Upload
emmanuel-sadewater
View
413
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cli-matePast, Present and Future
As we shifted over to a new millennium, with the industrial revolution behind us, the first world was thriving on technological
advances and the oil merchants were reaping enormous profits. This gradually developed framework catalysed consumerism
and production, with mining and resources, alongside energy and electricity securing revenue for Australia. Populations
increased which required agricultural yields to increase, putting pressure on governments to consider appropriate waste
management and recycling measures. Jumping over to 2016, due to an amalgamation of issues and lack of action from our
own foresight, our climate is predicted to raise 2°C+, pending introduction and implementation of sustainable measures.
In Australia, the Queensland Government is seeking responses to questions with regard to ‘Making the transition to a low
carbon future’, highlighting possible actions and opportunities Queensland should pursue to help shape our strategy across a
range of sectors. The University of Queensland Student Energy Network (UQ SEN) took this as an opportunity to lead a
collaborative and multidisciplinary group of students to create an extensive response (via this document and planned CliMate
Forum) to these questions in order to express our views and perspectives on the transition to a low carbon future.
The surveys were written by a committee from different faculties. The surveys were written online and distributed and
advertised through Facebook and word of mouth.
The surveys were advertised on the Student Energy Network’s Facebook group as well as the the UQ Environmental
Collective and through word of mouth to other environmentally minded students as well as some more conservative students.
Advancing Queensland ClimateA Student Perspective
2016
What should Queensland look like in 10 years time in a lowcarbon global economy?
For full results see Appendix E
Contents Page
The CliMate Committee
Energy and Electricity
Housing and Town Planning
Waste Management and Recycling
Mining in Climate Change
Plans to Mitigate Climate Change
Appendices
The Cli-Mate Committee
This initiative was pioneered by UQ SEN 2016 President Emmanuel Sadewater and Liaison Officer Yasmin Morgan.
Help from the rest of the hand picked committee was received for promoting the survey and upcoming forum. The CliMate
Committee consists of SEN members and the wider UQ student base, studying fields in engineering, business, economics, arts
and sustainability. UQ SEN aims to develop leadership, communication and collaboration. At UQ SEN we explore pressing
issues within the Energy Industry, giving the chance to learn from Research Experts, connect with Industry Professionals and
various faculties to discover the bigger picture. We strive to foster the following: skills development, networking and energy
education.
During UQ Sustainability Week, UQ SEN will host an innovative, student run seminar where we will frame and present our
responses and highlight the importance for every single discipline and industry to consciously engage and understand the
impacts of climate change. This event is designed to be a wellbalanced discussion on these issues that is not divided by
discipline. A forum to not only challenge conventional views but engage in critical thinking on the actions and opportunities
of the future. Formulation of the response paper and subsequent live delivery created the opportunity for students to
actively discuss climate change and highlight what perspectives and beliefs the student body had. From analysing
composting options to gocard levies, the future of mining and by encouraging practical discussions, fantastic data has
been collected which the student community at UQ believe can assist the Queensland Government in securing a clean,
sustainable future for all!
Energy and Electricity
Students tended to respond in a very similar
manner when posed questions on energy
sourcing and usage within Queensland. A
high percentage of students believed that
the current highest barrier to implementing
clean energy solutions in Queensland were
a lack of infrastructure and funding (56% of
student responses) and a lack of
knowledge/education (34% of student
responses). See Figure 1.
Furthermore, when asked how satisfied the
students were with the government’s current
efforts in transitioning to a cleaner energy
future, 40% of students ranked their
satisfaction in the 2030 range out of a
possible 100, with the average response
being 36.
Solar was found to be the most popular source of clean energy inQueensland. Other suggested solutions (noted as other) were given as
Nuclear, Biofuels and implementing Carbon Capture and Storage (See
figure 2).
What are the barriers (in your opinion) toimplementing clean energy sources in QLD?
Figure 1
Student written responses/comments on this topic ranged greatly, however, with answers covering
marketing/subsidisation of green energy to education and demand reduction. One student strongly stated that
‘greater emphasis needs to be placed on renewable energy from primary school and greater funding invested at a
tertiary level to promote research in the area’,
while another believed;
‘[with the] low PPA offered for renewable generations, uncertain policies seem unattractive for renewable investments.
With carbon tax abolishment, it acts as another hurdle for renewables’.
