View
187
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Philippe ELLUL, Senior Science Officer
ECOP meeting
Rome, 12-13 Nov. 2015
Consortium/System Office Science Team
Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning
System Office and new SRF
Finance
IP & Legal
Strat. & Partn.
ICT & KM
Science
System Council
Portfolio / CRPs / Centers
ind
epen
den
t ..
. IEA
ISPC
IAU New
SR
F
Science Team at the CRP level
To implement the reform process in alignment with SRF by
– maintaining an ongoing direct dialogue with CRPs to provide a sounding board and share best practices – concerns across programs
– ensuring that top quality and effective R4D proposals are designed and proposed to CB/ FC for approval (Extension, draft & pre-proposal phase2)
– assessing annually the planning (POWB) and reviewing performance of CRPs (Annual Reports) by monitoring progress along impact pathways and advise on resource re-allocation
– advising on the potential use of technological and behavioural innovations (eg pre-breeding approaches, policies issues on germplasm exchange, big data opportunities, system dynamics or agro-biodiversity studies
– supporting CRPs to set up an efficient Result-Based Management (RBM) framework, promoting an outcome-based approach; MEL CoP
1) The ST supports CGIAR scientists & stakeholders in shaping a coherent, innovative and well-balanced Portfolio of CRPs that
• enhances synergies across the system
• address research gaps
• minimize duplication
Science Team’s role at the Portfolio level
2) The ST produces and facilitates adherence to CGIAR research policies, guidelines, and standards that facilitate increased coherence and impact
• Harmonized reporting templates (POWBs and Annual Reports)
• Guidelines for Extension Proposals 2015-16
• Guidelines for CRP 2nd call 2017-22
• CB/FC Gender Strategy
• Open Access & Open Data strategy (harmonized implementation)
Science Team’s role at the Portfolio level
3) The ST deals with increased Portfolio efficiencies by steering the entire package towards increased efficiency, relevance, and scientific innovation and quality by:
• identifying concerted actions (pre-breeding, GB++, RBM, etc...)
• harmonizing responses on cross-cutting strategic issues
• coordinating strategic sharing of research infrastructure across CRPs
Site/country integration (Partnership)
Data repositories, metadata, interoperability (OA-DM, ICT)
User-friendly flexible IT system for RBM results information
Innovation platforms, Phenotyping platforms
Etc...
Science Team’s role at the Portfolio level
Science Team’s role at the Portfolio level
1st MEL CoP meeting (Rome, 10-11 November 2015)
System Office & CRP performance monitoring
CCEE
MonitoringEvaluation
CRP Life Cycle
Pro
port
ion
of
rese
arc
h p
ortf
olio
Impact Assessment
CONSORTIUM –SYSTEM-OFFICE
IEA
IAU
But generic ToC far too simplistic about how science caninfluence rest of world
Essential to evolve realistic & dynamic ToC overtime (e.gprivate seed companies w/ 5-year plan revisited annually)
Need + flexibility, + willingness to learn from mistakes,asking key questions, re-inventing program
3rd round of CRP Annual Reports (2012-2013-2014)
• quality reporting
• + structured CRPs
• visibility on progress towards IP
• Performance reporting strategy
CRP Annual Reports 2013, 2014 and 2015
A. KEY MESSAGES (1 ½ page)
B. IMPACT PATHWAY AND INTERMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES (IDOS) (1/4 page)
C. PROGRESS ALONG THE IMPACT PATHWAY
The CRP should complete Table 1, in Annex 1 and provide a narrative (C.1 to C.3), referring to those indicators from the table in Annex 1 that are relevant to the CRP
C.1 Progress towards outputs ( 2 pages)
C.2 Progress towards the achievement of research outcomes and IDOs ( 2 pages)
C.3 Progress towards Impact (1/4 page)
D. GENDER RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS (1 page)
E. PARTNERSHIPS BUILDING ACHIEVEMENTS (1 page)
F. CAPACITY BUILDING (1/2 page)
G. RISK MANAGEMENT (less than 1/2 page)
H. LESSONS LEARNED (1 page)
I. CRP FINANCIAL REPORT (L series, 9 Excel files)
CRP Annual Reports 2013, 2014 and 2015
• KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA (12)
• CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND INNOVATION PLATFORMS (5)
• TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT (10)
• POLICIES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT (5)
• OUTCOMES ON THE GROUND (2)
34 indicators in Table 1 / Annex 1
Indicator #9 Number of publications in ISI journals produced by CRP
Web-link to the complete list of papers published in 2014
Funding acknowledgement (W1, W2, W3 or bilateral) is suitable in all publications (mapping the publications to CRPs’ contribution)
A classification based on ISI impact index would provide information on science quality and content
Present a summary on the CRP research staff (numbers, grades, gender; see FTA AR 2014)
2014 CRP ISI papers
1 FTA 328
2 GRiSP 218
3 WLE 150
4 A4NH 137
5 CCAFS 114
6 GL 108
7 WHEAT 107
8 PIM 98
9 RTB 92
10 DS 72
11 MAIZE 64
12 AAS 49
