Upload
j-garcia-verdugo
View
290
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effective Project Management U i Si Si M th d lUsing Six Sigma Methodology
DefineMeasure
lAnalyseImproveImproveControl
Week 1
Knorr-Bremse Group
Content
• History of project management
• What is a project?
S f t f th j t k• Success factors of the project work
C t f j t t• Components of project management
The Six sigma methodology• The Six sigma methodology
• The project phases in the DMAIC cycle• The project phases in the DMAIC cycle
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 2/41
History of Project Management
Historical: The start point of project management stems from the „Manhatten-Project“
(Construction of the first nuclear bomb, (1941) in the USA).
1990
Airbus A320
Jäger `90
Spacelab
Ariane Rakete Tornado1970
1980Reaktor SNR 300, Kalkar IBM Personal Computer
Ariane Rakete
Development CPM Apollo-Program1960
1950
Manhatten Project1940
G. George; Kennzahlen f. d. Projektmanagement
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 3/41
G. George; Kennzahlen f. d. Projektmanagement
History of Project Management
Reasons for the increasing interest in project management:
Sh t d t lif lShorter product life cycles
Amplified compulsion to new or further developments
Still there was and there are many projects with little success e.g. channel tunnel or fast-breeder reactor (Kalkar)
Line organizations often react too slowly in an increasingly more dynamic environment
Thorough project management less often neglects aspects of the product life cyclelife cycle
Siemens AG generates approx. 30% of it´s sales with project realizations
Project management moves increasingly into the vision of the industry within the last few years. What are the reasons for it?
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 4/41
Project Features
What do we understand by a project?
A project is described by the following features:A project is described by the following features:
1 Uniqueness1. Uniqueness
2. Time limit
3. Target setting
4 I ti4. Innovation
5. Complexityp y
6. Assigned budget
7. Temporary organizational assignments
8 Supervision by control authorities
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 5/41
8. Supervision by control authorities
Operational and Value Flow
Payments Value Flow DepositsPayments Value Flow Deposits
Purchasing Materials MarketingProduction Sales
O ti l P Fl V l ddOperational Process Flow, Value add
Projects are always process orientated
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 6/41
Projects are always process orientated
Project Management
1 The extensive tasks on a project cannot be covered by one1. The extensive tasks on a project cannot be covered by one person. This leads to a combination of people and job sharing to accomplish a certain goal (cross functional team work).
2. In order to fulfil the goals, resources must be allocated, coordinated and used optimallycoordinated and used optimally.
3. These activities are described as management. The structure must be developed systematically. Inside and outside the project limits processes for work flow, communication and decision making have to be createddecision making have to be created.
4. The entire organization constitutes the frame to the management. Within this frame the management (as an institution) can carry out its tasks (functional management).
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 7/41
Project Management simplified
Project phases: Responsibility:CastingPlanningE ti
ContentTimeSt ffExecuting
ControllingStaffCost
Qualityy
The magical triangle
or
the field of compromise solutions
CostTiming
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 8/41
Structuring a Project:
Problem statement (Customer need)
Goals and definition
Planning
Risk analysis
Offer creating
Order placing
Obtaining resources
P iProcessing
Communication
St iSteering
Controlling
Documentation
Mile stones of project processing
Documentation
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 9/41
Mile stones of project processing
Success Factor Organization
Smax
Under organized Over organized
OrganizationalDegree of Control
Dopt
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 10/41
Success Factor Project Team
Performance
n T
ime
Project Duration
Rea
lisat
ion
Loss due to friction
R
OptimumOptimum Number of Team Members
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 11/41
Project Organization vs. Line Organisation
LeitungLeitungTop
Management
Linie 3
V t i bLinie 1
Ent ickl ngLinie 2
F i
Linie 2Qualität
Linie 3
V t i bLinie 1
Ent ickl ngLinie 2
F i
Linie 2Qualität
Line 3
Di t ib tiLine 1R&D
Line 2
O i
Line 2QualityVertriebEntwicklung Fertigung QualitätVertriebEntwicklung Fertigung QualitätDistributionR&D Operations Quality
Project 1Project 1
Project 2Project 2
Project 3
Project 4
Working on projects requires cross-functional collaboration .