People generally don’t have a complete solution to how they want the government to tackle the issue and are generally
split between choosing between large scale solar farms and rooftop solar as shown above.
What methods/sources of clean energy should we focuson, in order to transition into a cleaner future?
Figure 2
Figure ...
People commonly stated the biggest challenges to their
local communities for transition to a more climate
friendly future was costs and lack of public transport.
Lack of public transport was attributed to either lack of
population or distance from a major city.
Please rank the incentives that wouldencourage you to take public transport or beless reliant on private vehicle transportation?
For increasing reliance on public transport and
decreasing reliance on private vehicles the most
popular responses were ‘Cheaper ride sharing (Taxi/
Uber)’, ‘Cheaper gocard fares’ and ‘increasing the
price of parking’. Students also voted for the option to
carbon offset their trip on public transport as a voluntary
optin (donating to plant a tree e.g. 50c extra every so
often).
The less favoured options were:
Clean ridesharing options (electric or emissions free
Uber/taxi)
More extensive bike pathways
More expensive fuel costs as a result of emissions
taxation
A cleaner public transportation system but with a
higher use cost (More expensive gocard fees)
Housing, Building and Town Planning
Figure 3
Would you optin to a voluntary carbon offset levy on your gocard(e.g. 20c per zone)?
(Can be updated at gocard top up machines. Offset would be done by planting a tree.)
While some of the respondents thought a
‘greenlevy’ on gocards to subsidize
planting trees to offset carbon was a great
idea, those who didn’t rank it as the top
idea were against the idea and would opt
out.
Respondents felt that green building restrictions were important, however they should be less strict
on housing built for low income families due to increased costs that could impact these families.
The average response out of 100 was 54, with a maximum vote of 75 and a minimum of 11, showinga large range of responses for this question.
How strongly do you think that green building standards should be strict on newprojects aimed at lowincome individuals, with potentially higher costs of living for
this demographic as a result? (Answers on a scale of 1 100)
Figure 4
Waste Management and Recycling
Students tended to give widely varied and unique
responses when posed questions on waste
management and recycling within Queensland. A
high percentage of students, when asked about
Queensland’s top priority concerning waste
management, agreed that it is important to ban
plastic bags (33%), followed by increased quantity of
bins (recycling, compost etc) available to public
(22%), and improving recycling operations (22%).
(See figure 5)
The least voted for options were industrial waste,
improved education services and literacy on
recycling, and pesticide runoff.
Interestingly, when asked to rank how they felt about any food wastage issues in Brisbane (fromhousehold food waste, supermarket wastage, commercial kitchen wastage etc) out of a possible
score of 100, the average response was 79.
What would you like to see as QLD's top priorityconcerning waste management?
Figure 5
Nearly 80% of students agreed that they would
place fruit and vegetable scraps in a council
retrieved waste bin and would be willing to join a
council composting system if initiatives or a simple
optin system were provided.
Out of the students who participated in this survey,
only 22% currently own a compost bin.
All students who responded to this survey agreed that they would be interested inusing greenwaste bins if they were put in place in public areas.
One student voiced an opinion that if introduced to the public, these bins must besealed in such a way that they could not become a food source for local wildlife
populations.
Given the opportunity to place fruitand vegetable scraps in a councilretrieved waste bin, would you bewilling to join the council compostingsystem if initiatives or a simple optinsystem were provided?
Figure 6
Mining in Climate Change
When students were posed questions on the mining industry and its effect, the consensus of respondents were on two
opposing sides of the spectrum. Out of the submissions around 41.66% were happy with mining due to keeping
Australia ‘strong’ (See figure 7). In continuation, 58.33% of respondents were unhappy about coal seam gas and coal
mining with most being due to inefficiency, whilst 25% called for an outright ban! (See figure 8). The contributing
factors were the environmental and social concerns caused by some closed mines being left for the government to
clean up. Ineffective regulations have been of also a concern as there needs to be stability and cohesion between
States and beyond commodities.
In the most recent decade, Australia has experienced a mining boom which created economic growth and
strengthened grasps on the international resource market. As time progressed, regulation and rehabilitation policies
and standards garnered more public attention as the United Nations and international regulatory bodies urged
governments to consider the long term effects of unsustainable mining practises. With climate change effects being
increasingly integrated into technical, social and economic actions, companies, universities and the general public are
encouraged to partner with one another to ensure sustainable practise whilst aiming to create a stable future.