13 L&F 48
14 DC 47
15 HT 44
TOTAL 1676
CRP Performance / Science quality
Informed by
Elsevier bibliometric analysis
2014
34 indicators of the Annual Report (Table 1 / Annex 1)
TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
18. Number of technologies/NRM practices under research in the CRP (Phase I)
=> Novel genes, promoters or QTLs with known major effect(s) on specific traits, molecular markers, breeding or lines with improved traits (NILs, RILs, transgenic, …), DHLs, animal lines with specific traits
23. Number of technologies /NRM practices field tested (phase II)
=> Superior genotypes, breeds, lines, crosses or hybrids with improved traits, transgenic lines, improved variety for which certification is being sought
27. Number of technologies /NRM practices released by public and private sector partners globally (phase III)
=> Improved varieties, cultivar, lines or breeds with various desirable traits, management practices, ready to be dessiminated
TECHNOLOGIES / PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
18. Number of technologies/NRM practices under research in the CRP (Phase I)
23. Number of technologies /NRM practices field tested (phase II)
27. Number of technologies /NRM practices released by public and private sector partners globally (phase III)
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
WHEATMAIZE
DCGL
RTB
Phase I nº18 Phase II nº23 Phase III nº27
WHEAT MAIZE DC GL RTB
Phase I nº18 200000 34123 6329 1684 78
Phase II nº23 2151 2063 2173 23 48
Phase III nº27 24 70 8 32 22
From guidelines to creativity... MAIZE Annual Report 2014
Only 2 outcome-based indicators (Table 1 / Annex 1)
OUTCOMES ON THE GROUND
33. Number of hectares under improved technologies or management practices as a result of CRP research
34. Number of farmers and others who have applied new technologies or management practices as a result of CRP research
Outcome indicators 33 (a) and 34 (b)
From CGIAR Research Programs (CRP) Annual Reports 2013 and 2014
CRPs Number of hectares (a) Number of farmers reached (b)
2013 2014 2013 2014
A4NH 231 135,000 645,075 1,089,139
AAS (c) 242,133 7,408 584,953 -
CCAFS 450,000 (d) 185,000 2,000,000 3,900,000
Dryland Cereals 80,000 267,800 70,000 377,000
Dryland Systems 4,000,000 7,525,065 4,000,000 469,348
FTA 196,500,000 65,000,000 870,000 2,000,000
Grain Legumes 253,224 4,763,000 1,717,249 2,451,917
GRiSP 4,763,000 91,996 7,741,000 7,741,000
HumidTropics 12,000 430,000 94,466 91,000
Livestock & Fish (c) 331,070 632,169 24,000 488,000
MAIZE 417,000 2,305,462 1,100,000 4,089,000
PIM - - - -
RTB 398,000 430,000 1,180,000 1,180,000
WHEAT 1,650,000 2,096,240 2,802,000 10,310,000
WLE 15,471,050 4,845,000 35,000 205,946
Total 224,567,708 88,714,140 22,863,743 34,392,350
Intermediate users’ adoption
End of ADB
project
HRDC Formed
38 members
HRDC w/ 68 public & private members
Kindly provided by Dr. Achim Dobermann (IRRI)
End users’ adoption
Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) project
Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA)
http://www.cgiar.org/consortium-news/partnerships-lead-to-measurable-impacts-for-drought-tolerant-maize-for-africa/
DTMA Project indicators 2013
Number of new varieties released (2007-2013) 140
Seed production in 2013 (new varieties) 30,000 t
Number of NARs - or companies - involved in seed production 13
Number of stakeholders adopting the new varieties: cooperatives;
regional, national, small & medium enterprises (SMEs);
international enterprises; large companies
118
Hectares planted with the new varieties 1,230,000 has
Number of households reached 2,900,000
Number of consumers benefiting these adoptions (Millions) 20 M
CRP Portfolio Report 2014
CRP Portfolio Report 2014
CRP Portfolio Report 2014
CRP Portfolio Report 2014
8. RISKS TO PORTFOLIO PROGRESS AND THEIR MITIGATION
Risks of a CRP portfolio biased towards short-term priorities and results
New financial risk
Risk of continued disconnection between financial and programmatic planning and management
Risk of mobilizing insufficient human resources to undertake research on complex systemic approaches
Risk of a CRP leadership not fully empowered
Risk of a patchy approach to integrity and ethics in research for development at portfolio level
Science Team’s role at the CGIAR-Institutional level
How to optimize the implementation of the CGIAR reform process?
To participate to the design of the new Strategic Research Framework (SRF) for the CGIAR
To explain the way in which the new System Council functions, what it decides and the rationale in the decisions, to communicate clearly to the CRPs/stakeholders what donors’ expectations are
To communicate and work + collaboratively with ISPC, IAU, IEA, regional organizations (GCARD3), donors, development agencies
To maintain and build external partnerships (to provide leadership in agricultural development, share / learn from others)
To ensure a system-wide focus demonstrating global visibility on development impact for smallholders’ benefit
Thanks a lot for your attention...