141
Petrophysicist (Geologist) For Practical Use and References

Petrophysic interpretation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Petrophysic interpretation

Petrophysicist (Geologist)

For Practical Use and References

Page 2: Petrophysic interpretation

PETROPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION:

Logging Environment & HC EVALUATION

Logs Show Permeable Zone .

A. Spontaneous Potential (SP)

B. Gamma Ray (GR)

Logs measure Formation resistivity

A. Log Induction

B. Log Lateral

Logs measure Formation porosity

A. Log Neutron

B. Log Densities

C. Log Sonic

Clean Formation Evaluation

Shaly Formation Evaluation

Page 3: Petrophysic interpretation

LOGGING ENVIRONMENT

Logging Environment & HC EVALUATION

Page 4: Petrophysic interpretation

LOGGING ENVIRONMENT

Page 5: Petrophysic interpretation

Drilling Process:

Mud Pressure (Pm)

hydrostatic fluid Pressure in pore

Formation (Pr) Differ to :

Avoid “Blowout”

Push Liquid to Formation (invasion proses). invasion Proses make solid material (mud cake).

Liquid in to formation Mud Fitrate

LOGGING ENVIRONMENT

Page 6: Petrophysic interpretation

LOGGING ENVIRONMENT

Nomenclature:Borehole:

Rm = Resistivity of mud.

Rmc = Resistivity of mud cake.

Flushed Zone:

Rmf = Resistivity of mud filtrate.

RXO = Resistivity of flushed zone.

SXO = Water Saturation of flushed zone.

Uninvaded or Virgin Zone:

RT = True resistivity of formation.

RW = Resistivity of formation water.

SW = Formation Water Saturation.

RS = Resistivity of adjacent bed or shoulder

bed resistivity.

di = Diameter of invasion.

dh = Borehole diameter.

h = Bed thickness.

Page 7: Petrophysic interpretation

1. “Flushed zone” with diameter (df.)

Contain “Mud Filtrate” (Rm )

Contain “Residual Hydrocarbon”Has Rock Resistivity Rxo.Thick~ 6 inches, less or more

2. “Transition zone” with diameter (dj.)Several feet.

3. Undisturbed zone:Has Water Formation Resistivity (Rw), Rock Resistivity (Rt), and Water Saturation (Sw) .

Page 8: Petrophysic interpretation

Archie experiment

Page 9: Petrophysic interpretation

A. Water Formation resistivity, Rw

Archie first measure water Formation resistivity in Tank.“Measure flow I and voltage V, then water Formation resistivity , Rw”formulate as follows:

VRw = ----- [ ohmm]

I

B. Rock Resistivity, Ro.Archie analyse the rock. Begin with porosity calculation Ø. Then the pore filled with water formation which the resistivitywas measured (Sw = 1).On the experiment is Rw.therefore :

VRo = --------- [ ohmm]

I2Apparently Ro > Rw

Archie experiment

Page 10: Petrophysic interpretation

Archie repeat the experiment with different water salinity formation.

Resulting:

Ro1 = F Rw1

Ro2 = F Rw2

Ro3 = F Rw3

It seen that rock Resistivity (Ro) equal linearly with

Water Formation Resistivity (Rw).

Ro = F Rw (1)

whereF = Formation Resistivity Factor.

The experiment uses F & Ø data for about 300 rock sample.

The Value F & Ø plotted on axis and ordinate mathematically as follows:

1

F = ----------- (2)

Ø m

m = Cementation exponent, m = 1.3 - 2.2

Archie experiment

Page 11: Petrophysic interpretation

THE RELATION OF FORMATION RESISTIVITY FACTOR (F) VERSUS

PERMEABILITY (K) AND POROSITY (Ø)

Page 12: Petrophysic interpretation

C. Rock Resistivity (Rt).

Due to search oil, then the rock on experiment

begin with filled with oil and water.

Addition oil mean Sw smaller than one:

Sw < 1The measurement resulting Rock Resistivity ( Rt )

Where:

Rt bigger thanRo,

Rt equal linearly with Ro.

Rt = I Ro (3)Were I = Resistivity index

“ Smaller Sw mean more oil in the pore & bigger Rt bigger resistivity index (I).”

So I andSw relation as follows:

1

I = ----------- (4)

Sw n

where n = Saturation exponent, about = 2

Page 13: Petrophysic interpretation

From above, can be formulated as follows :

F. RwSw n = ------------------- (5)

Rt

The formula known as Archie Formula.

Principal Logging Measurement:

Measure Reservoir Resistivity (R1).

Measure Water Resistivity (R2).

if (R1) > (R2), then there is HC in the reservoir (R1) .

Page 14: Petrophysic interpretation

Calculate Volume HC in Reservoir

HC occurrence in pore can be measure with electrical Formation

resistivity.

Assumes:

Rock Matrix cannot flow the electrical current.

it mean electrical current fully done throgh water on pore

Due to the water contain NaCl.

So the rock contain water with High Conductivity (orlow resistivity).