How do you feel about miningin general in Australia?
How do you feel about CoalSeam Gas mining inAustralia?
Figure 7
Figure 8
Mitigating Climate Change
A survey on issues relating to the current plans
for mitigation was put forward and received 21
responses. The majority of responses stated the
most important reason for action was to
minimize environmental degradation for future
generations.
What do you think is thegreatest economic benefit oftaking action against climatechange?
Figure 9
An overwhelming majority of respondents felt
Queensland must meet global and national
commitments to mitigating climate change and that
Queensland should sign the ‘Under 2 MOU’;
however only 15% of respondents felt Queensland
would actually meet these commitments showing a
lack of trust and confidence in the Government’s
ability and commitment to the issue (See figure 11).
In asking ‘What will Queensland look like in a low
carbon economy’ most answered that there would
be more renewables and thought given to
sustainability, others were more cynical and voiced
concerns over potential recessions and a lack of
financial sustainability.
Does Queensland have a responsibility to meetglobal and national climate change
commitments?
Does QLD have any hope in meeting therequirements of the 'Under 2 MOU'?
Figure 11
Figure 10
In conclusion the surveys show that student’s are generally unhappy with the levels of work being done towards mitigating
climate change, especially in working towards established national and international goals. Generally the problem people
acknowledge with movements towards a more climate friendly future is lack of funding, as well as a lack of transparent, strong
and effective decision making regarding building a lowcarbon future.
Students are generally in favour of the incentives of greener waste management, increasing reliance on solar power and
increasing reliance on public transport/ride sharing. People are in favour of taking on a greater commitment in terms of climate
goals but unoptimistic about the government being able to actually reach those goals.
To conclude it is recommended based purely on these results to increasing funding and investigations into more solar power.
SEN as a student energy network aims to increase knowledge about the potential economic use of solar power and welcomes
any government involvement/collaboration.
Conclusion
Appendix A
Question (1): Queensland has the potential to switch to cleaner forms ofenergy. What methods/sources of clean energy should we focus on, in orderto transition into a cleaner future?
Survey: Energy and Electricity
Student Responses:Concentrated solar thermalSeems most doableWhatever’s most economicalBattery, gas and lower energy usageNuclear Energy It is education of what nuclear energy holds is what is keeping itback. It is fundamentally safe with today's technology plus Australia has barely anyearthquakes to make it a problem.It would be great if the different forms of energy have a brief explanation lack ofeducation? Or too general?BiofuelsSolar thermal and theorium nuclearCoal CCS
Question (2): What are the barriers (in your opinion) to implementing cleanenergy sources in QLD?
Student Responses:Apathy, hostility and simply lack of knowledge among the politicians who areresponsible for creating our energy policy.Lack of commitment and planningFundingInability to leave the grid, lack of uptake of innovative energy control systems,leveled electricity costs across the network.Solar energy density in QLD is located far away from where the biggest demand forenergy is.Capacity factor for renewables are poor so storing energy is the barrier.All these are consistently barriers at all times in all technological fields. I'd stress the'unsuitable' weather is a matter of if you're willing to make it suitable through ESSmethods and more constant power output generators, (such as solar thermal asthey can store energy as molten salt).Lack of interest *smiles smugly*Abundance of fossil fuel sources
Question (4): Would you like to elaborate on your ranking from the previousquestion?
Student Responses:Initiatives have been taken, for example the DHP's Advancing Queensland Climateproject, however there is a lack of coherency, support and publication of businessinnovations and best practices already available to facilitate this transition.Low PPA offered for renewable generations, uncertain policies seem unattractivefor renewable investments. With carbon tax abolishment, it acts as another hurdlefor renewables.The solar subsidies were good but not much is being done in my opinionWhilst our current solar subsidies are a step in the right direction, the governmentneeds to implement more funding for wind power and, most importantly, stop allsubsidies and support for coal mining and fracking.Stop building small test sites and commit to concentrated solar thermal on a largeand useful scale. Why waste money on tests when the technology is proven?NoThe levelised electricity cost gives justification for heavy investment in expensivegrid networks to support peak loading and thus higher electricity prices. Demandreduction is the most important action the government should be taking!Im not very happy with their efforts towards any changes made by either party in thepast 4+ years.
