Upload
hjc
View
70
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Next Gen. of Canadian Giving with emphasis on Gen. X and Gen Y
Citation preview
THE NEXT GENERATION OF CANADIAN GIVINGAFP Presentation 2014
About hjc
• hjc is a leader in non-profit technology and online fundraising strategy with over 20 years of experience.
• Some of our services: – Copywriting, design execution, strategic
planning, integrated fundraising, software implementation, email strategy and communications calendars, google analytics & adwords, social media strategy and management.
Proprietary & Confidential 3
About hjc
Current Fundraising Reality
Aging Donor Base
Donor files and acquisition list sources are shrinking –
the environment is competitive.
The Next Generation of Canadian Giving
• Joint study published in September 2013 based on an online survey of Canadian donors, excluding Quebec, conducted May 16-26, 2013.
• Conducted in conjunction with a similar study in the US.
• The fundraising landscape is becoming more and more complicated. What do we do? Listen to our donors.
What key questions did we ask?
• Does age influence who you give to? • What are the basic dos and don’ts for
fundraisers? • What are the preferred giving channels of
each generation? • What are the preferred communications
and engagement channels?
% Of Generation Giving
Tota
l ann
ual g
ivin
g
55% 65% 75% 85% 95%$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
79% Give5.8 M donors$831 yr/avg4.5 charities$4.8 B/yr
62% Give4.5M donors$639 yr/avg4.0 charities$2.9 B/yr
78% Give6.9 M donors$942 yr/avg4.9 charities$6.5 B/yr
87% Give3.1 M donors$1507 yr/avg7.0 charities$4.7 B/yr
Gen Y
Gen X
Boomers
Matures
Generational Giving
Bubble size is ‘Estimated Annual Contributions’
An overview of annual giving by generation confirms the importance of Boomers in the charitable giving space.
7
Born: 81-91
Born: before 1946Born: 46-64
Born: 65-80
Draw your bubbles.
Causes – Top Tier
GEN Y GEN X BOOMERS MATURES
PRIORITY CAUSE
45% 50% 50% 55%
21% 31% 31% 36%
32% 40% 38% 28%
18% 25% 23% 40%
15% 17% 17% 14%
12% 14% 11% 14%
Health charities
Local social service
Children’s charities
Place of worship
Animal rescue/protection
Emergency relief
50%
30%
35%
26%
16%
13%
71%
48%
46%
33%
23%
22%
Overall Giving Column1
% donating overall to causes
*Bolding indicates statistical significance among audiences. Arrows indicate statistical significance between 2010 and 2013.
• Health charities have the largest % of donors across generations
• Emergency giving dropped as a priority cause across generations
↓
↓
↓↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
↓
↓ ↓
↓
↓ ↓
GEN Y GEN X BOOMERS MATURES
55% 54% 58% 55%
45% 55% 35% 31%
21% 35% 47% 56%
36% 39% 38% 30%
29% 33% 40% 37%
11% 23% 36% 58%
22% 29% 37% 34%
22% 24% 29% 29%
24% 20% 25% 20%
25% 19% 11% 9%
15% 14% 12% 14%
5% 9% 15% 18%
7% 5% 4% 9%
4% 9% 4% 4%
5% 8% 4% 3%
12% 4% 2% -
6% 4% 3% 2%
1% 2% 3% 2%
Donated this way in last 2 years
Checkout DonationOnline Donation
Honor/TributePurchase for Proceeds
Pledge at EventMailed Check/Credit Card
Door to Door*Monthly Debit
Street Canvassing*Third Party Vendor
Email*Phone
Radio/TV*Online Ad*
Will/Planned GiftMobile/Text
Social Networking SiteStocks, Bonds, Property
56%
41%
41%
36%
35%
32%
32%
26%
22%
15%
13%
12%
6%
5%
5%
4%
4%
2%
Giving Channels*New or changed attribute, no tracking data
↑↑
↑
↓
↑
↓
↑
↑
↓↑
↑
↓
1%
1%
5%
6%
12%
18%
25%
33%
34%
34%
35%
43%
3%
6%
9%
9%
12%
14%
25%
16%
21%
23%
25%
24%
34%
36%
36%
30%
34%
29%
22%
15%
17%
16%
12%
9%
47%
41%
23%
18%
15%
11%
4%