1

Note : Conductivity = -----------------

Resistivity

Page 15: Petrophysic interpretation

Archie formula as follows:

F x Rw RoSwn = ---------- = -----

Rt Rt

If n = 2,Ro

Sw = --------Rt

This formula can be use if we have zone with containing water(water bearing), with no porosity data

Page 16: Petrophysic interpretation

For Porosity value that usually seen on logging, Formation Factor (F) calculated as follows:

1on limestone: F = ---------

2

0.81 0.62on sandstone: F = ------ or F = ------

2 2.15

wherea = cementation factor

Page 17: Petrophysic interpretation

Example using Archie Formula

Page 18: Petrophysic interpretation

Water Formation Resistivity (Rw) :Water Formation Resistivity measurement, Rw, can be done using Archie

formula in zone containing water (seefig 2-2) :

Zone D is water zone due to low Resistivity value

, that is Rt = 0.3 ohmm (assumes Sw = 1)

and the Porosity is about 0.35

F Rw

Sw2 = 1 = ---------

0.3

Rw calculated about 0.045 ohmm.

Page 19: Petrophysic interpretation

Formation Evaluation conducted with use 3 log type:

Log show Permeable Zone.Spontaneous Potential Gamma Ray

Log measure Formation ResistivityDeep Induction Deep Laterolog

Log measure Porosity.

Density

Neutron

Sonic

Page 20: Petrophysic interpretation

Finding Production zone?

Permeable Zone use Log SP or GR :

“Shale base line” on the right show shale

(impermeable and cannot be produced).

Deflection SP to left shows “Clean Zones”

(sand or limestone) may be productive.

Log-log Resistivity :

High resistivity shows HC or “tight zones” or

zones low porosity.

Low resistivity shows containing water.

Log-log Porosity

Shows zone with pore or

“ tight ”.

Page 21: Petrophysic interpretation

SP Log

(Spontaneous Potential)

Page 22: Petrophysic interpretation

Log SP APPLICATION : To differentiate permeable and non-permeable of rock.

To “well to well” Correlation.

As reference of depth for all logs.

To define layer limit.

To calculate Rw value.

As clay indicator.

Work Principal : An electrode insert to bore hole then record the electrical potential at

any point with reference on surface electrical potential

So the SP log is different of potential record between an moveable electrode in borehole and another electrode on surface

The Mud must conductive.

Logging speed may 1500 m/hr.

Page 23: Petrophysic interpretation

LOG SP MEASUREMENT

Figure 2.

Page 24: Petrophysic interpretation

Figure 1.

Origin Log SP Measurement

Page 25: Petrophysic interpretation

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 8.

Figure 7.

Origin Log SP Measurement

Page 26: Petrophysic interpretation

SP Deflection.

The SP curve constant but deflect to another level if pass the limit of the

different formation that differ.

Rock surface that permeable containing water, then

If Rmf > Rw SP deflect to left (SP negatif).

If Rmf < Rw SP deflect right (SP positif).

There is no SP deflection on rock surface that non-permeabel or shale

surface.

Page 27: Petrophysic interpretation

Figure 1. Figure 2.

LOG SP MEASUREMENT

Page 28: Petrophysic interpretation

SP DEFLECTION

Figure 4.

Page 29: Petrophysic interpretation

SP Log Presentation:SP curve presented in I with millivolt unit.

There is no Absolut scale, but use 10 mV per small division.

Usually use scale –80 to 20 mV

Page 30: Petrophysic interpretation

GR Log

( Gamma Ray )

Page 31: Petrophysic interpretation

Application Log GR. Standard Gamma Ray Application:

As main Reference to all run logging.

To “well to well” correlation.

Differentiate permeable and nonpermeable zone .

Calculate volume clay.

Natural Gamma Ray Tool (NGT) Application:

To detect, recognize and evaluate radioactive minerals .

Recognize the clay type and calculate volume clay.

Permeable zone that may contain Uranium much more than less permeable

zone.

Uranium reading on NGT log sometime useful as clue the existing fluid

movement.

Page 32: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work of GR Log. Gamma Rays that naturally come:

This Gamma Ray comes naturally in rocks and has relatively low

energy.

Device to measure gamma ray natural are:

1. Standard Gamma ray Tool (SGT)

2. Natural Gamma Spectrometry Tool (NGT)

SGT measure all natural GR.

NGT beside measure all GR, also measure GR energy and define

the concentration of 3 type radioactive element that usually in

nature :

Uranium (Ur235/238)

Potassium (isotope 19K40) and

Thorium (Th232)

Page 33: Petrophysic interpretation

Figure 2. Figure 3.