Question (4): Would you like to elaborate on your ranking from the previousquestion? (cont.)
Student Responses:While there is an obvious push towards solar power it is poorly marketed andsubsidised. Greater emphasis needs to be placed on renewable energy fromprimary school and greater funding invested at a tertiary level to promote researchin the area.There should be more funding and support for research and developing in thissector.Government as the leader of the clean energy to encourage people tomotivate more for our future.I don't have time for an essay rant on how Australia is falling behind on the worlds'renewable technologies.Would like to see a bigger focus on renewable energies from the state government.More effort is needed to be done in effectively promoting clean energy to people.Its good.There should be more education about clean energy by the government.Given the severity of the consequences of climate change, this transition needs tobe pursued aggressively by government.I'd say the electorate tends to focus on what they can see happening rather thentechnical areas behind the scenes. People in Brisbane, for example, focus onhousehold solar when, if you want a clean energy grid, you need large, aggregatedand smoothed power output.
Question (6): What degree are you currently enrolled in?
Student Responses:Bachelor of Engineering 7Bachelor of Business Management / Bachelor of Arts Bachelor of Mechanical engineering 2Bachelor of Mining Engineering / Bachelor of FinanceDoctor of MedicineBachelor or Eectrical Engineering 3Bachelor of Engineering / Bachelor of Economics 2Social workBachelor of Psychological Science (Hon)Bachelor of Health Science 2BSc Physics MajorPhysiotherapyBachelor of LawBachelor of Engineering (Hons) / Master of Engineering ChemicalB Business Management / B Economics
Appendix B
Question (1): Queensland has the potential to switch to cleaner forms ofenergy. What methods/sources of clean energy should we focus on, in orderto transition into a cleaner future?
Survey: Energy and Electricity
Student Responses:Concentrated solar thermalSeems most doableWhatever’s most economicalBattery, gas and lower energy usageNuclear Energy It is education of what nuclear energy holds is what is keeping itback. It is fundamentally safe with today's technology plus Australia has barely anyearthquakes to make it a problem.It would be great if the different forms of energy have a brief explanation lack ofeducation? Or too general?BiofuelsSolar thermal and theorium nuclearCoal CCS
Question (2): What are the barriers (in your opinion) to implementing cleanenergy sources in QLD?
Student Responses:Apathy, hostility and simply lack of knowledge amongst the politicians who areresponsible for creating our energy policy.Lack of commitment and planningFundingInability to leave the grid, lack of uptake of innovative energy control systems,leveled electricity costs across the network.Solar energy density in QLD is located far away from where the biggest demand forenergy is.Capacity factor for renewables are poor so storing energy is the barrier.All these are consistently barriers at all times in all technological fields. I'd stress the'unsuitable' weather is a matter of if you're willing to make it suitable through ESSmethods and more constant power output generators, (such as solar thermal asthey can store energy as molten salt).Lack of interest *smiles smugly*Abundance of fossil fuel sources
Question (4): Would you like to elaborate on your ranking from the previousquestion?
Student Responses:Initiatives have been taken, for example the DHP's Advancing Queensland Climate project, however there is a
lack of coherency, support and publication of business innovations and best practices already available to
facilitate this transition.
Low PPA offered for renewable generations, uncertain policies seem unattractive for renewable investments.
With carbon tax abolishment, it acts as another hurdle for renewables.
The solar subsidies were good but not much is being done in my opinion
Whilst our current solar subsidies are a step in the right direction, the government needs to implement more
funding for wind power and, most importantly, stop all subsidies and support for coal mining and fracking.
Stop building small test sites and commit to concentrated solar thermal on a large and useful scale. Why waste
money on tests when the technology is proven?
No
The levelised electricity cost gives justification for heavy investment in expensive grid networks to support peak
loading and thus higher electricity prices. Demand reduction is the most important action the government should
be taking!
Im not very happy with their efforts towards any changes made by either party in the past 4+ years.
While there is an obvious push towards solar power it is poorly marketed and subsidised. Greater emphasis
needs to be placed on renewable energy from primary school and greater funding invested at a tertiary level to
promote research in the area.
Question (4): Would you like to elaborate on your ranking from the previousquestion?
Student Responses (Cont.)Money needs to be placed on to government initiatives such as solar towers etc.
