25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION CASE NO: 8:13-cv-02782-EAK-EAJ ALFRED MOON, ALFRED MOON JR., CHERYL MOON & MEGAN WHITE, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, vs. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. HEARING ON MTA’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OCTOBER 28, 2014 Jonathan Pollard LLC 401 E. Las Olas Blvd. #1400 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 p. 954-332-2380 www.pollardllc.com

Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Among the many things that I learned while working at my old firm, Boies, Shiller & Flexner, was the importance of presentation--- Specifically, the value that a strong Powerpoint presentation can add to hearings, particularly where there are numerous complicated issues at play. This is an example of an actual Powerpoint presentation that we prepared for a hearing in the case Moon et al v. Medical Technology Associates, Inc (M.D.Fla 2013). In this case, we are defending the Moon family, owners of a medical gas company, against claims that they violated various non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. The case is presently pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida - Tampa Division. We prepared the attached Powerpoint for use at a recent evidentiary hearing on the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. In non-compete litigation, the preliminary injunction often represents the most critical part of the case. If a defendant can successfully defeat the motion for a preliminary injunction, this opens up the door for settlement and suggests that defendant has good odds of ultimately prevailing on the merits. If you are in Florida and have been sued for violating a non-compete agreement or are facing the prospect of non-compete litigation, I urge you to contact our office at 954-332-2380. We have experience litigating non-compete cases in federal and state courts throughout Florida. We are licensed in all Florida state and federal courts (Southern District, Middle District and Northern District) as well as the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. We focus our practice on defending non-compete, trade secret and trademark claims. For more information about me and my team, please visit www.pollardllc.com, check out or popular blog on non-compete litigation at www.thenoncompeteblog.com or view our page on JD Supra Business Advisors at www.jdsupra.com/profile/jonathan_pollard_docs/ Our goal is to be the most effective, most creative and most business-savvy non-compete and trade secret lawyers in the state of Florida. And, to date, we have made great progress to that goal. I urge you to read more about us and contact my office if we can be of assistance. Sincerely, Jonathan Pollard Direct: 954-332-2395

Citation preview

Page 1: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION

CASE NO: 8:13-cv-02782-EAK-EAJ

ALFRED MOON, ALFRED MOON JR., CHERYL MOON &

MEGAN WHITE,

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants,

vs.

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC.

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

HEARING ON MTA’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONOCTOBER 28, 2014

Jonathan Pollard LLC

401 E. Las Olas Blvd. #1400

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

p. 954-332-2380

www.pollardllc.com

Page 2: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

“Under federal law there is no presumption of irreparable harm.

Instead, the movant carries the burden of persuasion as to this

element.”

Southern Wine & Spirits of Am. v. Simpkins, 2011 WL 124631,

at *8 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2011)

(citing Church of City of Huntsville, 30 F.3d 1332, 1342)

(11th Cir. 1994).

2

Page 3: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Restricted Territoryfor Al, Megan and Chip

3

Page 4: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Actual Competition Against MTA in

Medical Gas

4

Page 5: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Florida Statute 542.335 – Regarding

Customers

With respect to customers, the purpose of F.S. 542.335 is “to prevent an

employee from taking advantage of a customer relationship which was

developed during the term of the employee's employment.”

Bradley v. Health Coal., Inc., 687 So. 2d 329, 334-35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1997)

Page 6: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Alfred Moon – A Medical Gas Industry Veteran

Forty years of experience in the medial gas and medical supply industry.

Began his career in the 1970’s working for medical gas and medical equipment

manufacturers and suppliers, including the predecessor of BeaconMedaes and Allied

Healthcare Products.

Founded Moon Medical with Cheryl Moon in 1991 and operated the company until 2008.

A founding member and Vice President of the largest medical gas-related trade

association, Medical Gas Professional Healthcare Organization since its inception in 1998.

A member or past member of American Society of Hospital Engineers, the American Society

of Sanitary Engineers, the American Society of Plumbing Engineers, the National Fire

Protection Association, the American Association for Respiratory Care, and the Kansas

Respiratory Care Society.

6

Page 7: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

“Substantial Customer Relationships”

Florida law only protects “substantial” customer relationships. Florida

Statute 542.335

7

Page 8: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

MTA’s “Substantial” Customer Relationships

“We never had anything close to an exclusive or special relationship with MTA . . .”

- Matt Brennan, owner of J.M. Brennan, Inc. in Milwaukee, WI

Between June 2013 and August 2014, JM Brennan has done business with 7 different

medical gas vendors. (See if you can do text in some creative way to make a sort of visual of

all these companies:

ACS, MTA, ARTEC, MEDGAS SOLUTIONS, O.E. MEYERS, OHIO MEDICAL CORP., PURELY

MED GAS

8

Page 9: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

MTA’s “Substantial” Customer Relationships

“We never had anything close to an exclusive or special relationship with MTA . . .”

- Matt Brennan, owner of J.M. Brennan, Inc. in Milwaukee, WI

Between June 2013 and August 2014, JM Brennan has

done business with 7 different medical gas vendors:

9

ACS Medical LLC

Page 10: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

MTA’s “Substantial” Customer Relationships

“[W]e have had a number of problems with MTA that have involved poor service, MTA’s failure to supply functioning equipment and MTA’s failure to keep its promises. … As a result, we have never had a very strong relationship with MTA.”

Q: In your view, did MTA do a good job of managing that relationship?

A: No.

Q: From 2008 through the present, has Titan/Just Service worked with numerous medical gas vendors?

A: Yes.

Q: Do you maintain an exclusive relationship with any one vendor?