Project 4
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 12/41
The results usually affect more than one line.
Project Structure Plan as the Foundation
The project structure plan is the most important tool within the classical project management; (deterministic view).classical project management; (deterministic view).
Definition according to DIN 69 901 (German institute of standards):Definition according to DIN 69 901 (German institute of standards):
1. Project structure: Entity of all relevant relations between the elements of a project. One often separates organizationalOne often separates organizational structure and work breakdown structure.
2 Project structure plan (PSP): Hierarchically structured list of all2. Project structure plan (PSP): Hierarchically structured list of all working packages needed to complete project work.
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 13/41
p p j
Work Breakdown Structure; WBS
Objective: A realistic project structure plan
Project 1. Level
WP Task TaskWP 2. Level
Task TaskWP WP 3. Level
WPWP WP WP 4. Level
Project: Description of the overall project as the sum of tasks and working kpackages
Task: Task can be broken down into working packagesWP: Working package will not be subdivided any more
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 14/41
Project Execution Structure110 Projekt
100 200
AP-Beschreibungen
W P
working packages
100
120110 130 210 220
200
120
132131 project structure plan
110 132131
110
network chart, detailed
210 220120 210 220120
network chart, coarse
The project structure plan is the starting point for
Overall network chart
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 15/41
the work breakdown structure.
Extract
Meanwhile many meters of literature are availableMeanwhile many meters of literature are available covering all aspects of project management. To my
opinion the distillate may be expressed in one sentence:opinion the distillate may be expressed in one sentence:
If you as a project manager can answer to your top management the following:management the following:
Who does what where why when and how in yourWho does what where why when and how in your project,
you are doing a great job!
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 16/41
Introduction of the „Evolutionary“ Model1. All the statements made up to now are in accordance with the classical
deterministic project world. We use the project plans to anticipate the workflow and break it down to the level of working packages. What we failed to anticipate is missing in the project.
2. Over the past decades knowledge has increased at phenomenal pace. New d i ti f ti h b t d d f l ll t ddescriptions of occupation have been created and formerly well separated areas of knowledge become related more and more closely, e.g. medicine, informatics, biometrics, sensor technology und materials science.
3. Recently with increasing speed the evolutionary project management is moving on target. Even the customer needs may be subject to changes (moving target). Bearing all this in mind one should move away from detailed plans on to aBearing all this in mind one should move away from detailed plans on to a project management that focuses on empowering the project members with respect to self organization. At the start of the project one does not always know how to convert customer needs into solutions and achieved results in lengthyhow to convert customer needs into solutions and achieved results in lengthy projects may well be no more state of the art.
4. Planning and evolution now have equal rights. Those who execute the working4. Planning and evolution now have equal rights. Those who execute the working packages become more and more those who do the planning. The main topics in the evolutionary model are knowledge management, communication, problem solving techniques and their impact on the project goals. This view is currently
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 17/41
g q p p j g ysubject of ongoing research.
Effective Project Management Using Six Sigma
On the first slides we looked at project management in a more general manner. Now we want to demonstrate how the Six Sigma methodology can help us in project management and help make
project work more transparent and efficient.
If we take a closer look at development and process improvement projects we always end up answering the same question:projects we always end up answering the same question:
How do we establish a stable process with minimum defects at minimum costs ?
Quality
minimum defects at minimum costs ?
With other words: How do we decrease the area of compromise in the magic triangle?
CostTiming
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 18/41
Six Sigma is ...
...a structured methodology for
consistent and confident application of selected statistical methodsconsistent and confident application of selected statistical methods
in teams lead by specialists trained for it
to almost eliminate process variation and failures
by processing well-chosen projects within a defined time frame
in accordance with the company strategy p y gy
and deliver precisely defined and controlled financial contributions.
