Upload
shaikhani
View
307
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GIB
Dr. Mohamed Alshekhani
Professor in Medicine.
MBChB-CABM-FRCP-EBGH.
2015
Download from:http://www.slideshare.net/shaikhani/gib-2015-for-4th-year
1
Overview:
• Common.
• Hospitalizations decreased by 4%.
• Inpatient death decreased by 23%, from treatment of H pylori & use of PPIs.
• Mortality is dependent on:
• Age.
• Comorbid illness.
• Source of bleeding.
2
Overview:
• Severe GIB:
• Orthostatic hypotension, shock, Hb decreased >2 g/dL (Hct>6%) from baseline or the need for >2 units of PRBCs.
• Hematemesis:
• Vomiting of fresh blood or coffee-ground ; most commonly from the esophagus,stomach, or duodenum
• Melena (black,tarry stool):
• Occurs when as litle as 50-100 mL of blood enters GIT; source is from eso, stomach, SI, or proximal colon.
• Hematochezia (bright red blood per rectum):
• Most commonly caused by a LGIB & if from UGI source often leads to hemodynamic instability, but distal colon or rectal bleeding rarely cause that.
3
UGIB:• The most common type of GIB.
• It is proximal to the ligament of Treitz.
• Mortality 5-10%.
• 80% stop spontaneously
• Adverse prognostic indicators are:
• Advanced age Variceal bleeding
• Comorbid conditions (organ failure or disseminated malignancy),
• Shock Hematemesis
• Increasing number of erythrocyte transfusions
• Active bleeding or rebleeding
• Visible vessel or clot in an ulcer on endoscopy.
• The goal: identify patients at highest risk of mortality so that the adequate in-hospital care can be provided & early discharge low risk ones.
4
UGIB: Causes• 1.NVUGIB:
• PUD(38%)
• Eso varices (16%)
• Esophagitis (13%)
• Malignancy (7%)
• Angioectasia (6%)
• Mallory-Weiss tear (4%)
• Dieulafoy (2%): submucosal arterioles intermittently protrude through the mucosa & cause hemorrhage.
• Other rare causes.
• 2.Varicceal UGIB:
5
UGIB: Causes• Other important but less common lesions are:
• Cameron lesions: erosion in hiatusn hernia, 5% of HH.
• Proximal Crohn’s disease.
• UGI cancers rarely result in severe bleeding (1%) include; eso or gastric cancer or GIST.
• GAVE (or "watermelon stomach") seen in cirrhosis& connective tissue diseases; linear ectatic vessels (erythematous stripes) that arise from the pylorus.
• Bleeding from PHG, GAVE,Cameron lesions is typically chronic rather than acute.
6
UGIB: Causes• PHG: commonly seen with cirrhosis
• Has a characteristic mosaic appearance at endoscopy
• Most often seen in body & fundus
• Classified as mild or severe depending on the absence or presence of red spots, respectively.
7
UGIB: Causes• Hemobilia is a rare cause of acute GIB from the biliary tree.
• Occur after liver biopsy, ERCP, or TIPS
• May present with the triad of biliary colic, obstructive jaundice (from clotted blood)&melena.
8
UGIB: Causes• Telangiectasias in stomach & proximal small bowel in patients with
hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osier-Weber-Rendu).
• Results in acute or chronic GIB,most typically recurrent epistaxis, mucocutaneous telangiectasia, other visceral involvement (lung, liver, brain)& a family history of HHT.
• Lesions should not be overlooked because bleeding can be brisk & mortality high, include varices, pseudoaneurysms& aortoentericfistulas.
9
UGIB: Causes• Variceal bleeding may be the first presentation of cirrhosis&
therefore a high index of suspicion is needed.
• Liver diseases is common & 1/3 with cirrhosis will have bleeding from esophageal varices with resultant 15-20% mortality.
10
UGIB: Causes• Acute or chronic pancreatitis can be associated with pseudocyst
formation, erode an adjacent artery (pseudoaneurysm) &rarely, cause very brisk GIB (hemosuccus pancreaticus).
• A repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm (especially endovascular repair) lead to the rare complication of an aortoenteric fistula, often as a result of graft infection or inflammation.
• An aortoenteric fistula can present with a minor herald bleed, followed by a torrential, life-threatening GIB.
11
Evaluation:• History
• Physical exam clues to the cause of bleeding.
