Upload
bcpsqc
View
235
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation was delivered by Dr. Tom Wallace at the BC Surgical Quality Action Network's 2013 annual meeting. It provides an intimate peak into one small hospital’s QI journey to decrease SSI’s in colorectal patients. Learn about the process of designing and implementing a comprehensive QI initiative to address a complex problem. Visit http://bcpsqc.ca/clinical-improvement/sqan/ to learn more about the event
Citation preview
Reducing Colorectal Surgical Site Infections
Dr. Tom WallaceNSQIP Surgeon ChampionRoyal Inland HospitalKamloops, BC
Disclosures
None
How Many F’s?
FINISHED FILES ARE THERESULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIFICSTUDY COMBINED WITH THEEXPERIENCE OF YEARS
Kamloops and TCSPopulation / Geography of Community
Served Kamloops 112,549 TCS 225, 813 (2011/2012)
Royal Inland Hospital (RIH)
5
216 In-patient bed hospital
RIH Operating Room Quality Initiatives
NSQIP ERACS Culture Checklist QIPS Unit Leader LEAN
NSQIP at RIH
Date Started – April 2011
Team Composition SCRs Clerk Quality Surgeon Champion Administration
NSQIPData Sharing
Display Boards Patient Safety Leadership
Walkrounds Monthly Reports Non Risk Adjusted
Reports Quarterly Risk Adjusted Reports IH Collaborative Presentations Physician Letters
Projects to date
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections – Gynecology
Surgical Site Infections - Colorectal
NS PQI
NSQIP
UTI Success
Month Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan -13 Feb 13 Mar 13 April 13 May 13 June 13
Occurrence 3 5 6 5 4 2 6 4 2 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 3 1 0 1 2
# of Surgeries 94 137 159 138 159 161 156 106 70 120 119 143 129 169 99 120 158 160 96 151 160 158
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
RIH Post Op Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection Rates(Non Risk Adjusted Data)
CA UTI Occurrence Rate RIH Mean NSQIP Mean UCL
CA UTI Improvementproject initial intervention implemented
Identifying Opportunities for Improvement
Question:Please describe howyou think your next patientmay be harmed?
NSQIPOpportunities Identified
All Cases Morbidity: 96 observed events and 1680 total casesAll Cases SSI: 46 observed events and 1679 total cases
SSI Data
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
2%
22%
5%
1% 1% 1% 0%
5%
2%
Wound Occurrence by SubspecialtyJuly 2012 - June 2013
N=306 N=92 N=507 N=117 N=184 N=76 N=82 N=195N=9120 Occurrences
SSI Data
RIH SQAN NSQIP0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
22%
17.7%
11.2%
Colorectal SSI Occurrence Rate comparison between RIH, SQAN and NSQIP
July 2012 - June 2013(Non Risk Adjusted)
Colorectal SSI Occurrence Rate
Patient Profiles
< 2 > 30
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
72.4
27.6
82.8
17.2
81.9
18.2
Comparison of Risk Factors for Colectomy Patients between RIH, SQAN and NSQIP
(Non Risk Adjusted Data)O/E period July 2012 - June 2013
RIH SQAN NSQIP
Why rob a bank…
Because that’s where the money is!
Our Goal
Aim Statement:Decrease Colorectal Surgical Site
Infections 30% by March 31, 2014
Our SSI Plan Why re-invent the wheel?
Dellinger U of W Wick JH Cima Mayo Laflamme Joint Commission Edminston
Literature Review
RIH NSQIP SSI BundlePre-OpPatient received pre op scrub Optimal Hair Removal (Clippers or None)Appropriate antibiotic Timing (0-60 min pre cut time)
Appropriate antibiotic givenPre Op BGM ValuePre op Bowel Prep & Oral AntibioticIntra- OpAppropriate Isolation techniqueWound barrier usedAntimicrobial sutures usedAntibiotic re-dosing for surgeries > 4 hrsNormothermiaIntra Op fluid volumeIntra Op BGM ValuePost - OpNormothermiaTotal Fluid volume in PARHigh O2 for 1 hr in PARBGM in PARStandardized wound care orders given (Remove POD 2)
Care for your surgical site information sheet given : Post Op outcome? If yes identify outcome
SSI Bundle Driver Diagram
SSI Bundle Driver Diagram
Baseline AuditWhat is our current practice?
Data Sources Custom Fields Procedure Targeted
Can we get this Process Data?
Pre Op Scrub
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%78%
22%
Pre Operative Scrub done on patients admitted day of surgery
N=18
Pre Op Scrub
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
14%
86%
Pre Operative Scrub done on patients admitted prior
to surgeryN=7
Pre Op Albumin
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
36%
64%
Pre Operative Albumin TakenN=25
Antibiotic Timing
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%60%
40%
Appropriate Abx TimingGiven within 0-60 cut time
N=25
Appropriate Antibiotic
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
68%
32%
Appropriate Abx givenN=25
Pre Op Bowel Prep
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
8%
92%
Pre Operative Bowel PrepN=25
Pre op Oral Antibiotics
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
100%
Pre Operative Oral Abx givenN=25
Surgical Site Infection Rates following Elective Colectomy
The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative
Englesbe. Ann Surg 2010;252: 514–520
n=195
All patientsGet I.V. antibiotics
Per
cent
of
patie
nts
* P < 0.05
*
*
Oral Antibiotics with a Bowel Preparation
A Propensity Matched Analysis (n=740)
*
Englesbe. Ann Surg 2010;252: 514–520
All patientsGet I.V. antibiotics
Containment Technique
Yes No0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Appropriate Containment TechniqueN=25
Wound Barrier
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Wound Barrier UsedN=25
New Technology
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Antimicrobial Sutures UsedN=25
Anaesthesia
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
44%
56%
Intra Operative Warming (Bair Huggers) doc-umented
N=25
Yes No45%
46%
47%
48%
49%
50%
51%
52%
53%52%
48%
Intra Operative Temperature taken and doc-umented
N=25
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
100%
Intra Operative BGM TakenN=25
Anaesthesia
Average Time: 2:55 hrs (175 min)Average Crystalloid 1504 mlAverage Colloid 841 ml
Average Crystalloid over time: 515.7 ml / hrAverage Colloid over time: 288.3 ml / hr
Standardize Post Operative Wound Care
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
16%
84%
Standardized Wound Care Orders Given (Removal POD 2)
N=25
Standardize Post Operative Wound Care
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Surgical Site Incision Info Sheet ProvidedN=25
Our Journey Continues….
Early in the process Information gathering
phase
Auditing Post implementation process Measures Correspond to outcome
measures
Share, Share, Share the data
42
The future state…
43
Stay Tuned ……..
Questions?
44