The goals of Six Sigma are:
• To fulfil customer needs completely and economically
• Breakthrough in process improvement and profitability
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 19/41
Breakthrough in process improvement and profitability
Structuring a Project:
P bl t t t (C t d)
Conventional Six Sigma Methodology
Problem statement (Customer need)
Goals and definition
Planning
Casting
Planning
Risk analysis
Offer creatingPlanning
Define
Offer creating
Order placing
Obtaining resources
Planning
MeasureObtaining resources
Processing
CommunicationExecuting Analyse
ISteering
ControllingControllingC t l
Improve
g
DocumentationControl
Mile stones of project processing
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 20/41
Mile stones of project processing
Fundamental Idea… 1
Causes for variation and / or defects can be:
– identified
– quantified
– eliminated or controlled
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 21/41
Fundamental Idea… 2 D fiDefine
Description of the project including scope, goal and boundaries. Key metrics and defined financial improvements will describe the project goaland defined financial improvements will describe the project goal. Development of a project strategy.
MeasureEvaluation of the current process. Documentation of all results (Outputs) und all factors (Inputs). Capability definition of the measurement system and the processthe process.
AnalyzeApplication of a Cause & Effect Matrix and a FMEA Pareto or varianceApplication of a Cause & Effect Matrix and a FMEA. Pareto or variance
analysis to figure out the importance of each input.
ImproveImproveCollection, prioritizing and validation of improvement opportunities. Improvement for optimum or robustness ( DOE)
ControlImplementation of effective steps to sustain the achieved improvements
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 22/41
(control plan). Process review for long term stability.
The Process
Controllable Inputs Baseline
1. Baseline„Measure“
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
Quality
Is performance evaluationQuality
characteristics: Outputs
LSL USLInputs:
The Process
Y1, Y2, …
Raw material, parts etc.
Z1 Z2 Z3Non controllable Inputs
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 23/41
Non controllable Inputs
The Process
2. Process analysisControllable Inputs
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
Quality
LSL USLInputs:
Quality characteristics:
Outputs
The Process
Y1, Y2, …
Raw material, parts etc.
Z1 Z2 Z3Non controllable Inputs
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 24/41
Non controllable Inputs
The Process
3. Process ImprovementControllable Inputs
X1 X2 X3
X
Controllable Inputs
QualityXLSL USL
Quality characteristics:
OutputsInputs:
The ProcessX Y1, Y2, …
Raw material, parts etc.
X LSL USL
Z1 Z2 Z3
XNon controllable Inputs
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 25/41
Non controllable Inputs
The Process
4. Process ControlControllable Inputs
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
Quality
LSL USL
Quality characteristics:
OutputsInputs:
The Process
Y1, Y2, …
Raw material, parts etc.
Z1 Z2 Z3Non controllable Inputs
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 26/41
Non controllable Inputs
Fundamental Idea… 3
Define Project and goal ResultDefine Project and goal
description
P ti l bl
Output
Measure Practical problem description Process
y = f(x1, x2,… xn)Analyze Statistical problem description
Improve Statistical problem solution
Control Practical problem solution
Influence
InputInput
Collect factors and define their significance
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 27/41
Collect factors and define their significance
General Approach
Practical Problem Statistical Problem
( )Y f ( )Y f x x xn= 1 2, ,...
Statistical SolutionPractical Solution Statistical SolutionPractical Solution
Y can be e.g.: delivery time; VCV; burden; yield; process time or d t f
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 28/41
product performance…
Fundamental Idea… 4
D fiBusiness Goal, Goal Tree, Score Card
Define
30 50Process Maps Measurement Systems
Business Goal, Goal Tree, Score Card
VOC, QFD, Project Charter
Measure 30 - 50Process Maps, Measurement Systems, Capability Analysis
Analyze 10 – 15Cause- and Effect Matrix,
Pareto, FMEA,
Improve 5 -10Hypothesis Testing,
Multivari Studies
Control3 - 5
DOE,SPC 3 - 5
N b f i t t i t
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 29/41
Number of important process inputs
The DEFINE Phase in the DMAIC Cycle
ControlMaintain
DefineProject charter (SMART)
ImprovementsSPC
Control Plans
j ( )Business Score Card
QFD + VOCStrategic GoalsC M
D Documentation Strategic Goals
Project strategyC M
MeasureBaseline AnalysisImprove
AIBaseline Analysis
Process MapC + E Matrix
Measurement SystemAnalyze
D fi iti f iti l
ImproveAdjustment to the
OptimumFMEA Measurement System
Process CapabilityDefinition of critical
InputsFMEA
Statistical Tests
FMEAStatistical Tests
SimulationTolerancing Statistical Tests
Multi-Vari StudiesRegression
Tolerancing
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 30/41
Project Phase „Define“
Start situation S I P O CProject Order
Tool Composition
SUPP
CUST
Output
Start
ProcessIutput
Start situation
j(SMART)
Business Score Card Balanced Score Card
RTY, COPQ, Cycle
PLIER
TOMER Metrics & Goals
Project focus
Problem description
RTY, COPQ, Cycle times,
Productivities, Inventories,
C h Fl t
End
Customer orientation .Resources & Team
Benefits & Advantages
Customer (intern/extern)
Cash Flow, etc.
