1
Ultrasonic & 0 pass 1500 bar – 1 pass 1500 bar – 3 passes 1500 bar – 5 passes 1. Introduction Applications of Magnetite Nanoparticles 4. Conclusion High Pressure Homogenizer (HPH, Nano Disperser, ILSHIN AUTOCLAVE) We have synthesized uniform magnetite nanoparticles using the high pressure homogenizer without dispersing agent and oxidant. The X-ray diffraction patterns showed that all the samples had the inverse spinel structure of magnetite nanoparticles. The average particle size decreased with the number of passes, but after reaching 3 passes the average particle size increased. The VSM measurements revealed superparamagnetism of the nanoparticles for 1 and 3 passes at 1500 bar. The uniform size, narrow distributions and superparamagnetism of these magnetite nanoparticles demonstrated their suitability for use as an MRI contrast agent, as magnetic fluids, and for targeting drug delivery systems. Synthesis of Monodisperse Magnetite Nanoparticles Using a High Pressure Homogenizer Jun Hee Cho a , Taeyoung Kim a , Yun Hye Yeon a , Sung Hwa Ji a , Hyun Hyo Kim a a Department of Research & Development, ILSHINAUTOCLAVE CO. #835 Taplipdong, Yuseonggu, Daejeon 305-510, Korea 2. Experimental & Results Experimental 3. Results & Discussion Requirement Superparamagnetic Uniform Particle Size Colloidal Suspension Objectives of This Study Nozzle Chamber High Energy Pressure (bar) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Fluid velocity (m/sec) 313 442 542 626 700 Inlet Shear & Cavitation Zone Impact Zone Outlet Inlet Inlet Outlet Outlet Impact Zone Shear & Cavitation Zone Shear & Cavitation Zone Impact Zone Fluid Velocity (Sound Speed: 340 m/s) XRD Patterns TEM Images Shear Force Cavitation Impact Force Inlet High Pressure Pump Pressure Gauge Nozzle Chamber VSM Magnetic Fluid Cell Separation Magnetic Memory MRI Imaging Hyperthermia Drug Delivery - Synthesis of uniform magnetite nanoparticles using a high pressure homogenizer without any dispersing agent. - Control of the size of the magnetite nanoparticles. - Synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles - High pressure homogenization in a solution during the chemical reaction may accelerate the rate of the reaction and the crystallization may be possible at low temperature. 0.85 M NaOH (30 ml, 0.0255 mol) H S ((( ))) Magnetite Nanoparticles 0.1 M FeCl 2 ∙4H 2 O (100 ml, 0.01 mol) High Energy (Nucleation & Crystal Growth) Filtration & drying Nano Disperser 1500 bar - 1, 3, 5 Passes Optimum conditions: - Reaction Temp.: R.T - Stirring Time: 5 min Cavitation - the formation, growth, and implosive collapse of bubbles in a fluid Cavitational Collapse - intense local heating(~5000 K) - high pressures(~1000 atm) - enormous heating and cooling rates(10 -9 K/sec) Advantages - Highly dispersion by high energy, Short process time - Magnetite nanoparticles have received intensive interest in recent years due to their potential applications in various fields, such as in magnetic memory devices, magnetic fluids, magnetic refrigeration, magnetic resonance imaging and targeting drug delivery systems Outlet 20 30 40 50 60 70 Intensity (arb.unit) 2 Θ (degree) (311) (220) (110) (222) (121) (400) (422) (221) (511) (440) Non-high pressure hpmpgemization Red Line: FeOOH peaks 20 30 40 50 60 70 Intensity (arb.unit) 2 Θ (degree) (220) (311) (222) (400) (422) (511) (440) 1 Pass 3 Passes 5 Passes 0 Pass FeOOH Fe(OH) 2 Ultrasonic FeOOH Average Particle Size (nm) Magnetic Property (b) Phase XRD (a) TEM Magnetization (emu/g) Coercive (Oe) Retentivity (emy/g) 0 Pass 26 - 64 125 17 FeOOH Fe(OH) x Fe 3 O 4 1 Pass 21 20 72 - - Cubic Spinel 3 Passes 19 17 67 - - Cubic Spinel 5 Passes 23 22 76 82 19 Cubic Spinel Average particle sizes and magnetic properties of the prepared magnetite nanoparticles a The particle size was calculated from the values of FWHM at the diffraction peak of 35.4 °for Fe 3 O 4 . b Magnetic properties were determined by VSM. Fe 2+ + 2NaOH Fe(OH) 2 + 2Na + 3Fe(OH) 2 +H 2 O 2 Fe 3 O 4 + 4H 2 O -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 Magnetization (emu/g) Magnetic Field (Oe) -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 Magnetization (emu/g) Magnetic Field (Oe) -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 Magnetization (emu/g) Magnetic Field (Oe) -90 -70 -50 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 -10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 Magnetization (emu/g) Magnetic Field (Oe) - The XRD pattern of the 0 pass sample showed diffraction peaks at 2 θ = 21.1 o , 40.3 o and 53.8 o from the FeOOH. - All the peaks of 1, 3 and 5 passes samples were matched to the inverse spinel Fe 3 O 4 H 2 O H + OH H + H · H 2 OH + OH H 2 O 2 Nano Disperser - The particles synthesized through the ultrasonic method and 0 pass sample are spherical, through square and rod shapes could also be observed. - Spherical magnetite nanoparticles were obtained for 1 to 5 passes at 1500 bar. 0 Pass 1 Pass 3 Passes 5 Passes

Synthesis of Monodisperse Magnetite Nanoparticles

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Synthesis of Monodisperse Magnetite Nanoparticles

Ultrasonic & 0 pass 1500 bar – 1 pass 1500 bar – 3 passes 1500 bar – 5 passes

1. Introduction

Applications of Magnetite Nanoparticles

4. Conclusion

High Pressure Homogenizer (HPH, Nano Disperser, ILSHIN AUTOCLAVE)

We have synthesized uniform magnetite nanoparticles using the highpressure homogenizer without dispersing agent and oxidant.

