12
Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort? Jana Kholová and col. ICRISAT AuSoRGM- 22 nd July - 2015

Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

  • Upload
    icrisat

  • View
    281

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Precision agriculture for SAT;Near future or unrealistic effort?

Jana Kholová and col.

ICRISAT

AuSoRGM- 22nd July - 2015

Page 2: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Overview

• Characterizing target environment

• Relevant phenotype for SAT

• Genetic determination of relevant phenotype

• HT-phenotyping

• Phenotype value

• System complexity & link to socio-economy

Page 3: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

average yield

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

vegetative pre-flowering post-flowering post-flowering

relieved

mild stress

we

igh

ed

yie

ld (

kg

/ha

)

vegetative

pre-flowering

post-flowering

post-flowering relieved

mild stress

4. Relevant phenotype???

1. Target environments

Kholová et al. 2013 3. Impact on production

7%

18%

18% 17% 40%

major stress patterns

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600

thermal time (oDay)

S/D

vegetative

pre-flowering

post-flowering

post-flowering relieved

mild

2. Environmental patterns

Page 4: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Grain Yield

Grain Number Grain Size & N

BiomassRADN

TE T RUE Rint

vpd

kl LAISLNRoots k

TN LNo

A >A

APSIM Generic Crop Template, from Graeme Hammer

Which ”phenotype” is linked to yield improvement in target agro-ecology

(SAT – terminal drought)?

Yield is consequence ofGxExM

Research concepts – relevant phenotyping

Focus on the“causal phenotype”

Page 5: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Relevant phenotype for SAT?Grain Yield

Grain Number Grain Size & N

BiomassRADN

TE T RUE Rint

vpd

kl LAISLNRoots k

TN LNo

A >A

R² = 0.7108

0

4

8

12

16

20

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

WU 3 weeks after stress imposition (L plant-1)

Gra

in Y

ield

(g p

lant-

1)

Grain yield and water use

R² = 0.7436

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000

Post

-an

thes

is w

ater

use

Pre-anthesis water use (g plant-1)

constitutive WU defines

grain-filling underterminal drought

Pre-/post-anthesis water use

Vadez et al. 2012

Page 6: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Relevant phenotype for SAT?

Constitutive WU :

Grain Yield

Grain Number Grain Size & N

BiomassRADN

TE T RUE Rint

vpd

kl LAISLNRoots k

TN LNo

A >A

Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD; kPa)Tra

nsp

irati

on

rate

(g

cm

-2h

-

1)0 2 4

0

1

LA conductivity

LA

Thermal time

& LA

Basic research onWU components Vadez et al. 2010-2015

Kholová et al. 2010-2014

Page 7: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Grain Yield

Grain Number Grain Size & N

BiomassRADN

TE T RUE Rint

vpd

kl LAISLNRoots k

TN LNo

A >A

Example: WU components – genetic determination

Effect of QTL depends on genetic background (stg 3A&B!)

R16 (senescent parent) + stg3A&3B QTLVPD response -> high TE

S35 (senescent parent) + stg3A&3B QTL

small leaves

Vadez et al. 2011

Stay-green ILs

Page 8: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Grain Yield

Grain Number Grain Size & N

BiomassRADN

TE T RUE Rint

vpd

kl LAISLNRoot

s

k

TN LNo

A >A

“causal phenotype”(HT-phenotyping)

“consequential phenotype”(High precision field trials)

No

. of lin

es p

hen

oty

ped

% o

f lines h

old

ing

desir

ed

p

hen

oty

pe

Phenotyping principle

Platforms linkage! LeasyScan

Lysimetry

Field

Page 9: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Value of phenotype? – in silico predictions

Environment

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

200 300 400 500 600 700 800

LA

(cm

2)

thermal time (degree days)

S35

7001

6008

6026

6040

6016

Canopy size

+ = $ ?

-1000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Gra

in y

ield

ga

in (

kg

ha

-1)

original grain yield (kg ha-1)

Smaller canopy

(low TPLAmax)

Grain

Pre-flowering

Flowering

Post-flowering

Post-flowering relieved

No stress

Model

Page 10: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

Example: System complexity

Crop value = f(quantity + quality; socio-economic context)

Stay-green sorghum; grain quality

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

S35 7001 6008 6026 6040 6008 S35 7001 6026 6040

pro

tein

s(%

)

stay-green isolines

~ 20% QTL effect

Control Drought

?Price per unit of protein?

Link to socioeconomics

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

pro

tein

(%)

management

Drought

~ 15% management effect

Control

Page 11: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

RESEARCH APPLICATIONConclusions; Structure of research

Value of traits(crop model & GxExM)

Genetic determination of phenotype

Environmental characterization& relevant traits

ideotypes & managementto regions

(precision Ag for SAT)

Breeding populations

Socio-economics

Page 12: Precision agriculture for SAT; Near future or unrealistic effort?

R4D requires multidisciplinarity!

• Bioinformatists• Technology developers• Physiologists• Breeders• Modelers• Socioeconomists• Nutritionists….

Thank youMissionTo reduce poverty, hunger, malnutrition and environmental degradation in the dryland tropics