8%
3%
6%
2%
1%
Acceptable Solicitation Channel(from organizations with an established relationship)
Very AcceptableVery UnacceptableNET GEN Y GEN X BOOMERS MATURES
+77 +78 +87 +77 +63
+69 +70 +76 +68 +62
+46 +53 +40 +46 +47
+34 +51 +43 +30 +13
+25 +50 +41 +11 +5
+8 +45 +26 -2 -33
-24 -4 -21 -37 -24
-26 +24 -5 -46 -65
-35 -6 -29 -49 -46
-35 -26 -38 -41 -30
-46 -17 -38 -54 -67
-57 -29 -48 -76 -63
Friend
Friend's child/grandchild
Letter/message
Radio or TV program
Opt-in for extra charge on ticket/recording
Phone call
Message via social media
Voice message
Door-to-door canvassing
Street canvassing
Text message
Acceptable Solicitation Channel
Net (Acceptable – Unacceptable)
Smwt Smwt
Channels with a personal connection are most acceptable, followed by letters or TV/radio.
*Bolding indicates statistical significance among audiences. Arrows indicate statistical significance between 2010 and 2013.
Acceptable Solicitation Channel
• Engagement channels may or may not be transaction channels.
• The cost of direct mail means that you need to be more strategic in how it is used and it must be integrated.
• Looking at your income channel-by-channel does not reflect the importance of each channel to fundraising.
Directed dona-tion
Unrestricted donation
Either is fine
24%22%
49%
26%
18%
53%
23% 25%
46%
10%
40% 43%
Directed Giving Preferences
Gen Y Gen X Boomers Matures
27%
55%
7% 5%
22%
44%
6%1%
22%
34%
5%0%
14%
28%
7%2%
Would Motivate Me a Great Deal to Make a Larger Donation to
Charity
*Bolding indicates statistical significance among audiences. Arrows indicate statistical significance between 2010 and 2013.
Engagement: Directed Giving
Quick audit of your organization:
1. Have I underinvested in fundraising to Gen. X donors, who are a quickly rising force in philanthropic giving in Canada?
2. Have I completely ignored the up and coming younger generation, or relegated them to an un-strategic social media effort?
3. Does my fundraising channel mix include direct mail for younger donors and digital communications for older ones? (Hint: it should)
4. Am I preparing for the future by addressing the cultural demands Gens X and Y are placing on institutions (such as transparency).
5. Am I empowering my most enthusiastic supporters to fundraise and evangelize on my behalf?
15
Appealing to Generation YOK – I’ll donate online.
What’s in it for me?
Where is this
money going? Look! I just finished
the ice bucket
challenge.
APPEALING TO GEN YCASE STUDY: THE REDWOOD
Background
• The Redwood is a Toronto based shelter for women and children who have fled abusive situations
• Provides a safe haven for families to live free from domestic violence, fear, and threat
• Strong support from local community
Challenge
• Every holiday season, donors would buy and deliver physical gifts to The Redwood
• The shelter was running out of space and gifts were taking up important program areas, like the children’s library
• Often, gifts didn’t meet the needs of women and children staying in the shelter
• Limited budget and technology constraints
Opportunity
• Shift traditional holiday gift program to online
• Meet immediate needs of women and children at the shelter
• Gain back physical space in the shelter to run programs over the holiday period
• Lessen the labour intensive work for staff who had to sort and wrap gifts
Opportunity
• Reach new donors in the online space• Increase giving levels of current donors• Create a symbolic gift program that runs
year round• Create a feeling of designated giving
without restricting the gifts.