The X-ray diffraction patterns showed that all the samples had the inversespinel structure of magnetite nanoparticles.

The average particle size decreased with the number of passes, but afterreaching 3 passes the average particle size increased.

The VSM measurements revealed superparamagnetism of the nanoparticlesfor 1 and 3 passes at 1500 bar.

The uniform size, narrow distributions and superparamagnetism of thesemagnetite nanoparticles demonstrated their suitability for use as an MRIcontrast agent, as magnetic fluids, and for targeting drug delivery systems.

Synthesis of Monodisperse Magnetite Nanoparticles

Using a High Pressure HomogenizerJun Hee Choa, Taeyoung Kima, Yun Hye Yeona, Sung Hwa Jia, Hyun Hyo Kima

aDepartment of Research & Development, ILSHINAUTOCLAVE CO. #835 Taplipdong, Yuseonggu, Daejeon 305-510, Korea

2. Experimental & Results

Experimental

3. Results & Discussion

Requirement

Superparamagnetic

Uniform Particle Size

Colloidal Suspension

Objectives of This Study

Nozzle Chamber

High Energy

Pressure (bar) 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Fluid velocity

(m/sec)313 442 542 626 700

Inlet Shear & Cavitation Zone

Impact Zone Outlet

Inlet

Inlet

Outlet

Outlet

Impact Zone

Shear & Cavitation Zone

Shear & Cavitation Zone

Impact Zone

Fluid Velocity (Sound Speed: 340 m/s)

XRD Patterns

TEM Images

• Shear Force

• Cavitation

• Impact Force

Inlet

High Pressure Pump

Pressure Gauge Nozzle

Chamber

VSM

Magnetic Fluid Cell Separation Magnetic Memory

MRI Imaging Hyperthermia Drug Delivery

- Synthesis of uniform magnetite nanoparticles using a high pressure homogenizer

without any dispersing agent.

- Control of the size of the magnetite nanoparticles.

- Synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles

- High pressure homogenization in a solution during the chemical

reaction may accelerate the rate of the reaction and the crystallization

may be possible at low temperature.

0.85 M NaOH (30 ml, 0.0255 mol)

H S

((( )))

MagnetiteNanoparticles

0.1 M FeCl2∙4H2O(100 ml, 0.01 mol)

High Energy(Nucleation &

Crystal Growth)

Filtration & drying

Nano Disperser

1500 bar - 1, 3, 5 Passes

* Optimum conditions:

- Reaction Temp.: R.T- Stirring Time: 5 min

• Cavitation

- the formation, growth, and implosive collapse of bubbles in a fluid

• Cavitational Collapse

- intense local heating(~5000 K)

- high pressures(~1000 atm)

- enormous heating and cooling rates(10-9 K/sec)

• Advantages

- Highly dispersion by high energy, Short process time

- Magnetite nanoparticles have received intensive interest in recent years due to their

potential applications in various fields, such as in magnetic memory devices, magnetic

fluids, magnetic refrigeration, magnetic resonance imaging and targeting drug delivery

systems

Outlet

20 30 40 50 60 70

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

.un

it)

2 Θ (degree)

(31

1)

(22

0)

(11

0)

(22

2)

(12

1)

(40

0)

(42

2)

(22

1)

(51

1)

(44

0)

Non-high pressure hpmpgemization

Red Line: FeOOH peaks

20 30 40 50 60 70

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

.un

it)

2 Θ (degree)

(220

)

(311

)(2

22)

(400

)

(422

)

(511

)

(440

)

1 Pass

3 Passes

5 Passes

0 Pass FeOOH

Fe(OH)2

Ultrasonic

FeOOH

Average Particle Size (nm)

Magnetic Property(b)

Phase

XRD(a) TEMMagnetization

(emu/g)Coercive

(Oe)Retentivity(emy/g)

0 Pass 26 - 64 125 17FeOOHFe(OH)xFe3O4

1 Pass 21 20 72 - - Cubic Spinel

3 Passes 19 17 67 - - Cubic Spinel

5 Passes 23 22 76 82 19 Cubic Spinel

Average particle sizes and magnetic properties of the prepared magnetitenanoparticles

a The particle size was calculated from the values of FWHM at the diffraction peak of 35.4°for Fe3O4.b Magnetic properties were determined by VSM.

Fe2+ + 2NaOH → Fe(OH)2 ↓ + 2Na+

3Fe(OH)2 + H2O2 → Fe3O4 ↓ + 4H2O

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000

Mag

net

izat

ion

(e

mu

/g)

Magnetic Field (Oe)

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000

Mag

net

izat

ion

(e

mu

/g)

Magnetic Field (Oe)

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000

Mag

net

izat

ion

(e

mu

/g)

Magnetic Field (Oe)-90

-70

-50

-30

-10

10

30

50

70

90

-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000

Mag

net

izat

ion

(e

mu

/g)

Magnetic Field (Oe)

- The XRD pattern of the 0 pass sample showed diffraction peaks at 2 θ = 21.1 o, 40.3 o and 53.8 o from the FeOOH.

- All the peaks of 1, 3 and 5 passes samples were matched to the inverse spinel Fe3O4

H2O H + OH

H + H· H2

OH + OH H2O2

Nano Disperser

- The particles synthesized through the ultrasonic method and 0 pass sample are spherical, through squareand rod shapes could also be observed.

- Spherical magnetite nanoparticles were obtained for 1 to 5 passes at 1500 bar.

0 Pass 1 Pass

3 Passes 5 Passes