Type radioactive element

Page 34: Petrophysic interpretation

Gamma Ray (GR)

Specifications

Measurement Range :

Gamma API Units : 0 to 400 API

Measurement Accuracy :

Gamma API Units : ± 1 API

Maxium Ratings :

Pressure : 20,000 psi (138,000 kPa)

Temperature : 350 o F (177 o C)

Dimensions :

Tool Length : 4.4 ft (2.30 m)

Tool Weight 80 lb (36 kg)

Maximum Diameter : 3.5 in (89 mm)

The Gamma Ray measures natural formation radioactivity, making it an excellent tool for correlation

purposes over the life of a well

Page 35: Petrophysic interpretation

Induced Gamma Ray Tools:The devices putted radioactive sources that transmit gamma ray with

high energy.

Example density log tools:

FDC - Formation Density Compensated

LDT – Litho Density Tool

Depth of Investigation and

Vertical Resolution.Depth of Investigation SGT about 10 inci.

Depth of Investigation NGT about 15 inci.

Vertical Resolution SGT about 10 inci

Vertical Resolution NGT about 15 inci.

Page 36: Petrophysic interpretation

Presentation kurva GRThe gamma ray curve presented in

Track I.

Common scale use 0-200 API.

Can reduce to 0-150 API or 0-120 API if gamma ray activity low.

The NGT curve presented:

○ SGR: Total Gamma Ray.

○ CGR: total GR less by Uranium

○ Ratio Th/K

○ Ratio Th/U

Page 37: Petrophysic interpretation

LQC dan Corrections

In free shale Rock, log GR recording low value about 20-30 API.

In “Shaly Formation” log GR has value 80 to 300 API.

Environmental corrections

Large borehole and much weight mud can reduce the value of GR rock measurement.

“centered” tools in borehole will receive gamma ray less than the GR tools that “eccentered”.

GR devices that survey in well contain KCl mud will accept GR much more due to high Potassium content.

Therefore the correction as parameter:

Hole size & mud weight.

Correction KCl content

Casing size & Casing weight

cement.

Page 38: Petrophysic interpretation

Example of correction GR

As bore hole

Find GR value after conduct correction

if value log GR = 32 API,

hole size (dhole) =12 inci,

mud weight (Wmud) = 9.2 lb/gal,

tool diameter (dsonde) = 3 3/8”, as

survey “centered”.

Calculate:

t = Wmud x [2.54(dhole) –

2.54(dsonde)]/[8.345 x 2]

= 12 g/cm2

Then follow redline (chart) with input t

= 12 g/cm2 for gain correction factor

1.2\

GRcorrected = 1.2 x GRlog = 38.4 API

Page 39: Petrophysic interpretation

Interpretation

Percentage shale in rocks

calculated by formula:

(GRlog – GRclean)

Vshale = ---------------------------------

(GRshale – GRclean)

Survey by NGT tool give curve

Uranium, Potassium and

Thorium curve .

Figure Mineral Identification from

Spectral Gamma Ray

Page 40: Petrophysic interpretation

Interpretation

Page 41: Petrophysic interpretation

Interpretation

Page 42: Petrophysic interpretation

Logs that measure

Formation Resistivity

Page 43: Petrophysic interpretation

The Main Basic Formula Interpretation is:

F. RwSw2 = ----------

Rt

The most important Input is Rt, uninvaded zone resistivity .

With invasion then logging has create 3 type Resistivity tools:

Deep investigation.

Medium investigation.

Shallow investigation.

Resistivity a liquid always presented with Temperatur.

Example:

Rmf = 0.30 ohm-m @ 80 degF

Rw = 0.10 ohm-m @ 120 degF

from resistivity data and temperature, can be found liquid salinity with ChartGen-9.

Resistivity Logs

Page 44: Petrophysic interpretation

Resistivity of NaCl solution (Schlumberger chart GEN-9)

Page 45: Petrophysic interpretation

Classification and Application.

Page 46: Petrophysic interpretation

Table 4-1 above is Resistivity tools classification until 1987

classification based on radius of investigation :

Deep : 3 + feet

Medium : 1.5 - 3 feet

Shallow : 1- 6 inches.

all curve deep, medium and shallow recorded use electrodes or coils putted on mandrel silindris, and placed more less centralized in borehole.

Microresistivity devices use sensor that putted on pad that forced close in wall of borehole wall as survey conducted.

Page 47: Petrophysic interpretation

Log Induction worked in:Fresh mud

Resistivity formation < 200 ohm-m

Rmf/Rw > 2.0

Log Lateral will better work in:Salt MudResistivity formation > 200 ohm-mRmf/Rw < 2.0

Large borehole >12 in. also deep invasion (>40in.)

Page 48: Petrophysic interpretation

Log Induction & Lateral

Figure 1.

Page 49: Petrophysic interpretation

Log Induction

Page 50: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal Work.

Induction devices to define

resistivity with measure rocks

conductivity. In transmitter

flowed by high frequency current

with constant amplitude that will

attain magnet field in rocks.

The magnet fields attain Eddy

current or Foucault current in

other name called ground loop.

