26
GERD: modern investigation / management Prepared by: Professor Dr. Mohammad Shaikhani, CABM/FRCP/EBGH.

GIT 4th GERD 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GIT 4th GERD 2016

GERD: modern investigation / management Prepared by:

Professor Dr. Mohammad Shaikhani, CABM/FRCP/EBGH.

Page 2: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Introduction:

• It is a very common. • Commonly under-diagnosed resulting in a significant impairment in

QOL.• 24-44% of general pop experiencing symptoms for 2 days or more/

week, oesophagiti; 12%, Barrett’s ;1.3%, irrespective of symptoms.• 33% with oesophagitis & 46% with Barrett’s areasymptomatic. • Severe form can lead to potentially avoidable complications

including severe oesophagitis with scarring/stricture formation, Barrett’s& adenoca.

Page 3: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Definitions:

• The Montreal classification:• ‘A condition that develops when the reflux of stomach contents

causes troublesome symptoms/or complications’.• Mostly acid gastric refluxate is responsible • Bile, may contribute (nonacid reflux). • Combined impedance&pH measurement characterises all acid &

non-acid reflux episodes.

Page 4: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Non-erosive reflux disease:• 70% of patients with heartburn do not have evidence of erosive

changes on endoscopy.• Of these, a proportion have increased acid reflux on 24-hour pH

monitoring, classified as having non-erosive reflux disease (NERD).

Page 5: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Functional heartburn:

• A proportion of patients describe typical reflux symptoms without evidence of reflux.

• The Rome II definition ‘an episodic burning in the absence of pathologic GER, motility disorders& any structural explanations’.

• The pathophysiology remains obscure

Page 6: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Reflux oesophagitis

• Reflux oesophagitis is reflux causing inflammation or ulceration of the oesophagus

• Los Angeles classification is now the most commonly used to quantify GERD damage.

Page 7: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Pathophysiology

• Results from disruption of the anti-reflux mechanisms of:• LES.• The crural diaphragm.• Oesophageal clearance by eso peristalsis.• Neutralisation mechanisms by saliva. • Abnormal TLESRs not initiated by a swallow, result in reflux of

gastric contents, account for 90% of reflux episodes, usually mild-moderate GERD.

• Hiatus hernias increase the magnitude of reflux during TLOSRs.• Factors which relax the LES& increase reflux: caffeine, fat,

smoking, drugs (CCB &nitrates)& gastric distention.• The association of increased BMI& GORD remains unclear.

Page 8: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Pathogenic factors in GERD:

• Defective LES& crural function (hiatus hernia)• Increased TLESR.• Reduced Oesophageal clearance mechanisms (oesophageal

motility, saliva)• Refluxate (gastric acid, bile, enzymes)• Mucosal response to refluxate• Drugs affecting anti-reflux barrier (nitrates, calcium antagonists)• Diet (fat, caffeine).

Page 9: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Clinical features of GERD:

• The most common symptom;s heartburn, regurgitation, belching, epigastric pain, chest pain, dysphagia& acid brash.

• Less frequent symptoms include odynophagia, globus, nausea & pharyngeal symptoms.

• Symptoms of GORD, can be highly variable.• Diagnosis of GORD can be difficult.• The presence of heartburn is not entirely predictive of acid reflux• Only 5–10% of episodes of acid reflux produce heartburn.• The positive predictive value of heartburn for endoscopic

oesophagitis is poor, although the negative predictive value is slightly better.

Page 10: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Diagnosis of GERD:emprical

• Most patients with typical symptoms of GORD do not require investigation and will respond to a trial of (PPI).

• High dose PPI 40 mgm Omeprazole twice daily for 1 week has a sensitivity of 80% as a diagnostic test for GORD.

Page 11: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Diagnosis of GERD:OGD

• Patients of any age presenting with typical reflux symptoms with the following alarm symptoms should have an urgent endoscopy:

• Dysphagia/Unintentional weight loss/GIB/Anaemia/Persistent vomiting.

• Endoscopy should also be performed before oesol pH studies. • A negative endoscopy does not exclude NERD.• Screening endoscopy for the diagnosis of Barrett’s in patients of any

age with a history of chronic heartburn cannot be recommended, as the absolute risk of adenocarcinoma is < 1:1,000&40% of who develop adenocarcinoma in association with Barrett’s oesophagus do not have a history of heartburn.

Page 12: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Diagnosis of GERD:Ph studies

• Acid exposure of the distal oesophagus can be measured either by placing a nasooesophageal probe 5 cm above the physiological LOS or by placing a wireless capsule probe endoscopically. Measurements of pH can be taken for either 24 or 48 hours.