Solution
• Create a new online symbolic giving catalogue
• Use existing online tools to host e-commerce part of site
• Develop unique microsite design and create custom CMS to make it easy for staff to update in the future
Safe Haven Store
• hjc worked with The Redwood on creative development, copy, design and building out the site
• Design and copy evoked a shopping and “Santa” feeling – store sign, corkboard background, coin like buttons
• Gift categories and items were created based on the most needed items at the shelter and reflected holiday theme
Holiday Campaign• Online marketing campaign to promote the
launch of the Safe Haven Store– Four email appeals– Banners for website and social media– Google advertising– Integrated into direct mail campaign
• Marketing assets kept the same look and feel of store
• Consistent CTA throughout e-appeals – focused on mom’s story
Results• Email campaign - $139 average gift, 1.14%
conversion rate, $10,725 revenue with a list size of 1,700
• Direct mail – total revenue of $39,159, total list size of 9,463
• General donations made on main website – total revenue of $16,663, 70 online transactions
• Total revenue (online & offline) - $66,622, growth rate of 64% over previous year
Appealing to Gen. XSure! I’ll get jiggy and
donate to your fundraising page!
That event
sounds fun. I
think I’ll join.
I’m thinking about my
future.I have kids. K
ids
charities are
important.
Giving with Gen. X is growing.Test solicitation approaches to Generation X they have lots of years to give!
Case Study: Sick Kids Foundation
Case Study: Sick Kids Foundation
Supporter survey sent out to: • Collect demographic
information• Collect information on
giving interests• Find legacy bequests• Identify comms
preferences. • Much More!
Case Study: Sick Kids Foundation
• Survey: – Sent to 57,400 donors– 3 key segments:
Monthly, Active & Lapsed
– Shared budgeting!– Surveymonkey and RE
Case Study: Sick Kids Foundation
The Results: 1. Generation X is thinking of legacy gifts!2. They are open to Gifts of Stock and 300%
over represented on LinkedIn3. Raised $7,5744. Reactivated 30 donors5. Found 85 expectances and 292 legacy leads.6. We learned how to solicit to Gen. X.
Step 1: Analyze & Identify
a. Start with your databaseb. Look at your analyticsc. Solicit feedback through surveysd. Build profiles / personas
Why a database audit?
• Benchmark• Identify Trends• Identify Pain Points • Identify Opportunities
Analytics Review
• Google Analytics – Top Referrals– Audience Demographics– Keyword Performance
• Facebook Insights– Audience Demographics– Popular Posts
• Email Analytics– Popular Content & Clicks
• Alexa.com– Competitor Web Analysis
Other Valuable Reports:
Supporter Surveys
Here’s where I go on my rant against anonymous surveys!
A Good Supporter Survey Should:
Collect demographic information Collect information on giving potential and
interests Collect information on first interest and interaction
with your charity Find legacy bequests Collect information on communication preferences Integrate back into your CRM for future marketing
opportunities & segmentation Help you build profiles / personas
Online Sample
• Sent to 57,400 donors• 3 key segments:• Monthly, Active &
Lapsed– 5,530 responses
(response rate of 11%)– Raised $7,574
• Reactivated 30 donors• Found 85 expectances
and 292 legacy leads
And the mail will pay for itself…
Build Profiles / Personas
Buyer personas are fictional,
generalized representations of your ideal
donors. They help you understand your
donors (and prospective donors) better,
and make it easier for you to tailor
content to the specific needs, behaviors,
and concerns of different groups.
Step 2: Map & Improve
a. Map Current Journeysb. Improve & Innovatec. Build Infrastructure & Processes to
Succeed
Team Facilitation
• Good to have outside party / consultant facilitate
• Invite anyone who ‘touches’ the donor – events, service, direct marketing, donor services, advocacy
• Set-up your journey mapping canvas…
Sample Journey Plan