Upload
gueste43ae1
View
701
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
1
A Initiative
2
Reason, Methodology and Conduct
3
Executive Summary
Currency for an almost Rs. 1000Cr endorsement + industry that currently works on gut & anecdotal learningWHY
Industry’s first large scale research that periodically tracks Celebrity Power on factors more than just popularityWHAT
A partnership of 2 leaders, PTM & Hansa, in the Talent & Research space, to grow the industry and create knowledgeWHO
A pan-India track of more than 400 celebrities over 10800 respondents across 2 waves annuallyHOW
Advertisers who currently use or are considering using talent for their ATL/ BTL initiativesFOR WHOM
Annual subscription of 10.8 LakhsHOW MUCH
4
Why CelebTrackTM?
The purpose
5
Endorsements – a high stake game
Lack of numeric data & objectivity leads to selection largely on gut feel
Personality fit of star with brand is subjective
Trade-off between popularity & personality association for the brand
6
CURRENCY
7
Science
Yardstick
9
We want to be
IRS
10
What?
Research Coverage
11
Widest, largest, deepestceleb research in the world
A first ever research of such magnitude to measure
Celebrity Power
13
PopularityRecognition and Likeability
Power of PersuasionCelebrity influence over a
category/ brand
Image AttributesTo enable scientific mapping of brand & star attributes
Media PresenceWidth and quality of
exposure in the media
Over ExposureFatigue factor
CPS
Measures Celebrity Power not just on popularity
14
All scores merge
CelebrityPowerScore
15
Celeb Power Score
• CPS = f [Popularity + Image + Persuasion Power + Media Presence - Overexposure]
Popularity = f [Recognition + Likeability]
Overall Image = f [Trust/Reliability + 24 other attributes]
Persuasion power = f [General + category persuasion power]
Media Presence = f [Reach index + Space Index]
16
The standard weights
Parameter Sub-parameter Sub-weight Weight
Popularity Recognition 33 50
Likability 17
Image 11 physical 8.8 20
14 character 11.2
Persuasion General 8 20
6 category specific 12
Media Presence Exposure 4 10
Tonality 6
Celeb Power Score 100
Less : Over-exposure (17)
Software allows user-defined weights
17
Image parameters - physical
• Macho/Feminine• Sexy• Stylish/Trendy• Handsome/Beautiful• Youthful• Tough/Has stamina
• Glamorous• Cute• Cool• Energetic• Healthy/Fit
18
Image parameters - Character
• Global• Family Oriented• Youthful• Intelligent• Techsavvy• Modern• Distinguished/Classy
• Trustworthy• Funny/Humourous• Bold/Daring• Innovative/Creative• Dynamic• Grounded/Humble• Savvy/Astute
19
Power of Persuasion by category
Health and Fitness
Electronic products/Home Appliances
Cosmetics/Beauty products
Security for future(for you and family)
Indulgence products(Once in a while)
Convenience products
General
20
Covers celebs from..
Cricket
Films
Other Sports
Music
Television
21
Representing most of India
• Nationally• Regionally• Locally
22
The leaders
-To grow the industry-To create knowledge
23
How?
The Methodology
24
3 step, 4 month process
Drawing up of list of 150+ celebrities per market[Individual & Group ranking from experts and consumers of entertainment]1
Validation, Tabulation, Software adaptation3
QuantitativePrimary Research[face to face interviews]
2Secondary data
from Eikona, TAM
25
6236 respondents across 39 towns9 Markets, 14 reporting units
States Town Classes &Towns Covered Centres Reported Sample
Maharashtra
Mumbai Nashik Mumbai
830Nagpur AurangabadRest of Maha-
rashtra
Gujarat
Ahmedabad VadodaraGujarat
430Surat
West Bengal
Kolkata West Bengal
477Asansol
Punjab
Ludhiana ChandigarhPunjab
383Amritsar
Karnataka
Bangalore Karnataka
420Mysore
Kerala
Kochi TrivandrumKerala
435Kozikhode
States Town Classes &Towns Covered Centers Reported Sample
TN
Chennai Salem Chennai
812
Coimbatore TiruchirappalliRest of TN
Madurai
AP
Hyderabad Guntur Hyderabad
928
Vijayawada WarangalRest of AP
Visakhapatnam
Hindi Belt
Delhi Lucknow Delhi
1521
Patna Ghaziabad
Rest of Hindi Belt
Faridabad Durg-Bhilai
Indore Ranchi
Jaipur Jodhpur
Kanpur Gwalior
Over 6000 respondents for Round I
State of the art software
27
For WHOM?
The beneficiaries
28
Corporates Celebrities
29
Who amongst Corporates / Brands
• Who have used celebrities in the past or use them currently
• Have competition that uses celebrities• Have a Multi-brand portfolio• Use local activation and promotions
30
Charter Subscribers
Why Celebrities?
• For knowing their ranking and relative strengths• For tracking progress• For pricing themselves for endorsements, appearances• For competitive intelligence
32
How much?
10.8 Lakhs per year*Cuts and chops available
A fraction of what brands spend on ambassadorsAnd then on media behind ads featuring them
*+Taxes
33
End of Document
Annex Follows