The value of the current equal to

rocks conductivity

Page 51: Petrophysic interpretation

Simultaneous triple induction (STI)

SPHERICALLY FOCUSSED RESISTIVITY SECTION

• Electrode System : Integrated into mandrel

• Measurements Range : 0,2 to 2000 ohm-in

• Outputs : V0 and I0

• Accuracy : 5 % of reading

• Inputs : Cal, Zero, Return select

• Full Vertical Resolution : 25 in (64 cm)

Accurate resistivity measurement with high vertical

resolution is vital for the determination of true

formation resistivity and flushed zone resistivity, two

essential parameters of formation evaluation

Open Hole Services

Page 52: Petrophysic interpretation

Depth of Investigation & Vertical Resolution.

Page 53: Petrophysic interpretation

LATEROLOG – INDUCTION LOGS

Better use Induction than

Laterolog if

1. Rmf/Rw > 2.5

2. Rt < 200 ohmm

3. Thickness > 10ft

If porosity bellow Rw but

Rmf/Rw still > 2.5 then

Laterolog should be used

Page 54: Petrophysic interpretation

Presentation Log Induction.

The deep Induction log presented on track 3-4 with logarithmic scale, as dashed curve with mnemonic ILD.

The medium induction log also on track 3-4 with logarithmic scale, as dashed curve with mnemonic ILM.

The shallow focused log also on track 3-4 with logarithmic scale, as continue curve with mnemonic SFLU (spherically focused log).

logarithmic Scale usually 4 cycles, from 0.2 s/d 2000 with unit [ohmm].

Page 55: Petrophysic interpretation

LQC / Interpretation Due to mud filtrate, therefore ILM

between ILD and SFLU.

ILD<ILM<SFLU Profile must shown on log Induction,

because of this condition Rmf/Rw > 2.5 fulfilled.

Figure 4.

Page 56: Petrophysic interpretation

Correction Log Induction.

Induction log need to be

corrected with:

Borehole corrections: mud

resistivity and borehole size

(figure 11)

Tool standoff corrections

(figure 11)

Bed thickness and shoulder

bed corrections (fig.12)

Invasion corrections (figure

13)

SFLU log also need to be

corrected as mud resistivity

and borehole size. (figure 10)

Page 57: Petrophysic interpretation

Correction Log Induction

Page 58: Petrophysic interpretation

Correction Log Induction

Page 59: Petrophysic interpretation

Lateral Log

Page 60: Petrophysic interpretation

Application Log Lateral.

Laterolog device designed for measure rock resistivity that drilled with salty mud or very conductive mud also used for detect zones that contain HC. Prinsipal work Log Lateral.

Sonde on resistivity tools has bucking electrode to focus survey current and insist to flow in vertical to sonde.

The focused current make possible to measure done on rocks with presizedirection.

This is the fixing tools that use unfocused current such ES (Electrical Survey) the previous, where the current survey more likely flow in mud due to mud resistivity is lesser than rock resistivity

Page 61: Petrophysic interpretation

Figure 3.

Log Lateral.

Page 62: Petrophysic interpretation

The Dual Laterolog measures

formation resistivity over a wide

dynamic range. It provides accurate

readings up to 40,000 ohm-m.

The DLL is generally the resistivity

tool of choice in wells drilled with salt

mud's, Especially if formation resistivity

are high.

DUAL LATEROLOG (DLL)

Measurenment Range

Deep Resistivity, LLd : 0,2 to 40,000 ohm-m

Medium Resistivity, LLm : 0,2 to 40,000 ohm-m

Measurement Precision

Deep Resistivity, LLd : ± 2 %

Medium Resistivity, LLm : ± 2 %

Open Hole Services

Page 63: Petrophysic interpretation

DLT & MSFL tools

Page 64: Petrophysic interpretation

Micro Spherically Focused Log (MSFL)

SPECIFICATIONS

MEASUREMENT RANGE :

MSFL Conductivity : 0 to 5,000 ms/m

Caliper : 4 to 21 in (100 to 530 mm)

MEASUREMENT PRECISION:

MSFL Conductivity : +/-2 mS/m

Caliper : +/-0,1 in (+/-2.5 mm)

MAXIMUM RATINGS :

Pressure: 20,000Psi (138,000 kPa)

Temperature : 350 o F (177 o C)

DIMENSIONS

• Tool Length : 10,6 ft (3,23m)

• Tool Weight : 200 lb (91 kg)

• Maximum Diameter : 4,0 (102 mm)

The MSFL can be used in fresh or saline muds. The pad

mounted device incorporates a caliper measurement and the

tool is typically run in combination with another resistivity

device, most often the Dual Laterolog.

The MSFL is a pad-Type microresistivity device employing a

concentric arrangement of five electrodes to force the measurement current into a hemispherical pattern

Open Hole Services

Page 65: Petrophysic interpretation

Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution

Page 66: Petrophysic interpretation

LIMITATION & PRESENTATION

Laterolog tools used to survey on well filled with mud with low

resistivity also in rocks high resistivity

Laterolog tools can accurately measure rocks resistivity about 0.2 –

40000 ohmm.

