35
How bad science gets good legs: myths, misperceptions and the media Cami Ryan , B.Comm , Ph.D. Canola Council of Canada Convention San Antonio, Texas February, 2014

How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Canola Council of Canada Convention San Antonio, Texas February 2014

Citation preview

Page 1: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

How bad science

gets

good legs: myths, misperceptions

and the media

Cami Ryan, B.Comm, Ph.D.Canola Council of Canada Convention

San Antonio, Texas

February, 2014

Page 2: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

People like stories and are

storytellers…

Important part of our social fabric

We like metaphors

We like symbols

Page 3: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Cami & canola

Page 4: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Photos courtesy: Wilf Keller

Page 5: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

QUESTIONRESEARCH

HYPOTHESIZE

PREPARE

EXPERIMENTCOLLECT DATA

CONCLUDE

Page 6: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Buying Behaviour…

Page 7: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Why go backwards when…

Rasmussen 1962

Page 8: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Michael Specter, journalist and author

“We have never

lived in a time when

we’ve needed

science so badly…”

Page 9: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Why do

people BELIEVE

what they

BELIEVE?

?

?

??

?

??

?

??

??

Page 10: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

FiltersFilters

GMOs = BAD

INFORMATION

Page 11: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Dog noses or space aliens?

HUMAN COGNITIVE HABITS

Page 12: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Those with GMO axes to grind…

HUMAN COGNITIVE HABITS

They ‘get’ it, they leverage it

Page 13: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Misplaced

perceptionsof who

the EXPERTS

really are…an

Agri-Intellectual

Page 14: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

The Dunning-Kruger Effect (1999)

less knowledgeable

moreknowledgeable

Unskilled and unaware of it!

Page 15: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Celebrity influence

Page 16: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Those with GMO axes to grind…

Perceptions about EXPERTISE

They ‘get’ it, they leverage it

Page 17: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Social Media ->

‘just in time’ users

72% use mobile technology (Pew

Institute 2013)

Social networks

Social media platforms

Rise of the ‘citizen journalist’ (Gant 2007)

Page 18: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Adult use of social networking sites

and Twitter (2005 to 2013)

So

urc

e:

Pe

w In

stitu

te 2

013

Page 19: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Social networking site use by age

group (2005-2013) (Pew Institute 2013)

So

urc

e:

Pe

w In

stitu

te 2

013

Page 20: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

From Activism to “Clicktivism”

Political engagement has

changed

Matter of clicking a few links

‘Lazy’ Activism

Avoid ‘drastic action’

Maybe less commitment to a

cause

Small donors can now

engage

Every little bit adds up!

Sources: White, M. (2010); Sunstein 2001

Page 21: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Those with GMO axes to grind…

SOCIAL MEDIA &

Personal NETWORKS

They ‘get’ it, they leverage it

Page 22: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Public Perceptions of

Science

‘science-industrial complex’ & private good

(Maseele 2009)

Traditional science communication model

One-way

Top-down and driven by private interests

Paternalistic

Increase public acceptance?

Raise awareness

Educate

Enhance scientific literacy

Old models

no longer work!

Ryan, C. 2014

Page 23: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

“An informed citizenry is necessary in the

formulation of public policy.”Jon Miller (2007)

Page 24: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Those with GMO axes to grind…

PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE

They ‘get’ it, they leverage it

Page 25: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Personal networks

Human cognitive

habits

Perceptionsof ExpertisePerceptions

of Science

What the…?!

INFORMATION

Page 26: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Scientific Research

Good Poor

PEER REVIEW

NO YES YES NO

PR

Campaign

Replication

MAKES GREAT

HEADLINES!“Standing on the

Shoulder of Giants”

Media Headlines???

NOT SO MUCH…

Page 27: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Scientific consensus:

"the judgment arrived at

by most of those concerned"

Miriam Webster Dictionary

Page 28: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Science -> ‘silent’?

Industry -> passive?

Public sector:

Scientists have been

“…slow to move beyond traditional forms of

communication…” (Ryan

and Doerksen 2013)

No incentives/rewards

(Braxton and Del Favero

2002; Iverson et al 2003)

Industry:

Old models?

Page 29: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

“…more than 500 activistorganizations are SPENDING

in excess of

$2.5 billion per year engaging in food-related campaigns.”

J.Byrne 2011

Page 30: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

New COMPETITIVE landscape for

industry & knowledge producers

New set of stakeholders…

…that play by a

whole new set of market rules!

Page 31: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

What’s the tipping point?

Will there be a tipping point?

Likely never win the hearts and minds of everyone

Understanding public perceptions of GE and GMOs:

Qualitative differences between academic studies &

media polls

Media can shape opinion

Studies -> “wildly variable results” (Lusk 2011)

Opinion on GE or GMOs depends a great deal on how you

ask the question (Hallman et al 2013)

PUBLIC OPINION

Page 32: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Movement in the media?

GRIST’s series on Panic-free

GMOs

Daily Meal series

Fraley’s article in HuffPo

Novella’s article in Mother

Jones

Page 33: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Some strategies?

Stories by influential others

Mark Lynas, Julee K – Sleuth4Health, Fourat Junabi

Sarah Schultz: nurse, farmer and mommy blogger

Anchor new symbols around ag and food and science

Meaningful, appeals to values

Transform facts / info ->

Meaningful, appeals to values

“sense-making” and “social representation”- Marcu et al (2014) -

Page 34: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

Lots of ‘good news’ out there…

34

Photo: J. Kamiya-Rose

Page 35: How Bad Science gets Good Legs: myths, mis-perceptions & the media

BLOG: doccamiryan.wordpress.com

@DocCamiRyan

Cami Ryan on science, tech & ag

HOW BAD SCIENCE GETS GOOD LEGS

Cami Ryan, B.Comm., Ph.D.

College of Agriculture and Bioresources

University of Saskatchewan