• Attention to hemodynamic status to quantify amount of blood loss.
• Stratification of risk for ongoing or recurrent GIB (Rockal& Balchfordscores).
12
Evaluation:History
• Type of blood loss—hematemesis, coffee grounds,melena, or hematochezia—can suggest the origin.
• Slow or intermittent UGIB usually presents with IDA.
• Brisk UGIB presents with hematemesis or coffee-ground emesis.
• Fresh Hematemesis may indicate variceal bleeding.
• Coffee-ground emesis is more typical of gastritis or PUD.
• H/O PUD or NSAID use, chronic alcohol consumption or liver disease, recent history of pancreatitis, or chronic GERD symptoms can point to PUD, variceal bleeding, pseudoaneurysmal bleeding, or esophagitis, respectively.
• H/O aortic endovascular stent placement, biliary manipulation, or radiation therapy may indicate bleeding from an aortoentericfistula, hemobilia, or radiation-related, respectively.
13
Evaluation: PE
• The most important components of Physical Exam are:
• Routine & orthostatic vital signs.
• Tachycardia indicates a 15-30% blood loss
• Hypotension indicates >30% blood loss.
• Orthostasis alone indicates large-volume bleeding even when routine vital signs are normal.
• Signs of chronic liver disease such as scleral icterus, spider angiomata, gynecomastia, ascites.
14
Evaluation:Lab tests
• A complete blood count, INR, BUN, serum creatinine.
• The hemoglobin&hematocrit are not accurate measurements of blood loss during the acute phase of bleeding but may aid decisions on erythrocyte transfusion requirements.
• Macrocytosis & an elevated INR are clues for underlying liver disease.
• Microcytosis can indicate chronic bleeding.
• An elevated BUN to creatinine ratio suggests an UGI source.
15
Evaluation: prognostic stratification
• Several prognostic scoring systems (Rokal & Blatchford) to quantitate the risk of needing endoscopic intervention, but these are not widely used in clinical practice.
• Blatchford Score can be used to predict patients with signs of UGIB who can be managed as outpatients if all of the following are present:
• BUN <18 mg/dL; normal hemoglobin; systolic blood pressure>109 mm Hg; PR<100/min;absence of melena, syncope, , hepatic &cardiac disease.
16
17
UGIB: Management
• Prompt hemodynamic assessment.
• Risk stratification.
• Support with IVF /or blood products
• consideration of the origin of blood loss by OGD.
• The initial management is the same until upper endoscopy performed to verify the cause of bleeding, but variceal bleeding is managed differently from NVGIB.
18
UGIB: Management
• The initial management:
• Airway protection.
• Placement of two large-bore IV cannulas .
• Resuscitation with IV crystalloids & packed red blood cell infusions.
• Continuous hemodynamic monitoring is more helpful than hemoglobin & hematocrit, in guiding resuscitation, but a Hb <7.0 g/dL is an absolute indication for packed red blood cell transfusion.
• For suspected NVGIB, IV PPI is often initiated before endoscopy.
• NGT is not routinely recommended.
• Erythromycin & metoclopramide (motility agents) decrease the need for repeat endoscopy by improving visibility at the initial endoscopy.
• Not routinely used ,because not shown to alter the need for erythrocyte transfusion or surgery or shorten hospital stay.
19
UGIB: Management
• Patients on anticoagulation with a suprathcrapeutic INR should receive fresh frozen plasma.
• The risk of continued bleeding on warfarin must be weighed against the risk of stopping anticoagulation & endoscopy should not be delayed for anticoagulation reversal unless the INR is supratherapeutic (INR >3.0).
• If a variceal bleed is suspected, octreotide & antibiotics should be administered as soon as possible.
• Upper endoscopy should be performed after hemodynamic stabilization but within 24 hours of presentation & within 12 hours for suspected variceal bleeding.
20
UGIB: Management
• Endoscopic trt of a bleeding ulcer depends on the ulcer characteristics, an important predictors of recurrent bleeding.
• Low-risk stigmata: (a clean-based ulcer [rebleeding risk with medical therapy 3-5%] or a nonprotuberant pigmented spot in an ulcer bed [rebleeding risk with medical therapy 5-10%]) can be fed within 24 hours,should receive oral PPI therapy& can undergo early hospital discharge.