Laterolog tools recomed to use if:

Ratio Rmf/Rw < 2.5

Rocks resistivity > 200 ohmm.

Thickness < 10 feet.

Deep laterolog presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as thin line

dashed with mnemonic LLD

Shallow laterolog presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as dotted

line with mnemonic LLS

Microresistivity presented in track 3-4, logarithmic scale as solid line

with mnemonic MSFL.

logarithmic scale usually in 4 cycle : 0.2 – 2000 ohmm.

Page 67: Petrophysic interpretation

LATEROLOG PRESENTATION

Page 68: Petrophysic interpretation

Resistivity Curve can be use as

indicator percentage

clay in rocks, VRT:

(Rsand – Rt)

VRT = ------------------------- x 4 Rclay/Rt

(Rsand – Rclay)

VRT usually relatively too high,

except the rocks with high

Resistivity.

Due to clay is conductive, with

minimal value Rsand will get value

VRT 100%

LATEROLOG PRESENTATION

Page 69: Petrophysic interpretation

Correction Lateral Log MSFL borehole corrections (fig.14)

Borehole corrections – to mud resistivity and borehole size (fig.15)

Bed thickness corrections (fig.16)

Invasion corrections – to invasion mud filtrate (fig. 17)

Page 70: Petrophysic interpretation

Fig.15 Laterolog Borehole Correction Chart

Page 71: Petrophysic interpretation

Fig. 17: Laterolog Invasion Correction Chart

Page 72: Petrophysic interpretation

Log that measure

Porosity

Page 73: Petrophysic interpretation

Density Log

Page 74: Petrophysic interpretation

Log Density Application

Density tool measure density of rocks then use to define rock porosity.

Together with another logs such log neutron, rocks lithology and fluids

type containing in the rocks can be defined.

Log density can differentiate Oil to gas in pore due to the fluids has

different density.

Density tool in modern age also measure PEF (photoelectric effect) that

useful for defining rocks lithology, identify heavy minerals and evaluate

clay.

Log density also use to define Vclay also to calculate “reflection

coefficients” along with log sonic to make synthetics seismogram.

Page 75: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Density tool

A radioactive sources Cs137 has 1.5 Curie transmit GR energy 662 kev to the rocks.

Gamma rays interact with rocks electrons with Compton scattering mechanism, where gamma rays lose its energy also spread to many direction.

Compton scattering Proses result “clouds” gamma ray around source with radius vary according Rocks electron.

The more rocks electron the shorter clouds radius and therefore lesser gamma ray reach to the detector (count rates).

So e reverse equal to count rates or cps that accepted

by detector

Gamma ray detected that less amount shows the

existing larger electron density.

Bulk density b for many element has value near equal

with electron density e as empirical equation bellow:

b = 1.0704 e – 0.1883

Page 76: Petrophysic interpretation

The Litho density tools not only measure density, but also photoelectric

absorption index PEF.

Photoelectric absorption happen if gamma ray that come has low energy.

There gamma ray catch by core atom and an electron throw by the atom.

PEF = (Z/10)3.6

where:

Z = number atom (= amount electron inatom).

Each element has Z particular value therefore PEF can be use as clue for

rocks type.

PEF value very little depends on rocks porosity as seen on figure bellow

PEF also only little influenced by fluid in pores, but log PEF influenced by

barite content on mud, because number atom Barium is high (Z=56).

Principal work Density tool

Page 77: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Density tool

Page 78: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Density tool

Page 79: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Density tool

tools

Page 80: Petrophysic interpretation

Figure 2.

Figure 1.

Principal work Density tool

Page 81: Petrophysic interpretation

Calculation of Density Porosity PHID

(its porosity from RHOB) :

Due to bulk density b is amount of matrix density ma and fluid density f in pores

then the porosity value of rocks can be define if the value ma (Recognize first the

lithology).

b = ma (1-PHID) + f (PHID)

the equation will be:

PHID = (b - ma ) / (f - ma )

where:

ma = matrix density

f = fluid density in pores

Page 82: Petrophysic interpretation

Porosity from RHOB

Page 83: Petrophysic interpretation

QC/Interpretations.

Shales Density usually smaller than rocks density that free of clay (clean

formation). Therefore shales porosity higher than rocks porosity.

The term “limestone compatible scales”, then:

In clean limestone RHOB & NPHI will overlay in shales RHOB will be in

right side of NPHI,

In limestone that contain gas, NPHI will be in the right side of RHOB.

In clean sand that contain water, NPHI will be in right side of RHOB

about 6-7 p.u.

In dolomite RHOB will be in right side of NPHI, similar with shale but

gamma ray usually has higher value in dolomite.

The term “Sandstone compatible scales”, then :

In sandstone rocks the curve RHOB and NPHI will overlay.

Due to PEF water, hydrogen and oxygen is near zero, then porosity effect

to PEF vey small and basic lithology usually can be define direct to PEF

curve (see6.2 Typical log reading).

