• To support REDD+ policy arenas and practitioner communities with• information • analysis• tools

• to ensure 3E+ outcomes for REDD+: • effectiveness (to reach C and non-

C benefits)• (cost-) efficiency • equity • + co-benefits

CIFOR’s Global Comparative Study (GCS-REDD+)

Thanks to

Research modules, project phases and partner-centered knowledge-sharing

Co-production of knowledgeOwnership and use of knowledge

KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION OUTCOMES

Engaged actors:

Learn skills, methods and tools

Internalise value of 3EUnderstand how

evidence can support 3E decision making

Behavior change in implementers

Access to knowledge Change in aspirations

Change in state

Sustainable development

IMPACTS

Program outcomes

contribute to global efforts to:

1. Reduce deforestation

2. Avoid carbon emissions

3. Achieve non-carbon

benefits

OUTCOMES

Implementers:

1. Create enabling conditions for…

2. Design and implement …

3. Assess carbon and non-carbon performance of…

…REDD+ and sustainable private sector initiatives.

INTERMEDIATE OUTCOME(IMPLEMENTERS)

Informed implementers in target countries have the

will, knowledge and support to implement

INTERMEDIATE OUTCOME(SUPPORTERS)

Informed supporters promote, motivate and enable implementation

OUTPUTS3E REDD+ knowledge

products and synthesis

KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION ACTIVITIESRelevant groupings of actors (national, sub-national and international policy makers, private sector, proponents, CSOs, round-tables & research partners) are engaged across the research cycle

1.1 REDD+ design (all levels)

1.3 Empowered CSO (national/subnational level)

3.1. MMRV (national and international levels)

2.2 Private sector participation in REDD+ (subnational level)

2.1 Experience-based policy design

(all levels)

1.2 Transformational change (national level)

3.2 Improved AFOLU information (all levels)

4.1. Multilevel governance (all levels)

4.2 Informed landscape management (subnational level)

3.3 MMRV capacity(national and sub-national levels)

4.3 Private sector alignment with REDD+ (all levels)

5.1 Partner engagement for co-production of knowledge• Early engagement and trust-building with collaborating partners from all levels and sectors• Joint definition of relevant research questions• Co-development of robust, salient, credible and legitimate research• Delivery, directly or through collaborating partners, of knowledge and tools that partners need

Theory of societal transformations: political economy lens(or: our theory of how change happens – out there)

How we engage with partners: Co-production of science

Where we work: The countries of this study

GCS REDD output & results: publications, websites…

+ Factsheets: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/factsheets/ + REDD+ legal studies: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/redd-legal-studies/ + Safeguards: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/redd-safeguards/ + over 350 scientific publications: http://www.cifor.org/gcs/publications/

2008

20122009 2014

(books thumbnails are hyperlinked)

http://www.cifor.org/gcs/landscapes-governance-peru/

GCS REDD output & results: … and tools

REDD+ Benefit Sharing Knowledge Toolhttp://www.cifor.org/knowledge-tree/

GCS-REDD+ - Verified „impact stories“

•Global• CIFOR contributed to the stepwise approach in setting FRELs/RLs (MRV)

• international expert consultations that led to a UNFCCC decision 2011 for a stepwise approach on setting, measuring and reporting reference levels (UNFCC Decision 12/CP17).

• UNREDD made tenure part of its strategy framework based on information CIFOR generated under this investment (2014)

•National• CIFOR was influential in Indonesia’s REDD decisions

• Supported FORDA directly and was involved the Indonesian National REDD+ Strategy development

• Supplied information that informed the GoI's decisions on the forest moratorium and forest reference emission levels (peatland emission factors)

• Support to establishment of Indonesia National Carbon Accounting System (INCAS) in 2015 (funding from the Government of Australia)

• CIFOR research contributed to the Cameroon R-PP and the Peru National REDD+ Strategy

• CIFOR’s engagement with national technical staff in Guyana and Ethiopia resulted in both countries adopting CIFOR’s stepwise approach

http://www.odi.org/publications/9932-informing-redd-policy-assessment-cifors-global-comparative-study

cifor.orgblog.cifor.orgForestsTreesAgroforestry.org

THANK YOU!

www.cifor.org/gcs