.
CoreThemes
CTQ
CTQ
CTQWork safety
Time plan & Mile Stones
Resources & Team
VOC
CoreTh
CTQ
CTQ
CTQ Project strategyThemes CTQ
CTQ
S ifi M bl A hi bl R l f h T Ti h d l
Project strategy
„Thought Map“
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 31/41
Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant for the Team, Time schedule
Example Business Score CardLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3
Reference Values Unit 2000 2001 February YTD cumVolume Poly Mt 30154 31455 2042 4404
European Performance Goals
Target ActualBaselineGlobal Business Key Values
Operation Performance
yVolume Comp Mt 16130,6 20389 1759 3664AOP census # 166 166 166Total Fix Costs TDM 29719 33702 2359 5866
Site Scorecard Metrics
• Improve safety behaviors
• Establish key customer
• Be customer intimate and market focused
• Drive growth throughSafety (TCIR) TCIR 1,66 1,45 1,99 1,96Report. Enviro. Incidents # 0 0 0 0Employee Training h/empl 36 40 5,5 11Customer Complaint Frequency ppm 4040 3200 26983 16358Customer Sigma (1Op) 4,2 4,23 3,4 3,6
Establish key customer partnerships for service and product development
O ti i ti f
Drive growth through innovative products and solutions
P id & t lg ( p) , , ,
Customer On Time Delivery % 97,3 98,5 98,3 97,5COPQ Plant controllable TDM 9200 9084 9240Inventory Level Turns 14,7 15,4 10,6 11,3Active Six Sigma Projects # 35 33 33SixSigma Project Benefit TDM 10100 9000 873 1768
• Optimization of compound efficiency
• High viscosity food
• Provide & capture value
• Meet our commitments through integrity,
Six Sigma Project Benefit TDM 10100 9000 873 1768CapEx Cost Factor act. vs. appro % 95 95 80 80
CP Polymer Mt/day 81,37 86,2 73,70 71,00CP Compound Mt/day 44,70 56,6 67,10 67,60
Manufacturing Scorecard Metrics
grade resin capability
• Use Six Sigma Plus to
accelerate growth and
accountability and speed
• Set the standard for safety, quality and CP Compound Mt/day 44,70 56,6 67,10 67,60
RTY Polymer % 89,56 89,7 89,70 89,70RTY Compound % 93,20 94,6 95,63 94,40Yield Loss Polymer ppm 10500 5700 5800 5600Product Sigma Polymer (13Op) 4,65 4,83 4,82 4,83Yield Loss Compo nd ppm 63800 50000 39700 50100
accelerate growth and productivity
safety, quality and consistency
Yield Loss Compound ppm 63800 50000 39700 50100Product Sigma Compound (16Op) 4,15 4,23 4,31 4,23Overall Efficiency Polymer % 86,91 85,36 73,00 70,40Overall Efficiency Compound % 46,40 65 58,10 60,90Conversion Cost Polymer DM/kg 0,55 0,52 0,56 0,54
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 32/41
Conversion Cost Compound DM/kg 0,89 0,81 0.67 0.66
Quality Function Deployment
Customer
The structured approach to work towards customer needs
Requirements
House of
FunctionalRequirements
mer
s
Product DesignSpecifications
s
Process SpecificationsHouse of
Quality 1
Cu
sto
mN
eed
House of
Quality 2
Fu
nct
ion
al
Req
uir
emen
ts
House of
Quality 3
p
uct
Des
ign
cifi
cati
on
s
House of
Process Control
ss
atio
ns
Product Design
Quality 3
Pro
dS
pec
House of
Quality 4Pro
ceS
pec
ific
a
RequirementsProcess
Requirements Process Control Requirements
ManufacturingProcess Engineering
• Performance• Reliability
DevelopmentMarketing
• Quality Monitoring• Performance • Reliability• Manufacturability• Cost
Six SigmaDesign for Six Sigma
y g• On Line Control • Statistical Process Control
• Quality• System Cost
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 33/41
Six Sigmag g
A Check List for the Project 1. What shall be achieved with the project? What are the specific
goals? Are they measurable?