21
UGIB: Management• High risk stigmata:
• Ulcers with adherent clots (rebleeding risk with medical trt 25-30%) can be irrigated to disrupt the clot& endoscopic trt provided after.
• Patients with high-risk stigmata (active arterial spurting [rebleedingrisk with medical therapy 80-90%] or a nonbleeding visible vessel in an ulcer base [rebleeding risk with medical therapy 40-50%]) should be treated with epinephrine injection+ one of" the following:
• Hemoclips, thermocoagulation, or a sclerosant .
• Duration of PPI depends on the underlying cause of the ulcer &future need for NSAIDs.
22
23
UGIB: Management
• Bolus + maintenance IV PPI for 72 hs is recommended for patients at high risk to decrease risk of rebleeding, followed by oral PPI.
• Patients at high risk require hospitalization for at least 72 hours after intervention.
• Surgery or interventional radiology (for embolization) is reserved for refractory bleeding or rebleeding despite 2 endoscopic therapies
• Routine second-look endoscopy (within 24 hs) is not recommended, but it should be performed if visualization or endoscopic treatment during the initial examination was suboptimal.
• A repeat endoscopy should be performed for rebleeding prior to considering surgery or interventional radiology.
25
UGIB: Management
• Surveillance endoscopy for gastric ulcers to rule out malignancy (6-8 weeks later) is recommended when biopsies of the ulcer were not performed during the initial endoscopy, which is generally the case in the context of a bleeding event.
•
26
UGIB: Management
• Further management of PUD should focus on the cause, with treatment & confirmation of eradication of Helicobacter pylori when present & counseling regarding cessation of NSAIDs when they are causative.
• For patients who require aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis, aspirin should be restarted while continuing PPI therapy when the benefit outweighs the risk of bleeding.
27
28
29
LGIB:
• Bleeding distal to the ligament of Treitz, typically from the colon or anorectum.
• Presents with bright red blood per rectum or red/maroon-coloredstool (hematochezia) that is acute in onset, usually without significant abdominal pain.
• Patients typically have evidence of anemia but less commonly have hemodynamic instability.
• Although significant hypotension can result from LGIB, it should prompt consideration of a briskly UGI source.
• The risk increases with age; typically 7th or 8th decade of life.
30
LGIB: Causes
• 75% with hematochezia have a colonic source of bleeding.
• 15-20% have bleeding from UGI
• 5% have bleeding from small bowel.
• 3% not identified.
31
LGIB: Causes
32
33
LGIB Causes: colonic diverticuli
• The most frequent cause in the west.
• Colonic diverticula occur when increased intraluminal pressure causes herniation of colonic mucosa& submucosa through the muscular layers at points of relative weakness.
• Diverticula tend to occur at site of entry of the small arteries (vasa recta)&may bleed at the base of the diverticular neck.
• Diverticulosis is most common in the left colon, but right-sided diverticula are more likely to bleed.
• 3- 5% experience diverticular bleeding at some time.
34
LGIB: Int hemmorrhoids
• The second most common colonic cause of LGIB( 1st here).
• Characterized by bright red blood on the outside of the stool, on the toilet paper, or in the toilet bowl.
• Occasionally, large amount of fresh blood & some can pass clots.
35
LGIB: Postpolypectomy
• 13% of LGIB.
• May occur immediately following polyp removal ,typically caused by vascular injury at the base of the polyp stalk
• bleeding may also be delayed for several days, resulting from ulceration of colon from electrocautery used for polyp removal.
36
LGIB: Angioectasias
• Angiodysplasia( often incorrectly called AVM) occur less frequently than diverticular or hemorrhoidal bleeding but are an important cause & frequency increases with age.
• Can be numerous yet subtle & can be easily missed on colonoscopy if not actively bleeding.
• Associated with AS & LVAD.
37
LGIB: Evaluation
• Consider whether the bleeding source could be from UGI.
• UGIB typically presents with melena; but may present with hematochezia when brisk & can be life threatening if not treated early.
• NGT (even if bile-stained aspirate) can miss 15% of actively bleeding lesions.
• NGT aspirate cannot rule out a postpyloric bleeding source&can be incorrect up to 50% of the time.
• if UGI source is suspected, OGD is the most appropriate.
• If an upper source is not a consideration or the patient has had a negative upper endoscopy, next step colonoscopy.
