Upload
dccrene
View
154
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Processes5 main processes involved in maintaining my study-based register
De-dupe
Search
Download
Screen
Main processes
…4 (and a tenth) now happen in the CRS
Studify
Search
sources searched every month
Bibliographic databases Trials registries
1200-1500 ‘records’
The searches are (generally) two concept searches with time limits:
P I C O T SDementia RCT/CCT
Download (and import)
Search
Bibliographic databases
Trials registries
Download Import
Tagged text
XML, then
convert
Except ClinicalTrials.gov where the search and download happens within the CRS
Download (and import)
Import Records tab
Locate file; select filter
Process import; check
mappings
File names: each file is named: [Year]_[Month]_[source]_[hits]These are individual batches within the CRS
Note:Previously excluded records don’t get reimported. This is proving to work well. Approximately 100 records are not re-imported
Question:Should I create study records as I bring the records in? No (at the moment I don’t do that)
De-dupe
De-duplication needs to happen against the imported files (database content overlap) and against the whole segment.
One new batch created and
ready for screening
[CoderName]_[date range covered]
Shirley
Usually down to about 1000 records by now
ScreenWant to Exclude all records that are not about RCT/CCT
Batch is selected; Screen in Browse screen; Records marked for CENTRAL; Records marked as Handsearch if they are RCT/CCT outside of my group’s scope
Screen
The batch has shrunk from around 1000 records to approximately 100. Most of the 900 have been Excluded; some have been submitted as Handsearch. The 100 left are published to CENTRAL
Batch: shirley_010913-131113
1000 records
100 records
Studify
100 records ? studies
Step 1: CRS studification tab – 10 records at a time, run studification
Studify
Step 1: CRS studification tab – 10 records at a time, run studification
Settings: Default2 records have come back with ‘Success At Textual Analysis’
Studify
‘Success At Textual Analysis’Sometimes it gets it right, sometimes it gets it wrong
And sometimes it doesn’t suggest an already existing study. It’ll be an exciting part of the CRS to develop further and useful to collect performance data now
Studify
100 records
80 new studies
This is the maximum number. As we code them up, we find that actually that study did already exist – it just wasn’t suggested as a candidate by the CRS
80 new study records. They need some meta-data (coding-up) so the next step is to get the full texts, attach them to the Reference Type record and to the Study record
Studify
1500+ records
De-dupeSearch Download Screen Studify
1000+ records
100+ records
60 studies
And then we do it all again…
1 month
Studify: why do it?
Portfolio of around 120 reviews in the Dementia group
I could run and re-run 120 bespoke intervention based searches AS WELL AS having to run searches for CENTRAL
OR
I could run one, very sensitive search, once per month, across multiple databases which feeds all the existing reviews (with v high sensitivity and specificity), helps to suggest gaps, AND feeds CENTRAL