12
ENERGY SECTOR AND MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING BALTICSCOPE Jūrmala, May 31, 2016 Reinis Āboltiņš MoEPRD [email protected]

Baltic SCOPE stakeholder workshop on FISHERIES - current status*

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ENERGY SECTOR

AND

MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING

BALTICSCOPE

Jūrmala, May 31, 2016

Reinis ĀboltiņšMoEPRD

[email protected]

CONTEXT FOR THE ENERGY

SECTOR

DIRECTION STEMS FROM THE EU POLICY – 20/20/20 BY 2020+

REGIONAL APPROACH – FOR EXAMPLE, BEMIP, EU BS STRATEGY

NATIONAL CHALLENGES – CO2 EMMISSIONS, INSUFFIECIENT INFRASTRUCTURE, COMPLICATED ENERGY PORTFOLIO

POLICY FRAMEWORK (different strategies, influence of industry’s lobbies)

INFRASTRUCTURE (for example, good access roads, service possibilities)

NETWORK CAPACITY (ENTSO-E 10 year dvelopment plan, ability of transmission network to accomodate distributed and variable RES energy)

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS (coal, lignite / oil shale, small hydro, wind, external costs of energy)

MARKET CONDITIONS (low liquidity, insufficient interconnections, unequal conditions for the dominating national enterprises and other market participants)

EUROPE 2020 TARGETS

• SUTAINABILITY ASPECT – CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY

– DECREASE GREEN-HOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BY 20% (AND AIM AT 30% DECREASE)

– INCREASE BY 20% THE SHARE OF RES IN FINAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION

– INCREASE BY 20% ENERGY EFFICIENCY

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

• ENERGY SECURITY STRATEGY (2014)– CAUSES: RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUPPLY

OF ENERGY RESOURCES FROM THIRD COUNTRIES

– CONSEQUENCES: STRATEGY TO MINIMISE RISKS

• EUROPEAN ENERGY UNION strategy (2015)– CAUSES: LACK OF SOLIDARITY

– CONSEQUENCES: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR CLOSER COORDINATION OF DECISION-MAKING

CHALLENGES

1. PUTTING IN PLACE A BALANCED LEGAL

FRAMEWWORK for the development of energy

sector and support for RES energy in particular;

2. DEVELOPMENT OF NEW GENERATING

CAPACITIES AND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING

CAPACITIES is essential to secure energy demand;

3. INCREASE OF LOCAL RES WITH THE GOAL OF

DECREASING THE IMPORT OF FOSSIL ENERGY

RESOURCES for energy production;

CHALLENGES

4. IMPROVING ENERGY EFFICIENCY in buildings,

production / industry, energy production;

5. STRENGTHENING OF REGIONAL AND LOCAL

TRANSMISSION NETWORKS by connecting with

other EU countries and making it possible to

accommodate RES electricity (TEN-E initiative,

BEMIP).

CBC MSP ENERGY:

REQUIREMENTS

1. PHYSICAL SPACE

2. LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS

3. GRID CAPACITY

4. WIND CONDITIONS

5. EXISTING LIMITATIONS FOR LAYING

CABLES

CBC MSP ENERGY:

COMPETING INTERESTS

1. LOCAL HERITAGE

2. NATURE CONSERVATION

3. BIRD MIGRATION CORRIDORS

4. HABITATS FOR SPECIES

5. NATIONAL DEFENCE INTERESTS

6. COMMERCIAL FISHING

7. RECREATION

8. SHIPPING AND MARINE

TRANSPORTATION

CBC MSP ENERGY:

PLANNING AND IMPLICATIONS

1. NATIONAL MSP

2. SPECIFICS OF ENERGY PLANNING

3. LOCAL IMPACTS

4. TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS

5. COMULATIVE IMPACTS

CBC MSP ENERGY:

A PLANNING EXAMPLE

• National TSO does the initial research

• Communicates with partner TSO

• Both TSOs do common research / could be outsourced

• Initiative put on TYND (ENTSO-E system development

committee)

• Regulator (SE Energi marknads inspektionen, LV SPRK, EE

PUC) approves + public consultation

• Feasibility study

• Environmental impact assessment (EIA) + public consultation

• Land ownership issues

• Technical project

• Final investment decision

• Implementation

NPS POWER MARKET SETS

THE TRENDS

NRG 4EVER