Page 84: Petrophysic interpretation

Typical log reading

Page 85: Petrophysic interpretation

Perhitungan Volume Shale (Vsh)

A shaly formation on the figure if Vsh is shale part in

rocks, then matrix part is (1-Vsh-), then:

b = ma (1-Vsh-) + sh Vsh + f

and

(ma - b ) – Vsh (ma - sh )

= -----------------------------------------------

(ma - f )

therfore

(ma - b ) – (ma - f )

Vsh = ----------------------------------------

(ma - sh )

Shale influence the porosity density and porosity

neutron.

If both corrected with shale effect, it will get effective

porosity as follows:

e = D - Vsh D

e = N - Vsh N

Page 86: Petrophysic interpretation

Typical Log Readings:

Recommend Parameter

Page 87: Petrophysic interpretation

RHOB correction should be done to:Mud cake thickness ( in real time)

Mud weight (alsoreal time)

Rugose hole (real time)

Borehole size.

Page 88: Petrophysic interpretation

Log Neutron

Page 89: Petrophysic interpretation

Application Log Neutron

Neutron tools used for define primary rocks porosity, that is rocks

pore filled by water, oil or gas

Together with another log lain such log density, can be use to

define rock type /lithology also fuluid type that fill the rocks pores.

Elastic scattering:

Neutron Particle collide with another atom, therefore neutron

particle change direction, but has still same energy.

Inelastic scattering:

The collide with another atom, neutron particle has lose half

its energy that given to atom that collided. This Atom

experiencing “excitation”,then transmit energy again in

Gamma Ray form that has specific spektrum.

neutron Particle also change direction in this collide.

Page 90: Petrophysic interpretation

Application Log Neutron

Page 91: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Neutron tools

Radioaktif source Am241Be transmit Neutron particle to the rocks about

5 MeV energy.

After collition with the rocks, the neutron energy reduce to level 0.1-10

eV (level epithermal).

The collisions next reduces energy further to less than 0.025 eV (level

thermal).

Due to mass Hydrogen near with Neutron, atom Hydrogen has bigger

ability in slowing down neutron particle than another atoms in rocks.

Two thermal detector put on 1-2 ft upper radioactive sources.

Ratio between amounts pulse : Nn/Nf are porosity function.

This Ratio has:

Bore hole influence reduced

Penetration depth further than one detector system .

Page 92: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Neutron tools

Page 93: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Neutron tools

Page 94: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Neutron tools

Page 95: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal work Neutron tools

Page 96: Petrophysic interpretation

Depth of Investigation and Vertical Resolution.

Page 97: Petrophysic interpretation

Presentation Log Neutron.

Neutron porosity presented on

track 5 - 6 with mnemonic NPHI

with scale:

45% sampai - 15% or

.45 sampai -.15 p.u

60% sampai 0% or

.60 sampai 0 p.u

Page 98: Petrophysic interpretation

Log Quality Control and Interpretation. Shale influence reading log, then NPHI higher than true porosity due to

water bound on shales.

The washed out well also make reading log higher than true porosity.

Rocks contain gas has hydrogen concentration lower than contain oil or

water, therefore reading neutron log willl smaller than true porosity.

The term “limestone compatible scale” are:

RHOB : 1.95 - 2.95

NPHI : 45% - -15%

In limestone without shale content water RHOB curves and NPHI will

overlay.

In shale rocks RHOB on right side NPHI.

In limestone contain gas, RHOB on left side NPHI. Separation larger than 6-

7 p.u

In sand without shale contain water , RHOB on left side NPHI with

separation 6-7 p.u

In dolomite without shale contain water, RHOB on the right side NPHI.

Page 99: Petrophysic interpretation

The term “sandstone compatible scale” are:

RHOB: 1.90 gr/cc - 2.90 gr/cc

NPHI : 45 % - -15 %

In sandstone without shale contain water RHOB and NPHI curves will overlay.

In shale RHOB on the right side NPHI.

In sandstone contain gas, RHOB on the left side NPHI. Separation larger than 3 p.u

In sandstone without shale contain oil , RHOB on the left side NPHI with separation 1-3 p.u

Page 100: Petrophysic interpretation

Log Quality Control and Interpretation

Page 101: Petrophysic interpretation

Formation content liquid. All points porosity contain water will fall in area line sandstone and

dolomite. True Porosity can predict by:

PHI = (PHID + PHIN)/2

For clean formation contain liquid, porosity above are effective porosity, and the value can be read as middle Density & Neutron logs.

Formation content gas. The exchange liquid with gas in pores reduce bulk density and hydrogen

content.

Density go down - PHID go up.

Hydrogen content go down - PHIN go up. The result is crossover effect recognize in Neutron and Density logs

shows gas.

PHIN most bigger than PHID except crossover zone, that shows interval contain gas.

Page 102: Petrophysic interpretation

Another way measure porosity is use formula:

PHI = (PHID2 + PHIN2)/2

With above formula will get porosity that close with the chart.

Therefore in formation contain gas, porosity not middle between Neutron and Density, but 2/3 distance between log Neutron to log Density.

