Upload
potashcorp
View
3.369
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PotashCorp.com
Click icon to add picture
September 18, 2013
Q3 2013 Market Analysis Report
This report contains forward-looking statements or forward-looking information (forward-looking statements). These statements can be identified by expressions of belief, expectation or intention, as well as those statements that are not historical fact. These statements are based on certain factors and assumptions including with respect to: foreign exchange rates, expected growth, results of operations, performance, business prospects and opportunities and effective tax rates. While the company considers these factors and assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available, they may prove to be incorrect. Several factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to the following: variations from our assumptions with respect to foreign exchange rates, expected growth, results of operations, performance, business prospects and opportunities, and effective tax rates; fluctuations in supply and demand in the fertilizer, sulfur, transportation and petrochemical markets; costs and availability of transportation and distribution for our raw materials and products, including railcars and ocean freight; changes in competitive pressures, including pricing pressures; adverse or uncertain economic conditions and changes in credit and financial markets; the results of sales contract negotiations within major markets; economic and political uncertainty around the world; timing and impact of capital expenditures; risks associated with natural gas and other hedging activities; changes in capital markets; unexpected or adverse weather conditions; changes in currency and exchange rates; unexpected geological or environmental conditions, including water inflows; imprecision in reserve estimates; adverse developments in new and pending legal proceedings or government investigations; acquisitions we may undertake; strikes or other forms of work stoppage or slowdowns; rates of return on and the risks associated with our investments; changes in, and the effects of, government policies and regulations; security risks related to our information technology systems; and earnings, exchange rates and the decisions of taxing authorities, all of which could affect our effective tax rates. Additional risks and uncertainties can be found in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 under the captions “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A – Risk Factors” and in our other filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the Canadian provincial securities commissions. Forward-looking statements are given only as at the date of this report and the company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Forward-looking Statements
• Economic Update: Slides 4-8
• Agriculture Update: Slides 9-19
• Potash Market Update: Slides 20-26
• Phosphate Market Update: Slides 27-32
• Nitrogen Market Update: Slides 33-38
Report Overview
Economic Update
Source: Oanda, PotashCorp
Series1-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%China EU Canada Malaysia Brazil India Indonesia
Percentage Change (January 1 - September 13, 2013)
Weaker Exchange Rates Benefit Major Crop Exporting Regions
World Currency Changes (versus USD)
Source: IMF
20
11
20
13
F
20
12
20
14
F
20
11
20
13
F
20
12
20
14
F
20
11
20
13
F
20
12
20
14
F
20
11
20
13
F
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%World EU US Brazil ASEAN-5 India China
Year over Year GDP Percentage Change
Uneven Economic Recovery Continues
World GDP Outlook
Note: ASEAN-5 is comprised of Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam.
Percent
Unemployment Rate Falling and Consumer Sentiment Improving
US Economic Indicators
Unemployment Rate
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
YTD50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Durable Goods Sales
Average Monthly Sales – Billion US$
Source: US Department of Labor, US Census Bureau
0
2
4
6
8
10
1210.0
7.3
Source: US Census Bureau, Scotiabank Group
Jul-0
3
Jul-0
4
Jul-0
5
Jul-0
6
Jul-0
7
Jul-0
8
Jul-0
9
Jul-1
0
Jul-1
1
Jul-1
2
Jul-1
30
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800Residential Nonresidential
Billion US$
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
F0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Million Units
Recovery in Auto Sales and Residential Construction
US Economic Indicators
Light Vehicle Sales Construction Expenditures
Agriculture Update
Source: Bloomberg
$/bushel
Wheat
$/bushel
Soybeans
$/bushel
Corn
Supportive Prices Despite Some Near-term Pressure
Crop Prices
1/1/2011
7/1/2011
1/1/2012
7/1/2012
1/1/2013
7/1/20130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8Dec. 13 Futures10-year Average
1/1/2011
7/1/2011
1/1/2012
7/1/2012
1/1/2013
7/1/20130
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18Nov. 13 Futures10-year Average
1/1/2011
7/1/2011
1/1/2012
7/1/2012
1/1/2013
7/1/20130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12Near-month Futures10-year Average
Source: India Meteorological Department
Indian Monsoon SituationStrong Monsoon Encouraging for Farmers
Percentage of Normal Monsoon Rain (June to Sept.)
