41
Jennifer Briselli @jbriselli A Design Strategy for Science Communication

ComSciCon Slides

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presented at ComSciCon, June 12th 2014. Panel: "Communicating Complexity and Controversy" More info here: http://repository.cmu.edu/theses/50/ And cards here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50147442/Thesis/method%20cards.pdf

Citation preview

Page 1: ComSciCon Slides

Jennifer Briselli @jbriselli

A Design Strategy for Science Communication

Page 2: ComSciCon Slides

the more things change…

Page 3: ComSciCon Slides
Page 4: ComSciCon Slides
Page 5: ComSciCon Slides
Page 6: ComSciCon Slides
Page 7: ComSciCon Slides

the more they stay the same.

the more things change…

Page 8: ComSciCon Slides

human beings are still human.

Page 9: ComSciCon Slides

“”The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.

Isaac Asimov

Page 10: ComSciCon Slides
Page 11: ComSciCon Slides

prove scientific consensus, out-reason them all!

more facts! better education! science literacy!

let’s just ignore them… maybe they’ll disappear.

so, the problem with science communication must be…

people are in denial

people are misinformed

people are irrational

the problem is…

Page 12: ComSciCon Slides

that’s not how it works.

Page 13: ComSciCon Slides

Denial?

Page 14: ComSciCon Slides

http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/11/15/why-climate-deniers-have-no-credibility-science-one-pie-chart

Page 15: ComSciCon Slides

24 reject global warming

Page 16: ComSciCon Slides
Page 17: ComSciCon Slides
Page 18: ComSciCon Slides

hierarchical

egalitarian

communitarianindividualist

gun control

HPV vaccine

compulsory health measures

evolution

climate change

nuclear power

abortion

Page 19: ComSciCon Slides

Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus

Source: Kahan, Dan M., Jenkins-Smith, Hank and Braman, Donald, Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus (February 7, 2010). Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 14, pp. 147-74, 2011

Fictitious “Experts”

&Two versions

of each expert’s article

Page 20: ComSciCon Slides

“Is this a knowledgeable and credible expert on…”

respondents who agree the author is an expert

Page 21: ComSciCon Slides

Denial?People generally trust science; but our perceptions of scientific expertise and policy implications are colored by our values.

Page 22: ComSciCon Slides

Misinformation?

Page 23: ComSciCon Slides

“How much risk do you think climate change poses?”

perceived risk

science literacy

egalitarian communitarian

hierarchical individualist

Prediction:better informed

more agreementwith consensus

Page 24: ComSciCon Slides

“How much risk do you think climate change poses?”

perceived risk

science literacy

egalitarian communitarian

hierarchical individualist

Result: for some, better educated

more polarized views opposing consensus

Page 25: ComSciCon Slides

Misinformation?

Overcoming a knowledge deficit or debunking misinformation is like speaking slower and louder, but it won’t necessarily change attitudes.

Page 26: ComSciCon Slides

Irrational?

Page 27: ComSciCon Slides

“All that stuff I was taught about evolution and embryology and the big bang theory, all that is lies straight from the pit of Hell.”Rep. Paul Broun R-GA & member the House Science Committee

Page 28: ComSciCon Slides

maybe this is a rhetorical design problem.

Page 29: ComSciCon Slides
Page 30: ComSciCon Slides

“”Everyone designs who devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones.

Herbert Simon

Page 31: ComSciCon Slides
Page 32: ComSciCon Slides
Page 33: ComSciCon Slides
Page 34: ComSciCon Slides
Page 35: ComSciCon Slides

How do you design for people who don’t already agree with you?

Page 36: ComSciCon Slides
Page 37: ComSciCon Slides

“”Where ever there is design, there is rhetoric.

Kenneth Burke

Page 38: ComSciCon Slides

design

human-centered

Page 39: ComSciCon Slides
Page 40: ComSciCon Slides
Page 41: ComSciCon Slides

To be continued…