Shale reduce the porosity Density measurement and Neutron. shale Volume can be calculated as follows:

VDshale = (PHID - PHIeff)/PHIDsh

VNshale = (PHIN - PHIeff)/PHINsh

Page 103: Petrophysic interpretation

Environmental Corrections. The quality of log guarantee good if been contacted between neutron tools with

borehole wall.

Environmental corrections should be done to log NPHI are:

Borehole size

Borehole salinity

Borehole temperature and pressure.

Mud cake

Mud weight

Formation salinity

Toll stand-off from wall of bore hole

Page 104: Petrophysic interpretation

Environmental Corrections.

Page 105: Petrophysic interpretation

Example Neutron Environmental Correction: Uncorrected TNPH =34 pu in hole 12” reduce with 2 pu as correction to bore hole size.

If mud cake ¼ inch, no mud cake effect.

If salinity borehole 100 kppm, add with 1 pu.

If used natural mud with density 11 lb/gal then add with 2 pu.

If temperature borehole 150 degF, add with 4 pu.

If 5kpsi water based mud, reduce 1 pu

If 100kppm formation salinity, reduce 2.5 pu

Total borehole correction: -2+1+2+4-1-2.5 = 1.5 pu.

Associated Mnemonics

Page 106: Petrophysic interpretation

Example of Neutron Environmental Correction:

Uncorrected TNPH =34 pu in hole 12” less by 2 pu as correction to bore

hole size.

If mud cake ¼ inch, no mud cake effect.

If salinity borehole 100 kppm, add 1 pu.

If use natural mud with density 11 lb/gal then add 2 pu.

If tem. borehole 150 degF, add 4 pu.

If 5kpsi water based mud, remove 1 pu

If 100kppm formation salinity, remove 2.5 pu

Total borehole correction: -2+1+2+4-1-2.5 = 1.5 pu.

Page 107: Petrophysic interpretation

Sonic Log

Page 108: Petrophysic interpretation

log sonic ApplicationTo define sonic porosity (s)

To define volume of clay (Vs)

Along with another logs to define lithology

Time-depth relationship

To define reflection coefficients

Mechanical properties

To define cement CBL-VDL quality

Theory of measurement

Sonic tool measure: speed of voice/sonic in formation.

The principal on figure below :

Transmitter transmit a “pressure pulse” frequency 25 kHz.

The pulse resulting 6 wave:Compressional wave and refracts wave shear waving in formation.direct two wave as long as sonde and in mud.two surface wave as long as hole wall of well (pseudo Raleigh dan Stoneley)

The speed of the waves about 4000 to 25 000 ft/sec depend on lithology

Page 109: Petrophysic interpretation

Principal log sonic tool

Page 110: Petrophysic interpretation

A compressional wave waving from transmitter via mud to formation , the waving in formation, then waving in mud again to reach receiver.

Transmitter transmit one pulse. An electronic tool measure time from this pulse until time reach “the

first negative excursion” detected by near receiver. Transmitter transmit one pulse again. Measured the time from pulse second to time reach “the first negative

excursion” detected by far receiver.

The Differ between those both time then divide by distance between

receiver-receiver (span) as two ft resulting formation

transit times in microseconds/ft (sec/ft).Compressional transit times vary:

40 sec/ft in hard formation150 sec/ft in soft formation.

Reverse transit time is velocity [feet/sec].

Shear wave travel time can be measured by logging

Particular along with wave form processing.

Principal log sonic tool

Page 111: Petrophysic interpretation

Log sonic presented as DT in track 2

and 3, with sec/ft unit, bigger from

right to left .

The raise of porosity deflect curve to the left, equal to reading density and neutron.

Small pips in depth track is “integrated travel time”.With small pips: 1 msec; between large pips: 10 msecThe Caliper dan Gamma Ray curves –in track 1.

Presentation log sonic

Page 112: Petrophysic interpretation

Long spaced sonic tool

Page 113: Petrophysic interpretation

Depth of Investigation & Vertical Resolution.

Page 114: Petrophysic interpretation

Sonic log presentation

Page 115: Petrophysic interpretation

6.3 Mnemonics.

Page 116: Petrophysic interpretation

Recommend parameters

Page 117: Petrophysic interpretation

Sonic porosity transform:

By using Willie Time Average (WTA):

DTlog – DTma 1

S = -------------------- x -------

DTfl - Dtma Cpwhere:

S = porosity sonic

DTma = transit time in 100% matrix.

DTlog = transit time read on log.

DTfl = transit time in 100% fluid

Cp = compaction factor:

Cp = 1 in hard formation

Cp = DTsh/100 in unconsolidated formation

Formula Raymer Hunt Gardner (RHG):

Sonic Porosity calculated with this formula no need Cp and more close to core

porosity value also porosity density-neutron differ by WTA.