A: No

- Al Mueller, owner of Just Service Inc. / Titan Plumbing in Greendale, WI

10

Page 11: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

“Open up the Yellow Pages…”

Q If I were to start a business such as ARTEC, MTA, ACS -- how

would I -- how would I go about finding customers?

A: Open up the Yellow Pages under "hospitals." Every one of

those are a customer. Drive down the road and look for every

blue sign that says "H," turn left or right, pull into the front door;

and that's your customer. There's hospitals all over.

Q Would I be able to find the point person at that hospital?

A Very easily. They are all -- they're all inside that building.

Deposition of Ross Williams – Artec Environmental

11

Page 12: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The Law – Substantial Customer

Relationships

“There was little evidence of any exclusive or other kind of relationship that

could be construed as ‘substantial’ within the meaning of the statute.”

Anich Indus., Inc. v. Raney, 751 So. 2d 767, 771 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)

Lack of an exclusive customer relationship, use of multiple vendors, fierce

competition and customer dissatisfaction weighs against a finding of a

substantial relationship.

TrueBlue, Inc. v. Dyn, 2010 WL 3565756 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 9, 2010)

12

Page 13: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The Customers Solicit Bids

The Facts

“[W]hen we obtain a new project, we often solicit bids from a variety of vendors for both

equipment and services.”

-Declaration of Matt Brennan, Owner of J.M. Brennan, Inc. in Milwaukee, WI

13

Page 14: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The Shields Decision Controls

On remand the district court should consider the application of Shields v.

Paving Stone Co., Inc., 796 So.2d 1267, 1269 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001),

because a federal court sitting in diversity is bound to apply the law of the

forum state.

Moon v. Med. Tech. Associates, Inc., 14-11155, 2014 WL 4056724 (11th

Cir. Aug. 18, 2014)

14

Page 15: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

What Shields Says…

A party seeking to enforce a non-solicitation agreement has no protectable

interest where the customer relationships are not exclusive, the customers

are known throughout the industry and contracts are awarded through

bidding.

15

Page 16: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Customer Lists

Customer lists which can be compiled from readily accessible sources not

protected. See Blackstone v. Dade City Osteopathic Clinic, 511 So.2d 1050

(Fla. 2d DCA 1987)

16

Page 17: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The Alleged Solicitation of Lexington

Plumbing

“Al did stop by my office on approximately November 8, 2013. . . . He

further explained that because of a non-compete agreement, he would not

be doing any medical gas work in the region of KS, MO, NE, and IA for the

next two years.”

“Neither Al Moon nor any member of the Moon family or Advanced

Compliance Solutions has attempted to solicit any business from me

since the family members stopped working for MTA.”

- Declaration of Dan Axtell, Chairman of Lexington Plumbing in Kansas City, MO

17

Page 18: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Timeline 18

2008 2010 2013

Moon Medical

sold to MTA

July 2008

2014

Cheryl resigns

from MTA

May 31, 2010Al, Chip, and

Megan resign

from MTA

Sep – Oct 2013

The alleged

“wrongful

conduct”

Oct – Nov 2013

MTA & ACS

bidding on

newly

announced

projects

Today

Oct. 28, 2014

All Past Harm No Current or Future Harm

Page 19: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

MTA’s Allegedly Confidential

Information

The Facts

Information regarding what a competitor bid or what a customer needs is not

valuable, confidential information that belongs to MTA.

The Law

Information that is commonly known in the industry and not unique to the allegedly

injured party is not confidential. See Autonation, Inc. v. O’Brien, 347 F.Supp.2d

1299, 1304 (S.D. Fla. 2004); Anich Indus., Inc. v. Raney, 751 So.2d 767, 771 (Fla.

5th DCA 2000); Keel v. Quality Medical Systems, Inc., 515 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA

1987)

19

Page 20: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

“During the term of or for a period of sixty months following the

termination or expiration of her employment. . . .”

A 5-year employee non-compete agreement is unenforceable. Florida

Statutes 542.335.

20The Actual Terms of Cheryl’s Non-Compete – Part I

Cheryl left MTA on May 31, 2010, more than 3 and ½ years ago

Page 21: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The Actual Terms of Cheryl’s Non-Compete – Part II

“Employee shall not [compete] in any county in which Employer

has sold products or services during the sixty (60) months

immediately preceding the signing of this Agreement.”

21

Page 22: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The Actual Terms of Cheryl’s Non-Compete – Part II

“Employee shall not [compete] in any county in which Employer has sold

products or services during the sixty (60) months immediately preceding the

signing of this Agreement.”

Where was MTA marketing medical gas training courses from July 7, 2003 to July 7,

2008? MTA’s papers do not say.

22

?

Page 23: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The Actual Terms of Cheryl’s Non-Compete – Part II

“Employee shall not [compete] in any county in which Employer has sold

products or services during the sixty (60) months immediately preceding the

signing of this Agreement.”

Where was MTA selling and servicing medical gas equipment from July 7, 2003 to

July 7, 2008? In what exact counties? MTA's papers do not say.

23

WHAT COUNTIES?

Page 24: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

The William Rowland Corporation markets medical gas training

courses on behalf of a South-Carolina based company called Medical

Gas Training & Consulting. Most of this is done through publicly

available email lists.

24

Page 25: Florida Non-Compete Defense - Preliminary Injunction Powerpoint

Jonathan Pollard LLC

Competition Lawyers

Jonathan Pollard LLC is a boutique litigation firm focused on defending

non-compete, trade secret and trademark claims throughout the state of

Florida. We are licensed in all Florida state and federal courts and the

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. For more

information about Jonathan Pollard and the practice, please visit any of the

following:

www.pollardllc.com

www.thenoncompeteblog.com

http://www.jdsupra.com/profile/jonathan_pollard_docs/

Or call our Fort Lauderdale office at 954-332-2380.

25