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Source: USDA Crop Explorer
Challenging Weather Patterns Negatively Impacts Crop Production
China Affected By Regional Floods and Drought
Seasonal Percent of Normal Precipitation
Excess Moisture
Moisture Deficiency
Source: USDA
Million Tonnes
Rice
Million Tonnes
Wheat
Million Tonnes
Corn
Expect Significant Imports to Meet Rising Consumption
China’s Grain Imports
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
F0
2
4
6
8
10
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
F0
2
4
6
8
10
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
F0
2
4
6
8
10
2013F refers to the 2013/14 crop year.
Source: Ministry of Agriculture for China
China’s Agricultural Products Import Bill
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
20
40
60
80
100
120
Billion US$
Import Bill Has Increased Rapidly Over the Past Five Years
Source: USDA
2013F refers to the 2013/14 crop year.
IA ND
CO WI
KS
MN
MS
NE IL SD
TX MI
IN PA
OH
KY
NC
TN
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Percent
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
F0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
5
10
15
20
25Use Production
Billion Bushels
Yield and Acreage Uncertainty Due to Late Developing Crop
US Corn Supply/Demand and Crop Condition
US Corn Supply and Demand US Good/Excellent Corn Rating – Current versus 10-year avg.
Stocks-to-Use - Percent
Source: USDA
Production - Million Tonnes
Higher Stocks Contingent on Large South American Crops
World Soybean Production and Stocks-to-Use
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F2013F0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40South America US Other World Stocks-to-Use
Based on crop year data. For example, 2013F refers to the 2013/14 crop year.
Stocks-to-Use - Percent
Expect Fertilizer Will Remain Very Affordable in 2013/14 Fertilizer Year
Fertilizer Cost Percentage of US Corn Revenue
Source: USDA, DTN, PotashCorp
04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13E 14F0
5
10
15
20
25Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Total
$4.00/bushel
2014 Corn Price Scenarios
$4.75/bushel
$5.50/bushel
Percent
Source: Safras, Soybean & Corn Advisor
Jan-10Apr-1
0Jul-10
Oct-10Jan-11
Apr-11Jul-11
Oct-11Jan-12
Apr-12Jul-12
Oct-12Jan-13
Apr-13
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60Soybeans Corn
Gross Margin Percentage
Returns Favor Soybean; Expect Slow Down in Corn Planting
Brazil Crop Economics
Source: USDA, CONAB, PotashCorp
Million Acres
Strong Soybean Economics Drives Expected Increase in Planted Area
Brazil Crop Area
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14F
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Soybeans Corn - Full Season Corn - Safrihna Wheat
Potash Market Update
Source: Fertecon, CRU, IFA, PotashCorp
Latin America
China
Middle East
Europe
North America
FSU
0 5 10 15 20
Historical Maximum Production, Million tonnes KCl
North America and FSU Are Major Potash Producing Regions
World Potash Producing Region Profile
Source: IFA, PotashCorp
IFA derives operational capability by multiplying capacity by the highest historical achievable operating rate.
2012 2013F 2014F 2015F 2016F50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90IFA Forecast as of May 2013 IFA Forecast as of May 2012
Million Tonnes KCl Equivalent
Significant Project Delays and Deferrals
IFA Potash Operational Capability Outlook
8 million tonnes
Source: Fertecon, CRU, Public Filings, PotashCorp
* Estimated annual achievable production level from existing operations; announced probable and possible projects; assuming typical ramp-up periods for new capacity. Probable and possible projects based on PotashCorp’s view of project probabilities.
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 2017F
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
63.0
76.8
World PotashCorp Other North America FSU Other
Million Tonnes KCl
PotashCorp Adding Majority of New Capacity
Global Potash Operational Capability*
Source: IPNI, PotashCorp
Million Tonnes KCl
Strong Offshore Shipments During First Eight Months of 2013
North American Potash Producers’ Export Sales
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.42013 2012 5-year avg.
Source: IPNI, TFI, PotashCorp
Thousand Tonnes KCl
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.22013 5-year avg.
Million Tonnes KCl
Low Distributor Inventory and Agronomic Need is Expected to Drive Demand
North America Potash Shipments
Domestic Producer Shipments Offshore Imports
Jan MarMay Jul
Sep Nov0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1402013 5-year avg.