2. How are the project goals linked with the business goals?
3 How ambitious are the goals? Does the project realization make3. How ambitious are the goals? Does the project realization make sense?
5 Does the project increases the customer satisfaction?5. Does the project increases the customer satisfaction?
6. Who has an advantage? Are they involved?
7. How big is the scope? “Boiling the Ocean” or feasible?
8 What is the probability of success?8. What is the probability of success?
9. Are Benchmark information available? If so, where?
10. What happens, if the project can not be realized?
11 Which resources are available for the project (team)?
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 34/41
11. Which resources are available for the project (team)?
The Team / Project Charter
The content of the charter
• Problem description
• Project goal Specific
• Metrics
• Impact on the customerMeasurable
Impact on the customer (extern/intern)
• Financial advantageAchievable
Financial advantage
• Project team (Leader/Champion)
Relevant for the Team (Leader/Champion)
• Resources (Manpower/Money) Time
• Time schedule
• Impact on work safety
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 35/41
Risk Analysis
Health, Safety & Environment
Legal & Statutory Requirements
Management
Market Pressure
Management Pressure
Risk categoriesTechnology
Development
Risk categories
DevelopmentCompetition
Warranty Services
Customer requirements
Public Liability
The categories are just examples. They have to be adjusted / l t d d di f th j t
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 36/41
completed depending of the project or program
Project Phase „Measure“Tool CompositionProcess Plan
• Prüfergebnis• Regelkreisinfo an
SMD/Siebdruckggf. Linienstop
Lotpasten- SMT- Reflow- SPC-
•Regelkarte•Lotpastenhöhe •Rüstkontrolldaten •Lötqualität
• Prüfergebnis• Regelkreisinfo an
SMD/Siebdruckggf. Linienstop
Lotpasten- SMT- Reflow- SPC-
•Regelkarte•Lotpastenhöhe •Rüstkontrolldaten •Lötqualität
Lotpasten- SMT- Reflow- SPC-
•Regelkarte•Lotpastenhöhe •Rüstkontrolldaten •Lötqualität C & E Matrix
Lotpastendruck Bestückung
ReflowLöten
SPCPrüfung
M LeiterplatteS LP-MarkenM LotpasteA ArbeitsanweisungS SchabloneS Temperatur
M BauteileK BestückprogrammK BE NachversorgungA ArbeitsanweisungS DruckluftS Wartungszustand
K Lötprofil ProgrammS HilfsstoffeS WartungszustandS Ofenverschmutzung
S Regelkreis-information
A KontrollfolieA Prüfanweisung
•Bestückqualität •Lotwellenparameter •Go / no go•Fehleranzahl•Fehlerzettel
Lotpastendruck Bestückung
ReflowLöten
SPCPrüfung
M LeiterplatteS LP-MarkenM LotpasteA ArbeitsanweisungS SchabloneS Temperatur
M BauteileK BestückprogrammK BE NachversorgungA ArbeitsanweisungS DruckluftS Wartungszustand
K Lötprofil ProgrammS HilfsstoffeS WartungszustandS Ofenverschmutzung
S Regelkreis-information
A KontrollfolieA Prüfanweisung
•Bestückqualität •Lotwellenparameter •Go / no go•Fehleranzahl•Fehlerzettel
Lotpastendruck Bestückung
ReflowLöten
SPCPrüfung
M LeiterplatteS LP-MarkenM LotpasteA ArbeitsanweisungS SchabloneS Temperatur
M BauteileK BestückprogrammK BE NachversorgungA ArbeitsanweisungS DruckluftS Wartungszustand
K Lötprofil ProgrammS HilfsstoffeS WartungszustandS Ofenverschmutzung
S Regelkreis-information
A KontrollfolieA Prüfanweisung
•Bestückqualität •Lotwellenparameter •Go / no go•Fehleranzahl•Fehlerzettel