• Anoscopy or sigmoidoscopy could be considered as alternatives if there is a high suspicion of hemorrhoids or left-sided bleeding, respectively, but majority will require a complete colonoscopy.
38
LGIB: Evaluation
• Colonoscopy identifies presumed or definite cause of LGIB 2/3 of the time.
• The sooner the colonoscopy is performed, the more likely it is to identify a source; but typically performed on the second day of hospitalization to allow for resuscitation &proper bowel prep.
• If OGD/colonoscopy do not identify site of bleeding &there is ongoing bleeding, the next step is to evaluate for obscure GIB.
• If the patient is in shock or severe bleeding causing visualimpairment during colonoscopy ,surgical conslutation should bedone parralel with angiography for emobotherapy / or RBC scan toidentfy bleeding source to guide surgery if embolotherapy was notsuccessful or not available.
39
LGIB: management
• Patients should be medically resuscitated.
• Two large-bore IV lines should be operational at all times.
• Patients should be hospitalized if they have predictors of severe bleeding (orthostatic vital signs, bleeding in the first 4 hours of evaluation, use of anticoagulants including aspirin, or multiple comorbidities).
• Most LGIB stops without direct intervention within 24 hours, but early rebleeding is common
40
LGIB: management
• Major complications (such as bowel ischemia, femoral artery thrombosis, contrast dye reactions& acute kidney failure) occur in 3% of angiographic interventions.
• For patients at significant risk with angiography or who have persistent bleeding despite radiographic intervention, surgery may be required to identify & treat the bleeding site.
• Mortality rate is low (<5%), but highest in hospitalized for another indication.
41
42
43
BO5 1:
• The minimum amount of GIT Blood loss sufficient to cause melena is:
• A. 10 mls.
• B. 20 mls.
• C. 50 mls.
• D. 40 mls.
• E. 30 mls.
44
BO5 2:
• The followings should be routine during UGIB except:
• A. Pre-endoscopy PPI.
• B. Post-endoscopy PPI in high risk patients.
• C. Two IV cannulas.
• D. IV erythromycin.
• E. Hemodynamic assessment.
45
BO5 3:
• The followings are high risk endoscopic lesions during UGI Bleeding except:
• A. Spurting vessel.
• B. Ozzing.
• C. Adherent clot.
• D. Ulcer with pigmentary changes.
• E. None of the above.
46
BO5 4:
• The best endoscopic hemostatic intervention for high risk lesions is:
• A. Dual therapy.
• B. Single therapy.
• C. Adrenaline injection alone.
• D. APC alone.
• E. Sclerotherapy.
47
BO5 5:
• Therapeutic interventional radiology can be used when endoscopic hemostasis fails in:
• A. UGI Bleeding.
• B. lower GI bleeding.
• C. Both.
• D. Neither.
• E. Only for UGI Bleeding.
48
BO5 6:
• The best indication for NGI in GI Bleeding is in:
• A. UGI Bleeding routinely.
• B. lower GI bleeding routinely.
• C. In severe lower GI bleeding with shock.
• D. It can surely exclude upper GI source of bleeding .
• E. None of the above.
49
BO5 7:
• IV erythromycin in UGI bleeding can:
• A. Improve survival.
• B. Can improve visualization during endoscopy & reduce the need for re-endoscopy.
• C. Reduce the need for blood transfusions.
• D. Reduces the need for surgery.
• E. Reduce hospital stay.
50
BO5 8:
• Angioectasias as a cause of lower GIB is associated with:
• A. Aortic stenosis.
• B. Vasculitis.
• C. Hemophilias.
• D. Female gender.
• E. None of the above.
51
BO5 9:
• Endoscopy for significant upper compared with lower GI Bleeding is usually performed:
• A. Earlier.
• B. Later.
• C. At the same time from the onset.
• D. The second day from the onset.
• E. The 3rd day from the onset.
52
BO5 10:
• Testing for H Pylori during UGI bleeding is frequently:
• A. Positive.
• B. False positive.
• C. False negative.
• D. Negative.
• E. None.
53
BO5 11:
• Patients with high risk endoscopic upper GI bleeding lesions should be monitored in the hospital for:
• A. 12 hours.
• B. 24 hours.
• C. 36 hourd.
• D. 72 hours.
• E. 96 hours.
54
Thanks for attention
55