Upload
iawg-africa
View
81
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Range land users association (RUA) - a model for transforming customary institution for sustainable management of natural resources in Merti Sub County Isiolo
Citation preview
Range land users association (RUA) - a model for transforming customary institution for sustainable management of natural resources in Merti Sub County Isiolo"
By Hassan HulufoManaging consultant
Drylands Development Co. Ltd
Customary NRM institution among Waso Borana
• Borana customary laws’ aada seera Boorana’ is formulated by Gada council with its seat in southern Ethiopia.
• Regulation of pasture and water fall under “ aada mara bisaani”• Elaborate unwritten laws binding on all members of Borana community and
whoever resides among them• Regulate access and use• Defined fines for law breakers which is enforced through customary institutions• Key Customary natural resource management institution• Aba Olla- owner of the village responsible for enforcing rules on those who reside
in his village. In consultation with other elders on his village he makes decision on migration
• Aba herega : father of wells/ponds: water regulation normally initiator of water source or his descendant
• Jars deedha; council of elders constituted from clan leaders / jalabs living in same deedha
• Customary laws; welfare of people, livestock, wild animals, vegetation
Key NRM management units
Unit Role in NRM Unit head/Decision making organ
Warr (household) •Manage own herd in accordance to defined communal rule of NR access•Educate HH members on customary laws•Responsible for paying fine in case HH member violates laws
•Aba Warra or male household head.
Olla (village); 30-100 hh •Decision on access to pasture and water around Olla• decision on migration and herd splitting
•Aba Olla( founder of the village or his descendant)
Ardha: Several Olla •Collaborate on management grazing resources around their villages•May make joint decision on migration
•Jars ardha ( ardha male elders)
Deedha; Wider grazing unit
•Regulate grazing regime; wet, dry and drought fall back•Maintain reciprocal NR access with neighbours
Jars Deedha
Deedha councils in Merti Sub county
Main Deedha are;• Cherab ; open grassland • Chari : bush thicket• Merti central: open grassland, bush thicket • Commonly shared : Drought reserve areas + flood plain (chaffa)• Historical transformation of deedha councils• Water and pasture access in all deedha regulated according to
Borana customary law during colonial time• Colonialist appointed respected elders as chiefs to administor
several deedha. Colonial chiefs enforced customary NRM rules• Post independence; authority of customary institutions eroded;
interference from provincial administration• Post independence chief appointed from administration police and
locals serving in other public service offices
Map of Isiolo county
Deedha council and management of key NR in Merti
Key NR managed by deedha councils are• Water especially shallow well in Chari, Individual
ponds, River water especially access points • Pasture ; wet season, dry season and drought season• From late 1970s boreholes were sunk( non
conventional water source)• Boreholes unlike shallow well and pond/pans are
initiated by outsiders(GoK)• Concept of konfi and aba herega would not apply• Borehole opened up critical grazing reserve area
Challenges in managing drought reserve boreholes
• 1980s managed by pump attendants employed by ministry of water• No user levies charged; opening and closure determined by
government• Break down common and repairs untimely and hence death of
livestock• 1990s formation of borehole adhoc committees• Committee dissolved after every drought• Committee lacked traditional authority and not recognized as user
groups representatives• Cost sharing levies misappropriated• Committee couldn’t enforce deedha laws; usurped by chiefs• Unregulated number of animals at boreholes, including influx from
neighbouring district• Effectiveness of borehole in mitigating drought undermined
Evolution of a hybrid NRM institution
• 1999/2000 drought DPIRP/OOP, Actionaid and District steering group initiated community reflection process on drought emergency management
• Need to strengthen customary NRM rules agreed on• Institution to regulate rangeland resources in Merti division was borne• Rangeland Users association; a membership organization formed• Drought reserve borehole treated as a deedha and RUA converted into
deedha council to manage it• Members are drawn from 4 deedha made up of 10 ardha(location)• Each ardha allocated slot on proportional basis on 19 member
management committee• Location representatives elected by ardha during general assembly• Investment in institutional strengthening of RUA; membership drives,
registration, training, exposure visits by partners GoK & NGOs
RUA management structure
General assembly(all members)
Management committee19 persons
Borehole 1 management
Borehole 2management
Borehole 3management
Borehole 4management
Borehole users/ RUA members + allowed immigrant users
RUA mandate • Management of drought reserve boreholes and grazing resources around the 4
boreholes• Enforce customary laws relating to water and pasture with • Represent members and wider community in district forum on NRM and drought
management• Collect levies and penalties set by general assembly on users when boreholes are
operational• Regulate number of animals allocated to each borehole based on available
pasture/browse and borehole yields• Regulate influx of animals from neighbouring communities through application of
customary rule on reciprocal access to cross border resources during• Periodic pasture surveillance during non drought period to ensure utilization of
drought reserve pasture by neighbors• Seek government recognition as representative of rangeland users and participate
in decisions on development of additional water points in the drought reserve rangeland
• Advice community on to Chari reserve when pasture is depleted to avoid denudation( alert ministry of interior as well since chari is prone to conflict)
Achievements• Registered as a trust• Has a constitution endorsed by general assembly last reviewed April 2014• Operation of drought reserve boreholes streamlined• Sense of ownership of boreholes and rangeland among communities• Authority of community to regulate pasture and water use restored through RUA• Recognition of RUA as user association by government and non state actors• Effectively moderated influence of chief on NRM• Sit on district steering group/county steering group• Death directly related to drought substantially reduced• Stockpiling of fast moving spares at borehole sites• All boreholes have standby genset and submissible pumps• Safe custody of genesets during normal time at RUA store in Merti• Effective resource mobilization for development of storage tanks, additional water troughs and
boreholes• Piloted trucking of water for calf, old animals and lactating animals when distance to boreholes
increased 2010/11 drought• Recognized and involved in proper selection of sites for new water sources development in
rangeland
Challenges• Irregular annual meetings due to cost implications• Political interference • Underrepresentation of women and youth in management
committee• Vastness of the reserve and cost of surveillance especially
when boreholes are not operation during normal time• Reliance on government technicians for major repairs which
is not free • Record keeping is rudimentary and has loopholes for
misappropriation of levies collected• Negative influence of INGO; setting up parallel grazing
committee, deedha committee in parts of Merti sub county
Opportunities to strengthen RUA
• RUA has taken advantage of the following opportunities;
• Water Act 2002; water users association • Constitution of Kenya 2010; devolved
government • Opportunity for county level legislation to
recognize customary NRM laws and institution
Key lessons
• Hybrid institution which draw on customary NRM laws and registered with government have better chance of getting recognized
• A community institution which evolve out of community need and run by community members will survive external interference
• Empowerment of community institutions should be seen as an essential component of drought resilience building
Livestock taking water at Yamicha August 2014