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Process Step Process Inputs Hea
vies
in
Pro
du
ct
Ligh
ts in
P
rod
uct
Moi
stur
e in
P
rod
uct
Aci
dity
in
Pro
du
ct
Low
Cap
acity
F
rom
Uni
t
Exc
essi
ve
Dow
ntim
e
Ma
teria
l Lo
sses
Cor
rosi
on o
f E
qu
ipm
en
t
Poo
r R
eact
or
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Total
139 Day Tanks Analysis 10 10 9 9 3359 Reactor Cat./HF Ratio 5 8 7 1577 Reactor Rxr Temperature 6 5 4 7 14973 Lights Removal Condenser Leak 4 8 2 4 1 148
Measurement SystemPart No. Standard 1st Measure 2nd Measure 1st Measure 2nd Measure Agreement
1 acceptable a. a. a. a. 100%
Appraiser 1 Appraiser 2
THT-Bestückung
End-Prüfung
Schwall-Löten
M BauteileA Roy.- ProgrammA BestückanweisungS Training
A LötparameterM HilfsstoffeM LötmaskeS Wartungszustand
A PrüfprogrammS AdapterS Netzwerk
•Fehlerzettel•DiagnoseTHT-
BestückungEnd-
PrüfungSchwall-
Löten
M BauteileA Roy.- ProgrammA BestückanweisungS Training
A LötparameterM HilfsstoffeM LötmaskeS Wartungszustand
A PrüfprogrammS AdapterS Netzwerk
•Fehlerzettel•DiagnoseTHT-
BestückungEnd-
PrüfungSchwall-
Löten
M BauteileA Roy.- ProgrammA BestückanweisungS Training
A LötparameterM HilfsstoffeM LötmaskeS Wartungszustand
A PrüfprogrammS AdapterS Netzwerk
•Fehlerzettel•Diagnose
74 Lights Removal Reboiler Leak 4 8 2 4 1 148131 Purification Low Stages 8 8 144144 Final Storage Containers 3 2 6 6 140100 Neutralization pH Value 6 6 3 13816 Catalyst Stripper Pluggage 3 6 5 3 137111 Drying Decomposition 2 6 3 2 2 13439 Drier Water Carryover 4 6 5 1 13234 Drier Molecular Sieve 3 3 2 7 2 125
Data Representation
2 acceptable a. a. a. a. 100%
3 not acceptable n.a. n.a. a. a. 60%
4 acceptable a. a. a. a. 100%
5 acceptable a. a. n.a. a. 80%
6 not acceptable n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 100%Gage R&R
16
14
12
10
zelw
ert
_
OEG=13,54
1
I-Karte von Einzelwerte
Data Representation
Process CapabilitySigma Calculation 191715131197531
8
6
4
2
Beobachtung
Ein
z X=8,04
UEG=2,54
0,11
0,10
0,09
Boxplot von FeuchteData Collection Plan
Was? Warum? Wer? Wie? Wann? Wo?
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Datensammlungsplan für Rüstzeitverbesserungsprojekt
7654321
0,08
0,07
0,06
0,05
Charge
Feu
chte
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)Nr. Messgröße Art der
Messgröße (ProzessOutputInput)
Art der Daten (stetig/diskret)
Operationale Definition/ Gage R&R
Verantwort- lichkeiten
/Zeitaufnahme und Registration/
Sammelverfahren (geänd.2)
Datum/ZeitHäufigkeit
Quelle/Ort
1.
Wechsel-Einstellung der Vorrichtungen im Betrieb
Output stetig Definition: Wechsel-Einstellung der Vorrichtungen in Minuten. Wechsel der Vorrichtungen, Einstellung, Kontroll. Messung der Umbauzeit mittels DIGITIME Zentraluhr. Genaugkeit:1 min
Schw.MA. des bestimmten Taktes
1.1 -Nehmen das geschweißte Endstück aus der Vorrichtung der letzten Serie aus , dann auf den Boden legen lassen. Dieser Zeitpunt soll als Startpunkt durch Schweißmitarbeiter in die Tabelle registriert werden .
bei jeder Serienwechsel und bei jeder Umstellungen pro Takte
Schweißerei beim Arbeitzplatz
Einlagerung der Bauteile im
Prozess stetig Definition: Einlagerung-Teileferfügbarkeit der
Schichtleiter der Schweißerei (wenn er
2.1 -Endstück der letzte Serie geschweißt, Auslagerung der Teile der
bei jeder Serienwechsel
Schweißerei beim
Project strategy
2.