There should be more funding and support for research and developing in this sector.Government as the leader
of the clean energy to encourage people to motivate more for our future.
I don't have time for an essay rant on how Australia is falling behind on the worlds' renewable technologies.
Would like to see a bigger focus on renewable energies from the state government.
More effort is needed to be done in effectively promoting clean energy to people.
Its good.
I think we should be transitioning to 100% clean energy right now. I think if the government weren't supporting
mining corporations we would already have become 100% renewable.
There should be more education about clean energy by the government.
Given the severity of the consequences of climate change, this transition needs to be pursued aggressively by
government. Private solar PV should be subsidised, but should not be the sole focus.
I'd say the electorate tends to focus on what they can see happening rather then technical areas behind the
scenes. People in Brisbane, for example, focus on household solar when, if you want a clean energy grid, you
need large, aggregated and smoothed power output.
Global warmings a myth
Appendix C
Question (2): What barriers does your local community face in transitioning toa climatefriendly/greener future?
Survey: Housing, Building and Town Planning
Student Responses:Industry investment and planningoverpopulation/mass immigrationCost of private PV solar arraysCost to residentsI live in Bellbowrie so it’s super far from everythingDistance from central city job, Uni as it is too costly and time consuming to usepublic transport and bikes etc compared to a carKnowledge, communication and engagement (especially with sceptics)Low income neighbourhood, lack of public transport, lack of awareness andunderstanding
Appendix D
Question (3): Do you have any comments on how mining operations areconducted in Australia?
Survey: Mining in Climate Change
Student Responses:Issues with cleanup of closed mines, lack of responsibility from mining / resourcecompaniesLow prices puts pressure on efficiency and costs. Cheaper and cheaper renewableoptions will be uptaken if they have a shorter payback period and investmentsupport.Regulation is ineffective and disjointed. Cohesion between the states and somestability is needed beyond the commodity prices.Yeah, pretty good.Vested interests are a big problem donations to political parties from fossil fuelcompanies should be banned.The environmental and social impact of mining must be given much moreconsideration, economics should not outweigh these issues.
Student Responses (cont.):Mining is the backbone of Australia's economy.While we should continue to regulate mining to ensure the environmental standardsare upheld the industry is doing an excellent job of moving forward and partneringwith local communities to make sure everyone's needs are met and to make ahealthy profit margin which the government can tax for the good of the Australianpeople.
Appendix EDescribe in 5 words or less, what should Queensland look like in 10 yearstime in a low carbon global economy?
Student Responses:Green, sustainable and accessible
Driven by sharing economy, Brisbane and rural areas communicating about needs of various stakeholders
renewable energy and recycled products
100% renewable
Renewables + electric cars
Sustainable
Not in a recession
Progressive invested innovative
Sustainable replacement to existing infrastructure
Remaining a tourist hotspot
All inclusive, unbiased education
Solar wind innovation green efficient
A forerunner in sustainable energy
Green solar community
Nuclear energy
Solar panels on every roof
Ecoomically ineficient
50% renewable energy
Beautiful
Healthier and greener
CLIMATEFORUM
2016
AN INITIATIVE BY
THE UQ STUDENT ENERGY NETWORK
The
Proudly sponsored byUQ Energy Initiative
THE CL IMATE FORUM.An innovative, student run seminar, held in UQ Sustainability Week, where weframed and presented our responses to 'Advancing Queensland Climate; AStudent Perspective' and highlighted the importance for every single field andindustry to consciously engage and understand the impacts of climate change.
This event was designed to be a wellbalanced discussion on these issues thatis not divided by discipline. A forum to not only challenge conventional viewsbut engage in critical thinking on the actions and opportunities of the future!
Approximately 70 students from theUniversity of Queenslandparticipated in this event. Theyrepresented various schools withinthe university, including theBusiness, Economics and Lawfaculty, Engineering school, NaturalSciences, Social Science andPsychology.
ATTENDEES .
PANELISTS .The Student Energy Network reached out to several notableacademics and industry representatives to join a panel for this event.
Dr. Andrew Wilson, UQ Sustainability Office
Dr. Paul Bell, UQ School of Economics
Professor Peta Ashworth, Chair in Sustainable Energy Futures
Dr. Martina Linnenluecke, UQ Business School
Dr. Paul Dargusch, Deputy Head of the School of Geography,Planning and Environmental Management
OUTCOMES .