Source: USDA, AAPFCO, PotashCorp
Million Short Tons KCl EquivalentMillion Short Tons KCl Equivalent
Application Rates Have Not Kept Pace With Higher Crop Removal
US Potassium Application and Crop Removal
US Total Regional Application Deficit – 2010
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 20100
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16Crop removal Fertilizer applied
Calculation based on commercial fertilizer application data, estimated nutrients available from manure and crop removal rates for all major crops grown in the US.
Central P
lains
Mountain
Lake States
MidwestOther
WestDelta
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
3.7
1.4
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.60.4
~ 8.0 million
st
Phosphate Market Update
Source: Fertecon, CRU, PotashCorp
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013F0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70India China Other Asia Latin America North America Other
Million Tonnes Product
Indian Demand Has a Significant Impact on the Global Market
World DAP and MAP Consumption
54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68300
350
400
450
500
550
600
Source: FAI, Katana, PotashCorp
Jan Feb
Mar
Apr May
Jun Jul Aug
Sep
Oct Nov
Dec
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 2013 2012 2011
Cumulative, Million Tonnes Product
Government Policy and Foreign Exchange Changes Distorting the Market
India DAP Import Economics
India DAP Imports Importer Breakeven Price Sensitivity
Rupee/USD ScenariosAssuming MRP of 22,500
US$/Tonne – CFR India
Source: Fertecon, CRU, PotashCorp
Integrated (low) Integrated (high)
Non-integrated0
100
200
300
400
500Total cash costFreight and export tax costsFOB China
60%
11%
5%4%
4%
16%
Emerged as a Major Supplier to India But Some Producers Are High Cost
China Phosphate Market Profile
2012 DAP/MAP Exports by Destination China DAP Export Costs
India
Vietnam
Pakistan
LatinAmerica
Other
Oceania
2012 Exports – 4.8 million tonnes
US$/Tonne
Higher cost integrated producers typically have higher rock transportation costs.
11 12 13 11 12 13 11 12 13 11 12 13MAP DAP TSP SSP
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200Production Imports
Source: Potafertz, PotashCorp
Thousand Tonnes P2O5 (YTD Jan-Jul)
Increased Phosphate Supply During the First Half of 2013
Brazil Phosphate Fertilizer Domestic Supply
Source: IPNI, TFI, PotashCorp
Jan
Mar
May
Jul
Sep
Nov
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700 2013 5-year avg.
Short-term Buying Lull Prior to the Fall Season
US DAP/MAP Shipments
Jan MarMay Jul
Sep Nov0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1602013 5-year avg.
Thousand Tonnes DAP/MAP Thousand Tonnes DAP/MAP
Offshore ImportsDomestic Producer Shipments
Nitrogen Market Update
Source: Fertecon, PotashCorp
201320122011
201320122011
201320122011
201320122011
0 1 2 3 4 5
FSU
Middle East
Trinidad
North Africa
Million Tonnes
Ammonia Supply Has Been Constrained in Major Exporting Regions
Ammonia Exports by Major Region
2008 2010 2012 2014F 2016F-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000Middle East and Africa Americas FSU Other China
Source: Fertecon, CRU, PotashCorp
Million Tonnes
Near-term Surge in Chinese Capacity; Several Proposed Projects in Medium-term
World Urea Capacity Additions
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013F0
20
40
60
80
100
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%Production Capacity Operating Rate
Source: CRU, PotashCorp
Operating Rate - PercentProduct - Million Tonnes
Near-term Over Supply in Chinese Market
China Urea Supply and Demand
Natural Gas Thermal Coal (L)
Anthracite (L)
Anthracite (M)
Anthracite (S)
200
240
280
320
360Total cash cost Freight and export tax costs FOB China
Source: Fertecon, CRU, PotashCorp
L refers to large-scale producers, M refers to medium and S refers to small.
US$/Tonne
Wide Range of Costs Depending on Feedstock and Plant Type
Chinese Urea Export Costs
US Middle East
Russia China (Coal)
Ukraine (Port)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400Cost Range
US
Middle EastTrinidad
Russia
West. Europe (Spot)
Ukraine (Port)
West. Europe (Contract)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600Cost Range
Source: Fertecon, PotashCorp
Note: Cost of production estimates based on natural gas price forecast for 2013.
US$/TonneUS$/Tonne
Production Costs Remain High In Several Key Nitrogen Producing Regions
Delivered Cash Costs to the US Market
Ammonia Urea
There’s more online:
PotashCorp.comVisit us online
Facebook.com/PotashCorpFind us on Facebook
Twitter.com/PotashCorpFollow us on Twitter
Thank you