Betrieb Bauteile in Minuten. Auslagerung die leere Behälter, Einlagerung der Bauteile, Kontroll. Messung der o.gen. Prozesszeit mittels DIGITIME Zentraluhr. Genaugke
fehlt:Schw.MA. des bestimmten Taktes)
alten Serie, Putzen, Einlegerung der Teile der neuen Serie und anschließende Messung. Stoppunkt: alle Teile zum Schweißen wurden eingelagert .
und bei jeder Umstellungen pro Takte
Arbeitzplatz
3.
Ausgabe der Dokumentation im Betrieb
Output stetig Definition: Ausgabe der Dokumentation in Minuten. Zusammensamlung der alten Zeichnungen, Ausgabe der Dokumentation der neuen Serie, Kontroll. Messung der o.gen. Prozesszeit mittels DIGITIME Zentraluhr.
Schichtleiter der Schweißerei
3.1 -Endstück der letzte Serie geschweißt, sammeln die Zeichnungen der alten Serie zusammen, geben die Zeichnungen der neuen Serie aus und anschließende Messung. Stoppunkt: wenn alle Dokumentation die zum Schweißen
bei jeder Serienwechsel und bei jeder Umstellungen pro Takte
Schweißerei beim Arbeitzplatz
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 37/41
„Thought Map“
Project Phase „Analyse“
Process Analysis
Results of the
measurement phase
Tool Composition
Előző széria utólsómuldéját kiveszi a
készülékből
Ki kell cserélni akészüléket?
Át kell állítani akészüléket?
Igen
NemKitakarítja a területet
Új rajzokat kiadja Régi rajzokat beszedi
Nem
Igen
1 2 6
15
0 perc 0 perc
0 perc
8 perc
0 perc
0 perc
Irányítja - szervezia folyamatot
Irányítja - szervezia folyamatot
A kimaradtalkatrészeket
elszállítja a köztesraktár területére
Az előkészítettalkatrészeket
bepakolja a hegesztőállásokba du.-éjszaka
3 4 9
11
19
18
1-5 perc 5 perc
5-10 perc
30-60 perc20,20,20
perc15,20,20
perc30-45,30-45,30-45 perc
FocusedProblem definitionProb
A kimaradtalkatrészeket
elszállítja a köztesraktár területére
Az előkészítettalkatrészeket
bepakolja a hegesztőállásokba
A nagyobbkészülékeknélsegítkezik akivontatásnál
A készüléket kivisziaz üzemből
Szabaddá teszi azutat a készülékek
kipakolásához
A nagyobb-nehezebbalkatrészeket
bepakolja a hegesztőmunkahelyre
A készüléket bevisziaz adott ütemre
A nagyobb-nehezebbtárolóeszközöket(kocsi) kiviszi az
üzemből
Időlegesen felügyeli aszériaváltás
folyamatát targoncásoldalról
5-180 perc
Az üres ládákat,kalodákat kipakolja
az átmenetitárolóterületre
A keletkezett selejtesalkatrészeket,
felesleges szemetetkiviszi
5 -180 perc
5
8
7
12
10
14
13
17
16
21
20
20 perc
6 perc
5 perc
perc perc
5 perc
20 perc
16
14
12
t
OEG=13,54
1
I-Karte von Einzelwerte
Data Representation
Root Cause Analysis
191715131197531
10
8
6
4
2
Beobachtung
Ein
zelw
ert
_X=8,04
UEG=2,54
0,11
0,10
Boxplot von Feuchte
Root Cause Analysis
7654321
,
0,09
0,08
0,07
0,06
0,05
Charge
Feu
chte
Hypothesis Tests & Data Analysisyp y
t-Test,
ANOVA8045
DOE Cube Plot
DOE
16A
15A Teststatistik 0,93p-Wert 0,920
Teststatistik 0 32
Bartlett-Test
Levenes Test
Test auf gleiche Varianzen für Festigkeit
Variance comparison Process or Product Name:
Prepared by:
Responsible: FMEA Date (Orig) ______________
Potential Potential S OC
D R
FMEA
F-Test
Regression
Chi²1
-1
40
20180160
Variable 3
Variable 2
Variable 1
8352
68
7260
54
19A
18A
17A
16A
