Teacher evaluation form

TEACHER EVALUATION FORM

ABDULLAH ZAFAR (B1310001)MAHIN AHMED (B1310048)

SAQIB AHMED (B13101121)SYED MOHAMMED AFFAN AZEEM (B13101145)SYED MOHAMMED BILAL IMAM (B13101148)

TOPICS TO BE COVERED……1. INTRODUCTION 2. REQUIREMENT GATHERING3. SOFTWARE MODEL USED4. UML USE CASE AND NETWORK

DIAGRAM5. GANTT CHART AND PERT CHART6. USES OF TEACHER EVALUATION

FORM7. UNIVERSITIES USING TEF

INTRODUCTION….

The teacher evaluation form is a software capable of teacher's assessment on the basis of their skills . Multiple questions are to be answered in order to evaluate the performance, the teacher can be ranked by student that is then reviewed by the administration and teachers. The software is a password protected and thereby can be reviewed by restricted personals only. The software is maintained using database(MySQL with wamp server 2.0) and netbeans is used as backend language for creating software.

REQUIREMENT GATHERING

• THE SYSTEM SHOULD EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF TEACHER.

REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS

• MULTIPLE QUESTIONS WILL BE ASKED IN THE FORM THAT WILL BE ANSWERED BY THE STUDENT.

• THE SYSTEM SHOULD HAVE LIMITED ACCESS TO THE PERSONALS.

• EACH AND EVERY STUDENT WILL HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT THAT WILL BE PASSWORD PROTECTED

• THE SYSTEM SHOULD HAVE THE AVERAGE CURRENT ASSESTMENT OF TEACHERS

• DATABASE WILL BE USED AS AN INTERFACE THAT WILL UPDATE ALL THE INFORMATION REGARDING RATINGS.

• IF THE ASSESTMENT OF ANY TEACHER IS BELOW 5 OUT OF 10 NOTIFY THAT TEACHER

• A METHOD OF NOTIFY( ) WILL BE USED THAT WILL NOTIFY THE TEACHER ON THE RESPECTIVE CONDITIONS.

SOFTWARE MODEL USED….THE SOFTWARE HAS BEEN CREATED USING “ITERATIVE MODEL” BECAUSE THE SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR THEY KEEP ON CHANGING RAPIDLY AS TEACHERS JOINS OR LEAVES THE DEPARTMENT. MOREOVER, THE CHANGES ARE EASY TO BE MADE AS IT WORKS ITERATIVELY AND UPON EACH ITERATION A NEW VERSION OF WORKABLE SOFTWARE IS DEVELOPED. TESTING AND DEBUGGING IS EASIER . ERRORS CAN BE DETECTED AT EARLIER STAGES.

HOW ITERATIVE MODEL WORKS…FIRST ITERATION

TEACHER’S EVALUATION FORM

TEACHER’S NAME: ____________________ TITLE NO: ________ COUSRE NO: ______ SEMESTER: _______ DEGREE : __________

Q1. The Instructor is prepared for each class /10O2. The Instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject /10Q3. The Instructor arrives on time /10Q4. The Instructor leaves on time /10Q5. The Instructor is fair in examination /10Q6. The course material is modern and updated /10Q7. The Instructor shows respect towards students and encourages class participation /10Q8. The Instructor returns the graded scripts etc. in a reasonable amount of time /10

HOW ITERATIVE MODEL WORKS…SECOND ITERATION




HOW ITERATIVE MODEL WORKS…THIRD ITERATION




SUBMIT

GANTT CHARTREQUIREMENT GATHERING :(4 DAYS) INFORMATION RELATED TO DEPARTMENT.PHASE #01: (2 DAYS) REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS, SORTS OUT THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION.PHASE#02: (3 DAYS) IMPLEMETATION ; CODING THE SOFTWAREPHASE#03: (3 DAYS) TESTING; UNIT TESTING AFTER A CHUNK OF CODE IS COMPLETEDINTEGRATION: (1 DAYS) WHEN THE USER IS SATISFIED FROM THE SOFTWARE, ALL THE PARTS OF CODE ARE INTEGRATED THAT IS SUMMED UP TOGETHER.

DELOPYMENT : (1 DAYS) THE SYSTEM IS DELIVERED TO THE USER.

PERT CHART

UML CASE DIAGRAM

STUDENT

ADMINISTRATION

TEACHER

LOGIN STD

LOGIN ADMIN

LOGIN TEACHER

DATABASE

FILLING TEF

RESULTS TEF

NOTIFICATIONS

SEQUENCE DIAGRAM

TEACHERDATABASE ADMINISTRATIONSTUDENT

FILLED FORM NOTIFIES USER

UPDATE REC.

RECORD UPDATED

IF [RATE < 5]

SEND NOTIFICATION

UML DIAGRAM

FINAL PROJECTSCREEN # 1:

USER :

PASSWORD:

AFFAN

*********

TEACHER EVALUATINGFORM

ENTER


TEACHER’S NAME: SIR ASIM TITLE NAME: BUSINESS COMMUNICATION COUSRE NO: 406SEMESTER: 4TH DEGREE : BS

Q1. The Instructor is prepared for each class 9/10O2. The Instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject 9/10Q3. The Instructor arrives on time 7/10Q4. The Instructor leaves on time 9 /10Q5. The Instructor is fair in examination 9 /10Q6. The course material is modern and updated 10 /10Q7. The Instructor shows respect towards students and encourages class participation 10 /10Q8. The Instructor returns the graded scripts etc. in a reasonable amount of time 9/10

SUBMIT

STUDENT’S VIEW

ADMIN’S VIEW

STUDENT’S NAME: SEAT NO:

TEACHER’S NAME : COURSE NO: AVERAGE:

STATUS :

AFFAN B13101145

SIR ASIM 406

QUESTIONS EVAULATED

FROM STATUS

1 9 10 GOOD2 9 10 GOOD3 7 10 FAIR4 9 10 GOOD5 9 10 GOOD6 10 10 EXCELLEN

T7 10 10 EXCELLEN

T8 9 10 GOOD

9

GOOD

UPDATE

DELETE

NOTIFY

UPDATE

TEACHER’S VIEW

TEACHER’S EVALUATING FORM

OK

CONGRATULATIONS! YOUR PERFORMANCE IS CONSISTENTLY GOOD. YOUR SKILLS ARE HIGHLY APPRECIATED. GOOD LUCK!

ADVANTAGES OF TEF… HELPS IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE STUDENT IS

ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS TAUGHT BY TEACHER.

EVALUATORS UNDERSTAND THE DIFFICULTIES INVOLVED IN TEACHING.

FEEDBACK TO TEACHER CAN BE IMMEDIATE AND EXCELLENT

EVALUATORS CAN THEMSELVES LEARN TEACHING TECHNIQUES FROM THOSE BEING EVALUATED.

UNIVERSITIES USING TEF BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK

MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY, VIRGINIA

INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, MALAYSIA

Internet

Teacher evaluation form