479.63 692.272 HSD 2279 614.069 503.874 399.900 1498.292 729.596 HSD 2348 501.208 423.004 299.481 1359.660 640.729 HSD 2380 486.988 333.250 418.562 1331.223 614.958 HSD 2416 558.083 532.310 490.544 1812.880 854.009 Mean 541.198 529.644 431.002 1546.280 735.816 SE ± 30.666 26.400 31.33 53.333 14.667 C.V% 28.91 27.65 38.31 19.47 21.47 LSD (0.05) 4.12 3.54 3.87 7.18 3.27

Page 20: Omar presentation

Table 5: Estimate of phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV %), Genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV %), heritability (h²), expected genetic advance from section (GA) and genetic advance as percentage of mean (GA %) for agronomic traits in 18 pearl millet genotypes tested at four sites in 2005/06 season.

CHARACTER (PCV %) (GCV %) (h²) (GA) (GA %)

Plant population/ha 17.21 6.62 0.147 1.71 5.24 50% days to flowering 19.32 16.64 0.742 20.03 29.53 95% days to maturity 15.31 13.15 0.738 22.89 23.26 Plant height (cm) 14.97 10.53 0.495 24.40 15.26 Stem diameter (cm) 15.19 10.17 0.448 0.145 14.02 Productive tillers/ plant 25.09 15.53 0.383 0.45 19.79 Panicle length (cm) 17.36 14.21 0.67 5.81 23.95 Panicle width (cm) 20.47 16.68 0.66 0.68 27.99 No of panicles/ plot 28.44 19.64 0.48 23.04 27.93 Dry panicles wt. (kg)/plot 33.52 28.56 0.73 0.89 50.13 No of seeds/panicle 28.49 23.71 0.69 561.73 40.65 1000 seeds weight (g) 14.33 8.97 0.39 0.92 11.57 Grain yield (g)/plant 35.03 25.83 0.54 11.8 39.24 Grain yield kg/ha 38.07 31.44 0.68 0.39 53.47 Biological yield kg ha 23.71 12.59 0.28 0.624 13.78 Threshing % 24.57 21.33 0.75 19.12 38.13 Harvest index % 37.89 30.98 0.67 8.73 52.20

Page 21: Omar presentation

Table 6: Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients between different pairs of traits in 18 pearl millet genotypes evaluated at four sites in 2005/06 season.

TRAIT DTF DTM PLH SD NPTP PNL PNW NP DPWT NSP TGWT GYP GYH BYH THP HI DTF 1.006** 0.366 -0.005 -0.69** -0.59** 0.061 -0.426 0.137 0.173 -0.590** -0.573* -0.573* 0.723** -0.89** 0.946**