1614121086420
Str
om
95% B f i KI fü St d d b i h
Teststatistik 0,32p-Wert 0,863
Project strategy
Process Step/Input
Potential Failure Mode
Potential Failure Effects
SEV
Potential Causes
OCC
Current Controls
DET
RPN
000000000
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 38/41
95%-Bonferroni-KIs für Standardabweichungen
„Thought Map“0000
Project Phase „Improve“Results of the
analysis phase
Tool Composition
Process or Product Prepared by:
FMEAEvaluate Solutions
Work out SolutionsProduct Name:
Prepared by:
Responsible: FMEA Date (Orig) ______________
Process Step/Input
Potential Failure Mode
Potential Failure Effects
SEV
Potential Causes
OCC
Current Controls
DET
RPN
000
Kern TEAM
Risk Assessment
000000000
Implementation Plan
Project strategy
Risk Assessment
DOEProject strategy
„Thought Map“Pilot Trial
Select SolutionSolution Person A Person B Person C Sum
A 4 3 5 12A 4 3 5 12
B 2 1 2 5
C 3 3 3 9
D 1 2 1 4
E 4 5 4 13
F 2 2 4 8
G 2 2 5 9
O ti S tti
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 39/41
Optimum Setting
Project Phase „Control“Results of the
improve phase
Tool Composition
P D i tiStandardization
Result Assessment
Process DescriptionDescription of the activity Process step No.
List of Inputs:
Purpose: Duration:
Inputs
Customer: Used tools:
Responsible: Special knowledge:
Location of conducting:
List of Outputs:
Name of the activity in
the process map
Outputs
Project strategy
Details of activities and required tools
If available, provide samples, standard forms etc.
Activity: Description: Specials: Remarks:
Final Documentation
Project Completion Hand Over Process Step
Result (Output)Process Step
Result (Output)
j gy
„Thought Map“
Documentation
Kern TEAM• Experiences
• Results
SpecificationLSL
GoalUSL
CapabilityCp
CpkSample
QuantityFrequence
Measurement Syst.% R & R
Factor (Input)
SpecificationLSL
GoalUSL
CapabilityCp
CpkSample
Quantity
ActionsWhat
SpecificationLSL
GoalUSL
CapabilityCp
CpkSample
QuantityFrequence
Measurement Syst.% R & R
Factor (Input)
SpecificationLSL
GoalUSL
CapabilityCp
CpkSample
Quantity
ActionsWhat
• Recommendations
% R & R% P/T
QuantityFrequence
Measurement Syst.% R & R
% P/T
ResponsibleCompleted
Effectiveness
DateReviewed by
% R & R% P/T
QuantityFrequence
Measurement Syst.% R & R
% P/T
ResponsibleCompleted
Effectiveness
DateReviewed by
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 40/41
Control strategy to sustain results
The Control Strategy
Quality Function DeploymentCustomer
Requirements
House of
FunctionalRequirements
mer
s
Product DesignSpecifications
s
Process SpecificationsHouse of
Quality 1
Cu
sto
mN
eed
House of
Quality 2
Fu
nct
ion
al
Req
uir
emen
ts
House of
Quality 3
p
uct
Des
ign
cifi
cati
on
s
House of
Process Control
ss
atio
ns
Product Design
Quality 3
Pro
dS
pec
House of
Quality 4Pro
ceS
pec
ific
a
RequirementsProcess
Requirements Process Control Requirements
Process control ensures that customerProcess control ensures that customer requirements will be fulfilled. But it will also reduce
our cost when properly conducted
Knorr-Bremse Group 03 BB W1 Six Sigma Project Management 08, D. Szemkus/H. Winkler Page 41/41