Upload
cfpbolivia
View
471
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
New Developments in Pile Foundations
K. Rainer Massarsch
2
Overview of Presentation
Auger Cast Piling (CFA) MethodRisk of Soil De-compressionMonitoring of Auger Cast Pile InstallationAuger Cast Pile with Expander Body Displacement Auger PilesVibrated Steel Piles with Expander BodySettlement-reducing Conical Concrete Nails
International DFI Conference – Stockholm 2014
3
Auger Cast Pile (CFA-pile)
Start of auger penetration
4
Auger Cast Pile (CFA-pile)
Auger penetrationSoil heave on ground surface
5
Auger Cast Pile (CFA-pile)
End of auger penetrationCompetent layer has been reached
6
Auger Cast Pile (CFA-pile)
Start of grouting processduring auger extraction
7
Conventional Auger Cast Pile (CFA-pile)
8
Auger Cast Pile (CFA-pile)
9
Small and Large Stem Auger
10
Decompression due to low penetration speed
Stiff layer
11
Decompression due to high extraction speed
Risk of necking
12
Risk of Soil Decompression during Penetration
d l
D
vcrit
Volume of stem
Volume of stem and flight
Volume of pumped soil
Critical penetration rate
n
13
Critical Penetration Speed – Soil De-compression
No de-compression
De-compression
14
Monitoring of Pile Installation
PENETATION
• Pushing force• Penetration speed• Torque• Hydraulic
pressure
EXTRACTION
• Concrete pressure
• Concrete volume• Extraction speed
15
Illistration of Installation Record
16
Determination of Pile Penetration Resistance
From drilling parameters the actual soil resistance is determined.
This information is used to establish required depth of penetration
Required pile length
17
Installation of Reinforcement
Placement of reinforcement can be critical for auger pile quality!
Single bar – cage – fibre concrete?
• Insertion procedure can damage borehole wall
• Full pile reinforcement may not be necessary
• Use straight reinforcement cage• For long piles: use guiding tube• Use vibrator if necessary• Large-stem piles facilitate
installation• Fibre concrete avoids problems
18
Applications of Expander Body
Expander Body can be combined with
conventional piling methods:
• Vibrated steel tube pile
• Continuous flight auger pile (CFA)
19
Pressuremeter Test
20
Inflation of Expander Body
Expander Body similar to
Pressure Meter Test
Grout volume and inflation pressure are
measured
21
After Expansion
TYPE LENTH DIAMETER TOE BEARING
AREA
SKIN AREA
VOLUME
m m mm2 mm2 m3
EB 610 1.0 0.6 0.28 1.43 0.21
EB 612 1.2 0.6 0.28 1.83 0.27
EB 615 1.5 0.6 0.28 2.38 0.36
EB 815 1.5 0.6 0.50 3.17 0.63
EB 820 2.0 0.8 0.50 4.42 0.88
22
EB Grouting Recording
23
Grouting Pressure and Grouting Volume, EB 600
Filling of EB
Expansion of EB
Soil displacement
Expansion pressure
24
Post-grouting of Expander Body
Post-grouted Zone
Expander Body shortens during
inflation
Inflation of Expander
Body
Full expansion
of Expander Body
25
Auger Cast Pile with Expander Body
26
Advantages of CFE + EB
Reduced pile lengthKnown shape of pile baseRecompression of soil at and below pile basePost-grouting of pile base avoids soil de-
compression Reduce pile shaft diameterQuality monitoring and control
27
Vibration Pile Test with Expander Body
Allermöhe, GermanyExpander
BodySteel tube piles12 and 16 m long
28
Comparison Steel Tube Pile and Expander Body Pile
ExpanderBody
Steel tubepile
Medium dense sand
Loose sandOrganic layers
29
Comparison Steel Tube Pile and Expander Body Pile
ExpanderBody
Steel tubepile
Medium dense sand
Loose sandOrganic layers
Steel tube pile
ExpanderBody
30
Design of Bearing Capacity based on CPT
