Upload
bodyin-mind
View
4.590
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Part of training the brain series focused on Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) but relevant to all types of pain.
Citation preview
Lorimer MoseleyNHMRC Senior Research FellowPrince of Wales Medical Research Institute & Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
CRPS Rehabilitation (or training the brain)
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009 Complex Regional Pain
Syndrome
Why train the brain?
CRPS as an extreme protective response.
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Why train the brain?
Our approach to treating CRPS
Cognitive
Understanding the problem
Other threatening cues are relevant
Educate & explain
Behavioural
Function & movement hierarchy
‘training the brain part 1’
Brain changes
S1 reorganisation
Reorganisation elsewhere?
‘training the brain part 2’
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Why train the brain?
CRPS as an extreme protective response.
Cognitive
Understanding the problem
Other threatening cues are relevant
Educate & explain
Behavioural
Function & movement hierarchy
‘training the brain part 1’
Brain changes
S1 reorganisation
Reorganisation elsewhere?
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Why train the brain?
CRPS as an extreme protective response.
Cognitive
Understanding the problem
Other threatening cues are relevant
Educate & explain
Behavioural
Function & movement hierarchy
‘training the brain part 1’
Brain changes
S1 reorganisation
Reorganisation elsewhere?
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
DAVID
BUTLER | LO
RIMER M
OSELEY | ART SU
NYATA
www.noigroup.comwww.OPTP.comwww.physiouk.co.uk
www.noigroup.comwww.physiouk.co.uk
www.OPTP.com
resources
www.amazon.comCA$35 & post.
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Most threatening
Least threatening
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range, duration, frequency
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Motor empathy
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Movements
Reduce speed, range, duration, frequency
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Motor empathy
Functional tasks PainMost threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Functional tasks
Movements PainReduce speed, range,
duration, frequency
Most threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Functional tasks
Movements PainReduce speed, range,
duration, frequency
Most threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range, duration, frequency
Explicit motor imagery
Most threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range, duration, frequency
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Most threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range, duration, frequency
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Motor empathy
Most threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
The motor/behavioural heirarchy
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range, duration, frequency
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Motor empathy
Most threatening
Least threatening
‘Training the brain’
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Do imagined movements activate the protective response?
Moseley 2004 Neurology 62: 1644Moseley et al 2008 Arth Care & Res 59, 623-31
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range,
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Motor empathy
Most threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
extensors
flexors
hyperthenar
thenar
Imagined movements
5 secNew picture
Moseley 2004 Neurology 62: 1644Moseley et al 2008 Arth Care & Res 59, 623-31
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
CRPS Non CRPS
0
4
8Pain
Pre Post 60 min95
110
125SizeRatio(%)
Moseley 2004 Neurology 62: 1644Moseley et al 2008 Arth Care & Res 59, 623-31
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Experiment: Can visual input alone activate CRPS neurotag?
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
stimulus
experience
normal
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
stimulus
experience
normal
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
stimulus
experience
normal
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
stimulus
experience
“dysynchiria”
CRPS1
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
stimulus
experience
“dysynchiria”
CRPS1
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
stimulus
experience
“dysynchiria”
pain
CRPS1
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
opoo
pp p
ppo
xxxx
x x x xx
xxxx x x
xx
xxxxxxx
xx
xxx
xx
x
xxxx
pp
pp
pp
p poo o o
p pp p
Allodynia
Parasthaesia
Response to light touch on opposite hand while looking in mirror
p = pain
x = ‘odd sensation’
0 =nothing (normal response)
Acerra&Moseley2005Neurology65:751‐3
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Do imagined movements activate the protective response?
Moseley 2004 Neurology 62: 1644Moseley et al 2008 Arth Care & Res 59, 623-31
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range,
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Motor empathy
Most threatening
Least threatening
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Do imagined movements activate the protective response?
Moseley 2004 Neurology 62: 1644Moseley et al 2008 Arth Care & Res 59, 623-31
Functional tasks
Movements
Reduce speed, range,
Explicit motor imagery
Implicit motor imagery
Motor empathy
Most threatening
Least threatening
Reducing the threat of imagined
movements.
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Graded motor imagery
1. Implicit motor imagery (left/right judgement task)
Moseley (2004) Pain; 108: 192-8;Moseley (2005) Pain 114;54-61Moseley (2006) Neurology 67 2129-34
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Is this a left or a right hand?
One image is shown at a timeSoftware is online and via CD “Recognise” www.noigroup.comObjectives: - Equal reaction times for left & right- >80% accuracy
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Graded motor imagery
1. Implicit motor imagery (left/right judgement task)
2. Explicit motor imagery (imagined movements)
Moseley (2004) Pain; 108: 192-8;Moseley (2005) Pain 114;54-61Moseley (2006) Neurology 67 2129-34
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Imagined limb movements
One image is shown at a timeSoftware is online and via CD “Recognise” www.noigroup.com
“Imagine adopting this posture with your own hand and then returning it to where it is. Imagine a pain-free, smooth movement”.
Objectives: - Little or no symptom provocation- Task is easy or boring
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Graded motor imagery
1. Implicit motor imagery (left/right judgement task)
2. Explicit motor imagery (imagined movements)
3. Mirror movements
Moseley (2004) Pain; 108: 192-8;Moseley (2005) Pain 114;54-61Moseley (2006) Neurology 67 2129-34
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Mirror movements
“Gently adopt the posture shown with both hands, while watching the mirror image of your good hand”.
Objectives: -Little or no symptom provocation-Movement is not dystonic -Movement L & R similar in range and speed- Task is easy or boring
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Time (weeks)
Neuropathic pain scale
50
200 2 4 6 12 18 24
Recog
nition
Imag
ined
Mirror
MIP MIP
Moseley(2004) Pain; 108: 192-8;
Crossed over
Single blind RCT
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
• CRPS of arm or leg• 18-75 years old• No other diagnoses• English-proficient• Presented to GP, physiotherapy, pain management or neurology
Single blind RCT
Moseley (2006) Neurology 67 2129-34
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Moseley (2006) Neurology 67 2129-34
Single blind RCT
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Moseley (2006) Neurology 67 2129-34
Single blind RCT
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Moseley (2006) Neurology 67 2129-34
NNT to get a 50% reduction in pain
Post-MIP = 3 (2-6)
6 months = 2 (1-5)
NNT to get a 4/10 point increase in function
Post-MIP = 4 (2-11)
6 months = 3 (2-4)
Single blind RCT
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Why train the brain?
Our approach to treating CRPS
Brain changes
S1 reorganisation
Reorganisation elsewhere?
‘training the brain part 2’
www.bodyinmind.com.au Copyright GL Moseley 2009
Go to the next set of slides: