Upload
abhishek-upadhyaya-ghimire
View
104
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Surfactant AnalysisAnalysis of the surfactants used in Organic
Solar Cell preparation
Abhishek Upadhyaya Ghimire
Advisor: Dr. Adrienne Stiff-RobertsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering
BackgroundSolar Energy: clean and renewable source of
energyOrganic Solar Cell
AdvantagesLow cost of productionCan be deposited on different surfacesAbility to tailor the molecule properties in
order to fit the applicationDisadvantages
Very low efficiencyShort lifetime
RIR-MAPLE system
RIR-MAPLE systemWater - O-H bond rich, resonates with laser, prevents energy from being absorbed by optoelectronic material
Phenol - secondary solvent - enriches target with hydroxyl bonds and prevents sublimation
Trichlorobenzene - solvent for active materials
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) - surfactant
RIR-MAPLE emulsion system consists of:
● Emulsion consists of chlorobenzene solution (with PCPDTBT), phenol and DI water (with surfactant) at a ratio of 1:0.25:3 by volume for PCPDTBT
● Surfactants are compounds that lower the surface tension (or interfacial tension) between two liquids or between a liquid and a solid
Motivation for surfactant analysisIt is expected that the organic solar cells
based on the blended film deposited by RIR-MAPLE should have higher efficiency than the cells fabricated by spin cast.
In reality, the RIR-MAPLE fabricated organic solar cells show poorer performance (3~4 times lower efficiency) than spin-cast solar cells.
One reason to explain the poor performance of RIR-MAPLE fabricated organic solar cells is the presence of insulating surfactant, typically sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Effect of SDS concentration
DTAC
Dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride
Cationic surfactant
● Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol)
PEG-PPG-PEG
Surfactant HLB value in water-oil system
SDS 40
PEG-PPG-PEG, Pluronic F-68 >24
DTAC 20
Surfactant 0.001 wt% DTAC
0.01 wt% DTAC 0.1 wt% DTAC 0.5 wt% DTAC 1 wt% DTAC
Volume of PCPDTBT solution
1.755 ml 0.91 ml 0.92 ml 1.17 ml 1.12 ml
Volume of surfactant
5.256 ml 2.73 ml 2.76 ml 3.51 ml 3.36 ml
Experimental dataSurfactant 0.001 wt% PEG-
PPG-PEG0.01 wt% PEG-
PPG-PEG0.1 wt% PEG-
PPG-PEG0.5 wt% PEG-
PPG-PEG1 wt% PEG-PPG-PEG
Volume of PCPDTBT solution
1.25 ml 1.12 ml 0.92 ml 0.97 ml 0.95 ml
Volume of surfactant
3.75 ml 3.36 ml 2.76 ml 2.91 ml 2.85 ml
0.5 wt% of PEG-PPG-PEG and DTAC
1 wt% of PEG-PPG-PEG and DTAC
Mixed SurfactantsSurfactant mixture Ratio and Concentration
DTAC with SDS 0.01 wt% DTAC + 0.0001 wt% SDS
PEG-PPG-PEG with SDS 0.01 wt% PEG-PPG-PEG + 0.0001 wt% SDS
0.001 wt% PEG-PPG-PEG + 0.0001 wt% SDS
● The motivation behind mixing the surfactants was to see the effect of mixed surfactants in the preparation of stable emulsion.
● Could not prepare a stable emulsion using the mixed surfactants
MAPLE growth using DTAC and PEG-PPG-PEG1 wt% DTAC and 0.5 wt % PEG-PPG-PEG5 mg PCPDTBT in 1 ml of TCB and 3 ml of deionized water containing
surfactant
DTAC PEG-PPG-PEG
XRD results
AFM results: DTAC
AFM results: PEG-PPG-PEG
Conclusion and Future worksEmulsions prepared using DTAC and PEG-PPG-PEG with
concentration lower than 0.5 wt% are not stable0.5 wt% is very high concentration for surfactant to be used in MAPLE
growth, and this would not help on the purpose of increasing the efficiency of organic solar cell
Adding phenol with DTAC or PEG-PPG-PEG made the emulsion even more unstable
Perform Photo-CELIV or other efficiency test for the solar cell grown using DTAC and PEG-PPG-PEG
Perform similar analysis for other surfactants such as Polyoxyethylene tridecyl ether (PTE) and Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB).
Referenceshttps://soar-ir.shinshu-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10091/162/1/aqueous_surfactant_solutions.pdf
(DTAC HLB)Required HLB values http://www.firp.ula.ve/archivos/historicos/76_Book_HLB_ICI.pdfPEG-PPG-PEG HLB values
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/materials-science/material-science-products.html?TablePage=22686648
http://www.brighthub.com/environment/renewable-energy/articles/95572.aspxHLB value of CTAB
http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/chem/issues/kim-05-29-1/kim-29-1-4-0401-15.pdfhttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2010/jm/c0jm02091ehttp://www.sigmaaldrich.com/materials-science/material-science-products.html?TablePage=22686648