This night was about problem solving and understanding the power ofshifting our thinking and sharing diverse ideas. To achieve these goals aworkshop activity was planned based on Edward De Bono's 'Thinking Hats'theory.
Students had seated themselves around 6 differently coloured tables. Thesecolours represented an individual perspective or 'thinking hat' as describedby De Bono. These 'hats' or frames of thinking were to be used by studentsin discussing the following topic;
RED . FEEL INGS
MUST WE CHANGE OUR IDENTITY AS AMINING NATION IN ORDER TO ADVANCEENVIRONMENTAL GOALS?
Given this question and facilitated by a panelist, teams put on their allocatedthinking hats and got to work. Read on to discover some of the ideas andkey points each table raised!
• Confused• Annoyed• Angry• Disappointed• Frustrated• We’re better than that• Frontier ’ism’• Conflicted
BLACK . CAUTIOUS -PESSIMISTIC
• Overlying ‘Caution’ • Natural gas vs coal alternatives• Global cooperation• Lower economic gains• Export of mining products (what % of total?)• How would we switch from coal to natural gas?• Renewables affect export?• The transition will affect the economy in more ways than one
GREEN . CREATIVE
• Become a turtle nation• Use skill of dodge ball• Sustainable mining – work together• Fill in the mines – jungle nationamazon etc• We are all now Iron Man• Invest in different sectors >manufacturing, construction > differentgrowth of the economy focus• 100% clean energy nation
• Make everyone wear a solar hat and backpack• Make it compulsory to have permaculture• Adapt to island lifestyle – tribes/indigenous way of life• Make population aware (leads to phasing out)/ make miners accountable for whatthey are doing (both onshore and offshore)
YELLOW . OPTIMISTIC
• Redefine ourselves• Innovation and leadership• Diversify cultural identity• Better global relationships• Transition to clean tech• Keep the Great Barrier Reef• Retain and create jobs• Stop biodiversity loss• Reduce land clearing
WHITE . FACTUAL -ANALYTICAL
• Are we ‘big’ enough to change global CO2 production that comes from coal?• Last year June – Indonesia CO2 emissions (probably easier/cheaper to change)• So in terms of just CO2 emissions – probably not• How big is Australia’s coal export?• Limit CO2 emissions to below 5% what they were in 2008? – by 2020 there’ll be100140 million tonnes CO2 – renewable energy target• Expected emissions by 2030 (before climate report was released) we wouldhave far exceeded the targets set (large land clearing considerations)• If we just change our identity, without changing our usage, and just stop ourexports, it wouldn’t change much at all (15% of CO2 emissions is from mining)• Based off previous global examples, we believe changing our identity may leadother nations to reconsider theirs but it may not have much effect on Australianemissions itself, based on our consumption and the 15% mining emissionsmentioned earlier
BLUE . CONTROL -PROGRESSION
• Need? Yes, due to climate change• Reliance on fossil fuels is great; they are a steady fuel source butwe need a transition from coal to renewables• Current identity built off primary industries• Timeline: domestic coal phasing out by 20 years, will result in agenerationwide change in social identity
CONCLUDING REMARKS .
"I thought it was a great event – very well
moderated and thought out. The discussion
topic and approach was also very engaging ..."
ANDREW WILSON
(Manager Energy &
Sustainability)
SUZANNE DAVIS
(Sustainability
Coordinator)
The Climate Forum commenced with an engaging speech from a student
whose traditional heritage is directly impacted by the effects of climate
change, Sailoto Liveti. The event transitioned to a brief overview of the
survey results, by Yasmin Morgan. Expert panelists shared their wisdom
regarding their industries and the challenges they face with future global
warming implications. The attendees then commenced their activity, which
lead to a display of intuition, knowledge and creativity.
In conclusion, this was a very engaging, exciting and educational night,
and highlighted how students feel about climate change and the future
challenges here in Australia. The event complemented the student survey
and, in conjunction, aims to give insight on how students believe the
Queensland Government can move forward and transition to a
low carbon future.
"Thanks to you all, we’ve enjoyed another
successful Sustainability Week with record
numbers attending events from our diverse
program. There was definitely something for
everyone!
Thank you for hosting events and to our
individual event coordinators who committed their
time and enthusiasm to ensure the success of
the week."
Proudly sponsored byUQ Energy Initiative