Equation RHG as follows:

S = c x (DTlog-DTma)/DTlogwhere : c = 0.67

c = 0.60 in gas saturated reservoir rock

Page 118: Petrophysic interpretation

Calculate Vsh from log Sonic:

If shale exist in rocks, the formula WTA tobe:

DTlog= DTma (1--Vsh) +DTfl. + DTsh Vsh.

DTsh value usually found about 80-110 sec/ft.

Page 119: Petrophysic interpretation

Quick-look with Delta Log R Delta Log R quick-look method to find hydrocarbon by overlay between

deep resistivity curve with curve porosity

No need to know a,m,n and Rw first

Basic Method Delta log R:

deep resistivity curve and porosity curve overlay in clean zone content

water.

In hydrocarbon zone, curve resistivity will raise.

Resistivity scale: raise for example 0.2 - 2000 ohmm.

So the raise of resistivity caused curve deflect to right

Page 120: Petrophysic interpretation

Delta Log R

Quick-look with Delta Log R

Page 121: Petrophysic interpretation

Quick-look with Delta Log R

Page 122: Petrophysic interpretation

Quick-look with Delta Log R

Page 123: Petrophysic interpretation
Page 124: Petrophysic interpretation

md (k) = (kcoef*PHIE**kexp)/(SWirr**2) (graphic 3)

REGRESION LOGARITMIC

grafik 2 Regresi Logaritmik kcore dan PHIcore sumur TJS-03

grafik 3 Permeabilitas core dan Log

Page 125: Petrophysic interpretation

md (k) = (kcoef*PHIE**kexp)/(SWirr**2) (graphic 3)

REGRESION LOGARITMIC

graphic 3 Permeability core and Log

Page 126: Petrophysic interpretation

INTERPRETATION METHODE Quick Look : D LOG R (DELTA LOG R) Interpretation by Cross Plot

a. Lithology Model Approach- Cross Plot N-D- Cross Plot N-S - Cross Plot S-D- Cross Plot M-N

b. Parameter Petrophysic calculation- Picket Plot (a, m & Rw)- Hingle Plot (Rw)- Cross Plot RWA-GR (Rclay & Water formation salinity)- Cross Plot PHIE-RHOMAU ( RhoH)

c. Permeability Calculation ApproachK = (kcoef x PHIEkexp)/(SWirr2) , mD

Page 127: Petrophysic interpretation

Cross Plot N-S

Page 128: Petrophysic interpretation

Cross Plot S-D

Cross Plot M-N

Page 129: Petrophysic interpretation

Picket Plot (a, m & Rw)

Hingle Plot (Rw)

Page 130: Petrophysic interpretation

Cross Plot RWA-GR

Cross Plot PHIE-OMAU ( RhoH)

Page 131: Petrophysic interpretation

D LOG R (DELTA LOG R)

Page 132: Petrophysic interpretation

Composite Log

Page 133: Petrophysic interpretation

Composite Log

Page 134: Petrophysic interpretation

CASE: T-42 (T-Field in South Africa)

Page 135: Petrophysic interpretation

T-42 (T-Field in South Africa)

Page 136: Petrophysic interpretation

T-42

PHI cutoff ~ 0.17Sw cutoff ~ 0.57Vcl~0.35a= 1, m=1.99, n=2

(in South Africa)

Page 137: Petrophysic interpretation

T-42(T-Field in South Africa)

Page 138: Petrophysic interpretation

Log-Core Data Validation

Core Data:

Dean Stark

Avg. PHIE~21.7

Avg. Density 2.65

Avg. SW~11.16

PRELIMINARY

CLEAN PLUG CORE

ANALYSIS DATA

Avg. Perm~341.98mD

Petrophysic:

Avg. PHIE~19.83

(Mod simandoux,

A=1, m=2, n=2 )

Avg. SW~24.12

Or 16.2 (@ Sand)

(Resistivity Log)

Perm X~330mD

( PHIE & Vcl)

RWA adjustment to

0.1

(T-Field in South Africa)

Page 139: Petrophysic interpretation

1.00

10.00

100.00

1000.00

0 10 20 30 40 50

Permeability - Vcl Cross Plot

Perm XVClay

Perm

eab

ili

ty

Permeability - VClay Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well

Properties Parameter cut

off

SW - Perm X Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well

SO-PHIE Crossplot of The OBSF-05 well

(T-Field in South Africa)

Page 140: Petrophysic interpretation

Reservoir Rock Type

Perm X - PHIE of The OBSF-05 well

(T-Field in South Africa)

Pe

rm X

Reservoir sand formation

divided three Rock type

based on Permeability –

PHIE (fraction) relation with

Vshale of OBSF-05 Core

data.

The Formation sand Rock

types consist of RT 1, RT 2

and RT 3 where each has

particular formula. RT 1 with

Volume Shale (Vsh) less

than 20% has low

permeability and low

porosity, RT 2 with Vsh.

20% to 40% has medium

permeability and medium

porosity, RT 3 with Vsh. Up

to 40% has high

permeability and medium-

high porosity.

Page 141: Petrophysic interpretation

From many Sources

Reference