• PPI or (H2A) should bes topped one week before the procedure. • Patients who have oesophagitis demonstrated on endoscopy do not

need pH studies for diagnostic purposes.• Patients who have refractory symptoms to a trial of PPI may have

inadequate acid suppression.• This can be demonstrated by pH studies obtained while the patient

is taking PPIs. It is reasonable as an alternative, however, to escalate PPI dose in these patients.

Page 13: GIT 4th GERD 2016
Page 14: GIT 4th GERD 2016
Page 15: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Diagnosis of GERD: Eso manometry

• Does not influence the management except in a few circumstances:• Where oes motility abnormalities are suspected as achalasia. • To correctly place the pH probe 5 cm above the LOS.• Prior to anti-reflux surgery, although studies suggest this very rarely

changes outcome or helps tailor surgery.

Page 16: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Diagnosis of GERD: MC Intraluminal impedance.

• Useful for the investigation of PPI-resistant reflux symptoms although its role has not yet been completely defined.

Page 17: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment:

• The is to effectively control symptoms&prevent associated complications by adopting a stepped approach.

• The effects of drugs on either the healing and/or symptom relief of oesophagitis or NERD is generally greater in patients with endoscopy proven oesophagitis.

Page 18: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment: Life style

• Simple manoeuvres outlined below may have a marked effect on symptoms:

• Dietary changes: avoiding fat, caffeine& alcohol• Avoiding late meals: Nocturnal reflux can be minimised by

consuming small meals long before sleep.• Although the association of obesity is unclea,but there is

association with oesophageal adenocarcinoma& many other well-known diseases, so weight loss is suggested as part of management.

Page 19: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment: antacids/alginates

• Antacids consist of calcium carbonate, magnesium& aluminum salts in various compounds or combinations.

• Antacids effects:neutralisation of gastric HCL &pepsin inhibition.• Alginate effects: formation of a gel in the presence of gastric acid.• Alginate-based raftforming usually contain sodium or potassium

bicarbonate; in the presence of gastric acid,converted to carbon dioxide, which becomes entrapped within the gel precipitate, converting it into a foam which floats on the surface of the gastric contents, much like a raft on water&providing a relatively pH-neutral barrier.

• They improve reflux symptoms, but do not heal oesophagitis.• They are indicated for very mild symptoms.• No role for antacids/ alginates in the maintenance of GORD.

Page 20: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment: Acid inhibition

• H2As / PPIs should be prescribed for patients with symptoms not well controlled on lifestyle changes or antacids/alginates.

• PPI are prodrugs, which are activated in the acidic canalicular space of the parietal cell, inhibiting the final pathway of acid secretion and suppress acid production for several days.

• (H2A) reversibly bind H2 gastric parietal cell receptors.• Both H2As&PPIs effectively heal prevent relapse of oesophagitis,

but PPIs are superior to both H2As/ prokinetics.• The efficacy of PPIs is dose dependant& mucosal healing is

dependent upon the proportion of time the intra-gastric pH is 4.• The dose effect of H2As , is constant.• At equivalent doses, all the PPIs appear to be equally efficacious.• PPI should be taken 30 minutes before meals.

Page 21: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment: Non-repons to PPI

• Patients with typical reflux symptoms, who do not respond to initial courses of PPIs fall into one of the following groups:

• Patients with inadequate acid suppression• Patients with an alternative diagnosis.• Patients with functional heartburn.

Page 22: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment: Non-repons to PPI

• If symptom control is not achieved after four weeks, we suggest extending PPI therapy to two months as healing improve from 68- 84%

• A proportion of patients fail to adequately increase the gastric pH 4 with standard-dose PPIs. Doubling the PPI dose does appear to have an additional effect specially in patients with more severe oesophagitis (LA grade C and D).

• A proportion of patients experience nocturnal acid breakthrough, even with twice daily PPI,so addition of an H2A before sleep may reduce nocturnal symptoms, however, the benefit may be limited by tachyphylaxis.

Page 23: GIT 4th GERD 2016
Page 24: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment: Prokinetic agents

• Existing drugs have not shown promise• Little data exist for domperidone.• GABA-B agonists,baclofen, may be potential targets for future

developments.

Page 25: GIT 4th GERD 2016

Treatment: Surgery

• There is no statistical difference between outcomes of medical therapy (PPI or H2A)&surgery.

• Mortality associated with surgery of up to 0.4%, this is only recommended if:

• Patients who do not respond to medical therapy.• Do not wish to take medication or • Have associated respiratory symptoms not responding to PPI.• The most common complications of Nissen fundoplication include: • Dysphagia & gas-bloat syndrome in up to 50% of patients. • After a median of five years, up to 50% of patients after surgery

require medication to control symptoms.

Page 26: GIT 4th GERD 2016