Swedish Design Recommendations
EB toe resistance: Sand: sBase = 0.5 qc < 5MPaSilt and clay: s Base = 1.0 qc
EB shaft resistance: sShaft = 0.005 qc<50 kPa
D
qc
D
3D
31
Bearing Capacity from CPT Test
SHAFT RESISTANCE
TOE RESISTANCE
32
Installation of Vibrated EB Pile
33
Pile Test Loading
34
Steel Tube Pile vs. Expander Body
Pile length: 12 m
35
Advantages of Vibrated Steel pile with EB in Friction Soils
Quick and environmentally-friendly installation
End-driving to “set” not required as EB compresses soil
Known shape of pile basePost-grouting of pile base avoids soil de-
compression Quality monitoring and control
36
Gewerbehof Halle, Germany
37
Vibrated Conical Nails – Halle Business Center, Germany
Difficult ground conditions with variable fill material
Installation close to existing buildingConical concrete nails vibrated to 9 m depthHigh driving frequency (38 Hz)Vibro-compaction at end of nail installationLoad testing of concrete nail capacity
38
Settlement Reduction by vibrated Concrete Nails
Alternative foundation
solution to stone columns or piles
39
Cone Penetration Test, CPT
Cone Resistance, MPa
Friction Ratio, %
De
pth
, m
Mixed fill
Dense sand
Stiff clay and
lignite
Medium dense sand
40
Design Concept of Conical Nail Foundation
Determine settlement of unimproved ground using tangent modulus method
Are the calculate settlements acceptable? Calculate load which corresponds to acceptable
settlement Calculate the excess load to be supported by conical
nails Determine the number and distribution of conical nails
This design approach achieves load-sharing with nail safety factor FS =1.0!
41
Load from Surface Foundation
Increasedconfiningstress aroundnails
Q
Load fromnails
Load fromfooting
2
1
Load from Footing
42
Load-sharing between Surface Foundation and
Concrete Nails
Increasedconfiningstress aroundnails
Q
Load fromnails
Load fromfooting
Load from Concrete
Nails
Load from Footing
Factor of Safety of Concrete Nails
Fs = 1.0
43
Ground Vibrations During Vibratory Pile Driving
44
Variable Frequency Vibrator
NO ECCENTRIC MOMENT DURING START-UP AND
SHUT-DOWN OF VIBRATOR
45
Variable Frequency Vibrator
STRONG VIBRATIONS DURING DRIVING PHASE
46
Avoids resonance peaks of ground vibrations!
Resonance-free driving
47
Conical Concrete Nails
48
VIBRATION-MONITORING
INSIDE BUILDING
ELECTRONIC PROCESS CONTROL
VIBRATOR MS100
VIBRATION MONITORING
UNIT
CONCRETENAIL
49
Monitoring Resonance Compaction
Geophone
50
Installation of Concrete Nail
51
Frequency vs. Ground Response
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
FREEQUENCY, Hz
VE
RT
ICA
L P
AR
TIC
LE
VE
LO
CIT
Y, m
m/s
ResonanceFrequency
Penetration Frequency
Extraction
Frequency
Penetration
Frequency
Compaction
Frequency
52
0
100
200
300
400
14:22:26 14:23:18 14:24:10 14:25:02
Time, hrs:min:sec
Pressure, bar
0
10
20
30
40
Frequency, HzDepth, m
Velocity mm/s
Pressure bar Frequency Hz
Depth m Geo z mm/s
Example of Compaction Monitoring
Pressure MPa
Pressure MPa
40
30
20
10
Time h:m:s
53
Concrete Nails after Installation
54
Load Test of Concrete Nail and Steel Tube Pile
55
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
0 50 100 150 250 300 350
LOAD, kN
DE
FO
RM
AT
ION
, mm
Steel tube
Concrete Nail
Results of Loading Test
56
Advantages of Vibrated Concrete Nails
Can be installed efficiently in most soils by vibrator
Conical shape and small toe reduces driving resistance
Conical shape increases soil compactionConical shape provides high lateral
resistance near ground surfaceKnown shape and material properties
57
Thank you!