Upload
karim-hamza
View
238
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA & NETWORK GOVERNANCE ON STATE STABILITY IN TIMES OF TURBULENCE EGYPT AFTER THE 2011 REVOLUTION
Citation preview
THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA & NETWORK GOVERNANCE ON STATE STABILITY IN TIMES
OF TURBULENCE
EGYPT AFTER THE 2011 REVOLUTION
Faculteit Economische, Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen en Solvay Business School
Vakgroep Politieke Wetenschappen
By
Karim Hamza
Egyptian Revolution 2011
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 2
During the revolution it appeared that social media as well as network governance played an important steering role as instruments that can impact state
stability, but they were not used adequately.
Problem Definition
• There is a growing attention toward political analysis models that can:
– Assess state governance situation.
– Consider non-state actors influence
– Consider other non-western forms of organisation, rule-making and conflict resolution (OECD, 2008).
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 3
Main Objectives
• Develop a model to describe the state governance situation with respect to state stability in times of turbulence
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 4
Contribution of the Study
Circle of State Stability Model (CSS)
Circle of State Stability Model – Why?
• The proposed model represents an improvement of existing models because it is:
– Simpler and easier for policy-makers to understand.
– Covers the macro level.
– Tailored for different state conditions.
– Functions as a general conceptual framework.
– Other models can be embedded inside it.
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 6
Circle of State Stability Model – What ?
• The model was designed to represent the impact of network governance on state stability in a specific state or country based on the following assumptions.
1. The main types of governance structure in the country: hierarchy and network.
2. State instability appears due to four main categories of instability conditions: confrontation, dictatorship, anarchy and failed state (P.77-79 and P.87).
3. State stability can be achieved if the state governance structure can achieve a reasonable balance between legal, democratic and economic values (P.44-47).
• CSS is designed as a conceptual model to help describe and document Egypt’s political situation after the 2011 revolution.
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 7
Governance Analysis Framework (GAF)
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 8
Phase / Component
Phase I Scope Map
Phase II Stakeholder Map
Phase III Process Map
Phase IV Governance Map
Objective Describe the main streams: • Problem Stream • Solution Stream • Political Stream
Describe who are the main actors and their relation with each other inside the governance model. • Citizen Power • Executive Authority • Judicial Authority • Legislative Authority • Non-state Political
Power
Identify policy networks collations and their usage of social media. • Identify Control level of
main actors on social media.
• Identify Confrontation level on social media.
Describe the progress (or not) of the state transformation from transition state toward a state stability.
Based on Multiple Stream Model, (Kingdom, Porter, 1984/1995)
Policy Network Analysis [PNA], (Rhodes, 1995)
Advocacy Coalition Framework [ACF], (Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith, 1999) and Social media
Circle of State Stability
Case Study Analysis
• Different drivers influence state stability.
• Focus on the impact of social media on state stability by considering :
– Control over social media
and
– Confrontation over social media.
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 9
Case Study Analysis
Egyptian Constitutional Referendum 2011
February 2011 - March 2011
• Result
– Proponents (YES): 77.27%
(Brotherhood, Salafis movement, Old Regime supporters)
– Opponents (NO): 22.73%
(Liberal , Kefaya, 6th April, Baradei, Amr Mousa, Christians)
Fig. 9 P.125
Egyptian Parliamentary 2012 elections
October 2011 – March 2012
• Result – Islamic Ideology Parties
(Al Horreya Wel Adala, Al-Nour)
Aprox. 70%
– Liberal Ideology Parties (Egyptian Bloc)
Aprox. 15%
– New Revolutionary Parties (Revolution Continues Alliance)
Aprox. 1.38%
P. 145, 147, Fig 5 P. 151
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 10
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 11
High
Hiera
rchy
High
Network
Anarchy S
tate
Dictato
rship
State
Network Governance control level
Hie
rarc
hy
Go
vern
ance
Co
ntr
ol l
eve
l
Tendency to State Control
Circle of State Stability
Tendency to Non-State Control
Tendency to Revolution
Tendency to State Failure
Circle of State Stability
Low Netw
ork &
Hierarchy No Control
Extreme State Control
State Control against Policy
Network ControlHigh
Network &
Hierarchy
Extreme Network control
Confrontation State
Failed State
EGYPT2
EGYPT3
EGYPT1
Egypt during the 2011 RevolutionJan’11- March’11
Egypt after the 2011 RevolutionMarch’11-Dec’12
Egypt before 2011 Revolution
Confrontation level with Network
Confrontation level with Hierarchy
Governance transformation in Egypt after 2011 revolution
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 12
High
Hiera
rchy
High
Network
Anarchy S
tate
Dictato
rship
State
Network Governance control level
Hie
rarc
hy
Go
vern
ance
Co
ntr
ol l
eve
l
Tendency to State Control
Circle of State Stability
Tendency to Non-State Control
Tendency to Revolution
Tendency to State Failure
Low Netw
ork &
Hierarchy No Control
Absolute State Control
State Control against Policy
Network ControlHigh
Network &
Hierarchy
Absolute Policy Network control
Confrontation State
Failed State
EGYPT
EGYPT
EGYPT
EGYPT
2011 RevolutionJan’11- March’11
Constitution ReferendumFebruary’11-April’11
Parliamentary Elections October’11-March’12
Presidential Elections April’12 - June’12
Circle of State Stability Confrontation level
with Network
Confrontation level with Hierarchy
Egypt ideal Positions on the Circle of State Stability Model
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 13
High
Hiera
rchy
High
Network
Anarchy S
tate
Dictato
rship
State
Network Governance control level
Hie
rarc
hy
Go
vern
ance
Co
ntr
ol l
eve
l
Tendency to State Control
Circle of State Stability
Tendency to Non-State Control
Tendency to Revolution
Tendency to State Failure
Low Netw
ork &
Hierarchy No Control
Absolute State Control
State Control against Policy
Network ControlHigh
Network &
Hierarchy
Absolute Policy Network control
Confrontation State
Failed State
EGYPT
EGYPT
EGYPT
EGYPT
2011 RevolutionJan’11- March’11
Constitution ReferendumFebruary’11-April’11
Dissolving the ParliamentJune’12
Presidential Elections April’12 - June’12
Circle of State Stability ModelConfrontation level
with Network
Confrontation level with Hierarchy
EGYPTParliamentary Elections October’11-March’12
EGYPT
Constitution Reformation March’12-November’12
EGYPT
scenario A: networks confrontation
scenario B: State control
Egypt’s Actual Progress on CSS since 2011
Conclusion
• The role of social media in Egypt after the 2011 revolution can be understood through its relationship with the creation of policy networks, organisations, communications and mobilisation mechanisms for mass protest.
• Social media provided the space and tools to form and expand networks that the Egyptian authorities could not easily control during the time frame of the two case studies.
• Despite debate on impact of social media, it actually helped different policy networks by facilitating new connections among the middle-class youth and supporting the circulation of stories, videos, blogs, tweets, posts that promoted the interests of these policy networks.
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 14
Future Discussions
• Address the role that market governance plays with regard to state stability.
• Outline the role of different drivers, like culture and societal structure.
• State stability prioritisation issues must be reviewed more carefully and in detail for each country because needs such as security safeguards, welfare, food and others differ across countries.
• The effect of external influences on state stability requires additional study from an international relations prospective.
21 Feb.2013 Karim Hamza 15
Thank You Questions