DTM 0.972** 0.336 -0.078 -0.65** -0.60** 0.045 -0.374 0.173 0.176 -0.527* -0.570* -0.571* 0.74** -0.93** -0.95**

PLH 0.193 0.186 0.258 -0.097 0.233 -0.72** 0.036 0.053 -0.064 -0.084 -0.159 -0.107 0.782** -0.305 -0.199

SD 0.018 -0.059 0.313 0.433 -0.085 0.367 0.416 -0.147 0.116 0.316 0.102 0.177 0.358 0.189 -0.038

NPTP -0.437 0.413 0.060 0.217 0.179 0.065 0.941** 0.188 0.084 0.599** 0.468* 0.614** -0.038 0.399 0.532*

PNL 0.421 -0.429 0.197 0.028 0.093 -0.403 0.113 0.119 0.204 0.075 0.593** 0.522* -0.344 0.515* 0.721**

PNW 0.003 0.006 0.296 0.320 0.103 0.207 -0.014 0. 112 0.564* -0.220 0.226 0.187 -0.087 0.037 -0.047

NP 0.324 0.285 0.157 0.243 0.839** 0.121 0.053 0.308 0.076 0.459 0.392 0.517* 0.133 0.161 0.291

DPWT 0.061 0.097 0.154 0.050 0.176 0.106 0.161 0.295 0.663** -0.318 0.675** 0.574* 0.437 -0.355 -0.025

NSP 0.079 0.072 0.020 0.086 0.027 0.188 0.455 0.036 0.520* -0.445 0.457 0.383 0.512* -0.234 -0.017

TGWT 0.317 0.303 0.098 0.221 0.324 0.137 0.000 0.286 -0.019 0.233 0.036 0.245 -0.507 0.429 0.236

GYP 0.381 0.382 0.017 0.021 0.321 0.352 0.202 0.210 0.596** 0.358 0.093 0.978** -0.197 0.455 0.720**

GYH -0.439 0.425 0.006 0.133 0.375 0.358 0.193 0.407 0.642** 0.368 0.251 0.832** -0.231 0.522* 0.719**

BYH 0.265 0.297 0.489* 0.229 0.139 0.106 0.113 0.255 0.396 0.309 0.023 0.042 0.104 -0.83** -0.68**

THP 0.655** -0.69** -0.157 0.127 0.192 0.385 0.016 0.081 0.291 0.204 0.252 0.363 0.423 0.346 0.893**

HI 0.665** 0.661** 0.117 0.088 0.289 0.491* 0.027 0.166 0.064 0.035 0.158 0.620** 0.632** 0.286 0.736**

The genotypic correlations are the upper triangle and phenotypic correlations in the lower one. *, ** and ns are the level of significance at 5%, 1% and non-significant, respectively. D.f = n-2=16, r 5%= 0.468, r 1% = 0.590 Legend: DTF Days to flowering PNL Panicle length (cm) TSWT 1000 grains weight (g) HI Harvest index DTM Days to maturity PNW Panicle width (cm) GYP Grain yield per plant (g) THP Threshing% PLH Plant height (cm) NP Number of panicle/ plot GYH Grain yield (kg/ ha) SD Stem diameter DPW Dry panicle weight kg/ plot BYH Biological yield (kg/ ha) NSP Number of seeds/ panicle NPTP Productive tillers/ plant

Page 22: Omar presentation

Table 7: Path coefficient analysis of the direct and indirect effect of five yield components and their genotypic correlation coefficients with grain yield/ plant in pearl millet genotypes at four sites in 2005/06 season.

Effect on grain yield plant (g) Indirect effect via

Character Direct effect

Productive tillers/plant

Panicle length (cm)

Panicle width (cm)

Number of seeds/ panicle

1000 seeds

weight (g)

Genotypic correlation with grain

yield/ plant

Productive tillers/plant

0.286 0.176 0.065 0.081 0.142 0.464

Panicle length (cm)

0.510 0.176 -0.403 0.195 0.074 0.593

Panicle width (cm) 0.223 0.065 -0.403 0.537 -0.221 0.226 Number of seeds/panicle

0.119 0.081 0.195 0.537 -0.461 0.457

1000 seeds weight (g)

-0.022 0.599 0.074 -0.221 -0.461 0.036

Residual 0.664

Page 23: Omar presentation

The improved varieties generally showed good yield performance than the local ones for most of the traits studied.

The performance of the genotypes was greater under irrigated clay soil conditions (Shambat site).

The phenotypic coefficients of variation were higher than the genotypic coefficients of variation for all the traits studied.

CONCULSIONS

Page 24: Omar presentation

Grain yield/ plant and harvest index showed high values for both genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation, this indicates the importance of these traits in selection for grain yield improvement.

Very high to moderate heritability estimates were observed for most of the agronomic traits studied.

High Heritability coupled with high genetic advance as percentage of mean were recorded for Grain yield/ hectare, grain yield/plant, harvest index and dry panicle weight/ plot. These traits can be useful as selection criteria for yield improvement.

Page 25: Omar presentation

The study revealed that the genotypic correlation coefficients were generally higher than the corresponding phenotypic ones. This indicates the presence of genetic variability among genotypes for the agronomic traits studied.

Page 26: Omar presentation

The results revealed that grain yield/ plant may be the best indicator in selection for grain yield improvement, as well as harvest index, dry panicles weight/ plot, panicle length, number of panicles/ plot and productive tillers/ plant.

Path coefficient analysis revealed that, among yield components, panicle length had the highest direct effect on grain yield /plant, followed by productive tillers/ plant and panicle width.

Page 27: Omar presentation

CONTACT: [email protected].

Mobile Phone: 0915085680